Democrat Stunt Pulling... Again

[Pete7469]

Democrats doesn't care about the Constitution, they are usurping the Chief Justice chair for the trial, which he refused to attend because it isn't a legal trial.

Debasing the Constitution: Why Chief Justice Roberts is Not Presiding over Trump’s Impeachment Trial

Article written by: William Levin is a graduate of Yale Law School and a former special assistant in the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice.

We all know bed wetting liberals loathe the Constitution, and the country in general.


.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Nobody thinks the Banana Republican's will convict their King.

So what is the purpose of you Nazis? Showboating?

No, it's intimidation, a warning to any who would defy the Reich and promote America. Look at what the Nazi party did to Trump....

 

[Concerned American]

Looking to generate some soundbytes from this wasted time/money sham.

All it is is a game. No crime. No votes.

"Let's throw some shit around for the hell of it." Should have been the dems battle cry from the last 4 years.

Look over here at this sham impeachment and you won't notice what they are doing behind the scenes. MSM has paid more attention to the impeachment than they have to the damage being done by illegal EO's eg. cancelling student debt.

 

[jbrownson0831]

The Democrats know they once again can NOT affect their full confessed political partisan Impeachment because they do not have the votes to do so. Still, they continue to waste time and tax payer dollars to carry out another failed partisan political stunt.

The Trumpybear has already been impeached for the second time. This time with Bipartisan support. No posible chance of conviction in the Senate however.

I've opposed Impeachment from the beginning in favor of an impowered special prosecutor like they did for Whitewater. (with a nice cigar filled tell all book at the end of if too!)

What does it feel like to have your brain dissolved by propaganda?

 

[BULLDOG]

I noticed that you right wingers always say there aren't enough votes to convict, but never want to discuss whether he is guilty of the charges. It's easy to see that since your party discarded integrity, It no longer matters if he actually did what he is charged for. It only matters that you have the political power to force.

Guilty of what specifically, Bulldyke?

Defeating Hillary? Supporting America over China? Derailing the Iranian nuclear program?

In 2018, Nancy Pigshit incited insurgents to storm the Capitol and disrupt senate proceedings. Oddly, Ashley Judd was not shot to death the way Ashli Babbit was. But Nazi scum Pelosi declared that what Judd and other insurgents did was acceptable because "it's the people's house."

I get it, different laws for the Reich.

What do you claim the last legitimate president is guilty of?

Will you please point out Ashley Judd in the following video?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Hahahahaha.

Trumpybear hirers only the best Lawyers.

Hahaha he doesn't even need lawyers for this farce. I'm sure you'll have your vaseline and tissues ready to go!

Nobody thinks the Banana Republican's will convict their King.

He is 3 weeks out of office, thus the trial is dead on arrival.

 

[Fueri]

Looking to generate some soundbytes from this wasted time/money sham.

All it is is a game. No crime. No votes.

"Let's throw some shit around for the hell of it." Should have been the dems battle cry from the last 4 years.

Look over here at this sham impeachment and you won't notice what they are doing behind the scenes. MSM has paid more attention to the impeachment than they have to the damage being done by illegal EO's eg. cancelling student debt.

Of course, as was part of the intent. Bread and circuses......

 

[daveman]

I noticed that you right wingers always say there aren't enough votes to convict, but never want to discuss whether he is guilty of the charges.

And I always notice how you and snowflakes always avoid bringing up all the previous threads, discussions, links, & evidence...

Of course Trump is innocent. Just reading the transcripts of his 6 January speech proves that.

Nancy Pelosi's admission during her interveiw that this whole thing is about protecting the Democrat Party from Trump in 2024 and beyond proves his innocense.

All of the Democrats support for, incitement of violence - from inspiring an attempted assassination of GOP politivcians to Maxine Waters encouraging harasse=ment and violence against the GOP and Trump's team to Schumer's threat against the USSC Justices to the VP's incitement and call for continued Antifa/BLM terrorist violence, not to mention her helping bail out terrorists and return them to the streets to commit more crime - the Democrats are FAR MORE guilty of 'Inciting Violence / Insurrection' than Trump ever was.

When did any of the people you mentioned instigate a coup that attacked congress in an effort to void the constitutionally required work of congress and overthrow an election to ensconce a tyrant into the presidency? Setting a car on fire is wrong, and certainly deserves punishment to the fullest extent of the law, but it doesn't compare to the treason planned and executed by trump.

Cultist.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I noticed that you right wingers always say there aren't enough votes to convict, but never want to discuss whether he is guilty of the charges. It's easy to see that since your party discarded integrity, It no longer matters if he actually did what he is charged for. It only matters that you have the political power to force.

Guilty of what specifically, Bulldyke?

Defeating Hillary? Supporting America over China? Derailing the Iranian nuclear program?

In 2018, Nancy Pigshit incited insurgents to storm the Capitol and disrupt senate proceedings. Oddly, Ashley Judd was not shot to death the way Ashli Babbit was. But Nazi scum Pelosi declared that what Judd and other insurgents did was acceptable because "it's the people's house."

I get it, different laws for the Reich.

What do you claim the last legitimate president is guilty of?

Will you please point out Ashley Judd in the following video?

WTF?

Point out Ashli Babbit in it.

Good god you Nazis are fucking morons.

Now Judd "stormed the capitol" in 2018 and broke into the Senate chamber while it was in session. Yet she was not shot to death? Why the disparate treatment of the two Ash's? Oh that's right, Judd belongs to the Reich. One nation, two VERY different systems of justice.

 

[BlindBoo]

Hahahahaha.

Trumpybear hirers only the best Lawyers.

Hahaha he doesn't even need lawyers for this farce. I'm sure you'll have your vaseline and tissues ready to go!

Nobody thinks the Banana Republican's will convict their King.

He is 3 weeks out of office, thus the trial is dead on arrival.

Yes he is, but I bet they at least double the number of opposition Senators who vote to convict a president of their own party.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hahahahaha.

Trumpybear hirers only the best Lawyers.

Hahaha he doesn't even need lawyers for this farce. I'm sure you'll have your vaseline and tissues ready to go!

Nobody thinks the Banana Republican's will convict their King.

He is 3 weeks out of office, thus the trial is dead on arrival.

democrats seek to execute the last legitimate president and his entire family.

 

[Hum Dinger]

There seems to be a mix up between two separate questions:

1. Did Trump intend to incite insurrection?

2. Did Trump incite Insurrection?

Without a doubt the answer to number 2 is "YES". You only have to hear many statements by people involved in the insurrection to know that he did, without a doubt, incite the insurrection.

That make the first question moot. Even if he did not intend to incite insurrection, the fact that he DID incite insurrection makes him guilty. Perhaps he should learn to think before he speaks.

 

[jbrownson0831]

There seems to be a mix up between two separate questions:

1. Did Trump intend to incite insurrection?

2. Did Trump incite Insurrection?

Without a doubt the answer to number 2 is "YES". You only have to hear many statements by people involved in the insurrection to know that he did, without a doubt, incite the insurrection.

That make the first question moot. Even if he did not intend to incite insurrection, the fact that he DID incite insurrection makes him guilty. Perhaps he should learn to think before he speaks.

Waaah waah waah you libbers have no brain cells left.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There seems to be a mix up between two separate questions:

1. Did Trump intend to incite insurrection?

2. Did Trump incite Insurrection?

Without a doubt the answer to number 2 is "YES".

Uh, no.

In fact the KGB notes that the planning for the 1/6 Reichstag Fire started days, if not weeks before Trump spoke.

You only have to hear many statements by people involved in the insurrection to know that he did, without a doubt, incite the insurrection.

That make the first question moot. Even if he did not intend to incite insurrection, the fact that he DID incite insurrection makes him guilty. Perhaps he should learn to think before he speaks.

You Nazis fully intended the 2018 insurrection at the Kavanagh hearings where your people stormed the capitol and burst into the Senate while it was in session in an attempt to subvert the legal confirmation of a supreme court justice.

Did speaker Nazi Pigshit incite that insurgency? Yes, she did.

 

[BlindBoo]

I noticed that you right wingers always say there aren't enough votes to convict, but never want to discuss whether he is guilty of the charges. It's easy to see that since your party discarded integrity, It no longer matters if he actually did what he is charged for. It only matters that you have the political power to force.

Guilty of what specifically, Bulldyke?

Defeating Hillary? Supporting America over China? Derailing the Iranian nuclear program?

In 2018, Nancy Pigshit incited insurgents to storm the Capitol and disrupt senate proceedings. Oddly, Ashley Judd was not shot to death the way Ashli Babbit was. But Nazi scum Pelosi declared that what Judd and other insurgents did was acceptable because "it's the people's house."

I get it, different laws for the Reich.

What do you claim the last legitimate president is guilty of?

Will you please point out Ashley Judd in the following video?

WTF?

Point out Ashli Babbit in it.

Good god you Nazis are fucking morons.

Now Judd "stormed the capitol" in 2018 and broke into the Senate chamber while it was in session. Yet she was not shot to death? Why the disparate treatment of the two Ash's? Oh that's right, Judd belongs to the Reich. One nation, two VERY different systems of justice.

I think it must be that Judd has a magic Pusswah and used it to get by all the security. Fucinhor!

 

[Uncensored2008]

I think it must be that Judd has a magic Pusswah and used it to get by all the security. Fucinhor!

Hitting the bottle early and hard today, I see.

Judd had the door held open by security, just as the 1/6 group did.

 

[Hum Dinger]

There seems to be a mix up between two separate questions:

1. Did Trump intend to incite insurrection?

2. Did Trump incite Insurrection?

Without a doubt the answer to number 2 is "YES".

Uh, no.

In fact the KGB notes that the planning for the 1/6 Reichstag Fire started days, if not weeks before Trump spoke.

You only have to hear many statements by people involved in the insurrection to know that he did, without a doubt, incite the insurrection.

That make the first question moot. Even if he did not intend to incite insurrection, the fact that he DID incite insurrection makes him guilty. Perhaps he should learn to think before he speaks.

You Nazis fully intended the 2018 insurrection at the Kavanagh hearings where your people stormed the capitol and burst into the Senate while it was in session in an attempt to subvert the legal confirmation of a supreme court justice.

Did speaker Nazi Pigshit incite that insurgency? Yes, she did.

1. The KGB does not exist anymore, dumbass.

2. The people that burst into the Kavanaugh hearing were removed by the capitol police and charged appropriately. No one was hurt.

3. Protesting a hearing - while not showing any sign of intending to stop the hearing - is not insurrection. Saying that they were going to "Stop the Steal", "Hang Mike Pence", and "Kill Nancy Pelosi", clearly is an insurrection.

Fact check: Capitol riot, 2018 Kavanaugh protests meme lacks context (usatoday.com)

 

[BlindBoo]

Simply a waste of time and tax dollars. All so the Dems can feel good about themselves.

The QOP is the party of no accountability.

Who has been held accountable for spying on the incoming Trump administration? The spying is a proven fact.

I think they could be held accountable if the allegations were proven in a court of law. Sound familiar?

Funny how that law and order thingy works.

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. The KGB does not exist anymore, dumbass.

Sure they do. You probably still use the outdated "FBI" moniker.

2. The people that burst into the Kavanaugh hearing were removed by the capitol police and charged appropriately. No one was hurt.

Of course they were NOT charged. Reich members are above all laws. AND they could have done the same this time, but instead acted violently against the protestors.

3. Protesting a hearing - while not showing any sign of intending to stop the hearing - is not insurrection. Saying that they were going to "Stop the Steal", "Hang Mike Pence", and "Kill Nancy Pelosi", clearly is an insurrection.

What the fuck are you lying about?

Standing up and SCREAMING that Kavanaugh is a RAPIST is intended purely to stop the hearing.

The ONLY difference is the party involved.

Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh hearing rocked by 'mob rule'

Democrats demand an adjournment as scores of protesters are arrested in chaotic scenes.

www.bbc.com

Fact check: Capitol riot, 2018 Kavanaugh protests meme lacks context (usatoday.com)

Useless Rag Today is part of the Reich propaganda, they have ZERO credibility.

They contradict themselves;

Trump-era protests, Kavanaugh drama show we need less democracy

Our Constitution was a product of the Age of Reason, not the age of rage. The demonstrators are a symptom of national political dysfunction.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

Simply a waste of time and tax dollars. All so the Dems can feel good about themselves.

The QOP is the party of no accountability.

Who has been held accountable for spying on the incoming Trump administration? The spying is a proven fact.

I think they could be held accountable if the allegations were proven in a court of law. Sound familiar?

Funny how that law and order thingy works.

Yet you Nazis don't use courts of law, instead turning to kangaroo courts impeaching private citizens.