Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I find it funny how much it triggers you. Once I find a weakness...Premise? It is math!! You cannot argue vs. math.Did not agree with premise, so wasn't and won't waste my time playing math games with you. Do what you like. I trust the scientists more than I trust you. You should have run for office or sought job in the trump administration. I will leave it up to state and local health officials as it varies from place to place greatly.You cannot dispute the math so you post nonsense.View attachment 330077It is a math problem? So you're OK 900+ suffering to save less than 2 people? Illogical.No. We all do not agree it is a war just because we are making an effort to fight the disease, so your false premise shot to hell, right off the bat. I understand war. I'm trained to shoot back. You can't shoot back at this. Hell, we can't even mount an offense. Some people want to fight by full free access to the total freedom. Reminds me of using insect powder designed to be found by the insects and carried back to their nest. The insects are just too stupid not to get in line to pick up the poison thinking all food is good and must bring it in to feed the family. This isn't war. Don't be one of the ants.Deaths: 61,200 - of which, btw 29% is in NY (I believe those numbers include the Flu deaths and NY didn't allocated correctly as they are such an outlier but let's assume 61,200 is accurate).
Population: 330mil. Probably more due to the non documented but we will go with that #.
Deaths per 1000: Less than 2.
Let's say I assume 2.5x the deaths or 154,250. That number moves to less than 5 deaths per 1000 persons. We all agree it is a war and in war unfortunately you sacrifice the few to save the many. Why are we sacrificing 900+ people to save 2 or at worst 5?
Where is the logic?
Thanks
View attachment 330164
just got another one!!!
View attachment 330168
azog cares. he's obsessed & searches me out cause he can't stand all the likes i get. he's obsessed AND jealous.
View attachment 330179
He listened to the hacks in The Swamp....I'm surprised how easily he keeps getting rolled by the hackarama.He listened to the scientists but only the scientists. And now the data shows a much less grim picture. Math doesn’t lie.Our President is wrong.Deaths: 61,200 - of which, btw 29% is in NY (I believe those numbers include the Flu deaths and NY didn't allocate correctly as they are such an outlier but let's assume 61,200 is accurate).
Population: 330mil. Probably more due to the non documented but we will go with that #.
Deaths per 1000: Less than 2.
Let's say I assume 2.5x the deaths or 154,250. That number moves to less than 5 deaths per 1000 persons. We all agree it is a war and in war unfortunately you sacrifice the few to save the many. Why are we sacrificing 900+ people to save 2 or at worst 5?
Where is the logic? End the LOCKDOWN!
Thanks
Your president said that the lockdowns saved over a million American lives.
Is he wrong?
Well stated.
Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
An enemy nation allowed their infected citizens to infect other nations.
Go ahead and continue making an ass of yourself.
If you're that stupid, you should be stripped of your credentials.No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
An enemy nation allowed their infected citizens to infect other nations.
Go ahead and continue making an ass of yourself.
Neat. Still don't see how that answers my question though.
Thanks anyway.
If you're that stupid, you should be stripped of your credentials.No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
An enemy nation allowed their infected citizens to infect other nations.
Go ahead and continue making an ass of yourself.
Neat. Still don't see how that answers my question though.
Thanks anyway.
Trade War...Killer Virus developed...Killer Virus escorted onto plane fucks up world economy.
It's obviously Trump's fault.
If that's your logic, you deserve to be permanently unemployed.
You are implying that the US tactical is wrong.If you're that stupid, you should be stripped of your credentials.No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
An enemy nation allowed their infected citizens to infect other nations.
Go ahead and continue making an ass of yourself.
Neat. Still don't see how that answers my question though.
Thanks anyway.
Trade War...Killer Virus developed...Killer Virus escorted onto plane fucks up world economy.
It's obviously Trump's fault.
If that's your logic, you deserve to be permanently unemployed.
I didn't say anything about the world economy. Or Trump.
You are implying that the US tactical is wrong.If you're that stupid, you should be stripped of your credentials.No wonder you work in the back office.It has everything to do with it.Let's ask China's leaders who allowed infected people to leave China.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
That has nothing to do with anything.
But sure, go ahead.
And you claim to be a statistician?
Except it doesn't.
An enemy nation allowed their infected citizens to infect other nations.
Go ahead and continue making an ass of yourself.
Neat. Still don't see how that answers my question though.
Thanks anyway.
Trade War...Killer Virus developed...Killer Virus escorted onto plane fucks up world economy.
It's obviously Trump's fault.
If that's your logic, you deserve to be permanently unemployed.
I didn't say anything about the world economy. Or Trump.
You will then walk into the next box where the US tactical is Trump's idea.
You will walk into the next box where the fatality count is unacceptable.
You want food in 4 months?
You better learn to accept some fatalities.
The evil media runs this countryHe listened to the hacks in The Swamp....I'm surprised how easily he keeps getting rolled by the hackarama.He listened to the scientists but only the scientists. And now the data shows a much less grim picture. Math doesn’t lie.Our President is wrong.Deaths: 61,200 - of which, btw 29% is in NY (I believe those numbers include the Flu deaths and NY didn't allocate correctly as they are such an outlier but let's assume 61,200 is accurate).
Population: 330mil. Probably more due to the non documented but we will go with that #.
Deaths per 1000: Less than 2.
Let's say I assume 2.5x the deaths or 154,250. That number moves to less than 5 deaths per 1000 persons. We all agree it is a war and in war unfortunately you sacrifice the few to save the many. Why are we sacrificing 900+ people to save 2 or at worst 5?
Where is the logic? End the LOCKDOWN!
Thanks
Your president said that the lockdowns saved over a million American lives.
Is he wrong?
Well stated.
At least 1%. You’re the genius who doesn’t believe having the disease gives one immunity and then cannot explain if that’s the case why 100+ companies are working on a vaccine.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
At least 1%. You’re the genius who doesn’t believe having the disease gives one immunity and then cannot explain if that’s the case why 100+ companies are working on a vaccine.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
Don’t need a source. If there was no immunity then companies would not try to create a vaccine as it is the same science. One percent means 10 people out of 1000 die. Right now we have 1. Of the people who die, 82% are over 65. They may social distance, the rest should be free to do as they please.At least 1%. You’re the genius who doesn’t believe having the disease gives one immunity and then cannot explain if that’s the case why 100+ companies are working on a vaccine.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
Why 1%? That's 3.3 million people. You don't see the use in doing anything unless at least 3.3 million people die from it?
You want to bring up the old argument again? You already stumbled through multiple sources that only confirmed what I told you, you gave up and admitted that you couldn't find sources that confirmed your argument, and then changed your argument.
Fine with me. Show me a source that confirms immunity. Show me the quote. Or shut the fuck up. I'm making it as simple as I can for you.
Don’t need a source. If there was no immunity then companies would not try to create a vaccine as it is the same science. One percent means 10 people out of 1000 die. Right now we have 1. Of the people who die, 82% are over 65. They may social distance, the rest should be free to do as they please.At least 1%. You’re the genius who doesn’t believe having the disease gives one immunity and then cannot explain if that’s the case why 100+ companies are working on a vaccine.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
Why 1%? That's 3.3 million people. You don't see the use in doing anything unless at least 3.3 million people die from it?
You want to bring up the old argument again? You already stumbled through multiple sources that only confirmed what I told you, you gave up and admitted that you couldn't find sources that confirmed your argument, and then changed your argument.
Fine with me. Show me a source that confirms immunity. Show me the quote. Or shut the fuck up. I'm making it as simple as I can for you.
the population is 300,000,000Deaths: 61,200 - of which, btw 29% is in NY (I believe those numbers include the Flu deaths and NY didn't allocated correctly as they are such an outlier but let's assume 61,200 is accurate).
Population: 330mil. Probably more due to the non documented but we will go with that #.
Deaths per 1000: Less than 2.
Let's say I assume 2.5x the deaths or 154,250. That number moves to less than 5 deaths per 1000 persons. We all agree it is a war and in war unfortunately you sacrifice the few to save the many. Why are we sacrificing 900+ people to save 2 or at worst 5?
Where is the logic?
Thanks
I gotta question your math my friend. I'm coming up with a mortality rate of .057 or 57 times deadlier than the flu.
IOW 5.7 deaths per ONE HUNDRED - Hey, I'm not great at math, but yours does appear suspicious.
United States
Coronavirus Cases:
1,075,643
Deaths:
62,319
Recovered:
149,686
Don't need a source if one understands how vaccines work. So you admit you don't know how vaccines work. Get out of my thread. This is for logical people.Don’t need a source. If there was no immunity then companies would not try to create a vaccine as it is the same science. One percent means 10 people out of 1000 die. Right now we have 1. Of the people who die, 82% are over 65. They may social distance, the rest should be free to do as they please.At least 1%. You’re the genius who doesn’t believe having the disease gives one immunity and then cannot explain if that’s the case why 100+ companies are working on a vaccine.How many deaths are needed, in your opinion, for these measures to be justified?
Where exactly is that boundary number for you?
Why 1%? That's 3.3 million people. You don't see the use in doing anything unless at least 3.3 million people die from it?
You want to bring up the old argument again? You already stumbled through multiple sources that only confirmed what I told you, you gave up and admitted that you couldn't find sources that confirmed your argument, and then changed your argument.
Fine with me. Show me a source that confirms immunity. Show me the quote. Or shut the fuck up. I'm making it as simple as I can for you.
So you admit that you don't have a source verifying what you say.
Thanks. You're excused now.
