Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who's opposed to free speech? Robertson was free to say what he said.
So he shouldn't have to apologize or meet with gay families to listen to them and the family is free to tell A&E to fuck off.
Yes, that's what we have been saying all along.
Of course. He doesn't have to meet with anyone. And of course, he's free to tell A&E to fuck off. His 1st Amendment right to free speech was never disrupted.
That's not to say that A&E is denied their right to air whatever they want (within FCC regulations) on their network.
Earlier this week, Robertson, 67, gave a controversial interview to GQ magazine in which he compared homosexuality to bestiality..
Nonsense. There have been plenty of folks complaining his freedom of speech is being infringed upon.So he shouldn't have to apologize or meet with gay families to listen to them and the family is free to tell A&E to fuck off.
Yes, that's what we have been saying all along.
Of course. He doesn't have to meet with anyone. And of course, he's free to tell A&E to fuck off. His 1st Amendment right to free speech was never disrupted.
That's not to say that A&E is denied their right to air whatever they want (within FCC regulations) on their network.
Lol, again, the constitutional right defelection.
No one is saying that A+E violated his First Amendment rights, dumbass.
But had he said some PC outrageous bullshit and got fired, you would be pissing yourself for a year, probably.
Who's opposed to free speech? Robertson was free to say what he said.
So he shouldn't have to apologize or meet with gay families to listen to them and the family is free to tell A&E to fuck off.
Yes, that's what we have been saying all along.
Of course. He doesn't have to meet with anyone. And of course, he's free to tell A&E to fuck off. His 1st Amendment right to free speech was never disrupted.
That's not to say that A&E is denied their right to air whatever they want (within FCC regulations) on their network.
Earlier this week, Robertson, 67, gave a controversial interview to GQ magazine in which he compared homosexuality to bestiality..
Only in that God considers both a sin. Of course, it doesn't play into the liberal rant unless the true meaning of what he said is twisted around to suit the agenda.
Earlier this week, Robertson, 67, gave a controversial interview to GQ magazine in which he compared homosexuality to bestiality..
Only in that God considers both a sin. Of course, it doesn't play into the liberal rant unless the true meaning of what he said is twisted around to suit the agenda.
The Bible also says eating an animal with cloven hoofed feet is a sin. If Robertson eats pork, doesn't that make him a hypocrite?
How about that one folks, Glaad is demanding he meet with homosexuals..
Have you ever heard of such nonsense
who do they think they are, the homo police of this country
people need to tell them where to go, straight to hell
Sin is sin. Either defying kosher AND homosexuality are both sins or neither are sins. And while I agree he is free to be a hypocrite, it seems that is exactly what he is doing.Only in that God considers both a sin. Of course, it doesn't play into the liberal rant unless the true meaning of what he said is twisted around to suit the agenda.
The Bible also says eating an animal with cloven hoofed feet is a sin. If Robertson eats pork, doesn't that make him a hypocrite?
He isn't bound by the laws of the Old Testament as a Christian. Also, in this country he's free to be a duck hunter AND a hypocrite if he so chooses. Not that he is, just that he's free to be one.
Sin is sin. Either defying kosher AND homosexuality are both sins or neither are sins. And while I agree he is free to be a hypocrite, it seems that is exactly what he is doing.The Bible also says eating an animal with cloven hoofed feet is a sin. If Robertson eats pork, doesn't that make him a hypocrite?
He isn't bound by the laws of the Old Testament as a Christian. Also, in this country he's free to be a duck hunter AND a hypocrite if he so chooses. Not that he is, just that he's free to be one.
Christ died for our sins. That would include both defying kosher AND homosexuality, would it not?Sin is sin. Either defying kosher AND homosexuality are both sins or neither are sins. And while I agree he is free to be a hypocrite, it seems that is exactly what he is doing.He isn't bound by the laws of the Old Testament as a Christian. Also, in this country he's free to be a duck hunter AND a hypocrite if he so chooses. Not that he is, just that he's free to be one.
Your statements indicate clearly you have no knowledge of what Christ did with the Law after he came to earth. Ignorance is bliss as they say and you are certainly very happy it appears.
How about that one folks, Glaad is demanding he meet with homosexuals..
Have you ever heard of such nonsense
who do they think they are, the homo police of this country
people need to tell them where to go, straight to hell
MSNBC suggested that Phil might like anal sex if he tried it. Disgusting perverts.
Sin is sin. Either defying kosher AND homosexuality are both sins or neither are sins. And while I agree he is free to be a hypocrite, it seems that is exactly what he is doing.He isn't bound by the laws of the Old Testament as a Christian. Also, in this country he's free to be a duck hunter AND a hypocrite if he so chooses. Not that he is, just that he's free to be one.
Your statements indicate clearly you have no knowledge of what Christ did with the Law after he came to earth. Ignorance is bliss as they say and you are certainly very happy it appears.
Christ died for our sins. That would include both defying kosher AND homosexuality, would it not?Sin is sin. Either defying kosher AND homosexuality are both sins or neither are sins. And while I agree he is free to be a hypocrite, it seems that is exactly what he is doing.
Your statements indicate clearly you have no knowledge of what Christ did with the Law after he came to earth. Ignorance is bliss as they say and you are certainly very happy it appears.
While you have a right to freedom of speech, you don't have a right to immunity from consequences about what you say.
This Duck Dynasty thing... it's not a violation of the first amendment since A&E is a private company and can prettymuch do whatever the hell they want.
Another gay hater got put in his place.
No one is saying that there was a violation of the Constitution here, idiot. A+E is well within their legal rights, but what they did was MORALLY wrong and FASCIST in nature.
Libtards think quoting the Bible is like yelling fire in a crowded theater!
http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/330812-duck-dynasty-42.html#post8337053
And we are going to boycott and put and end to this PC fascism all the easier because of this attack on Phil.
I am not sure where this protest is coming from. i watched this show once, and as far as I could tell, it was an updated reality version of the Beverly Hillbillies. I just assumed that the only audiance they had was a group of white, ignorant ,red neck, conservative white trash...
Ah, so wees be haitin' crackus now, huh?
Dems crackus shood be hoss whupped for not gettin a tan lahk Gawd ment 'em 2, stupid crackus.....
/s
You really are a stupid fuck, aren't you?
What do these people sound like by saying he should have to go meet homosexuals?
re-education camps anyone?
People better wake up in this country
