Democrat protesters try to attack a man with gun, in NM, bad idea

[Gracie]

Older vid I saw some years back, but nothing has changed. Mama must be so proud of her two little assholes she raised as she giggles.

 

[Gracie]

Damn good idea but it sure sucks it has come to this.


Ian Christian

@IanChristianT1
·
2h

Replying to
@tkag2020_ann
and
@McDonalds
Next time I see a #PoliceOfficer approaching a fast food joint, I’m going to order & pay for them and bring the food to the police officer.

 

[Gracie]

As long as you make no attempt to harm anyone you'd be within your rights. Say a bunch of store owners form an armed picket line to protect their property and livelihoods, technically it's the same, they're within their rights to do so.

This militia does not own the statue, it is not their property and they are not protecting either their property or their livelihoods here. "Technically" it is not at all the same.

In this country, people cry "rights" when they're in the wrong. A lot. Maybe not "legally" wrong, but I know what I think is right and wrong, and what this group of militia did was wrong, imo.

Are you confused? This guy was NOT militia. That was another statue in another town/state.

 

[Gracie]

She should have been armed.

 

[Gracie]

 

[fncceo]

 

[pyetro]

Age old fact throughout human history in that if there’s no one assigned to law enforcement, everyone will assume that role.
Update: the police arrested the man for defending himself.
Truly the Crazy Years.

Hoax pic.

 

[Gracie]

Hell's Grannies. Love the name, lol.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What did you think the guy was going to do? Let you attack him? Lol

it felt so good to hear democrats scream like a little 5 year old girl when he defended him self haha

The future looks good

Not for Mr. Blue Shirt Shooter who thinks he's some kind of civil guard. He is probably going to prison. Way to own the libs!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/06/16/albuquerque-militia-shooting-protest/

“The heavily armed individuals who flaunted themselves at the protest, calling themselves a ‘civil guard,’ were there for one reason: To menace protesters, to present an unsanctioned show of unregulated force,” New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) said in a statement. “To menace the people of New Mexico with weaponry — with an implicit threat of violence — is on its face unacceptable; that violence did indeed occur is unspeakable.”

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller (D) said the statue would now be speedily removed as an “urgent matter of public safety” until authorities determine a next step.
“The shooting tonight was a tragic, outrageous and unacceptable act of violence and it has no place in our city,” Keller said in a statement. “Our diverse community will not be deterred by acts meant to divide or silence us. Our hearts go out [to] the victim, his family and witnesses whose lives were needlessly threatened tonight.”

This is Clown World for real.
"The People of New Mexico" are out there beating up on people and defacing statues?

You can call it Clown World or or you can call it No More Motherfucking Racists World. Semantics don't really matter. This is now the way things are in this country.

We will no longer tolerate monuments to murderers and slave owners. They are coming down and no whiteboi 'civil guard' will stop it from happening.

You know erases history? Religious fruitloops, and socialist wannabe dictators. Which are you?

History is still there. Only drama queens such as yourself equate tearing down statues of traitors with erasing history.

If you want to statues showing how things really were in the 'south', where are all the statues of the town pillories? Where are all the statues of the slave owners whipping, beating and raping their slaves? Where are all the statues of lynched black people hanging from trees?

You've just got your feelings hurt because people are no longer willing to romanticize the southern LOSERS. Why do you hate winners?

Your nazism precedes your ignorance.

Oh look, another Drama Queen!

You advocate burning books based on out-of-context history. That’s nazism and ignorance. Try a pointed response if you can, hypocrite.

I never advocated burning any books.

I'm not going to play Drama Queen with you. Find someone else that will listen to your nazi nonsense.

You endorse statue removal which is tantamount to book-burning.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here's a video of what started all of it.

Baca threw a girl on the ground. The crowd gets angry and someone then hits him with his skateboard. And then someone gets shot.

What a mess.

No sound what were the two saying to each other
Its also a well known left wing tactic to try and get a reaction like that out of someone ...they live for it ,...thats why I wanna know whats being said


This antifa asshole clearly states I'm going to kill you and tries to follow through with threat

View attachment 351313

What was said is irrelevant. It clearly turned into self-defense AFTER Baca provoked the attack.

Initially it kind of reminded me of this incident. (As well as Zimmerman)

View attachment 351314

But now that I think about it more, there are some major differences.

The self-defense is much more apparent in Baca's case. The guy in the parking lot was walking away and Baca was clearly being attacked.

The initiated confrontation is also much clearer in Baca's case. Parking lot guy was just being an asshole. Baca actually physically threw a woman to the ground.

What they share in common is that some asshole with a gun started an altercation, got attacked, and then shot his attacker.

Actually what was said does matter
KILL THE MOTHER FUCKER AND THE ASSAULT BEGINS
So yes sometimes what is said is relevant.

You mean as he's already attacking him? No, it doesn't matter what was said at that point. It's clearly self-defense by then. He could have been singing the theme song to DuckTales and it wouldn't matter.

If you paid attention to the video and removed your leftist glass you can see she kept moving against him pressing and pushing her back into him that's a clear and cut case for assault and false imprisonment by restricting his means of travel on a public street.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here's a video of what started all of it.

Baca threw a girl on the ground. The crowd gets angry and someone then hits him with his skateboard. And then someone gets shot.

What a mess.

she assaulted him throwing her body on him and not following the social distance defined by the governor's orders.

It's hard to distinguish between sarcasm and stupidity these days.

she assaulted him by pushing her body against him and restricting he means of movement
Your ignorance is not my problem.

 

[bripat9643]

You can't be protecting yourself if you are black though. Then it is you that get arrested.

Black pastor reports threat to police, but he winds up arrested

Yes, shit like that happens and it's wrong but it does not justify lawlessness.

It does.

No it doesn't. We are a nation of laws, lawlessness goes against everything that is constitutional.

I've noted many times..........The Founders understood that at times violence is all that is left.

The Founders weren't vandalizing private property or assaulting innocent people.

 

[bripat9643]

The guy had just as much "business" (right) being there as the mob.

If I , Jane Q. Public, go to a demonstration by people I am totally opposed to, and I take a loaded gun with me, and I play riot control when they get rowdy, even though I have been given no authority to do so, I HAVE NO BUSINESS DOING THAT.
Sorry.

You have every right to carry a firearm and use it to defend yourself.

 

[Jitss617]

I have no idea what happened...it sounds like a bunch of monkeys screeching and then some guy walking away.

They attacked the guy he backs up and leaves, takes his gun out because they are coming at him, he continues to back away, THEY ATTACK HIM as he fleeing,, then shots them. They start screaming

Well WTF was he doing down there with those idiots in the first place? Protecting the honor of a statue?

Being a man

A gun makes a man?

Huh

 

[Jitss617]

We need more of this armed men protecting our heritage. Cops won’t do it we will

Vigilantes?

How can you criticize violence from the Left and encourage violence from the Right?

Isn't it the violence that pisses you off? Or is it the fact there are protesters in the first place?

Protecting. Our statues is violence?

 

[pknopp]

You can't be protecting yourself if you are black though. Then it is you that get arrested.

Black pastor reports threat to police, but he winds up arrested

Yes, shit like that happens and it's wrong but it does not justify lawlessness.

It does.

No it doesn't. We are a nation of laws, lawlessness goes against everything that is constitutional.

I've noted many times..........The Founders understood that at times violence is all that is left.

The Founders weren't vandalizing private property or assaulting innocent people.

They most certainly "vandalized" property. I don't think you are up on your history. Were you "innocent" for being a Tory?

 

[bripat9643]

You can't be protecting yourself if you are black though. Then it is you that get arrested.

Black pastor reports threat to police, but he winds up arrested

Yes, shit like that happens and it's wrong but it does not justify lawlessness.

It does.

No it doesn't. We are a nation of laws, lawlessness goes against everything that is constitutional.

I've noted many times..........The Founders understood that at times violence is all that is left.

The Founders weren't vandalizing private property or assaulting innocent people.

They most certainly "vandalized" property. I don't think you are up on your history. Were you "innocent" for being a Tory?

Really? Post an example.

 

[pknopp]

You can't be protecting yourself if you are black though. Then it is you that get arrested.

Black pastor reports threat to police, but he winds up arrested

Yes, shit like that happens and it's wrong but it does not justify lawlessness.

It does.

No it doesn't. We are a nation of laws, lawlessness goes against everything that is constitutional.

I've noted many times..........The Founders understood that at times violence is all that is left.

The Founders weren't vandalizing private property or assaulting innocent people.

They most certainly "vandalized" property. I don't think you are up on your history. Were you "innocent" for being a Tory?

Really? Post an example.

What Happened To British Loyalists After The Revolutionary War?.

I didn't think I would have to teach history here.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

What were these white "militia" gangs doing there?

Exercising their right to assemble JUST LIKE everyone else there.

 

[OldLady]

These self-appointed armed militia men came to the protest to protect the statue? You think these white knuckleheads in their military surplus give a shit about conquistador Juan de Oñate? Give me a break. They came to see if they could kick some ass. And when the ass kicking started, the guy pulled a gun on people he had provoked and he shot one. That's the other way to look at this.

Maybe he will get off on self defense, but the cops don't appreciate these vigilantes getting involved for EXACTLY this reason. Who the hell died and made them the police? NO ONE. There could have been a loss of life here. He didn't have to be there playing cop or defender of the Spanish oppressors.

Real patriots love their country and work toward a better society that is safe for everyone. Juan de Onate wasn't killed. He was a statue. He could be repaired, if so decided. A life is harder to replace. Real patriots don't make irresponsible decisions that lead to more violence.

And where WERE the police anyway?

Yet you say not one word about these violent assholes who were committing illegal acts. Destruction of public property, assault, and more. So you can shut your pie hole. We know who REAL patriots are. And it’s nobody you and your ilk support.

I don't like all the statue attacks. It's the senseless fad of the week. But the militia was asking for trouble. All acting badly.