Democrats overplayed their Hate.

And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
 
Democrats are dumbasses. We found that out in 2016 when they nominated that Crooked Hillary asshole that had more baggage than Delta Airlines.

The number one issue for the people that elected Trump was making sure that the Democrats could appoint Supreme Court Justices.

Now the stupid Democrats decided they were going to go bat shit crazy over Trump's Supreme Court nominee. How dumb was that? Really?

I am glad the Democrats are idiots. That will insure that they never control the Senate or the Presidency. They will also give it a run to lose another 1,000 national seats like they did under Obma's leadership.
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
 
Good article. Just one man's opinion---but one who was right in Nov. 2016. And who reminds us that the Polls are put out by the same Propagandists who bring us the FAKE NEWS--the Pravda Subsidiary of the Democratic Party---now out of the closet as the Socialist Party.

Mid-Term Prediction: HUGE RED WAVE to Hit America After Disgusting Kavanaugh Attacks ...(And We Were Right in 2016 Too!)

"The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been harping for months that there is going to be a “blue wave” this year because this is the pattern after a President and his Party win a national election and the House. However, this is not the total truth.


According to one report, Republicans do much better than Democrats in the midterm elections in this scenario going back to WWII –"


On average, Democrat presidents lose 35.2 seats in the House. Republican presidents only lose 11.2 seats in the House in their first midterm on average. Again, this is every president since WWII, so this is a very extensive analysis.
___________


Also note--us Deplorables are really, really pissed---REALLY pissed, at how Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court has been treated. This ain't Cuba.

You're going to lose the House and quite possibly the Senate.

You forgot to lead that with "In my dreams..."
 
Good article. Just one man's opinion---but one who was right in Nov. 2016. And who reminds us that the Polls are put out by the same Propagandists who bring us the FAKE NEWS--the Pravda Subsidiary of the Democratic Party---now out of the closet as the Socialist Party.

Mid-Term Prediction: HUGE RED WAVE to Hit America After Disgusting Kavanaugh Attacks ...(And We Were Right in 2016 Too!)

"The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been harping for months that there is going to be a “blue wave” this year because this is the pattern after a President and his Party win a national election and the House. However, this is not the total truth.


According to one report, Republicans do much better than Democrats in the midterm elections in this scenario going back to WWII –"


On average, Democrat presidents lose 35.2 seats in the House. Republican presidents only lose 11.2 seats in the House in their first midterm on average. Again, this is every president since WWII, so this is a very extensive analysis.
___________


Also note--us Deplorables are really, really pissed---REALLY pissed, at how Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court has been treated. This ain't Cuba.

You're going to lose the House and quite possibly the Senate.
________________________________

You would look less like an Immature Hater, and more like you have the maturity to be a Moderator---if you at least started your post with "In my opinion...."-------since you have backed it up with absolutely nothing.

______

Because you're incapable of telling an expression of opinion without having it announced in flashing neon letters?
 
I don't think either side is getting a "wave" at this point. I think the Democrats have far less chance of taking the majority than they did, but I think Republicans aren't exactly poised to expand their majority, either. I think it could go either way, but I expect the margin of control to remain similar, whoever ends up on top.
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
Again for the slow, IT DOES NOT MATTER if every person in California votes for one person it takes the electoral college to elect the President.
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
Again for the slow, IT DOES NOT MATTER if every person in California votes for one person it takes the electoral college to elect the President.
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

You’re fucking demented.

It’s not about what matters... it’s not about the electoral college... it’s not about winning the election...

it’s about your asinine comment that Conservatism is on the rise.

How’s that possible when Hillary got more votes than trump?

Savvy?
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
Again for the slow, IT DOES NOT MATTER if every person in California votes for one person it takes the electoral college to elect the President.
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

You’re fucking demented.

It’s not about what matters... it’s not about the electoral college... it’s not about winning the election...

it’s about your asinine comment that Conservatism is on the rise.

How’s that possible when Hillary got more votes than trump?

Savvy?
Again with out California Trump had over a million more votes then Hillary. It does not matter that a super majority of people in California support the D's it matters what the other 49 States have. Plus how many illegals are there in California again?
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
Again for the slow, IT DOES NOT MATTER if every person in California votes for one person it takes the electoral college to elect the President.
It’s not about what matters... it’s not about the electoral college... it’s not about winning the election...

Can you believe this fucking jackass retard brain-dead moron who stands there casting exasperated aspersions at others lamenting how it is NOT ABOUT WINNING THE ELECTION, even as his party LOSES election after election, then in the same breath says its NOT about how you run campaigns, its not about the Electoral College (which decides the elections), and its not about what matters.

One might as well argue football with an orangutan. Well Faun, then you guys are RIGHT ON TARGET because GUESS WHAT? You've lost nearly every major election in the past TEN YEARS! Ever since Obama was put in office.

As to the rise of conservatism, there is no doubt about it. I won't post any links because I want Leftard readers here who actually think their form of extreme mental meltdown prevalent in their inner city circle of jerkoff friends to be caught with their pants down around their ankles this fall again, balls swinging in the air with another: "Well, I didn't see that one coming." Faun here is so monolithic in his smug, neanderthal thinking that he thinks that there is a DIRECT correlation between political leaning and number of democrat or republican voters cast with no other factors influencing the vote!

Fact is that the Left have waved their pimply, adolescent, smelly ass out there so far naked in public both while Obama was in office and especially now since Trump took office, that they've forced many once certain democrats into reconsidering the party they once believed in! All one needs to do is look at a country by country breakdown of the nation to see that we are a nation of conservative, traditional values and the Leftist Loonibirds are mainly in a few clutches along either coast, increasingly isolated by their own naive, idealistic intolerance of others.


electoral-map-county.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good article. Just one man's opinion---but one who was right in Nov. 2016. And who reminds us that the Polls are put out by the same Propagandists who bring us the FAKE NEWS--the Pravda Subsidiary of the Democratic Party---now out of the closet as the Socialist Party.

Mid-Term Prediction: HUGE RED WAVE to Hit America After Disgusting Kavanaugh Attacks ...(And We Were Right in 2016 Too!)

"The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been harping for months that there is going to be a “blue wave” this year because this is the pattern after a President and his Party win a national election and the House. However, this is not the total truth.


According to one report, Republicans do much better than Democrats in the midterm elections in this scenario going back to WWII –"


On average, Democrat presidents lose 35.2 seats in the House. Republican presidents only lose 11.2 seats in the House in their first midterm on average. Again, this is every president since WWII, so this is a very extensive analysis.
___________


Also note--us Deplorables are really, really pissed---REALLY pissed, at how Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court has been treated. This ain't Cuba.

They seethe with hatred. Kind of hard for them to hide it. And yes it’s a gift.
 
Democrat hatred of Trump runs wide and deep fueled by fake news and the Neo-Marxist smear machine funded by George Soros. We are only seeing the tip of the iceberg of hatred. These people are truly mentally disturbed and probably dangerous.
 
Good article. Just one man's opinion---but one who was right in Nov. 2016. And who reminds us that the Polls are put out by the same Propagandists who bring us the FAKE NEWS--the Pravda Subsidiary of the Democratic Party---now out of the closet as the Socialist Party.

Mid-Term Prediction: HUGE RED WAVE to Hit America After Disgusting Kavanaugh Attacks ...(And We Were Right in 2016 Too!)

"The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been harping for months that there is going to be a “blue wave” this year because this is the pattern after a President and his Party win a national election and the House. However, this is not the total truth.


According to one report, Republicans do much better than Democrats in the midterm elections in this scenario going back to WWII –"


On average, Democrat presidents lose 35.2 seats in the House. Republican presidents only lose 11.2 seats in the House in their first midterm on average. Again, this is every president since WWII, so this is a very extensive analysis.
___________


Also note--us Deplorables are really, really pissed---REALLY pissed, at how Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court has been treated. This ain't Cuba.



The only way a blue wave will hit is if they get better at cheating.


43124682_10215332986172132_2565932553483583488_n.jpg
 
Blah, blah, blah. Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. Your dinosaur ways will soon end.

PickPocket as usual padding the walls of his isolation cell in his mother's attic just to keep his sanity during the lean Trump years. Saying Trump lost the popular vote is like saying Hillary failed to get the NRA nomination-- -- -- neither one amounts to a hill of beans in winning the office! Yes, our ways will end soon, any day now, that is why all us "dinosaurs" threw your worthless asses out in historic losses starting in 2010, again in 2014 and now in 2016. If you guys don't take back YUGE gains this fall in Congress it will be considered another big loss.

If you think the Great Red Curtain is about to fall next week, dude, think again. Conservatism is on the rise! The nation has seen the naked, raw, smelly ass of the Left and rejected it-------- the only way you win any elections at all or the popular vote is with millions of illegal votes--- --- that too is coming to an end.


View attachment 220223

AMERICA - a SEA of RED.
”Conservatism is on the rise! The nation has seen the naked, raw, smelly ass of the Left and rejected it”

And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

And that “sea of red,” is actually mostly dirt.

You really nave nothing better than that old canard?
 
Good article. Just one man's opinion---but one who was right in Nov. 2016. And who reminds us that the Polls are put out by the same Propagandists who bring us the FAKE NEWS--the Pravda Subsidiary of the Democratic Party---now out of the closet as the Socialist Party.

Mid-Term Prediction: HUGE RED WAVE to Hit America After Disgusting Kavanaugh Attacks ...(And We Were Right in 2016 Too!)

"The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been harping for months that there is going to be a “blue wave” this year because this is the pattern after a President and his Party win a national election and the House. However, this is not the total truth.


According to one report, Republicans do much better than Democrats in the midterm elections in this scenario going back to WWII –"


On average, Democrat presidents lose 35.2 seats in the House. Republican presidents only lose 11.2 seats in the House in their first midterm on average. Again, this is every president since WWII, so this is a very extensive analysis.
___________


Also note--us Deplorables are really, really pissed---REALLY pissed, at how Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court has been treated. This ain't Cuba.

Blah, blah, blah. Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. A Dem candidate that almost everyone despised...and he still could not beat her in votes.

You Trumpbots are the fringe...you are mostly old, 'white', racist, misogynistic, uneducated hicks who live in the sticks and who watch Fox News on dinosaur TV.
The rest of us (Dem or independents) laugh at your 1950's mentalities and ideals.
You are the past. You will mostly be dead in a decade or two...and will be forgotten.

The Dems and Indy's did not take the Trump threat seriously in 2016. They take it VERY seriously now. Dems are registering at a record pace for midterms...far above record pace.
And there are far more of them then there are of you.
The economy is booming (in theory - not in practise) and still Trump is nowhere near 50% at the respected polls.

Your dinosaur ways will soon end. Your power will be reduced in a couple of months. And when Trump is thrown out in 2020...it will die for good.

Guaranteed.

Have a wonderful day.

Sad Snowflake response.
 
And by that, you mean Hillary getting more votes than Trump.

For one thing, we all know that take away the illegal vote and she probably wouldn't have even gotten the popular vote! But it is still no matter if all your votes are around LA, Chicago and NYC! The Founders designed a system so that THE WHOLE COUNTRY was fairly represented, expressly designed to prevent local regions from monopolizing the country. Trump scored heavily in nearly EVERY state. Hillary scored heavy in only the preeminently blue states. You don't get to be president when you can only take 40% of the states next to Trump's 60%. That is a 20% difference. Electorally, Trump crushed her, and THAT IS ALL THAT REALLY MATTERS.

Everything else you say is only so many whinny baby tears. Maybe had Hillary actually campaigned in all 50 states instead of flying over half of them thinking them disposable, she might have won. That is, if she could keep from coughing, hacking, choking and falling over.
Dumbfuck, you claimed conservatism is on the rise. That speaks to people, not states. And while states elect the president and the people do not, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump — which speaks to your idiocy of conservatism being on the rise, not to who won the election.

As far as illegal aliens voting, a few were found. About 3 million short of the ones you need to lucidly claim Trump won the popular vote. You should know that since trump tried to look for illegal voters and failed miserably.
Again for the slow, IT DOES NOT MATTER if every person in California votes for one person it takes the electoral college to elect the President.
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

You’re fucking demented.

It’s not about what matters... it’s not about the electoral college... it’s not about winning the election...

it’s about your asinine comment that Conservatism is on the rise.

How’s that possible when Hillary got more votes than trump?

Savvy?
Again with out California Trump had over a million more votes then Hillary. It does not matter that a super majority of people in California support the D's it matters what the other 49 States have. Plus how many illegals are there in California again?
So what if many Liberals live in California? Your idiotic claim is that conservatism is on the rise. How is that possible when Hillary got more votes than Trump?

If anything, ya moron, it’s actually Liberalism that’s on the rise...

 

Forum List

Back
Top