Don't worry about climate until you see stuff like in this photo

Nonsense. It's the biggest problem there is and you have turned a blind eye towards it.
What is the basis of your claim re deforestation? As to my "blind eye", you haven't a fucking clue.
 
What is the basis of your claim re deforestation? As to my "blind eye", you haven't a fucking clue.
My basis is your only focus is on atmospheric CO2. What about urbanization? Concrete jungles? Do they have no impact? Where's your outrage over that.
 
My basis is your only focus is on atmospheric CO2. What about urbanization? Concrete jungles? Do they have no impact? Where's your outrage over that.
What is the basis of your claim that deforestation is the biggest problem there is?
 
What is the basis of your claim that deforestation is the biggest problem there is?
I think urbanization is probably worse. Or do you think we should be building more concrete jungles?
 
I think urbanization is probably worse. Or do you think we should be building more concrete jungles?
Short term memory loss?

Nonsense. It's [deforestation] the biggest problem there is and you have turned a blind eye towards it.

For the third time, what is the basis for your claim that deforestation "is the biggest problem there is"?
 
Short term memory loss?



For the third time, what is the basis for your claim that deforestation "is the biggest problem there is"?
Can you please show me where I said, deforestation is the biggest problem there is?

Or do you want me to start attributing things you didn't say to you. Such as why do you think sex with girls at 14 should be allowed?
 
Can you please show me where I said, deforestation is the biggest problem there is?

Or do you want me to start attributing things you didn't say to you. Such as why do you think sex with girls at 14 should be allowed?
For fuck's sake. How about post #65, IMMEDIATELY ABOVE.

And here is the post to which you were responding:

I have argued about over development and deforestation. Deforestation is listed by the IPCC as one of the causes of increasing CO2 and albedo. But it is a much smaller factor than is the warming from CO2. No one is deforesting the oceans or the poles.
 
For fuck's sake. How about post #65, IMMEDIATELY ABOVE.

And here is the post to which you were responding:
I didn't write post #65. Quote the post I wrote, dummy. Show me where I said it. You can't because I didn't. I think you are senile or something.
 
I never made that claim, dummy.
You lying sack of shit.

1718052562358.png
 
You lying sack of shit.

View attachment 960344
Not a lying sack of shit. Link to the actual quote so that the context can be seen. From this snippet I read overdevelopment is the biggest concern of which deforestation is one consequence of it. Let's see the whole discussion. Why snip it when you can literally link to the conversation. What are you trying to hide?
 
Not a lying sack of shit. Link to the actual quote so that the context can be seen. From this snippet I read overdevelopment is the biggest concern of which deforestation is one consequence of it. Let's see the whole discussion. Why snip it when you can literally link to the conversation. What are you trying to hide?
My god what a piece of shit you are.
 
So, if the oceans have been "warming," why is the RECORD DECADE for CANES still the 1940s, and in second place is the 1890s???





You have to have an IQ under 5 to believe the bullshit your side hides behind...
We'll see. Predictions are for many large hurricanes this season. If the widespread rainstorms and flooding are any indication we might in for it this summer.
 
We'll see. Predictions are for many large hurricanes this season. If the widespread rainstorms and flooding are any indication we might in for it this summer.


LOL!!!!

Translation - the truth of the DATA showing NO INCREASE in CANES should be tossed aside to make room for a one year prediction, that, even if true, doesn't change the truth that

1940s strongest decade for canes
1890s second strongest decade for canes


So if "warming oceans" produces more and bigger canes, WHERE THE FUCK ARE THEY???

DDDDDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
 
LOL!!!!

Translation - the truth of the DATA showing NO INCREASE in CANES should be tossed aside to make room for a one year prediction, that, even if true, doesn't change the truth that

1940s strongest decade for canes
1890s second strongest decade for canes


So if "warming oceans" produces more and bigger canes, WHERE THE FUCK ARE THEY???

DDDDDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
still no sea level rising anywhere while both poles are still full of ice. Where's the extra water going to come from that isn't there yet?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
LOL!!!!

Translation - the truth of the DATA showing NO INCREASE in CANES should be tossed aside to make room for a one year prediction, that, even if true, doesn't change the truth that

1940s strongest decade for canes
1890s second strongest decade for canes


So if "warming oceans" produces more and bigger canes, WHERE THE FUCK ARE THEY???

DDDDDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Are hurricanes the only weather phenomenon caused by warm ocean water? What if winds bring that heat inland causing the heavy rains we are experiencing.
 
Are hurricanes the only weather phenomenon caused by warm ocean water?


Your side sang that tune after 2005...

and then the Atlantic had a record 10+ straight years with no Cat 3+ strikes at all.....


Your side "predicts" and you never ever question why the "predictions" are all completely WRONG. You are NOT SANE by that definition.
 

Forum List

Back
Top