Did last nights debate harm Trumps chances at winning the nomination?

[longknife]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

 

[Avatar4321]

If this was a sane and logical world it would

 

[rightwinger]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

 

[deltex1]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

When did the moral high ground ever win a war?

 

[Redfish]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

you live in a dream world. American soldiers and civilians are ALREADY being subjected to much worse things than water boarding. Beheading, burned alive, drowned in a cage. WTF is wrong with you? Being nice to murdering bastards who want to kill all of us will only get more of us killed.

You fricken libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Plenty of cons and centrists oppose torture etc.

Trump wisely backed off the stupid statement, saying he would never order an officer to break the law.

 

[rightwinger]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

When did the moral high ground ever win a war?

We have held a moral high ground in every war
How did poison gas work out in WWI?
Why haven't we resorted to nuclear weapons again?
Why aren't our troops trained to torture and maim?

 

[rightwinger]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

you live in a dream world. American soldiers and civilians are ALREADY being subjected to much worse things than water boarding. Beheading, burned alive, drowned in a cage. WTF is wrong with you? Being nice to murdering bastards who want to kill all of us will only get more of us killed.

You fricken libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.

Crime is crime and those who engage in it are punished
Our pilots routinely engage in missions against civilian targets. When captured, they can be tried as war criminals and tortured for information that can save lives.
Sinking to the level of terrorists does nothing to help our cause except demonstrate to the world we are no better than terrorists

 

[Redfish]

Plenty of cons and centrists oppose torture etc.

Trump wisely backed off the stupid statement, saying he would never order an officer to break the law.

having water squirted up your nose in not torture.

it does no permanent physical or mental damage. Scares the shit out of the person for a few minutes, but its not torture.

Pouring gasoline on your nuts and then lighting it is torture. ramming a cattle prod up your ass is torture. sticking a red hot poker in your eye is torture.

once again, you fricken libs have no idea how the real world operates.

 

[eagle1462010]

This style of attack will go on until November......regardless of who finally wins..................

The Hillary attack machine will attack, attack, attack..................and she will get it in return..........

We will see one of the dirtiest contests in a life time on this one..............

But they have always done so..........

 

[Redfish]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

you live in a dream world. American soldiers and civilians are ALREADY being subjected to much worse things than water boarding. Beheading, burned alive, drowned in a cage. WTF is wrong with you? Being nice to murdering bastards who want to kill all of us will only get more of us killed.

You fricken libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.

Crime is crime and those who engage in it are punished
Our pilots routinely engage in missions against civilian targets. When captured, they can be tried as war criminals and tortured for information that can save lives.
Sinking to the level of terrorists does nothing to help our cause except demonstrate to the world we are no better than terrorists

OMG, you are truly a moron. War is about killing the enemy faster than he kills you. There are no rules. How many innocent civilians did we kill at Hiroshima? Second question, how many American and Japanese lives were saved by ending the war at Hiroshima?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Plenty of cons and centrists oppose torture etc.

Trump wisely backed off the stupid statement, saying he would never order an officer to break the law.

having water squirted up your nose in not torture.

it does no permanent physical or mental damage. Scares the shit out of the person for a few minutes, but its not torture.

Pouring gasoline on your nuts and then lighting it is torture. ramming a cattle prod up your ass is torture. sticking a red hot poker in your eye is torture.

once again, you fricken libs have no idea how the real world operates.

It is a good thing the only item you are charge of is your play pen.

 

[Redfish]

Plenty of cons and centrists oppose torture etc.

Trump wisely backed off the stupid statement, saying he would never order an officer to break the law.

having water squirted up your nose in not torture.

it does no permanent physical or mental damage. Scares the shit out of the person for a few minutes, but its not torture.

Pouring gasoline on your nuts and then lighting it is torture. ramming a cattle prod up your ass is torture. sticking a red hot poker in your eye is torture.

once again, you fricken libs have no idea how the real world operates.

It is a good thing the only item you are charge of is your play pen.

I would venture a guess that my lifetime responsibilities and accomplishments are significantly greater than yours. I have done business in the mid east, I know how arabs and muslims view life, and where they place their priorities. They do not think and believe as we do.

Naivete such as yours is why the USA has become the laughing stock of the world under obozo.

 

[rightwinger]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

you live in a dream world. American soldiers and civilians are ALREADY being subjected to much worse things than water boarding. Beheading, burned alive, drowned in a cage. WTF is wrong with you? Being nice to murdering bastards who want to kill all of us will only get more of us killed.

You fricken libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.

Crime is crime and those who engage in it are punished
Our pilots routinely engage in missions against civilian targets. When captured, they can be tried as war criminals and tortured for information that can save lives.
Sinking to the level of terrorists does nothing to help our cause except demonstrate to the world we are no better than terrorists

OMG, you are truly a moron. War is about killing the enemy faster than he kills you. There are no rules. How many innocent civilians did we kill at Hiroshima? Second question, how many American and Japanese lives were saved by ending the war at Hiroshima?

Civilized societies have rules of war.
After WWI we banned poison gas....it was too horrible
After WWII we banned nuclear weapons ......it was too horrible

Conservatives want to return us to the Middle Ages when family members were killed in retaliation and torture was routine

 

[Redfish]

The question whether or not the military would follow any "illegal orders" to torture prisoners was lame and a clear shot at Trump.

Uniform Code of Military Justice -- which is the most difficult-to-crack part of the legal puzzle. The UCMJ is a federal statute that prohibits U.S. armed forces from, among other things, engaging in cruelty, oppression or maltreatment of prisoners (art. 93), assaulting prisoners (art. 128) (a prohibition that includes a demonstration of violence that results in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm), and communicating a threat to wrongfully injure a detainee (art. 134).

The answer to getting about this is simple - have individuals who are not subject to the UCMJ do the interrogating!

As to his answer that the military would do as he wished - I think that is closer to the truth than most leftists wish to hear. When the military respects their Commander-in-Chief and knows he has their backs, they will carry out his orders "to the best of their abilities" and Trump's answer shows he respects and admires the military.

Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?
79% say "Yes" - 21% say :"no" @ Should the U.S. be allowed to use torture techniques on terrorists?

So, I think a whole lot of viewers nodded their approval of The Donald's stand on treating terrorists/jihadists

Trump does not have our military's back. He never has.

Open the door to torture and you open the door to our troops being subjected to the same treatment. Not just by terrorists, but any nation we are in conflict with
We have lost the moral high ground and surrendered to the end justifies the means

you live in a dream world. American soldiers and civilians are ALREADY being subjected to much worse things than water boarding. Beheading, burned alive, drowned in a cage. WTF is wrong with you? Being nice to murdering bastards who want to kill all of us will only get more of us killed.

You fricken libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.

Crime is crime and those who engage in it are punished
Our pilots routinely engage in missions against civilian targets. When captured, they can be tried as war criminals and tortured for information that can save lives.
Sinking to the level of terrorists does nothing to help our cause except demonstrate to the world we are no better than terrorists

OMG, you are truly a moron. War is about killing the enemy faster than he kills you. There are no rules. How many innocent civilians did we kill at Hiroshima? Second question, how many American and Japanese lives were saved by ending the war at Hiroshima?

Civilized societies have rules of war.
After WWI we banned poison gas....it was too horrible
After WWII we banned nuclear weapons ......it was too horrible

Conservatives want to return us to the Middle Ages when family members were killed in retaliation and torture was routine

But dropping bombs from drones and blowing people into tiny pieces is OK ? War is hell, the way to stop the hell is to end them quickly by destroying the enemy completely. Truman understood that------------------BTW, Truman was a democrat.

 

[bodecea]

Water boarding and killing Isis fighters at their dinner table are concepts I can live with. Trump was unscathed.

Even though both are classified as "war crimes"?

If they are...why hasn't Obama brought Vlad to trial?

Admiring Putin, the new RW hero.

 

[MrShangles]

It was basically a sloppy 5 on 1 attack on The Donald. John Kasich is in his own Ben Carson reality so he doesn't count. The Donald is defending himself from the MSM, and the ZOG, just fine.

What do you think his motivation is?

It's to make America great again


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[JakeStarkey]

I would venture a guess that my lifetime responsibilities and accomplishments are significantly greater than yours. I have done business in the mid east, I know how arabs and muslims view life, and where they place their priorities. They do not think and believe as we do. Naivete such as yours is why the USA has become the laughing stock of the world under obozo.

If so, then why is your understanding of the word so immature?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The admiration of Putin by the far right reveals their desire for authoritarian leaders. They need to be governed instead of governing.

 

[Redfish]

I would venture a guess that my lifetime responsibilities and accomplishments are significantly greater than yours. I have done business in the mid east, I know how arabs and muslims view life, and where they place their priorities. They do not think and believe as we do. Naivete such as yours is why the USA has become the laughing stock of the world under obozo.

If so, then why is your understanding of the word so immature?

the immature view of the world is yours my little friend.