Democrat thugs shut down Trump rally

It appears that the thugs were already there, looking for trouble.

Serious question: what do they expect to accomplish with this behavior?
Uh... I guess they expected to shut down a rally

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

And...accomplish what?
Accomplish shutting down a rally. What do you think they were there for?
They used free speech to shut down free speech! Thugs, just plain thugs!

They didn't cancel the rally. They just used their free speech. Why are you so butthurt about it?
 
Not being able to hear is violent then. That's different than where I'm from.


Well, like I stated earlier - America has awakened. I wouldn't go to any rallies with the idea of shutting it down anymore. It might be bad for one's health.

Just want you to know that when you defend violence then there will be a reaction.

But you think only one side should be able to violent. Lol

So you admit they are brownshirt thugs.

Yes Trump supporters are brown shirts. Yiu defended violence and now you put a flower in your hair.

When did I defend violence?

I'll show you.

When did you disagree with any violent attack that happened at any Trump rally?

Do you disagree with the violence at Trump rallies?

Now when you don't answer....the answer to your question will be apparent
 
Not being able to hear is violent then. That's different than where I'm from.


Well, like I stated earlier - America has awakened. I wouldn't go to any rallies with the idea of shutting it down anymore. It might be bad for one's health.

Just want you to know that when you defend violence then there will be a reaction.

But you think only one side should be able to violent. Lol

So you admit they are brownshirt thugs.

Yes Trump supporters are brown shirts. Yiu defended violence and now you put a flower in your hair.

When did I defend violence?

You support the big government storm troopers going in and knocking some citizens' heads.
 
The news is reporting that Trump cancelled a rally in Chicago because a hoard of Democrat thugs showed up to threaten him and his fans.

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Who are the brownshirts here?
This illustrates just how clueless and myopic most Trump supporters are – that there are those so opposed to Trump's bigotry and hate, they would seek to protest at his events, indicating that there are significantly more Americans who are likewise opposed, and would never consider voting for the likes of Trump.

^^^^ Composition fallacy, red herring and the usual left loon blather
 
Obviously talking is violent where you come from


He can "talk" all he wants. No problem there. He was DISRUPTING a rally and kept people from hearing the speaker. He was trying to "trump" his rights over others. Doesn't work that way and you know it. Glad he got his ass kicked. He went there to start trouble and he found trouble - and the man was 78 years old. :)

Not being able to hear is violent then. That's different than where I'm from.


Well, like I stated earlier - America has awakened. I wouldn't go to any rallies with the idea of shutting it down anymore. It might be bad for one's health.

Just want you to know that when you defend violence then there will be a reaction.

But you think only one side should be able to violent. Lol


You have what I have termed.....Reality Dyslexia.....thinking that Trump rallies were violent...then saying that this thuggery was in reaction to Trump..........

This violence is typical left wing crap.......they have done this since the first left winger expected his caveman buddies to give him their food....since he reused to get his own......

Here ya go head-inna-sand, taken from another post in another thread about yesterday's Rumpbot brownshirt:


>> Recently, a photographer for TIME was put in a chokehold and thrown to the ground at a Donald Trump rally after stepping outside the press corral. Trump supporters kicked, punched, and choked Black Lives Matter activist Mercutio Southall at a rally in November — after which Donald Trump said that maybe his supporters did the right thing. These types of violent outbreaks at Trump events have become common; today, video emerged of a black man getting punched in the face by a supporter and then wrestled to the ground by the police at a Trump rally. The man who attacked him was allowed to stay.

Breitbart, however, has been one of Trump’s staunchest defenders. Lewandowski’s excuse hours after the incident to Mathew Boyle, Breitbart’s Washington political editor, was that he and Fields — who normally covers GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz — “had never met before and that he didn’t recognize her as a Breitbart reporter, instead mistaking her for an adversarial member of the mainstream media,” according to the Daily Beast.

Breitbart’s weak response to the assault of their own reporter has incensed figures in the media — including Breitbart Editor-At-Large, Ben Shapiro.


>> Protesters at prior Trump rallies have been dragged, kicked, beaten, choked, and shoved to the ground.

Trump himself has failed to condemn his more violent supporters. Instead, he’s invited them on stage to be publicly honored for beating up a high schooler, argued a Black Lives Matter protester deserved to be roughed up, and told a crowd that he wished he could punch a protester at a Nevada rally in the face.

“You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher,” he said at the time. <<

(Links here and here) <<
--- some of that is referring to a Breitbart reporter who was also assaulted upon asking Rump a question --- apparently on the basis that they didn't know her and assumed she was from "unfriendly" media rather than Breitbart.

You know about "unfriendly media" right? The one Rump's gonna shut down once he gets to "open up" the First Amendment?
 
Well, like I stated earlier - America has awakened. I wouldn't go to any rallies with the idea of shutting it down anymore. It might be bad for one's health.

Just want you to know that when you defend violence then there will be a reaction.

But you think only one side should be able to violent. Lol

So you admit they are brownshirt thugs.

Yes Trump supporters are brown shirts. Yiu defended violence and now you put a flower in your hair.

When did I defend violence?

I'll show you.

When did you disagree with any violent attack that happened at any Trump rally?

Do you disagree with the violence at Trump rallies?

Now when you don't answer....the answer to your question will be apparent

He's an anarchist who now supports Trump's promises to use big government to restrict free trade and guarantee that big government Socialist Security isn't touched.
 
The news is reporting that Trump cancelled a rally in Chicago because a hoard of Democrat thugs showed up to threaten him and his fans.

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Who are the brownshirts here?
This illustrates just how clueless and myopic most Trump supporters are – that there are those so opposed to Trump's bigotry and hate, they would seek to protest at his events, indicating that there are significantly more Americans who are likewise opposed, and would never consider voting for the likes of Trump.


Shut the fuck up hypocrite.
 
This sort of thuggery encourages people who ordinarily might sit at home election day to get off their ass and try to take back their lives. Those Demothugs are turning imagined fear into deep, gut-wrenching REAL fear. I DO hope they keep up the good work! It'll be their own downfall but please don't tell them that.
 
It appears that the thugs were already there, looking for trouble.

Serious question: what do they expect to accomplish with this behavior?
Uh... I guess they expected to shut down a rally

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

And...accomplish what?
Accomplish shutting down a rally. What do you think they were there for?
They used free speech to shut down free speech! Thugs, just plain thugs!

They didn't cancel the rally. They just used their free speech. Why are you so butthurt about it?

These clowns are fucking the Democrats. Of you can't see that, I say get after it.

Using violence to change Americans's minds is a losing proposition.
 
Uh... I guess they expected to shut down a rally

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

And...accomplish what?
Accomplish shutting down a rally. What do you think they were there for?
They used free speech to shut down free speech! Thugs, just plain thugs!

They didn't cancel the rally. They just used their free speech. Why are you so butthurt about it?

These clowns are fucking the Democrats. Of you can't see that, I say get after it.

Using violence to change Americans's minds is a losing proposition.
How much violence happened?
 
It appears that the thugs were already there, looking for trouble.

Serious question: what do they expect to accomplish with this behavior?
Uh... I guess they expected to shut down a rally

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

And...accomplish what?
Accomplish shutting down a rally. What do you think they were there for?
They used free speech to shut down free speech! Thugs, just plain thugs!

They didn't cancel the rally. They just used their free speech. Why are you so butthurt about it?
Trump had to cancel so no one got hurt. He even cares for the thugs, bless his heart.
 
It appears that the thugs were already there, looking for trouble.

Serious question: what do they expect to accomplish with this behavior?
Uh... I guess they expected to shut down a rally

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

And...accomplish what?
Accomplish shutting down a rally. What do you think they were there for?
They used free speech to shut down free speech! Thugs, just plain thugs!

They didn't cancel the rally. They just used their free speech. Why are you so butthurt about it?

They suppresed free speech, but I know Liberals don't believe in free speech.
 
The news is reporting that Trump cancelled a rally in Chicago because a hoard of Democrat thugs showed up to threaten him and his fans.

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Who are the brownshirts here?
I'm a liberal and, while I think Trump is an extremist dangerously close in a lot of his views to other extreme radicals, I also support free speech.

I think that it is in bad taste to create a hostile environment not open for discussion, now with that said I honestly think that Trump's supporters should have been allowed to peaceably assemble AS WELL AS Trumps protesters been allowed to peaceably protest. I'm not sure who organized the event nor exactly how hostile the crowds seemed to be but either the event was planned by an idiot without enough resources available, or the people attending needed to chill their jets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top