chesswarsnow
"SASQUATCH IS WATCHING"
- Dec 9, 2007
- 10,829
- 4,136
Sorry bout that,
1. I know this topic has never been disguised, and I know doctors take an oath to, *Do No Harm*, why is that?
2. Because you would think that because they got into medicine, they would just figure they will encounter *sick people*.
3. And seeing you would assume they got into a med-school, and then graduated, got on at a Hospital or clinic what have you, that they would try to cure people, whoever they are.
4. But, it seems they have to take an oath, to do the right thing and heal, if they can, but do they always?
5. I would have to say, *no*, how could they always keep the oath?
6. An oath to, *Do no harm* is subjective, doing harm could always be subjective, when whatever they do is just an educated guess, a *Well this worked before* medicine.
7. When these symptoms were present, along with these actual evidenturay signs of disease, then what was commonly used to treat was this or that.
8. So its always a judgment call on what to do for the sick, what to allow or dis-allow.
9. So all in all doctors are unable to really absolutely *cure*, they can say, "Do this and do that, take these two pills, and in the morning call me"
10. So whether you trust the doctor absolutely or not, its really just a calculation on their part, they are *practicing*, you unfortunately are the *practice-ee*.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
1. I know this topic has never been disguised, and I know doctors take an oath to, *Do No Harm*, why is that?
2. Because you would think that because they got into medicine, they would just figure they will encounter *sick people*.
3. And seeing you would assume they got into a med-school, and then graduated, got on at a Hospital or clinic what have you, that they would try to cure people, whoever they are.
4. But, it seems they have to take an oath, to do the right thing and heal, if they can, but do they always?
5. I would have to say, *no*, how could they always keep the oath?
6. An oath to, *Do no harm* is subjective, doing harm could always be subjective, when whatever they do is just an educated guess, a *Well this worked before* medicine.
7. When these symptoms were present, along with these actual evidenturay signs of disease, then what was commonly used to treat was this or that.
8. So its always a judgment call on what to do for the sick, what to allow or dis-allow.
9. So all in all doctors are unable to really absolutely *cure*, they can say, "Do this and do that, take these two pills, and in the morning call me"
10. So whether you trust the doctor absolutely or not, its really just a calculation on their part, they are *practicing*, you unfortunately are the *practice-ee*.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas