Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit bush had no real involvement in "keeping us safe" .I recall everyone saying it wasn't a question of if, but when the US was struck again. Didn't happen. W did keep us safe. Get over it and be grateful. We really didn't need another 9/11.
I wonder if Bush had a clear shot on Obama like Clinton did. Seems if Clinton hadn't whimped out:How the fuck was that trolling? OBl is a major player if not the architect of 9/11.Trolling is a zone 2 inappropriate behavior infraction. Clean up your act and add something worthwhile to the discussion, and leave your troll bull shit on your face.Yeah...we know the RW still mourns OBL.Gee... that wouldn't have ever happened had pervert Bubba Clinton captured obama bin laden when he was offered to him.
Ooops, I mean osama... there's only a little BS difference between the two.
Anything said about him is relevent.
Bill Clinton's Chilling Statements Hours Before 9/11 Attacks
Nope that's all you guys.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?His brother had an intelligence report about Bin Laden planning an attack on U.S. soil one month before this happened:
Safe?
Are you fucking kidding me?
That happened on W.'s watch.
The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
This is leftwing history whitewashing.
\His brother had an intelligence report about Bin Laden planning an attack on U.S. soil one month before this happened:
Safe?
Are you fucking kidding me?
hat happened on W.'s watch.
Clinton had obl on a silver platter and refused to take him. Had he taken him, 3000 americans wouldnt have died.
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault? lol
Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?
A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens.
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault?
Indeed, red lights were blinking all over the board...
With no information of when where or how
And so he did nothing at all. Brilliant leadership there.
Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Let's get something straight, Bush received much more than a single warning. He ignored all of it because he was focused elsewhere and he wanted a war.
"On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
These and other similar warnings were ignored by the White House. The Neocons in charge insisted that the threat was instead a coordinated diversion meant to distract attention from Saddam Hussein, according to Eichenwald. This opinion frustrated the intelligence community, who saw the theory as totally illogical." Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider
and WHICH of those warnings would have prevented 9-11?
Which gave a MONTH, much less a DAY.
Which gave a CLUE of the method of the attack?
Operation Bojinka was formulated in 1995, and not mentioned in either PDB.
Was it mentioned in any of the other warnings?
Again, there was enough information for Clinton to raise airport security at some airports and potentially thwart the attack. Why didn't Bush do that?Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?His brother had an intelligence report about Bin Laden planning an attack on U.S. soil one month before this happened:
Safe?
Are you fucking kidding me?
That happened on W.'s watch.
The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Clinton took action and there was no attack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the attack happened after he had left office.
The PDB Bush got had, for the most part, the same information, and was years old.
and there was NOTHING IN IT that would have prevented 9-11.
If there was information in it about Operation Bojinka, you MIGHT have a point.
There wasn't.
So, no point.
But it's been a GREAT exercise in futility trying to open the eyes of the left for OVER A DECADE.
\His brother had an intelligence report about Bin Laden planning an attack on U.S. soil one month before this happened:
Safe?
Are you fucking kidding me?
hat happened on W.'s watch.
Clinton had obl on a silver platter and refused to take him. Had he taken him, 3000 americans wouldnt have died.
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault? lol
Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?
A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens.
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault?
Indeed, red lights were blinking all over the board...
With no information of when where or how
And so he did nothing at all. Brilliant leadership there.
Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Let's get something straight, Bush received much more than a single warning. He ignored all of it because he was focused elsewhere and he wanted a war.
"On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
These and other similar warnings were ignored by the White House. The Neocons in charge insisted that the threat was instead a coordinated diversion meant to distract attention from Saddam Hussein, according to Eichenwald. This opinion frustrated the intelligence community, who saw the theory as totally illogical." Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider
and WHICH of those warnings would have prevented 9-11?
Which gave a MONTH, much less a DAY.
Which gave a CLUE of the method of the attack?
Operation Bojinka was formulated in 1995, and not mentioned in either PDB.
Was it mentioned in any of the other warnings?
Nothing could have prevented it unless you had a time machine , went back to the middle east 100 years ago and changed the way we handled that region.\His brother had an intelligence report about Bin Laden planning an attack on U.S. soil one month before this happened:
Safe?
Are you fucking kidding me?
hat happened on W.'s watch.
Clinton had obl on a silver platter and refused to take him. Had he taken him, 3000 americans wouldnt have died.
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault? lol
Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?
A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens.
Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?
Oh right Dubya IGNORING a dozen plus high level warnings was Bill's fault?
Indeed, red lights were blinking all over the board...
With no information of when where or how
And so he did nothing at all. Brilliant leadership there.
Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Let's get something straight, Bush received much more than a single warning. He ignored all of it because he was focused elsewhere and he wanted a war.
"On May 1 the CIA said that a terrorist group in the U.S. was planning an attack.
On June 22 it warned that this attack was "imminent."
On June 29 the brief warned of near-term attacks with "dramatic consequences" including major casualties.
On July 1, the briefing said that the terrorist attack had been delayed but "will occur soon."
On July 24, the president was told again that the attack had been delayed but would occur within months.
These and other similar warnings were ignored by the White House. The Neocons in charge insisted that the threat was instead a coordinated diversion meant to distract attention from Saddam Hussein, according to Eichenwald. This opinion frustrated the intelligence community, who saw the theory as totally illogical." Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider
and WHICH of those warnings would have prevented 9-11?
Which gave a MONTH, much less a DAY.
Which gave a CLUE of the method of the attack?
Operation Bojinka was formulated in 1995, and not mentioned in either PDB.
Was it mentioned in any of the other warnings?
Again, there was enough information for Clinton to raise airport security at some airports and potentially thwart the attack. Why didn't Bush do that?Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?The August PDB?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You should read it sometime.
And then read it's father...
the PDB Clinton got in December 1998.
Which had most of the information Bush got in August.
You can't imagine how amusing I find it when someone brings up that PDB.
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Clinton took action and there was no attack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the attack happened after he had left office.
The PDB Bush got had, for the most part, the same information, and was years old.
and there was NOTHING IN IT that would have prevented 9-11.
If there was information in it about Operation Bojinka, you MIGHT have a point.
There wasn't.
So, no point.
But it's been a GREAT exercise in futility trying to open the eyes of the left for OVER A DECADE.
And here's what you call, "years old" information ....
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
The Bush fluffing continues.
including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
Just giving credit where credit is due
IMO...No one could think outside the box into imagining someone would be willing to kill themselves so dramatically...at least so many at once.
Just giving credit where credit is due
I always felt that Bush and Cheney knew an attack would happen, they just didn't think it would be as dramatic as it turned out.
Could have increased airport security. It worked for Clinton.Again, there was enough information for Clinton to raise airport security at some airports and potentially thwart the attack. Why didn't Bush do that?Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.If Bush's 2001 PDB had "most of the information" as Clinton's 1998 PDB, why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't?
why was Clinton able to thwart the attack but Bush couldn't
Clinton thwarted an attack?
Clinton took action and there was no attack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the attack happened after he had left office.
The PDB Bush got had, for the most part, the same information, and was years old.
and there was NOTHING IN IT that would have prevented 9-11.
If there was information in it about Operation Bojinka, you MIGHT have a point.
There wasn't.
So, no point.
But it's been a GREAT exercise in futility trying to open the eyes of the left for OVER A DECADE.
And here's what you call, "years old" information ....
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
The Bush fluffing continues.
including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
I said 90% was old, or did you miss that?
as to the recent surveillance of federal buildings in NY?
Could have put up barriers and strip searched everyone entering and leaving those federal buildings.
wouldn't have prevented ONE plane from flying into the twin towers, would it?
and the only time I can find Bill increasing airport security was in 1996.
about a year after Operation Bojinka, and before the rumor of hijacking planes to trade for the blind sheik.
Keep playing, tho.
Maybe you'll get a consolation prize.
Could have increased airport security. It worked for Clinton.Again, there was enough information for Clinton to raise airport security at some airports and potentially thwart the attack. Why didn't Bush do that?Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.Clinton thwarted an attack?
Clinton took action and there was no attack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the attack happened after he had left office.
The PDB Bush got had, for the most part, the same information, and was years old.
and there was NOTHING IN IT that would have prevented 9-11.
If there was information in it about Operation Bojinka, you MIGHT have a point.
There wasn't.
So, no point.
But it's been a GREAT exercise in futility trying to open the eyes of the left for OVER A DECADE.
And here's what you call, "years old" information ....
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
The Bush fluffing continues.
including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
I said 90% was old, or did you miss that?
as to the recent surveillance of federal buildings in NY?
Could have put up barriers and strip searched everyone entering and leaving those federal buildings.
wouldn't have prevented ONE plane from flying into the twin towers, would it?
and the only time I can find Bill increasing airport security was in 1996.
about a year after Operation Bojinka, and before the rumor of hijacking planes to trade for the blind sheik.
Keep playing, tho.
Maybe you'll get a consolation prize.
You clearly don't know ... Clinton raised airport security in 1999, after receiving that warning. You know, the similar warning you point out was 90% the same as Bush's warning; only Bush did absolutely nothing in response to.Could have increased airport security. It worked for Clinton.Again, there was enough information for Clinton to raise airport security at some airports and potentially thwart the attack. Why didn't Bush do that?Apparently. Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential attack inside the U.S. The PDB you mentioned. Clinton took action and there was no attack. Bush received a similar PDB which, as you also mentioned, contained much of the information Clinton was given. In response, unlike Clinton, Bush did absolutely nothing and the result was the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. I'm just wondering why, since both presidents were given similar warnings, Clinton was able to thwart the attack whereas not only did Bush fail to do so -- he didn't even try.
Clinton took action and there was no attack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the attack happened after he had left office.
The PDB Bush got had, for the most part, the same information, and was years old.
and there was NOTHING IN IT that would have prevented 9-11.
If there was information in it about Operation Bojinka, you MIGHT have a point.
There wasn't.
So, no point.
But it's been a GREAT exercise in futility trying to open the eyes of the left for OVER A DECADE.
And here's what you call, "years old" information ....
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
The Bush fluffing continues.
including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
I said 90% was old, or did you miss that?
as to the recent surveillance of federal buildings in NY?
Could have put up barriers and strip searched everyone entering and leaving those federal buildings.
wouldn't have prevented ONE plane from flying into the twin towers, would it?
and the only time I can find Bill increasing airport security was in 1996.
about a year after Operation Bojinka, and before the rumor of hijacking planes to trade for the blind sheik.
Keep playing, tho.
Maybe you'll get a consolation prize.
He increased airport security in 1996, 2 years before his PDB.
LEAVING OUT ONE ATTACK? Oh right the one where 3,000+ American's died
