Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is the irrefutable factual DNA evidence that you believe is nothing but "conjecture".
Which embryo is human?
The early stages of embryonic development clearly demonstrate the ancestral DNA common across all genera. That you have no knowledge of these scientific facts throws considerable doubt on your specious claims to have "worked in the field and studied mutations for over 11 years".
Most cells look alike hmm they must be related and will produce the same family of organism how ridiculous.
Only thing ridiculous is you pretending that you work in the field of genetic mutations.
You just admitted that all life came from the nonliving ground.
Thank you.
So we are back to the origins question see how that works ? how did the first cell form with all the needed parts to reproduce itself then to form the diversity of all life ?
The bible makes a better argument then all the text books in school. God created each family group and we see small changes in each of those families and extrapolate because small changes happen within each family group not seeing that there are limits to adapting once an organism encounters an environment they can't adapt to, what happens to them ?
Thanks for ruining your own credibility on this topic.
The scientists at the Human Genome Project have credibility while believers spouting religious gibberish do not.
That is really funny, since their lead scientist is a self-described Christian believer in God.
75% of our genetic make-up is the same as a pumpkin - 57% the same as a cabbage.
So we didn't come from monkeys, we actually came from pumpkins and cabbages!
...And it's Creationists who are the nutters???
The scientists at the Human Genome Project have credibility while believers spouting religious gibberish do not.
That is really funny, since their lead scientist is a self-described Christian believer in God.
Your ignorance is out of date!
Most cells look alike hmm they must be related and will produce the same family of organism how ridiculous.
Only thing ridiculous is you pretending that you work in the field of genetic mutations.
Since you seem to know what I did for a living for 11 years what would you like to discuss concerning mutations ? we can speak on induced mutations and naturally occurring mutations. What organism would you suggest is best for this kind of research and why ? we can even get in to the numbers let's see if you are up to this debate.
That is really funny, since their lead scientist is a self-described Christian believer in God.
Your ignorance is out of date!
Your ignorance is not. what are you 16 years old or so ?
That is really a very stupid thing to write, Bossy Man.So we didn't come from monkeys, we actually came from pumpkins and cabbages!75% of our genetic make-up is the same as a pumpkin - 57% the same as a cabbage.
...And it's Creationists who are the nutters???
.
That is really a very stupid thing to write, Bossy Man.So we didn't come from monkeys, we actually came from pumpkins and cabbages!
...And it's Creationists who are the nutters???
.
For all the fruits and nuts in this thread.
Just 2.5% of DNA turns mice into men - 30 May 2002 - New Scientist
Only thing ridiculous is you pretending that you work in the field of genetic mutations.
Since you seem to know what I did for a living for 11 years what would you like to discuss concerning mutations ? we can speak on induced mutations and naturally occurring mutations. What organism would you suggest is best for this kind of research and why ? we can even get in to the numbers let's see if you are up to this debate.
You made that claim while displaying profound ignorance about both DNA and the Human Genome Project. You also claimed that your deity "created" all of the current species on earth. Debating scientific facts with you would be an exercise in futility.
Your ignorance is out of date!
Your ignorance is not. what are you 16 years old or so ?
Collins left the HG project 5 years ago but FACTS are ignored by religious believers like you and the OP.
That is really a very stupid thing to write, Bossy Man.
.
For all the fruits and nuts in this thread.
Just 2.5% of DNA turns mice into men - 30 May 2002 - New Scientist
Ironic given that you just proved yourself wrong!
For all the fruits and nuts in this thread.
Just 2.5% of DNA turns mice into men - 30 May 2002 - New Scientist
Ironic given that you just proved yourself wrong!
I have stated all along DNA similarity proves nothing between humans and other organisms are you really this dense ?
The scientists at the Human Genome Project have credibility while believers spouting religious gibberish do not.
That is really funny, since their lead scientist is a self-described Christian believer in God.
Your ignorance is out of date!
Your ignorance is out of date!
Your ignorance is not. what are you 16 years old or so ?
Collins left the HG project 5 years ago but FACTS are ignored by religious believers like you and the OP.
Ironic given that you just proved yourself wrong!
I have stated all along DNA similarity proves nothing between humans and other organisms are you really this dense ?
Ironic considering that the current point is that it is a scientific FACT that all the different genera share so much common DNA in spite of religious believers like yourself insisting that evolution must spawn a new genus from a single DNA mutation.
I still want an explanation as how life began from non-life. This would Pretty much save us a lot of wasted time once we figure out life is a product of design.
I still want an explanation as how life began from non-life. This would Pretty much save us a lot of wasted time once we figure out life is a product of design.
