CDZ Death penalty for terrorists?

I hope you realize you are the only one here paying attention to this “person”.
I am a generous person. I learned to be tolerant
during my college years when I tutored the town
idiots in English Composition and Euclidean
Geometry
 
Oh! Then you will have no problem CITING
my many grammatical errors. FEEL FREE!
BTW, you left out the comma after the first
word of your moronic post. I am not an
"artist" ?? To what does that idiotic retort
refer?
Don't you know that writing is an art? You're ruining it though..
 
Can you cite an example of that "hypocritical
rubbish" to which you refer?
I couldn't be bothered to. I never prove a person what they have done because they know what they've done. That's why I never reply to your useless questions. I'm very picky that way.
 
Oh! Then you will have no problem CITING
my many grammatical errors. FEEL FREE!
BTW, you left out the comma after the first
word of your moronic post. I am not an
"artist" ?? To what does that idiotic retort
refer?
You overestimate your value when you make requests like this.
 
Aren't drones mindless by definition?
no Drones are male bees. They do have a rostral
ganglion
Here's a reply that you would give me — let's see how you like it:

What question are you referring to? And what deflection are you talking about?
I would never write "what question are you referring to" It is grammatically incorrect. I would
write "To what question do you refer". If I wrote
"what deflection are you talking about" then I did
so mistakenly. I would write "about what deflection
do you refer"
 
I couldn't be bothered to. I never prove a person what they have done because they know what they've done. That's why I never reply to your useless questions. I'm very picky that way.
Try again!. You are stymied and engaging in
avoidance behavior. "I couldn't be bothered to."
is very sloppy English
 
I am an avid reader and have read lots of news
and other publications----since I was about 8
years old. I am well passed 70 now. I have also
interacted with people from most parts of the
world. I NEVER came across a credible account
of Israeli Mass Rape of Palestinian Women-----
you got a link to support that "just read some
news" idiot retort? An interesting factoid of
you may not be aware >>> rape is even more
likely to result in pregnancy than is "sex the regular
way" -----where are the children of these MASS
RAPES?
Wouldn't you forgive them for the sake of having Palestine?

A technical error on Israel's state archive website has revealed that a prominent Israeli politician said in 1948 that he could "forgive instances of rape" committed against Palestinian women in the violence that preceded the founding of the Israeli state, Haaretz has reported.
 
How does a simple request of you to demonstrate
the veracity of your statement indicate, to you,
that I "overestimate" MY "value"????
My time is valuable. You do the math. Didn't you tutor on it or something. I must say, it doesn't show.
 
Ummmm, the terrorists have already done that.
Is a rational conversation possible with you? I'll try again because this is the CDZ.

Americans hate terrorists and they hate Chinese people, but they love Chinese terrorists. The Uighurs!

There's a need for Americans to understand who are the terrorists and who are the freedom fighters.

There are some states (countries) that fight for freedom and there are some that are terrorist states.

I think we might not be able to totally agree on which are which.

As to the 'rational conversation', that is pre-determined by the rules of the CDZ in my opinion.
 
ganglion

I would never write "what question are you referring to" It is grammatically incorrect. I would
write "To what question do you refer". If I wrote
"what deflection are you talking about" then I did
so mistakenly. I would write "about what deflection
do you refer"
I know, it's tiring.
 
ganglion

I would never write "what question are you referring to" It is grammatically incorrect. I would
write "To what question do you refer". If I wrote
"what deflection are you talking about" then I did
so mistakenly. I would write "about what deflection
do you refer"
Seriously, people call others bees these days to offend them? Do you not like bees or something?
 

Forum List

Back
Top