Disgusting, Violent Video.

[Crixus]

Someone has made a video using trump, the media and politicians.

It's a video of trump going on a murdering rampage killing media and politicians in a church.

This video was played at a republican gathering at Mar a Largo. Republicans have denied any involvement but how did it get played at Mar A Largo?

Before you far right radical conservative extremists go off on what Kathy Griffen did, I personally denounced it and she paid a heavy price for it. It doesn't give you people the right to be worse. If you are like me and believe what Kathy Griffen did was very wrong, you certainly should believe this video is very wrong.

Macabre Video of Fake Trump Shooting Media and Critics Is Shown at His Resort

I think a Democrat made that film-to hurt Trump.

If so it didn't work. I liked it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The right wing went a bit crazy over the Kathy Griffin video....

yeah why isn't she in jail? She threatened decapitation of a sitting president.

She did huh.

----------- Link?

sure, she held his head dripping in blood. what else was she implying?

What you inferred is irrelevant. You said she made a threat, Where is it?

Isn't it weird that the far right radical conservative extremists don't know the difference between a mannequin head and a real head?

She wasn't holding trump's head. If she had been he would be dead and she would be in on death row right now.

The far right radical conservative extremists sure are very dramatic. Yet they don't have a problem with the video.

Well, it's not like you Communists don't know the difference between Jib-Jab faces pasted over the Kingsmen and a real film.

BUT you're hypocritical enough to throw a shitfit anyway. Oh, and if you Stalinists want to boycott the filmmaker, by all means do...

 

[toobfreak]

Far too many Trump supporters are disgusting, violent people.

That is right, Clayhead, for three years the Left have been staging Trump assassinations, Trump beheadings, Trump massacres on stage, wishing Trump dead, talk of locking him up, killing him, and now some loon takes a movie scene and puts Trump's head on it and WE are the disgusting, violent people!

Agreed. Too many of you on both sides are behaving like ass clowns, but only get upset when the other side does it.

I was upset when both did it. Kathy Griffen was wrong to do what she did.

Whoever made that video was wrong for doing it.

But then, I've been a registered Independent since 1978. I don't care what party a person is affiliated with.

I just don't like when people get upset about it only when the other side does it.

One Big Sad Tragic difference here, though, Dana, what Griffin did and many others on the Left have done, Robert DeNiro, some stage play, etc., were all PUBLIC demonstrations of CONTEMPT AND HATE for the POTUS. Meant to popularize and SPREAD that hate and contempt. Make it fashionable, even. That video was a PRIVATE event, probably meant nothing more than a joke perhaps exemplifying Trump's exasperation with the dishonest media for a few laughs, and someone CHOSE to make it public. Or perhaps that was the intention all along, to try to again harm Trump's image? Either way, they were obviously not acting out of friendship for The Donald.

How many other events have you heard about that go on behind the closed doors there at Mar-a-lago?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The video lie fell apart in days - yet here you are still lying about it...

Sad.

It wasn't a lie, ya dumbfucking insane poster. It's what our intelligence community believed at first was the most likely cause.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf​

Not only was it a lie, psychopath, the Obamugabe regime had considered using a different lie that that a video from a pastor in Oregon was the catalyst. The CIA was under the rule of fucking KGB Agent John Brennan at the time - they had and have ZERO credibility.

And of course you are a pathological liar, as every last person on the board know.

{
o Examination of Blumenthal’s emails, as leaked by hacker Guccifer, shows that reports sent by Blumenthal were gathered by Drumheller.

• 12 Sep 12 (2326 ET): SecState Clinton wrote to Jake Sullivan “We should get this [Drumheller note] around asap.”

• 12 Sep 12 (2330 ET): Clinton forwarded to top aide Jake Sullivan email briefing rec’d that morning from Sid Blumenthal about report to Libyan president el-Magariaf that blamed YouTube video, with the words, “More info.”

• 13 Sep 12: Max Blumenthal published an op-ed making similar claimsas his blog entry the day before.

• 13 Sep 12: Jay Carney: “”The protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie…”

• September 13, 2012, Hillary Clinton metwith Moroccan Foreign Minister Saad-Eddine Al-Othmani. She condemned what she called the “disgusting and reprehensible” anti-Muslim video and the violence that it triggered.

• 14 Sep 12 (0930 ET): SecState Clinton held meeting w/Susan Rice

• 14 Sep 12: Jay Carney “protests were in reaction to a video”

• 14 Sep 12 (1415 ET): SecState Clinton attended transfer of remains ceremony. She told Tyrone Woods’ father, Charles Woods,“We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”

• 14 Sep 12 (1832 ET): Sidney Blumenthal sent SecState Clinton memo which states, “In addition, he stated in private that Morsi and al-Katany spoke with Libyan President Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf, and they had all agreed that military and security officials in Egypt and Libya will cooperate in an effort to track links between the violence in Cairo and Benghazi.” (SecState Clinton response that it should be printed dated 23 Sep 12)

• 14 Sep 12 (1833 ET): DoS Victoria Nuland notified re CIA talking points

• 14 Sep 12 (NLT 1739 ET): Jake Sullivan included in process

• 14 Sep 12 (2124 ET): Nuland refers to “issues” the “building leadership” has with the talking points. Sends email to Sullivan at same time

• 14 Sep 12 (2125 ET): Sullivan indicates he spoke w/Tommy Vietor & talking points would be addressed next day.

• 15 Sep 12: CIA Acting Director Michael Morell made massive edits to talking points. Sullivan’s name appears on the page

• Per Judicial Watch email: at Secure Video Teleconference (SVTS), “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy editing hand to them. He noted that he would be happy to work with Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points. McDonough, on Rhode’s behalf, deferred to Sullivan. It was agreed that Jake would work closely with the intelligence community (within a small group) to finalize points on Saturday that could be shared with HPSCI.”

• 15 Sep 12: Jake Sullivan worked w/UN Amb. Susan Rice to prep her for next day Sunday talk shows. From Judicial Watch: “I spoke to Jake immediately after the SVTS andnoted that you were doing the Sunday morning shows and would need to be aware of the final posture that these points took. He committed to ensure that we were updated in advance of the Sunday I specifically mentioned Erin Pelton as the one coordinating your preparations for the shows and also strongly encouraged him to loop in Rexon during the process.”

• 16 Sep 12: Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf told Bob Shieffer on “Face the Nation”: “…this leaves us with no doubt that this was preplanned, determined—pre-meditated months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their arrival”

• 16 Sep 12: Amb. Susan Rice on 5 Sunday talk shows, including “Face the Nation,” directly after Libyan president

• “we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned”

• “What happened in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result – a direct result of a heinous and offensive video”

• 16 Sep 12: Sullivan monitored Susan Rice’s appearances.

• 16 Sep 12 (1221 ET): Email states, “But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved. The only troubling sentence relates to the investigation, specifically: ‘And we’ll see when the investigation unfolds whether what was — what transpired in Benghazi might have unfolded differently in different circumstances.’”

• Rice’s comments: “In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated. We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to — or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in — in the wake of the revolution in Libya are — are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there.”

• 16 Sep 12 (1439): SecState Clinton’s response to Meet the Press transcript of Susan Rice’s appearance has been redacted by State Department

• 18 Sep 12: Jay Carney “…it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped — that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi…”

• 19 Sep 12: Jay Carney “do not yet have indication that it was pre-planned”

• 19 Sep 12: Matt Olson, NCTC to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joe Lieberman on whether the attack was a terrorist attack: “They were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

• 20 Sep 12: Jay Carney admits terrorism

• 20 Sep 12: Obama at Univision town hall meeting “”What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

• 21 Sep 12: SecState Clinton admits terror and after that, post-UN speech, video narrative was abandoned

• 28 Sep 12: Film producer Mark Basseley Youssef arrested, sentenced to 1 yr. in jail for “probation violations”}

Benghazi: The Cover-Up Timeline - Center for Security Policy

OMG You mean Government issued talking points aren't always truthful?

Say it ain't so, Sally, say it ain't so.

Yet here you are all these years later, still lying...

First lies I remember were the Body Counts from Vietnam on the Evening News.

Bet you thought those were true too huh?

I remember Walter Cronkite lying that the NVA won a major battle every night. I was too young to know what fucking liars the left are back then. Later I found out that Cronkite was Ho Chi Mihn's right hand man.

 

[BlindBoo]

It wasn't a lie, ya dumbfucking insane poster. It's what our intelligence community believed at first was the most likely cause.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf​

Not only was it a lie, psychopath, the Obamugabe regime had considered using a different lie that that a video from a pastor in Oregon was the catalyst. The CIA was under the rule of fucking KGB Agent John Brennan at the time - they had and have ZERO credibility.

And of course you are a pathological liar, as every last person on the board know.

{
o Examination of Blumenthal’s emails, as leaked by hacker Guccifer, shows that reports sent by Blumenthal were gathered by Drumheller.

• 12 Sep 12 (2326 ET): SecState Clinton wrote to Jake Sullivan “We should get this [Drumheller note] around asap.”

• 12 Sep 12 (2330 ET): Clinton forwarded to top aide Jake Sullivan email briefing rec’d that morning from Sid Blumenthal about report to Libyan president el-Magariaf that blamed YouTube video, with the words, “More info.”

• 13 Sep 12: Max Blumenthal published an op-ed making similar claimsas his blog entry the day before.

• 13 Sep 12: Jay Carney: “”The protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie…”

• September 13, 2012, Hillary Clinton metwith Moroccan Foreign Minister Saad-Eddine Al-Othmani. She condemned what she called the “disgusting and reprehensible” anti-Muslim video and the violence that it triggered.

• 14 Sep 12 (0930 ET): SecState Clinton held meeting w/Susan Rice

• 14 Sep 12: Jay Carney “protests were in reaction to a video”

• 14 Sep 12 (1415 ET): SecState Clinton attended transfer of remains ceremony. She told Tyrone Woods’ father, Charles Woods,“We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”

• 14 Sep 12 (1832 ET): Sidney Blumenthal sent SecState Clinton memo which states, “In addition, he stated in private that Morsi and al-Katany spoke with Libyan President Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf, and they had all agreed that military and security officials in Egypt and Libya will cooperate in an effort to track links between the violence in Cairo and Benghazi.” (SecState Clinton response that it should be printed dated 23 Sep 12)

• 14 Sep 12 (1833 ET): DoS Victoria Nuland notified re CIA talking points

• 14 Sep 12 (NLT 1739 ET): Jake Sullivan included in process

• 14 Sep 12 (2124 ET): Nuland refers to “issues” the “building leadership” has with the talking points. Sends email to Sullivan at same time

• 14 Sep 12 (2125 ET): Sullivan indicates he spoke w/Tommy Vietor & talking points would be addressed next day.

• 15 Sep 12: CIA Acting Director Michael Morell made massive edits to talking points. Sullivan’s name appears on the page

• Per Judicial Watch email: at Secure Video Teleconference (SVTS), “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy editing hand to them. He noted that he would be happy to work with Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points. McDonough, on Rhode’s behalf, deferred to Sullivan. It was agreed that Jake would work closely with the intelligence community (within a small group) to finalize points on Saturday that could be shared with HPSCI.”

• 15 Sep 12: Jake Sullivan worked w/UN Amb. Susan Rice to prep her for next day Sunday talk shows. From Judicial Watch: “I spoke to Jake immediately after the SVTS andnoted that you were doing the Sunday morning shows and would need to be aware of the final posture that these points took. He committed to ensure that we were updated in advance of the Sunday I specifically mentioned Erin Pelton as the one coordinating your preparations for the shows and also strongly encouraged him to loop in Rexon during the process.”

• 16 Sep 12: Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf told Bob Shieffer on “Face the Nation”: “…this leaves us with no doubt that this was preplanned, determined—pre-meditated months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their arrival”

• 16 Sep 12: Amb. Susan Rice on 5 Sunday talk shows, including “Face the Nation,” directly after Libyan president

• “we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned”

• “What happened in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result – a direct result of a heinous and offensive video”

• 16 Sep 12: Sullivan monitored Susan Rice’s appearances.

• 16 Sep 12 (1221 ET): Email states, “But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved. The only troubling sentence relates to the investigation, specifically: ‘And we’ll see when the investigation unfolds whether what was — what transpired in Benghazi might have unfolded differently in different circumstances.’”

• Rice’s comments: “In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated. We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to — or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in — in the wake of the revolution in Libya are — are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there.”

• 16 Sep 12 (1439): SecState Clinton’s response to Meet the Press transcript of Susan Rice’s appearance has been redacted by State Department

• 18 Sep 12: Jay Carney “…it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped — that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi…”

• 19 Sep 12: Jay Carney “do not yet have indication that it was pre-planned”

• 19 Sep 12: Matt Olson, NCTC to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joe Lieberman on whether the attack was a terrorist attack: “They were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

• 20 Sep 12: Jay Carney admits terrorism

• 20 Sep 12: Obama at Univision town hall meeting “”What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

• 21 Sep 12: SecState Clinton admits terror and after that, post-UN speech, video narrative was abandoned

• 28 Sep 12: Film producer Mark Basseley Youssef arrested, sentenced to 1 yr. in jail for “probation violations”}

Benghazi: The Cover-Up Timeline - Center for Security Policy

OMG You mean Government issued talking points aren't always truthful?

Say it ain't so, Sally, say it ain't so.

Yet here you are all these years later, still lying...

First lies I remember were the Body Counts from Vietnam on the Evening News.

Bet you thought those were true too huh?

I remember Walter Cronkite lying that the NVA won a major battle every night. I was too young to know what fucking liars the left are back then. Later I found out that Cronkite was Ho Chi Mihn's right hand man.

You know you're lying. They never won a major battle. We could've sweep away the NVA and been fighting China in a matter of weeks. It was never the Grunts he blamed for the losing strategy.

 

[jknowgood]

Someone has made a video using trump, the media and politicians.

It's a video of trump going on a murdering rampage killing media and politicians in a church.

This video was played at a republican gathering at Mar a Largo. Republicans have denied any involvement but how did it get played at Mar A Largo?

Before you far right radical conservative extremists go off on what Kathy Griffen did, I personally denounced it and she paid a heavy price for it. It doesn't give you people the right to be worse. If you are like me and believe what Kathy Griffen did was very wrong, you certainly should believe this video is very wrong.

Macabre Video of Fake Trump Shooting Media and Critics Is Shown at His Resort

Your side is hateful.

 

[Lakhota]

Sickening...

 

[Correll]

Here is the Kingsman clip. No one had a problem with killing people in church then.


The movie did quite well.

Actually, it was a surprising good movie. And at the risk of spoilers, the bad guys were liberals. Their motive was liberal.

I would recommend it, as an enjoyable movie.

 

[Faun]

Someone has made a video using trump, the media and politicians.

It's a video of trump going on a murdering rampage killing media and politicians in a church.

This video was played at a republican gathering at Mar a Largo. Republicans have denied any involvement but how did it get played at Mar A Largo?

Before you far right radical conservative extremists go off on what Kathy Griffen did, I personally denounced it and she paid a heavy price for it. It doesn't give you people the right to be worse. If you are like me and believe what Kathy Griffen did was very wrong, you certainly should believe this video is very wrong.

Macabre Video of Fake Trump Shooting Media and Critics Is Shown at His Resort

View attachment 284486
Your side is hateful.

LOLOLOL

You rightards crack me up!

 

[Faun]

Sickening...

LOL

What's hysterical is how the loons always try to make trump appear like such a tough guy....

... yeah, they're talkin' about President Bonespurs.

 

[progressive hunter]

Here is the Kingsman clip. No one had a problem with killing people in church then.


The movie did quite well.

Actually, it was a surprising good movie. And at the risk of spoilers, the bad guys were liberals. Their motive was liberal.

I would recommend it, as an enjoyable movie.

they were leftist with a leftist motive,,they were not liberals,,

 

[Correll]

Here is the Kingsman clip. No one had a problem with killing people in church then.


The movie did quite well.

Actually, it was a surprising good movie. And at the risk of spoilers, the bad guys were liberals. Their motive was liberal.

I would recommend it, as an enjoyable movie.

they were leftist with a leftist motive,,they were not liberals,,

The vast majority of "liberals" today, are illiberal leftists.

The bad guys in the movie, would, until the big reveal, would be heroes to the "liberals" on this site, and in mainstream American culture.



Indeed, quite possible, even AFTER the big reveal.

 

[progressive hunter]

Here is the Kingsman clip. No one had a problem with killing people in church then.


The movie did quite well.

Actually, it was a surprising good movie. And at the risk of spoilers, the bad guys were liberals. Their motive was liberal.

I would recommend it, as an enjoyable movie.

they were leftist with a leftist motive,,they were not liberals,,

The vast majority of "liberals" today, are illiberal leftists.

The bad guys in the movie, would, until the big reveal, would be heroes to the "liberals" on this site, and in mainstream American culture.



Indeed, quite possible, even AFTER the big reveal.

they may call themselves liberals but nothing about them is about liberty and freedom,, we should call them progressive leftist just to keep the record straight,,

 

[Correll]

Here is the Kingsman clip. No one had a problem with killing people in church then.


The movie did quite well.

Actually, it was a surprising good movie. And at the risk of spoilers, the bad guys were liberals. Their motive was liberal.

I would recommend it, as an enjoyable movie.

they were leftist with a leftist motive,,they were not liberals,,

The vast majority of "liberals" today, are illiberal leftists.

The bad guys in the movie, would, until the big reveal, would be heroes to the "liberals" on this site, and in mainstream American culture.



Indeed, quite possible, even AFTER the big reveal.

they may call themselves liberals but nothing about them is about liberty and freedom,, we should call them progressive leftist just to keep the record straight,,

I will consider your words.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Sickening...

I LOVE IT.

 

[jknowgood]

Someone has made a video using trump, the media and politicians.

It's a video of trump going on a murdering rampage killing media and politicians in a church.

This video was played at a republican gathering at Mar a Largo. Republicans have denied any involvement but how did it get played at Mar A Largo?

Before you far right radical conservative extremists go off on what Kathy Griffen did, I personally denounced it and she paid a heavy price for it. It doesn't give you people the right to be worse. If you are like me and believe what Kathy Griffen did was very wrong, you certainly should believe this video is very wrong.

Macabre Video of Fake Trump Shooting Media and Critics Is Shown at His Resort

View attachment 284486
Your side is hateful.

LOLOLOL

You rightards crack me up!

Obama, they come with a knife. We come with a gun. That's what you preach.

 

[jc456]

Meh, this is America, we don't riot or go too crazy over fucked up spoof videos.......yet.

Yes you're right.

I just think it's interesting that the video was made and where it was shown.

Some people just don't know what is right and what is wrong.

You have no idea the video or if it was shown

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not only was it a lie, psychopath, the Obamugabe regime had considered using a different lie that that a video from a pastor in Oregon was the catalyst. The CIA was under the rule of fucking KGB Agent John Brennan at the time - they had and have ZERO credibility.

And of course you are a pathological liar, as every last person on the board know.

{
o Examination of Blumenthal’s emails, as leaked by hacker Guccifer, shows that reports sent by Blumenthal were gathered by Drumheller.

• 12 Sep 12 (2326 ET): SecState Clinton wrote to Jake Sullivan “We should get this [Drumheller note] around asap.”

• 12 Sep 12 (2330 ET): Clinton forwarded to top aide Jake Sullivan email briefing rec’d that morning from Sid Blumenthal about report to Libyan president el-Magariaf that blamed YouTube video, with the words, “More info.”

• 13 Sep 12: Max Blumenthal published an op-ed making similar claimsas his blog entry the day before.

• 13 Sep 12: Jay Carney: “”The protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie…”

• September 13, 2012, Hillary Clinton metwith Moroccan Foreign Minister Saad-Eddine Al-Othmani. She condemned what she called the “disgusting and reprehensible” anti-Muslim video and the violence that it triggered.

• 14 Sep 12 (0930 ET): SecState Clinton held meeting w/Susan Rice

• 14 Sep 12: Jay Carney “protests were in reaction to a video”

• 14 Sep 12 (1415 ET): SecState Clinton attended transfer of remains ceremony. She told Tyrone Woods’ father, Charles Woods,“We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.”

• 14 Sep 12 (1832 ET): Sidney Blumenthal sent SecState Clinton memo which states, “In addition, he stated in private that Morsi and al-Katany spoke with Libyan President Mohammed Yussef el Magariaf, and they had all agreed that military and security officials in Egypt and Libya will cooperate in an effort to track links between the violence in Cairo and Benghazi.” (SecState Clinton response that it should be printed dated 23 Sep 12)

• 14 Sep 12 (1833 ET): DoS Victoria Nuland notified re CIA talking points

• 14 Sep 12 (NLT 1739 ET): Jake Sullivan included in process

• 14 Sep 12 (2124 ET): Nuland refers to “issues” the “building leadership” has with the talking points. Sends email to Sullivan at same time

• 14 Sep 12 (2125 ET): Sullivan indicates he spoke w/Tommy Vietor & talking points would be addressed next day.

• 15 Sep 12: CIA Acting Director Michael Morell made massive edits to talking points. Sullivan’s name appears on the page

• Per Judicial Watch email: at Secure Video Teleconference (SVTS), “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy editing hand to them. He noted that he would be happy to work with Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points. McDonough, on Rhode’s behalf, deferred to Sullivan. It was agreed that Jake would work closely with the intelligence community (within a small group) to finalize points on Saturday that could be shared with HPSCI.”

• 15 Sep 12: Jake Sullivan worked w/UN Amb. Susan Rice to prep her for next day Sunday talk shows. From Judicial Watch: “I spoke to Jake immediately after the SVTS andnoted that you were doing the Sunday morning shows and would need to be aware of the final posture that these points took. He committed to ensure that we were updated in advance of the Sunday I specifically mentioned Erin Pelton as the one coordinating your preparations for the shows and also strongly encouraged him to loop in Rexon during the process.”

• 16 Sep 12: Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf told Bob Shieffer on “Face the Nation”: “…this leaves us with no doubt that this was preplanned, determined—pre-meditated months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their arrival”

• 16 Sep 12: Amb. Susan Rice on 5 Sunday talk shows, including “Face the Nation,” directly after Libyan president

• “we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned”

• “What happened in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result – a direct result of a heinous and offensive video”

• 16 Sep 12: Sullivan monitored Susan Rice’s appearances.

• 16 Sep 12 (1221 ET): Email states, “But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved. The only troubling sentence relates to the investigation, specifically: ‘And we’ll see when the investigation unfolds whether what was — what transpired in Benghazi might have unfolded differently in different circumstances.’”

• Rice’s comments: “In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated. We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to — or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in — in the wake of the revolution in Libya are — are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there.”

• 16 Sep 12 (1439): SecState Clinton’s response to Meet the Press transcript of Susan Rice’s appearance has been redacted by State Department

• 18 Sep 12: Jay Carney “…it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped — that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi…”

• 19 Sep 12: Jay Carney “do not yet have indication that it was pre-planned”

• 19 Sep 12: Matt Olson, NCTC to Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joe Lieberman on whether the attack was a terrorist attack: “They were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

• 20 Sep 12: Jay Carney admits terrorism

• 20 Sep 12: Obama at Univision town hall meeting “”What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”

• 21 Sep 12: SecState Clinton admits terror and after that, post-UN speech, video narrative was abandoned

• 28 Sep 12: Film producer Mark Basseley Youssef arrested, sentenced to 1 yr. in jail for “probation violations”}

Benghazi: The Cover-Up Timeline - Center for Security Policy

OMG You mean Government issued talking points aren't always truthful?

Say it ain't so, Sally, say it ain't so.

Yet here you are all these years later, still lying...

First lies I remember were the Body Counts from Vietnam on the Evening News.

Bet you thought those were true too huh?

I remember Walter Cronkite lying that the NVA won a major battle every night. I was too young to know what fucking liars the left are back then. Later I found out that Cronkite was Ho Chi Mihn's right hand man.

You know you're lying. They never won a major battle. We could've sweep away the NVA and been fighting China in a matter of weeks. It was never the Grunts he blamed for the losing strategy.

I know Walter Cronkite was lying, but I and America didn't know it at the time. Every night at dinner time Red Walter would lie through his teeth on behalf of the North Vietnamese.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sickening...

That was the first time I saw the video. It's funny as hell.

 

[jc456]

The right wing went a bit crazy over the Kathy Griffin video....

yeah why isn't she in jail? She threatened decapitation of a sitting president.

She did huh.

----------- Link?

sure, she held his head dripping in blood. what else was she implying?

What you inferred is irrelevant. You said she made a threat, Where is it?

Isn't it weird that the far right radical conservative extremists don't know the difference between a mannequin head and a real head?

She wasn't holding trump's head. If she had been he would be dead and she would be in on death row right now.

The far right radical conservative extremists sure are very dramatic. Yet they don't have a problem with the video.

Projecting is a normal habit you have