Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
Of course you don't want me; I'm not a sexual deviant.Sorry Skippy
But No, we don’t want you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course you don't want me; I'm not a sexual deviant.Sorry Skippy
But No, we don’t want you
LinkOf course you don't want me; I'm not a sexual deviant.
Justice Thomas is already on the court!I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
And?Justice Thomas is already on the court!
Do you realize the entire liberal wing of the court will all be female?
I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
She was only confirmed by 3 votes. Why do you think they couldn't win?Ive been pondering on this.
It strikes me as dumb politics for the GOp to oppose this appointment when it was a fight that they couldnt win. why
So you equate being black with a mental illness. That explains a lot.
Really? Where is the proof of that stupid allegation? No one has ever supplied any proof, only accusations!Remember what Clarence Thomas did to Anita Hill when she was nominated to his office?
There are several “minorities” on the court already, African-American, women, Hispanic, and Jews & Catholics.I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
No. .. I am not equating the two. NOT AT ALL. Quite the opposite in fact.Ive been pondering on this.
It strikes me as dumb politics for the GOp to oppose this appointment when it was a fight that they couldnt win. why
So you equate being black with a mental illness. That explains a lot.
Nominations to SCOTUS should absolutely NEVER consider skin color.I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
They have a different opinion of what "great" means.How can you say she's going to be a great Justice when she was a flawed judge in lower courts?
That fact that there is no Link is proof that I am not a sexual deviant.Link
show meThat fact that there is no Link is proof that I am not a sexual deviant.
You, on the other hand, want to train 2 year olds to be sexually aware of themselves and the entire population of the Earth.
That makes you a sexual deviant.
Why were you listening to an Anglo Saxon British band? That isn't a minority band WTF is wrong you?I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
His USSC choices were about one thing: Covering his ass.I was doing a little thinking while listening to Dark Side of the Moon earlier - and it got me wondering. Donald Trump got THREE SCOTUS nominations - THREE chances to make history and put a minority on the SCOTUS. How come President Trump didn't take the opportunity to make history with a nomination?
I thought it was 6 votes ?She was only confirmed by 3 votes. Why do you think they couldn't win?
Historically the supreme court judges have always been chosen for the colour of their skin and nature of their genitals. Why do you want to change that ?They have a different opinion of what "great" means.
To leftists judges that means always voting in lockstep no matter if that vote is affirming something that is
illegal or not.
Kind of like how Ketangi Jackson Brown is seen as a great choice for the Supremes whether she knows what a woman is or not. Whether she will give a shot in the arm to pedophiles or not.
Whether she is liable to give lighter sentences to people she favors or not.
,
Disgraceful clowns think that the color of the skin and type of genitals one has trumps every
other qualification and consideration. That's inssane.
Kavanaugh was a Circuit Court judge for a dozen years; longer than Jackson spent on the bench...
His USSC choices were about one thing: Covering his ass.
That's always his top priority, whether it works or not.
You are boring.show me