Democrat "Slavers Party"

When I look at liberalism, I see people at the top who envision themselves as masters of the universe who believe they are more intelligent and special than other human beings. Look at Castro, Chavez, Hitler and other sleazebags who ruled over the people. Those are the types of people who would not have a problem with slavery because they see others as lesser human beings.

Liberals did not want the slaves freed. Liberals did not want equal rights. The only thing that has changed now is that they pretend to feel differently, but their policies that treat minorities like subhuman idiots tell you all you need to know. They honestly don't believe that minorities are as smart as the whites. The sad part is that they have been busy trying to dumb down America, destroy the black families and constantly gin up the anger to stay in power. Liberals use blacks, but they don't want to see them succeed. They want to keep them in their place and they do just that with all their liberal programs.

Going from the real plantations to the liberal plantations wasn't much of a change in the long run.

I see you put Hitler in there as a liberal.

Hitler was not a liberal, however; he was a leftist. Too many people make the mistake of thinking leftism is synonymous with liberalism.

Don't give up on Hitler so easily. He had a lot to be admired by modern american conservatives. He hated unions

Hitler hated unions??? Well, you must have missed chapter 12 in his book "Mein Kampf", where he stated:

"As things stand today, the trade unions in my opinion cannot be dispensed with. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions of the nation's economic life. Their significance lies not only in the social and political field, but even more in the general field of national politics. A people whose broad masses, through a sound trade-union movement, obtain the satisfaction of their living requirements and at the same time an education, will be tremendously strengthened in its power of resistance in the struggle for existence".

When Hitler came to power, he moved to correct hyperinflation while keeping his socialist views front and center. In 1933, the Nazis disbanded the Weimar unions and replaced them with the new and improved union, the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of 2 primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. The labor contracts that were Weimar contracts were now DAF-honored contracts. The Nazi’s funded the DAF’s coffers with the Weimar unions’ stockpile of wealth (the existing unions were part of that inflation problem). One of the new unions’ most popular programs was the Strength through Joy (Kraft durch Freude, KdF)) program, which developed the KdF-wagen, that later became the Volkswagen, or People’s Car.


intellectuals

Intellectualism is not a staple of only people with leftist socialist politics. There are intellectuals from the far left to the far right and at every point in between. If you weren't such a profoundly ignorant hack, you would've stated that Hitler hated intellects of opposing views, much like Barack Obama, who surrounds himself with only like-minded idealogues.


Negroes?? Wow, the term you used is a completely different topic in and of itself. Well, let's talk about hatred of black Americans....

How about good ol leftist progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson whose favorite movie was the KKK movie "Birth of a Nation". Keep in mind the last high ranking KKK member in politics was a Democrat senator, Robert Byrd.

Oh, what was it Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy during the 2008 Democrat primary battle between Hillary and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton said to Ted Kennedy in reference to Barack Obama:

"A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

Oh, and how about lefties open-mindedness and tolerance towards Clarence Thomas:

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc]"Progressive" Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas - YouTube[/ame]


While the above mentioned incidents are not even scratching the surface in leftist progressive hatred of black people, the long history of it lead Malcolm X to make these statements in his: "God's Judgement of White America" speech:

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way. The liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor, and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political football game. Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football, and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball. Through tricks of tokenism and false promises, and they have the willing cooperation of Negro leaders. These leaders sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains.

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but at least they don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves, they show you their teeth in a snarl. That always keep the Negro aware of where he stands with them, but the white liberals are foxes who show their teeth to the Negro also, but they pretend they’re smiling. The white liberal is more dangerous than the conservative. They lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf. He flees into the open jaws of the smiling fox. The job of the Negro leaders is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and fox belong to the same canine family, and no matter which one of them the Negro puts his trust in. He always ends up in the dog house."



While Malcolm X didn't like conservatives, he clearly saw progressive leftists for for the worthless trash they are. Malcolm X hit too many raw nerves of the leftist Democrats........

63ae64f43fae8dad2022e9ced39e87ca.jpg
 
Last edited:
Bullshit.

When the slave trade started and flourished, the "Democratic Party" didn't yet exist. Neither did the Republican.

Purty desperate stretch here, Lumpster. Purty desperate.

What's your point then? One-party state?

The Democrat Party was started in 1792..slavery expanded to their delight...
Tell us, who was responsible for the slaves coming here 150 years before that?

Democrat ancestors seems the likely answer. but Yes & No

A timeline for your lazy Democrat ass.


http://sharondraper.com/timeline.pdf

You can do research on PCs Ya know..you don't have to depend on others to do your work for you, women up. Paint-MY-House sounds appropriate...
 
Last edited:
Why do Democrats include others when they bought the African Slaves in the first place?

LOL, you guys try so hard to prove that you are not what you really are. :lol:
The Party of Whitie is desperate not to be thought of as such a thing yet they stand for just exactly what they did 200 years ago? The South hasn't changed. It's still the same mentality. Call it Tea Party, call it GOP. There are no black people to speak of in it, just a few tokens, because they want them back down on the farm picking cotton, like the Bible says they should. The Pro-slavery folks are still anti-choice, pro-religion, pro-states rights, pro-capitalism, pro-inequality, and anti-multicultural anything at all. Not a thing has changed in 300 years.

Freed the slaves? These people killed the guy who did, and they wonder why black people don't vote for them?
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
 
The Democrat Party was started in 1792..slavery expanded to their delight...
Tell us, who was responsible for the slaves coming here 150 years before that?

Democrat ancestors seems the likely answer. but Yes & No

A timeline for your lazy Democrat ass.


http://sharondraper.com/timeline.pdf

You can do research on PCs Ya know..you don't have to depend on others to do your work for you, women up.
I know the answers. I do wonder however why you blame something on one group when it started more than 300 years before they even existed? To my way of thinking, that's known as not telling the truth. Is that who you are? Was it just an honest mistake?

Your other problem of course is that what they believed in 220 years ago, maybe with the exception of Slavery, you believe in today. So that makes you what exactly?
 
LOL, you guys try so hard to prove that you are not what you really are. :lol:
The Party of Whitie is desperate not to be thought of as such a thing yet they stand for just exactly what they did 200 years ago? The South hasn't changed. It's still the same mentality. Call it Tea Party, call it GOP. There are no black people to speak of in it, just a few tokens, because they want them back down on the farm picking cotton, like the Bible says they should. The Pro-slavery folks are still anti-choice, pro-religion, pro-states rights, pro-capitalism, pro-inequality, and anti-multicultural anything at all. Not a thing has changed in 300 years.

Freed the slaves? These people killed the guy who did, and they wonder why black people don't vote for them?
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?
 
When I look at liberalism, I see people at the top who envision themselves as masters of the universe who believe they are more intelligent and special than other human beings. Look at Castro, Chavez, Hitler and other sleazebags who ruled over the people. Those are the types of people who would not have a problem with slavery because they see others as lesser human beings.

Liberals did not want the slaves freed. Liberals did not want equal rights. The only thing that has changed now is that they pretend to feel differently, but their policies that treat minorities like subhuman idiots tell you all you need to know. They honestly don't believe that minorities are as smart as the whites. The sad part is that they have been busy trying to dumb down America, destroy the black families and constantly gin up the anger to stay in power. Liberals use blacks, but they don't want to see them succeed. They want to keep them in their place and they do just that with all their liberal programs.

Going from the real plantations to the liberal plantations wasn't much of a change in the long run.

I see you put Hitler in there as a liberal.

Hitler was not a liberal, however; he was a leftist. Too many people make the mistake of thinking leftism is synonymous with liberalism.



Hitler hated unions??? Well, you must have missed chapter 12 in his book "Mein Kampf", where he stated:

"As things stand today, the trade unions in my opinion cannot be dispensed with. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions of the nation's economic life. Their significance lies not only in the social and political field, but even more in the general field of national politics. A people whose broad masses, through a sound trade-union movement, obtain the satisfaction of their living requirements and at the same time an education, will be tremendously strengthened in its power of resistance in the struggle for existence".

When Hitler came to power, he moved to correct hyperinflation while keeping his socialist views front and center. In 1933, the Nazis disbanded the Weimar unions and replaced them with the new and improved union, the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of 2 primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. The labor contracts that were Weimar contracts were now DAF-honored contracts. The Nazi’s funded the DAF’s coffers with the Weimar unions’ stockpile of wealth (the existing unions were part of that inflation problem). One of the new unions’ most popular programs was the Strength through Joy (Kraft durch Freude, KdF)) program, which developed the KdF-wagen, that later became the Volkswagen, or People’s Car.


intellectuals

Intellectualism is not a staple of only people with leftist socialist politics. There are intellectuals from the far left to the far right and at every point in between. If you weren't such a profoundly ignorant hack, you would've stated that Hitler hated intellects of opposing views, much like Barack Obama, who surrounds himself with only like-minded idealogues.


Negroes?? Wow, the term you used is a completely different topic in and of itself. Well, let's talk about hatred of black Americans....

How about good ol leftist progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson whose favorite movie was the KKK movie "Birth of a Nation". Keep in mind the last high ranking KKK member in politics was a Democrat senator, Robert Byrd.

Oh, what was it Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy during the 2008 Democrat primary battle between Hillary and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton said to Ted Kennedy in reference to Barack Obama:

"A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

Oh, and how about lefties open-mindedness and tolerance towards Clarence Thomas:

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc]"Progressive" Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas - YouTube[/ame]


While the above mentioned incidents are not even scratching the surface in leftist progressive hatred of black people, the long history of it lead Malcolm X to make these statements in his: "God's Judgement of White America" speech:

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way. The liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor, and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political football game. Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football, and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball. Through tricks of tokenism and false promises, and they have the willing cooperation of Negro leaders. These leaders sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains.

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but at least they don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves, they show you their teeth in a snarl. That always keep the Negro aware of where he stands with them, but the white liberals are foxes who show their teeth to the Negro also, but they pretend they’re smiling. The white liberal is more dangerous than the conservative. They lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf. He flees into the open jaws of the smiling fox. The job of the Negro leaders is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and fox belong to the same canine family, and no matter which one of them the Negro puts his trust in. He always ends up in the dog house."



While Malcolm X didn't like conservatives, he clearly saw progressive leftists for for the worthless trash they are. Malcolm X hit too many raw nerves of the leftist Democrats........

63ae64f43fae8dad2022e9ced39e87ca.jpg

Amazing post Locke, you are one impressive Guy..now behold my jealousy...:lol:
 
The Party of Whitie is desperate not to be thought of as such a thing yet they stand for just exactly what they did 200 years ago? The South hasn't changed. It's still the same mentality. Call it Tea Party, call it GOP. There are no black people to speak of in it, just a few tokens, because they want them back down on the farm picking cotton, like the Bible says they should. The Pro-slavery folks are still anti-choice, pro-religion, pro-states rights, pro-capitalism, pro-inequality, and anti-multicultural anything at all. Not a thing has changed in 300 years.

Freed the slaves? These people killed the guy who did, and they wonder why black people don't vote for them?
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?

No, I don't think he can read your mind..

Democrats have devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided...

Read Locke's post and learn..
 
Lumpy, the 1792 Democrat.

"History
Main article: History of the United States Democratic Party
Andrew Jackson is typically considered the first Democratic President of the United States

The Democratic Party evolved from the Jeffersonian Republican or Democratic-Republican Party organized by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in opposition to the Federalist party of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. The party favored republicanism, a weak federal government, states' rights, agrarian interests (especially Southern planters) and strict adherence to the Constitution; it opposed a national bank, close ties to Great Britain, and business and banking interests. The Party came to power in the election of 1800."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)
 
Last edited:
The Party of Whitie is desperate not to be thought of as such a thing yet they stand for just exactly what they did 200 years ago? The South hasn't changed. It's still the same mentality. Call it Tea Party, call it GOP. There are no black people to speak of in it, just a few tokens, because they want them back down on the farm picking cotton, like the Bible says they should. The Pro-slavery folks are still anti-choice, pro-religion, pro-states rights, pro-capitalism, pro-inequality, and anti-multicultural anything at all. Not a thing has changed in 300 years.

Freed the slaves? These people killed the guy who did, and they wonder why black people don't vote for them?
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?
What I mean is what I said, not what you SAY I said.
 
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?

No, I don't think he can read your mind..

Democrats have devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided...

Read Locke's post and learn..
He's not reading my mind, he's reading the mind of these stupid black people who vote for Democrats who have "...devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided..." according to you. Boy, they must really be stupid to have all that happen to them and still vote for us eh? Some people might even say they were Dumb Ni++ers right?
 
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?

No, I don't think he can read your mind..

Democrats have devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided...

Read Locke's post and learn..
He's not reading my mind, he's reading the mind of these stupid black people who vote for Democrats who have "...devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided..." according to you. Boy, they must really be stupid to have all that happen to them and still vote for us eh? Some people might even say they were Dumb Ni++ers right?
That seems to be what YOU'RE saying.
 
Black people will vote for whoever gives them free shit.
Think so huh? Then they must be really, really stupid right? I mean, I can just buy their votes and they aren't smart enough to catch on? So what you mean is, boy are they really stupid?
What I mean is what I said, not what you SAY I said.
Well I don't want to put words in your mouth but what do you call someone who will vote for you just because you give them free stuff? If I buy a woman a hamburger and a few beers and she blows me, isn't she kind of a dumb slut? Shouldn't she have more respect for herself than that?

I mean if all I have to do is give somebody something for free and then they vote against their own best interests, doesn't that make them really stupid?
 
No, I don't think he can read your mind..

Democrats have devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided...

Read Locke's post and learn..
He's not reading my mind, he's reading the mind of these stupid black people who vote for Democrats who have "...devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided..." according to you. Boy, they must really be stupid to have all that happen to them and still vote for us eh? Some people might even say they were Dumb Ni++ers right?
That seems to be what YOU'RE saying.
I'm not saying that, you are. If I vote for you, against my best interests, just because you gave me something, doesn't that make me pretty stupid?
 
Lumpy, the 1792 Democrat.

"History
Main article: History of the United States Democratic Party
Andrew Jackson is typically considered the first Democratic President of the United States

The Democratic Party evolved from the Jeffersonian Republican or Democratic-Republican Party organized by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in opposition to the Federalist party of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. The party favored republicanism, a weak federal government, states' rights, agrarian interests (especially Southern planters) and strict adherence to the Constitution; it opposed a national bank, close ties to Great Britain, and business and banking interests. The Party came to power in the election of 1800."
Democratic Party (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moving on...but here Ya go...

Encyclopædia Britannica's Guide to American Presidents
 
Lumpy, the 1792 Democrat.

"History
Main article: History of the United States Democratic Party
Andrew Jackson is typically considered the first Democratic President of the United States

The Democratic Party evolved from the Jeffersonian Republican or Democratic-Republican Party organized by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in opposition to the Federalist party of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. The party favored republicanism, a weak federal government, states' rights, agrarian interests (especially Southern planters) and strict adherence to the Constitution; it opposed a national bank, close ties to Great Britain, and business and banking interests. The Party came to power in the election of 1800."
Democratic Party (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moving on...but here Ya go...

Encyclopædia Britannica's Guide to American Presidents
Fine. Terrific. But isn't that really close to what you believe in even 200 years later?
 
He's not reading my mind, he's reading the mind of these stupid black people who vote for Democrats who have "...devastated the black family structure and made far too many dependent, afraid and obviously misguided..." according to you. Boy, they must really be stupid to have all that happen to them and still vote for us eh? Some people might even say they were Dumb Ni++ers right?
That seems to be what YOU'RE saying.
I'm not saying that, you are. If I vote for you, against my best interests, just because you gave me something, doesn't that make me pretty stupid?
Yes, we can agree you are pretty stupid.
 
When I look at liberalism, I see people at the top who envision themselves as masters of the universe who believe they are more intelligent and special than other human beings. Look at Castro, Chavez, Hitler and other sleazebags who ruled over the people. Those are the types of people who would not have a problem with slavery because they see others as lesser human beings.

Liberals did not want the slaves freed. Liberals did not want equal rights. The only thing that has changed now is that they pretend to feel differently, but their policies that treat minorities like subhuman idiots tell you all you need to know. They honestly don't believe that minorities are as smart as the whites. The sad part is that they have been busy trying to dumb down America, destroy the black families and constantly gin up the anger to stay in power. Liberals use blacks, but they don't want to see them succeed. They want to keep them in their place and they do just that with all their liberal programs.

Going from the real plantations to the liberal plantations wasn't much of a change in the long run.

I see you put Hitler in there as a liberal.

Hitler was not a liberal, however; he was a leftist. Too many people make the mistake of thinking leftism is synonymous with liberalism.



Hitler hated unions??? Well, you must have missed chapter 12 in his book "Mein Kampf", where he stated:

"As things stand today, the trade unions in my opinion cannot be dispensed with. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions of the nation's economic life. Their significance lies not only in the social and political field, but even more in the general field of national politics. A people whose broad masses, through a sound trade-union movement, obtain the satisfaction of their living requirements and at the same time an education, will be tremendously strengthened in its power of resistance in the struggle for existence".

When Hitler came to power, he moved to correct hyperinflation while keeping his socialist views front and center. In 1933, the Nazis disbanded the Weimar unions and replaced them with the new and improved union, the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of 2 primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. The labor contracts that were Weimar contracts were now DAF-honored contracts. The Nazi’s funded the DAF’s coffers with the Weimar unions’ stockpile of wealth (the existing unions were part of that inflation problem). One of the new unions’ most popular programs was the Strength through Joy (Kraft durch Freude, KdF)) program, which developed the KdF-wagen, that later became the Volkswagen, or People’s Car.


intellectuals

Intellectualism is not a staple of only people with leftist socialist politics. There are intellectuals from the far left to the far right and at every point in between. If you weren't such a profoundly ignorant hack, you would've stated that Hitler hated intellects of opposing views, much like Barack Obama, who surrounds himself with only like-minded idealogues.


Negroes?? Wow, the term you used is a completely different topic in and of itself. Well, let's talk about hatred of black Americans....

How about good ol leftist progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson whose favorite movie was the KKK movie "Birth of a Nation". Keep in mind the last high ranking KKK member in politics was a Democrat senator, Robert Byrd.

Oh, what was it Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy during the 2008 Democrat primary battle between Hillary and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton said to Ted Kennedy in reference to Barack Obama:

"A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

Oh, and how about lefties open-mindedness and tolerance towards Clarence Thomas:

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc]"Progressive" Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas - YouTube[/ame]


While the above mentioned incidents are not even scratching the surface in leftist progressive hatred of black people, the long history of it lead Malcolm X to make these statements in his: "God's Judgement of White America" speech:

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way. The liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor, and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political football game. Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football, and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball. Through tricks of tokenism and false promises, and they have the willing cooperation of Negro leaders. These leaders sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains.

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but at least they don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves, they show you their teeth in a snarl. That always keep the Negro aware of where he stands with them, but the white liberals are foxes who show their teeth to the Negro also, but they pretend they’re smiling. The white liberal is more dangerous than the conservative. They lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf. He flees into the open jaws of the smiling fox. The job of the Negro leaders is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and fox belong to the same canine family, and no matter which one of them the Negro puts his trust in. He always ends up in the dog house."



While Malcolm X didn't like conservatives, he clearly saw progressive leftists for for the worthless trash they are. Malcolm X hit too many raw nerves of the leftist Democrats........

63ae64f43fae8dad2022e9ced39e87ca.jpg

He clearly saw the conservatives as the worthless trash they are. He saw them basically as the same, two sides of the same coin.................... I hope you don't think that he was giving a ringing endorsement to conservatives. I see plenty of today's conservatives playing the role of the "Fox" when they play their "Martin Luther King Game". Even then they can't hide it when they bring the likes of cain, west, and the other minstrels out to insult Blacks in general. :)
 
So, let's look at what Jefferson the Slave Owner, and he had children by at least one, believed in in 1800:

Republican Platform of 1800 (it later became the Democratic-Republican Party and later still the Democratic Party)
Adopted in Congressional Caucus, Philadelphia


An inviolable preservation of the federal constitution, according to the true sense in which it was adopted by the states, that in which it was advocated by its friends, and not that which its enemies apprehended, who, therefore, became its enemies.

Opposition to monarchising its features by the forms of its administration, with a view to conciliate a transition, first, to a president and senate for life, and secondly, to an hereditary tenure of those offices, and thus to worm out the elective principle.

Preservation to the states of the powers not yielded by them to the Union, and to the legislature of the Union its constitutional share in the division of powers; and resistance, therefore, to existing movements for transferring all the powers of the states to the general government, and all of those of that government to the executive branch.

A rigorously frugal administration of the government and the application of all the possible savings of the public revenue to the liquidation of the public debt; and resistance, therefore, to all measures looking to a multiplication of officers and salaries, merely to create partisans and to augment the public debt, on the principle of its being a public blessing.

Reliance for internal defense solely upon the militia, till actual invasion, and for such a naval force only, as may be sufficient [sic] to protect our coasts and harbors from depredations; and opposition, therefore, to the policy of a standing army in time of peace which may overawe the public sentiment, and to a navy, which, by its own expenses, and the wars in which it will implicate us, will grind us with public burdens and sink us under them.

Free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment.

Opposition to linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe, entering their fields of slaughter to preserve their balance, or joining in the confederacy of kings to war against the principles of liberty.

Freedom of religion and opposition to all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendency of one sect over another.

Freedom of speech and of the press; and opposition, therefore, to all violations of the constitution to silence, by force, and not by reason, the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their public agents.

Liberal naturalization laws, under which the well disposed of all nations who may desire to embark their fortunes with us and share with us the public burdens may have that opportunity, under moderate restrictions for the development of honest intention, and severe ones to guard against the usurpation of our flag.

Encouragement of science and the arts in all their branches, to the end that the American people may perfect their independence of all foreign monopolies, institutions, and influences.
Republican Platform of 1800

Does anybody have any serious issues with all that?
 
Last edited:
I see you put Hitler in there as a liberal.

Hitler was not a liberal, however; he was a leftist. Too many people make the mistake of thinking leftism is synonymous with liberalism.



Hitler hated unions??? Well, you must have missed chapter 12 in his book "Mein Kampf", where he stated:

"As things stand today, the trade unions in my opinion cannot be dispensed with. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions of the nation's economic life. Their significance lies not only in the social and political field, but even more in the general field of national politics. A people whose broad masses, through a sound trade-union movement, obtain the satisfaction of their living requirements and at the same time an education, will be tremendously strengthened in its power of resistance in the struggle for existence".

When Hitler came to power, he moved to correct hyperinflation while keeping his socialist views front and center. In 1933, the Nazis disbanded the Weimar unions and replaced them with the new and improved union, the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of 2 primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. The labor contracts that were Weimar contracts were now DAF-honored contracts. The Nazi’s funded the DAF’s coffers with the Weimar unions’ stockpile of wealth (the existing unions were part of that inflation problem). One of the new unions’ most popular programs was the Strength through Joy (Kraft durch Freude, KdF)) program, which developed the KdF-wagen, that later became the Volkswagen, or People’s Car.




Intellectualism is not a staple of only people with leftist socialist politics. There are intellectuals from the far left to the far right and at every point in between. If you weren't such a profoundly ignorant hack, you would've stated that Hitler hated intellects of opposing views, much like Barack Obama, who surrounds himself with only like-minded idealogues.


Negroes?? Wow, the term you used is a completely different topic in and of itself. Well, let's talk about hatred of black Americans....

How about good ol leftist progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson whose favorite movie was the KKK movie "Birth of a Nation". Keep in mind the last high ranking KKK member in politics was a Democrat senator, Robert Byrd.

Oh, what was it Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy during the 2008 Democrat primary battle between Hillary and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton said to Ted Kennedy in reference to Barack Obama:

"A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”

Oh, and how about lefties open-mindedness and tolerance towards Clarence Thomas:

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc]"Progressive" Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas - YouTube[/ame]


While the above mentioned incidents are not even scratching the surface in leftist progressive hatred of black people, the long history of it lead Malcolm X to make these statements in his: "God's Judgement of White America" speech:

"The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way. The liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor, and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political football game. Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football, and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball. Through tricks of tokenism and false promises, and they have the willing cooperation of Negro leaders. These leaders sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains.

The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but at least they don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves, they show you their teeth in a snarl. That always keep the Negro aware of where he stands with them, but the white liberals are foxes who show their teeth to the Negro also, but they pretend they’re smiling. The white liberal is more dangerous than the conservative. They lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf. He flees into the open jaws of the smiling fox. The job of the Negro leaders is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and fox belong to the same canine family, and no matter which one of them the Negro puts his trust in. He always ends up in the dog house."



While Malcolm X didn't like conservatives, he clearly saw progressive leftists for for the worthless trash they are. Malcolm X hit too many raw nerves of the leftist Democrats........

63ae64f43fae8dad2022e9ced39e87ca.jpg

He clearly saw the conservatives as the worthless trash they are. He saw them basically as the same, two sides of the same coin.................... I hope you don't think that he was giving a ringing endorsement to conservatives. I see plenty of today's conservatives playing the role of the "Fox" when they play their "Martin Luther King Game". Even then they can't hide it when they bring the likes of cain, west, and the other minstrels out to insult Blacks in general. :)

Clearly comprehending the English language is not one of your strengths. If wealth were attained by being an idiot, you'd be a billionaire. Oh, how about that "fox": Harry Reid, you know the guy who referred to Obama as a light skinned African-American with no negro dialect.
 

Forum List

Back
Top