Do you know the libs on the this site still think there was collusion between Russia and Trump?

[hadit]

All our president needs to do is provide a credible explanation of why his key aids were having multiple meetings with the Russians and I will be satisfied

Until that time....we need to continue the investigation

No, you wouldn't be satisfied. You'd simply move on to another.

where are Trump's Tax returns ?

And there is a prime example.

sorry I do not trust man who declares bankruptcy six times , starts a fake university and trails 4000 law suits around and is a serial adulterer

Yet you trust democrats? That doesn't compute.

 

[hadit]

sorry I do not trust man who declares bankruptcy six times , starts a fake university and trails 4000 law suits around and is a serial adultererThen you don't trust 85% of the politicians/celebrities in this world do ya ?? LOL
.

so all politicians have 6 bankruptcies a fake University 4000 law suits and serial adultery ...OK ....

If they own hundreds of businesses, it's not surprising if a few go bankrupt.

 

[Oldstyle]

While you idiots obsess about his bankruptcies and divorces, Trump keeps right on getting more done to fix the economy in his first year than Barry did in his entire eight! Do you even know how ridiculous you look right now?

The Great Obama stopped a Depression

Fat Donnie is just surfing the Obama economic wave

TARP stopped another Depression...Obama gave us the Great Recession because he didn't have a clue how to stimulate the economy and so many of his policies were job killers! The Obama economic wave? Don't make me laugh! Barack Obama oversaw the worst recovery from a recession in modern economic history!

Interesting you should bring that up as the initial TARP request passed with strong Republican support, but when The Great Obama requested additional TARP funds to save the banks and auto companies.....not a single Republican would vote for it

He already had EXISTING TARP funds to pay for things, Winger! He wanted ADDITIONAL funds to give away to help HIS supporters which is why the GOP said no!

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

 

[rightwinger]

The Great Obama stopped a Depression

Fat Donnie is just surfing the Obama economic wave

TARP stopped another Depression...Obama gave us the Great Recession because he didn't have a clue how to stimulate the economy and so many of his policies were job killers! The Obama economic wave? Don't make me laugh! Barack Obama oversaw the worst recovery from a recession in modern economic history!

Interesting you should bring that up as the initial TARP request passed with strong Republican support, but when The Great Obama requested additional TARP funds to save the banks and auto companies.....not a single Republican would vote for it

He already had EXISTING TARP funds to pay for things, Winger! He wanted ADDITIONAL funds to give away to help HIS supporters which is why the GOP said no!

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

 

[Oldstyle]

TARP stopped another Depression...Obama gave us the Great Recession because he didn't have a clue how to stimulate the economy and so many of his policies were job killers! The Obama economic wave? Don't make me laugh! Barack Obama oversaw the worst recovery from a recession in modern economic history!

Interesting you should bring that up as the initial TARP request passed with strong Republican support, but when The Great Obama requested additional TARP funds to save the banks and auto companies.....not a single Republican would vote for it

He already had EXISTING TARP funds to pay for things, Winger! He wanted ADDITIONAL funds to give away to help HIS supporters which is why the GOP said no!

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

Democrats screwed over creditors to protect the same United Auto Workers that poured millions into their election campaigns. Obama "saved" them and screwed over people who under our rules of law shouldn't have had their rights to compensation trampled on! That's what Republicans wouldn't vote for!

It's the kind of thing you do if you're the leader of a banana republic...the kind of thing that makes investors think long and hard about putting their money to work in your country! Was it any wonder that the economy was stagnant for so long under the Obama Administration?

 

[Oldstyle]

It's interesting to note that Obama's sweetheart deal with the UAW is the ONLY part of TARP that didn't get repaid with interest! The US taxpayers lost billions on Obama's "reward" to the UAW for supporting him!

 

[rightwinger]

Interesting you should bring that up as the initial TARP request passed with strong Republican support, but when The Great Obama requested additional TARP funds to save the banks and auto companies.....not a single Republican would vote for it

He already had EXISTING TARP funds to pay for things, Winger! He wanted ADDITIONAL funds to give away to help HIS supporters which is why the GOP said no!

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

Democrats screwed over creditors to protect the same United Auto Workers that poured millions into their election campaigns. Obama "saved" them and screwed over people who under our rules of law shouldn't have had their rights to compensation trampled on! That's what Republicans wouldn't vote for!

It's the kind of thing you do if you're the leader of a banana republic...the kind of thing that makes investors think long and hard about putting their money to work in your country! Was it any wonder that the economy was stagnant for so long under the Obama Administration?

What would have happened to those creditors during a bankruptcy?

I have no problem with protecting workers over creditors. The creditors accepted the risk. Those workers also made concessions in salary and benefits as a condition of the government bailout

The Great Obama saved the auto companies

 

[rightwinger]

It's interesting to note that Obama's sweetheart deal with the UAW is the ONLY part of TARP that didn't get repaid with interest! The US taxpayers lost billions on Obama's "reward" to the UAW for supporting him!

The UAW forced its workers to accept cuts in pay and benefits to save their jobs
Unlike Bush, who just threw money at the auto companies with no conditions, The Great Obama demanded stock for the US taxpayer, he demanded workers accept pay cuts, he demanded an management restructure and the closing of unprofitable brands

The Great Obama saved the auto companies...Republicans voted to see them fail

 

[Oldstyle]

He already had EXISTING TARP funds to pay for things, Winger! He wanted ADDITIONAL funds to give away to help HIS supporters which is why the GOP said no!

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

Democrats screwed over creditors to protect the same United Auto Workers that poured millions into their election campaigns. Obama "saved" them and screwed over people who under our rules of law shouldn't have had their rights to compensation trampled on! That's what Republicans wouldn't vote for!

It's the kind of thing you do if you're the leader of a banana republic...the kind of thing that makes investors think long and hard about putting their money to work in your country! Was it any wonder that the economy was stagnant for so long under the Obama Administration?

What would have happened to those creditors during a bankruptcy?

I have no problem with protecting workers over creditors. The creditors accepted the risk. Those workers also made concessions in salary and benefits as a condition of the government bailout

The Great Obama saved the auto companies

The creditors accepted the risk under our rule of law. Then Obama and the Democrats CHANGED the rule of law to favor union workers that supported them with campaign donations with a sweetheart deal! The fact of the matter is that the UAW didn't give up nearly as much as they would have had to if GM and Chrysler had simply gone through a normal bankruptcy. Liberals screwed over other investors to protect union auto workers. In doing so they sent a loud message to anyone who was thinking about investing in American businesses that the rule of law wouldn't be their to protect that investment. Then they were baffled why investment capital stayed on the sidelines during the Obama Recession.

 

[rightwinger]

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

Democrats screwed over creditors to protect the same United Auto Workers that poured millions into their election campaigns. Obama "saved" them and screwed over people who under our rules of law shouldn't have had their rights to compensation trampled on! That's what Republicans wouldn't vote for!

It's the kind of thing you do if you're the leader of a banana republic...the kind of thing that makes investors think long and hard about putting their money to work in your country! Was it any wonder that the economy was stagnant for so long under the Obama Administration?

What would have happened to those creditors during a bankruptcy?

I have no problem with protecting workers over creditors. The creditors accepted the risk. Those workers also made concessions in salary and benefits as a condition of the government bailout

The Great Obama saved the auto companies

The creditors accepted the risk under our rule of law. Then Obama and the Democrats CHANGED the rule of law to favor union workers that supported them with campaign donations with a sweetheart deal! The fact of the matter is that the UAW didn't give up nearly as much as they would have had to if GM and Chrysler had simply gone through a normal bankruptcy. Liberals screwed over other investors to protect union auto workers. In doing so they sent a loud message to anyone who was thinking about investing in American businesses that the rule of law wouldn't be their to protect that investment. Then they were baffled why investment capital stayed on the sidelines during the Obama Recession.

We have something we like to call courts to address any constitutional overreach by Government

The UAW should have demanded GM stock in return for accepting cuts in pay and benefits. Instead, they gave GM cheaper labor in order to save them

It was GM who accepted the terms of a Government bailout instead of bankruptcy. The workers never had a vote

 

[Oldstyle]

Republicans didn't vote for it because it undermined the rule of law...giving priority to the auto worker unions over others...auto worker unions that contributed millions of dollars to the Obama election campaign!

Interesting....But they voted for it when Bush asked for it

Republicans were doing everything they could to have the auto companies fail on Obama's watch

The Great Obama saved them anyway

Democrats screwed over creditors to protect the same United Auto Workers that poured millions into their election campaigns. Obama "saved" them and screwed over people who under our rules of law shouldn't have had their rights to compensation trampled on! That's what Republicans wouldn't vote for!

It's the kind of thing you do if you're the leader of a banana republic...the kind of thing that makes investors think long and hard about putting their money to work in your country! Was it any wonder that the economy was stagnant for so long under the Obama Administration?

What would have happened to those creditors during a bankruptcy?

I have no problem with protecting workers over creditors. The creditors accepted the risk. Those workers also made concessions in salary and benefits as a condition of the government bailout

The Great Obama saved the auto companies

The creditors accepted the risk under our rule of law. Then Obama and the Democrats CHANGED the rule of law to favor union workers that supported them with campaign donations with a sweetheart deal! The fact of the matter is that the UAW didn't give up nearly as much as they would have had to if GM and Chrysler had simply gone through a normal bankruptcy. Liberals screwed over other investors to protect union auto workers. In doing so they sent a loud message to anyone who was thinking about investing in American businesses that the rule of law wouldn't be their to protect that investment. Then they were baffled why investment capital stayed on the sidelines during the Obama Recession.

We have something we like to call courts to address any constitutional overreach by Government

The UAW should have demanded GM stock in return for accepting cuts in pay and benefits. Instead, they gave GM cheaper labor in order to save them

It was GM who accepted the terms of a Government bailout instead of bankruptcy. The workers never had a vote

You seem to have forgotten how it went down, Winger! The Obama Administration screwed over bond holders that had rights. They simply declared those rights GONE! The workers didn't need to "vote"...they had an Administration that was giving them a piece of the pie in the restructured auto companies that rightfully belonged to others!

 

[rightwinger]

Did Trump collude with Russia?

That is a worst case scenario that would lead to impeachment and possibly prison
Trump would have to be pretty stupid to be personally involved in contacts with Russia. But there is ample evidence that his aids were having multiple contacts with Russia while allegations of Russian involvement in the election were ongoing

A more likely charge against Trump would be obstruction of justice or possible financial misdealing's while Russia was under sanction

I think Jared Kushner is probably the most likely to take a fall

 

[DrLove]

You mean like saving GM and Chrysler that not even a single Republican voted to save

 

[charwin95]

All our president needs to do is provide a credible explanation of why his key aids were having multiple meetings with the Russians and I will be satisfied

Until that time....we need to continue the investigation

. Aren't the Russians a super power in which every administration has to deal with ?? So you think in this one instance in history, and because Hillary was running for President, that it was hands off in regards to the Russians all because of ?? Did not the Russians come up in past presidential debates, and haven't we always dealt with the Russians ever since world war two ?? Why is it that Obammy and Hitlery we're free to deal with the Russians, and to speak with the Russians, but all of a sudden they were off limits according to the Demon-crats in this past election ? Were the Demon-crats so corrupt that they were jumping at their own shadows anymore ??

Dont waste your time. The only thing proven is the democrats were the ones colluding. That is beyond the shadow of any doubt now and the losers are still claiming the opposite. In fact CNN several times has been caught red handed showing that they are lying. They have found NOTHING and they use stupid shit like manafort or flynn as their eureka moments. Nothing, they have nothing.

Yet, when it is proven that it was the democrats, they seem to be fine with it.

The day we understand what sort of ass backwards piles of shit we are dealing with, will be the day we truly get why we need to avoid even communicating with such losers.

The day those losers on the left understand that they get very little, will be the day they are understanding a lot.

Very funny.
It’s the republican that hired Mueller to investigate republican president.

You all can flip however you want. If there are no collusions then........
1. Prove to us here that there are no collusions.
Share to us what you know.
2. If there are NO collusions. Why is Trump and his cult are so scared?

 

[charwin95]

'Do you know the libs on the this site still think there was collusion between Russia and Trump?'

Of course they do.

1. 'Collusion' is not a crime. It is a made-up term created by seditious Democrats used to try Trump in the court of public opinion, utilizing the army of Fake News Media surrogates to push their propaganda, bullshit, and lies.
-- The only connection Trump has to 'Russian Election Interference' is Trump's laughable debate remark in which he said he hoped Russia would hack and release her files to expose her now proven criminal server activity. Trump voiced his wishes that Hillary's crimes would be revealed - the same thing millions of other Americans wished for...and it has since been exposed.

2. It has been proven that Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid the evidence of Russia's intent on buying Uranium One and their crimes of Bribery, Extortion, Violence, Intimidation...even protected Hillary from being indicted for taking approx. $145 million from the KGB Bank, the leading financier behind the Russian effort to buy Uranium One....but snowflakes insist - without evidence - that TRUMP is guilty of 'Collusion'.

3. It has been proven Comey, Lynch, and Obama KNEW about the Russians running a PsyOp campaign using social media in the US to con snowflakes into organizing and marching for them, about the Russians paying Liberal groups like Antifa / The Black Fist / Black Lives Matter to spread racial hatred and violence across the US, about how the Russians were attempting to hack the most Senior US politicians' computers / files....and none of them did a damn thing about it. They did not warn those senior politicians, did not do anything to stop the Russians' PsyOp program or the Interference. Evidence shows Obama refused to do anything about it because he did not want to anger Putin because he wanted Putin's approval / ok to invade Syria. OBAMA WAS COMPLICIT IN RUSSIA'S INTERFERENCE BY ALLOWING RUISSIA TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO DO...but snowflakes insist - without evidence - that TRUMP is guilty of 'Collusion'.

4. Hillary took $145 million from the KGB Bank....Bill took $500k per speech from the KGB Bank and met directly with Vladimir Putin when he could not get an audience with the Russian Nuclear Agency reps...Hillary's campaign manager, John Podesta, cofounded a firm that worked for the Russians, 1/3rd of his company's board of directors consist of prominent Russian businessmen who had direct connections to the Kremlin and to Vladimir Putin himself, and he received thousands of UN-REPORTED shares of Russian stocks...Fat Tony Podesta - John's brother and co-owner of the Podesta group - worked f0r the Russians as CEO of the Podesta Group company, worked for the KGB Bank as an unregistered foreign agent, and, most amazingly, worked for the same RUSSIAN SPY AGENCY that supposedly hacked the DNC...ND NOT ONLY DOES THAT NOT BOITHER ANY OF THE SNOWFLAKES, THEY STILL BELIEVE - WITHOUT EVIDENCE - THAT TRUMP IS GUILTY OF 'COLLUSION'.

YOU CAN OT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!

Snowflakes are mentally disturbed, reality denying, butt-hurt, hate-driven, Trump-Hating, Hillary/Obama worshipping seditious nut bags.

Really? If there are no collusions. Why is your boy is so scared? You’ve been listening too much of Hannity.

Hillary? Really? What’s the point of mixing Hillary and the collusions? So at the end of the day Hillary will be impeach. Right?

 

[hadit]

While you idiots obsess about his bankruptcies and divorces, Trump keeps right on getting more done to fix the economy in his first year than Barry did in his entire eight! Do you even know how ridiculous you look right now?

The Great Obama stopped a Depression

Fat Donnie is just surfing the Obama economic wave

He also stopped the world from spinning off it's axis. True story!!

And stopped the ocean's from rising...just ask him!

He did promise to do that, didn't he?

 

[hadit]

All our president needs to do is provide a credible explanation of why his key aids were having multiple meetings with the Russians and I will be satisfied

Until that time....we need to continue the investigation

. Aren't the Russians a super power in which every administration has to deal with ?? So you think in this one instance in history, and because Hillary was running for President, that it was hands off in regards to the Russians all because of ?? Did not the Russians come up in past presidential debates, and haven't we always dealt with the Russians ever since world war two ?? Why is it that Obammy and Hitlery we're free to deal with the Russians, and to speak with the Russians, but all of a sudden they were off limits according to the Demon-crats in this past election ? Were the Demon-crats so corrupt that they were jumping at their own shadows anymore ??

Dont waste your time. The only thing proven is the democrats were the ones colluding. That is beyond the shadow of any doubt now and the losers are still claiming the opposite. In fact CNN several times has been caught red handed showing that they are lying. They have found NOTHING and they use stupid shit like manafort or flynn as their eureka moments. Nothing, they have nothing.

Yet, when it is proven that it was the democrats, they seem to be fine with it.

The day we understand what sort of ass backwards piles of shit we are dealing with, will be the day we truly get why we need to avoid even communicating with such losers.

The day those losers on the left understand that they get very little, will be the day they are understanding a lot.

Very funny.
It’s the republican that hired Mueller to investigate republican president.

You all can flip however you want. If there are no collusions then........
1. Prove to us here that there are no collusions.
Share to us what you know.
2. If there are NO collusions. Why is Trump and his cult are so scared?

It is incumbent on the accusers to prove that there was collusion. Thus far, they have not done so.

 

[Oldstyle]

All our president needs to do is provide a credible explanation of why his key aids were having multiple meetings with the Russians and I will be satisfied

Until that time....we need to continue the investigation

. Aren't the Russians a super power in which every administration has to deal with ?? So you think in this one instance in history, and because Hillary was running for President, that it was hands off in regards to the Russians all because of ?? Did not the Russians come up in past presidential debates, and haven't we always dealt with the Russians ever since world war two ?? Why is it that Obammy and Hitlery we're free to deal with the Russians, and to speak with the Russians, but all of a sudden they were off limits according to the Demon-crats in this past election ? Were the Demon-crats so corrupt that they were jumping at their own shadows anymore ??

Dont waste your time. The only thing proven is the democrats were the ones colluding. That is beyond the shadow of any doubt now and the losers are still claiming the opposite. In fact CNN several times has been caught red handed showing that they are lying. They have found NOTHING and they use stupid shit like manafort or flynn as their eureka moments. Nothing, they have nothing.

Yet, when it is proven that it was the democrats, they seem to be fine with it.

The day we understand what sort of ass backwards piles of shit we are dealing with, will be the day we truly get why we need to avoid even communicating with such losers.

The day those losers on the left understand that they get very little, will be the day they are understanding a lot.

Very funny.
It’s the republican that hired Mueller to investigate republican president.

You all can flip however you want. If there are no collusions then........
1. Prove to us here that there are no collusions.
Share to us what you know.
2. If there are NO collusions. Why is Trump and his cult are so scared?

Prove to you that there are no collusions? Do you not understand how our legal system works? I don't accuse you of a crime and then demand that you prove I'm wrong...if I accuse you of a crime it's incumbent on ME to PROVE that a crime took place! You have the presumption of innocence.

I'm sorry but I'm not seeing any fright at all in the Trump camp! I see impatience. I see anger. Quite frankly, I see exactly what you would expect to see from someone who's been falsely accused of something by their arch enemies!

 

[deanrd]

Do you know the libs on the this site still think there was collusion between Russia and Trump?

Something is scaring Trump and the GOP.

 

[hadit]

Do you know the libs on the this site still think there was collusion between Russia and Trump?

Something is scaring Trump and the GOP.

Your foil helmet is on too tight. You're confusing irritation with fear.