Asclepias
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #121
Of course I am giving her the truth. How could he have been a sub saharan African if he never went below the Sahara? I'm disappointed that you think Black people were only below the Sahara when they occupied the entire area from Africa all the way to India. That sub saharan designation is usually the calling card of a card carrying racist. I didnt think you were a racist.You are not giving her the truth and the guy on this forum who thinks Jesus was essentially from sub-saharan Africa is a nut case. To be really honest, I am quite disappointed in you. You don't need to think he was black. We know he wasn't European, blond and blue eyed. But the real point is that God and Jesus are not and should not be considered any race. Sad.What facts tell you the Hebrews were not Black? I have a lot of facts and implications that they were Black. I have even had white Jews admit the Hebrews were Black. One on this very forum. My aim is to give her the truth not what whites have told us was the truth.Whatever. The fact you think it is important to teach children Jesus was black, despite the fact he was a Jew living in the Middle East, that's sad. He wasn't blond and blue eyed, so I can see how teaching people he wasn't blond and blue eyed is good because fact is important.What color is burnt brass? If you check the internet you will see it could only have been a Black man.My interpretation is that bronze skin and wooly hair describes what a Jewish man in that region of the world would have looked like at that time. And Jesus was a Jewish man. Not black skin. I don't care about race but fact: it is not factual to assert he had very dark skin.He was described in prophecy in the OT depending on interpretation
But what you are talking about is indoctrination instead of teaching fact. Not just in regard to Jesus, but creating a world view.