Dear "Conservatives"....

Oh tank engine.........

You've folded like a cheap tent Sears....


The primary...He believes that Obammy can beat Romney in the general.
EXACTLY. Obama wants a 'squishy' Repubican that can be manipulated like Juan McCain in the form of Romney. (Which I see as an endorsement by Jimmah, and a huge RED FLAG to Conservatives).
 
Great thread. There is a big problem with the Republican party and anyone who thinks that Anyone But Obama is a good slogan to run off is a fool.
 
Who the hell are you ?

I'll support who I want, where I want, when I want.

In this case, he's less a BOS than the current BOS-In-Chief we have now.

Eat crap and die.

So you are a Repblican, not a conservative. The two aren' mutually inclusive.

When you vote for a liberal for his nations highest office in November, you will demonstrate that you aren't a conservative.

I admit I'm not thrilled with Romney but I'm less thrilled with Obama. So I have to choose between a communist or a semi socialist. It's sucks to be a conservative in this country because liberals have taken it down so far it may never recover.
 
Who the hell are you ?

I'll support who I want, where I want, when I want.

In this case, he's less a BOS than the current BOS-In-Chief we have now.

Eat crap and die.

So you are a Repblican, not a conservative. The two aren' mutually inclusive.

When you vote for a liberal for his nations highest office in November, you will demonstrate that you aren't a conservative.

I admit I'm not thrilled with Romney but I'm less thrilled with Obama. So I have to choose between a communist or a semi socialist. It's sucks to be a conservative in this country because liberals have taken it down so far it may never recover.

You don't think you enable that by voting for the liberals the "conservative party" sends you?
 
I'm wondering why the socialists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate, or why the communists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate?
It's kind of the same thing isn't it? :eusa_whistle:
 
It's sucks to be a conservative in this country because liberals have taken it down so far it may never recover.

You realize this makes no sense, yes?

During the 40-year period between 1969 and 2009 democrats controlled the WH for only 12 of those 40 years.

During the 30 years between 1969 and 1999 democrats appointed only two justices to the Supreme Court.

And republicans controlled Congress for 12 of the last 16 years.

When exactly did ‘liberals’ ever have the opportunity to ‘take down’ the country?

Or, given the overwhelming control conservatives have had over the Executive and Judicial Branches of government since 1969, and their recent majority control over the Legislative Branch, consider the fact that conservatives have ‘take[n] down’ the country.
 
It's sucks to be a conservative in this country because liberals have taken it down so far it may never recover.

You realize this makes no sense, yes?

During the 40-year period between 1969 and 2009 democrats controlled the WH for only 12 of those 40 years.

During the 30 years between 1969 and 1999 democrats appointed only two justices to the Supreme Court.

And republicans controlled Congress for 12 of the last 16 years.

When exactly did ‘liberals’ ever have the opportunity to ‘take down’ the country?

Or, given the overwhelming control conservatives have had over the Executive and Judicial Branches of government since 1969, and their recent majority control over the Legislative Branch, consider the fact that conservatives have ‘take[n] down’ the country.

The Republican party has been the other liberal party for a long time now. The GOP found they can buy votes through welfare just like the Democrats do. How do you think we ened up with a 15 trillion dollar deficit, try looking at a pie chart of spending somrtime.
 
I'm wondering why the socialists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate, or why the communists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate?
It's kind of the same thing isn't it? :eusa_whistle:

Indeed, and it's got to confuse the Hell outta them...:eusa_eh:

It's different if they do it, because they know their candidate doesn't stand a chance to win. They have to vote for a viable candidate. :lol:
 
I'm wondering why the socialists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate, or why the communists will vote for Obama over their own party candidate?
It's kind of the same thing isn't it? :eusa_whistle:

Indeed, and it's got to confuse the Hell outta them...:eusa_eh:

It's different if they do it, because they know their candidate doesn't stand a chance to win. They have to vote for a viable candidate. :lol:

Yes. The viable candiate that most closely reflects their views even if that still leaves them pretty far apart .
 
...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

I'd support Hannibal Lecter if he were running against Obama
 
Oh look, a dumbfuck liberal telling us to choose Ron Paul.....because Obamination could sleep through the election and still win.

Oh, Romney is a moderate, but nice try dumbfuck....also, GO TO HELL.:eusa_whistle:

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....
 
...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

I'd support Hannibal Lecter if he were running against Obama

I'll go you one better. I would vote for Al Franken if he had challenged Obama for the Democrat nomination. And believe me that is making a HUGE statement.
 
...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

I'd support Hannibal Lecter if he were running against Obama

Admit it, only if Hannibal was a Republican would you support him because in all honesty if Obama switched to a Republican and Mitt switched to Democrat (stayed liberal, lol) you would vote Obama.
 
...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....

I'd support Hannibal Lecter if he were running against Obama

Admit it, only if Hannibal was a Republican would you support him because in all honesty if Obama switched to a Republican and Mitt switched to Democrat (stayed liberal, lol) you would vote Obama.

If Obama was the same Obama and Mitt was the same Mitt....and they switched? I would vote democrat.
 
Oh look, a dumbfuck liberal telling us to choose Ron Paul.....because Obamination could sleep through the election and still win.

Oh, Romney is a moderate, but nice try dumbfuck....also, GO TO HELL.:eusa_whistle:

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....
Desparation...The OP knows Obama is in trouble.
 
Yes, the liberals were touting Santorum when he was battling Romney, now they're touting Paul....all trying to fool Republicans into picking the biggest dope for them to crush in the national election.

When your enemy recommends something, there is a reason behind it....

Oh look, a dumbfuck liberal telling us to choose Ron Paul.....because Obamination could sleep through the election and still win.

Oh, Romney is a moderate, but nice try dumbfuck....also, GO TO HELL.:eusa_whistle:

...if you support the Massachusetts liberal known as Mitt Romney you are not a conservative, you are just a Republican that will support whatever bag of shit they send you.

At least the Paul people have the balls to support a losing candidate that truly endorses their beliefs.

Sign in below....
Desparation...The OP knows Obama is in trouble.
 
:lol:
Yes, the liberals were touting Santorum when he was battling Romney, now they're touting Paul....all trying to fool Republicans into picking the biggest dope for them to crush in the national election.

When your enemy recommends something, there is a reason behind it....

Oh look, a dumbfuck liberal telling us to choose Ron Paul.....because Obamination could sleep through the election and still win.

Oh, Romney is a moderate, but nice try dumbfuck....also, GO TO HELL.:eusa_whistle:
Desparation...The OP knows Obama is in trouble.

And they as Obama, think we're foolish enough to take it.
 
Yes, the liberals were touting Santorum when he was battling Romney, now they're touting Paul....all trying to fool Republicans into picking the biggest dope for them to crush in the national election.

When your enemy recommends something, there is a reason behind it....

Oh look, a dumbfuck liberal telling us to choose Ron Paul.....because Obamination could sleep through the election and still win.

Oh, Romney is a moderate, but nice try dumbfuck....also, GO TO HELL.:eusa_whistle:
Desparation...The OP knows Obama is in trouble.

I remember Biden saying that McCain is a republican he could vote for. :lol:
I wish that Obama's administration was as transparent as Biden's statement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top