AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
- Aug 21, 2020
- 13,070
- 9,847
Why, because for the first time in decades it isn’t packed with reliable liberals?I don't care what this supreme court says.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why, because for the first time in decades it isn’t packed with reliable liberals?I don't care what this supreme court says.
Why, because for the first time in decades it isn’t packed with reliable liberals?
You mean exactly like the Dems would have done if the situation was reversed?Merrick Garland should be on the SCOTUS instead of Neil Gorsuch. I don't mean that Gorsuch is a bad guy or a bad justice, but McConnell rigged the process.
You mean exactly like the Dems would have done if the situation was reversed?
I agree. They should still have followed the process.There was no reason to block his confirmation hearing. I don't disagree with you that both sides have become hyper-partisan when it comes to court nominations, but at least follow the traditional process. Garland/Gorsuch was bad enough, but then to turn around and go full-on hypocrite with the nomination and confirmation of Coney-Barrett was adding disgrace on top of disgrace.
I agree. They should still have followed the process.
of course there was a reason and it shows itself by his using the AGs office as a political weapon,,There was no reason to block his confirmation hearing. I don't disagree with you that both sides have become hyper-partisan when it comes to court nominations, but at least follow the traditional process. Garland/Gorsuch was bad enough, but then to turn around and go full-on hypocrite with the nomination and confirmation of Coney-Barrett was adding disgrace on top of disgrace.
Most mass shootings are committed with handguns.It is the proliferation and ease of attaining weapons of semi-automatic capability and high cap magazines that can mow down 15 people before someone can scream.
Welcome to hardball politics.Merrick Garland should be on the SCOTUS instead of Neil Gorsuch. I don't mean that Gorsuch is a bad guy or a bad justice, but McConnell rigged the process.
You may not care what the USSC says, but you don't get to ignore it.I don't care what this supreme court says.
Unsupportable nonsense.That's because the laws don't go after the massive number of guns in this country. Do that, and you'd see a significant reduction in deaths and violence.
of course there was a reason and it shows itself by his using the AGs office as a political weapon,,
imagine if that mother fucker was on SCOTUS for life??
Welcome to hardball politics.
You may not care what the USSC says, but you don't get to ignore it.
Unsupportable nonsense.
Really..Nope, not at all. Every other modern, developed, politically-stable nation on earth has gun control laws that are clearly more effective than ours.
he would be doiing worse by using his seat in SCOTUs to fuck the people,,Well if what you're saying is true and Garland is weaponizing the AG's office, then he wouldn't be doing it right now had McConnell just gone ahead with the confirmation as he should have.
Of course AG Garland is not weaponizing the office and hasn't even brought charges against your MAGA God, but if he does, Trump will have due process as required by the Constitution. That's what you're afraid of, though.
2nd Amendment. Go ahead and try to repeal it.Nope, not at all. Every other modern, developed, politically-stable nation on earth has gun control laws that are clearly more effective than ours. You can cover your ears and eyes and scream "Nah! Nah! Nah! I can't hear you!" all you want, but the evidence is there. You just have to acknowledge that America's a nation-state like all others and not a separate universe with its own special laws of physics.
The enshrinement of constitutional rights -- necessarily and intentionally -- takes certain policy choices off the table2nd Amendment. Go ahead and try to repeal it.