Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

interesting... he usually has a bad weekend and upticks a few during the early weekdays...

Hmmmmmmm....
 

Obama is going to be a one termer beating President Carter out of 1st place as the worst President in American history. Warning to the democratic congress the sunami is coming in 2010, you have done enough damage already with the stimulus bill, the cap and trade that you passed, that has yet to pass the senate, to kill any hopes of re-election. You will not even be able to redeem yourselves with this health care plan, even should you pass a reasonable bill. Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, Bennet all senators, all gone in the next election, just to name a few.
 
Holy crap he is into his base now.
2% beneath the 30 % mainline koolaid users
i'd put that koolaid line a little closer to 40%

he still has an overall approval of 47%

dont look for it to go as bad as Bush was because conservatives were not happy with Bush either
 
Holy crap he is into his base now.
2% beneath the 30 % mainline koolaid users
i'd put that koolaid line a little closer to 40%

he still has an overall approval of 47%

dont look for it to go as bad as Bush was because conservatives were not happy with Bush either

what about when the grass-roots people get pissed at him about health care?
 
Nice, the OP uses Rasmussen, the Right-wing's favorite BS poller:

Read em and weep:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

OBAMA JAR (average):

Approve: 53.2 Disapprove: 41.5

OBAMA JAR (Rasmussen):

Approve: 47 Dissapprove: 53

Which means that Rasmussen is WAY out in left field.

Since the Rasmussen poll was included in the average, the true average without Rasmussen is actually much higher.

In fact, CBS News has Obama's Jar at:

Approve: 56 Dissapprove: 35
 
Last edited:
I can;t believe his numbers are goign down....he's fulfilled so many of his empty promises he made during his campign
 
Nice, the OP uses Rasmussen, the FoxNews Channel's personal poller, and doesn't even use raw approval poll numbers:

Read em and weep:

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

You just don't like Rasmussen because they don't give numbers you like.


Um, no, I don't like Rasmussen because they have a radically different result from every other pollster in existence.

They had Obama winning by six points the first week of november. How many others were that accurate?
 
And if you look at the charted average...


there's actually a 2 point INCREASE in the past week...

Not a decrease.

Nice try though.
 
Nice, the OP uses Rasmussen, the Right-wing's favorite BS poller:

Read em and weep:

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

OBAMA JAR (average):

Approve: 53.2 Disapprove: 41.5

OBAMA JAR (Rasmussen):

Approve: 47 Dissapprove: 53

Which means that Rasmussen is WAY out in left field.

Since the Rasmussen poll was included in the average, the true average without Rasmussen is actually much higher.

In fact, CBS News has Obama's Jar at:

Approve: 56 Dissapprove: 35

It doesn't necessarily mean they're in left field. they are averaging polls without knowing how each poll was conducted.
 
And if you look at the charted average...


there's actually a 2 point INCREASE in the past week...

Not a decrease.

Nice try though.

Again, averaging isn't necessarily accurate and even if it were, since 2 points is within the margin of error, statistically, there was no change at all.
 
And if you look at the charted average...


there's actually a 2 point INCREASE in the past week...

Not a decrease.

Nice try though.

Again, averaging isn't necessarily accurate and even if it were, since 2 points is within the margin of error, statistically, there was no change at all.

While that's true, it certainly doesn't indicate a decrease, does it?
 
And if you look at the charted average...


there's actually a 2 point INCREASE in the past week...

Not a decrease.

Nice try though.

Again, averaging isn't necessarily accurate and even if it were, since 2 points is within the margin of error, statistically, there was no change at all.

While that's true, it certainly doesn't indicate a decrease, does it?

No, which is why I said no change at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top