Elementary school shooting

There is no freedom for the UNARMED victims of mass shootings. There is freedom for the man with the gun, which is the whole point of having guns. This shooting started in the administrative office. That's where it should have ended. If the staff had been armed that's where it would have ended.
Fortress Kindergarten. Armed guards in schools, on campuses, in theaters, all over. That's the answer? An assailant firing hundreds of rounds a minute seems to be the problem. And that seems to be the way to eliminate this modern and tragic phenomena of mass shootings. Such tragedies were impossible before weapons designed to kill as many human beings as possible were foisted upon the American public by gun manufacturers and their lackey lobbyists. There certainly were shootings, but not on a mass scale. The answer to the fire isn't pour on more gasoline. The answer is to stop access to weapons better held by a well regulated militia.

Connecticut has done it the gun grabbers way for years . Now Connecticut has proven gun control does not work. Now it's time to do it my way. Arm the citizens of the state.
Within my lifetime the access to semi and fully automatic weaponry, the "Saturday Night Special" cheap handgun, and high capacity magazines has eased to the point their availability is common. Also in that time, the phenomena of mass shootings has blossomed into an almost acceptable fact of modern life. Before access to weapons designed for soldiers and law enforcement, there were practically no mass gun shootings. After, we have what we are enduring today.

Can you justify the absolute need for high capacity weapons? The need for semi or fully automatic firing actions? These weapons are responsible fro the modern phenomenon of mass murder by gunfire. Is there really a reason more necessary than the lives of the victims to have such weapons in the hands of ordinary citizens and not well regulated militias?

Such weapons have no place in society. If rational heads prevail, the adolescents who think these weapons are cool would be schooled in the tragic consequence of the reality of such weapons, not the virtual video game prurient pleasure of their use. Such weapons belong in well regulated militia, not on the streets. Once confiscated, I suggest they be melted down and rendered into manhole covers to cap the putrid sewer of death they have wrought.
 
Take away all the legal guns we the people might possess. Now tell me this. Can you promise me 100 percent that no mass killings will ever happen again? If you can't make me that promise I rest my case.
 
There is no freedom for the UNARMED victims of mass shootings. There is freedom for the man with the gun, which is the whole point of having guns. This shooting started in the administrative office. That's where it should have ended. If the staff had been armed that's where it would have ended.
Fortress Kindergarten. Armed guards in schools, on campuses, in theaters, all over. That's the answer? An assailant firing hundreds of rounds a minute seems to be the problem. And that seems to be the way to eliminate this modern and tragic phenomena of mass shootings. Such tragedies were impossible before weapons designed to kill as many human beings as possible were foisted upon the American public by gun manufacturers and their lackey lobbyists. There certainly were shootings, but not on a mass scale. The answer to the fire isn't pour on more gasoline. The answer is to stop access to weapons better held by a well regulated militia.

I belong to a wll regulated militia.. There is one member at the moment.

Capt Squeeze Berry
Well regulated.
 
When DC's gun laws became the most restrictive in the land, that instantly became the place where innocent civilians were most likely to be gunned down.

Progressive yahoos know this, just as they know that abortion for all results in increased abortions. THEY DON'T CARE. Their primary objective is #1, disarm law abiding people, and #2, reduce the population.

Seriously. DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM. They do not care if children are mowed down. Dead children are secondary to establishing a totalitarian regime. In fact, they generally have plans of their own for reducing the population.

THEY DON'T CARE. Their primary objective is #1, disarm law abiding people, and #2, reduce the population.

You may have hit the target on this.
Wouldn't more gun control be an effective tool to gain number 2.
Reduce the population?

dc-full.png

link?
 
Fortress Kindergarten. Armed guards in schools, on campuses, in theaters, all over. That's the answer? An assailant firing hundreds of rounds a minute seems to be the problem. And that seems to be the way to eliminate this modern and tragic phenomena of mass shootings. Such tragedies were impossible before weapons designed to kill as many human beings as possible were foisted upon the American public by gun manufacturers and their lackey lobbyists. There certainly were shootings, but not on a mass scale. The answer to the fire isn't pour on more gasoline. The answer is to stop access to weapons better held by a well regulated militia.

I belong to a wll regulated militia.. There is one member at the moment.

Capt Squeeze Berry
Well regulated.

our by laws state that we are well regulated.

Our defintion is that the ammo is stored safely, gun safety is practiced and all firearms are obtained legally.
 
According to the last report. Lanza killed himself when he heard the authorities in the building and knew that they were going to kill him when they saw him. Then he shot himself. Likely if he knew that by going into that school he was going into a situation where he would be the first to die, he wouldn't have done it.
 
You may have hit the target on this.
Wouldn't more gun control be an effective tool to gain number 2.
Reduce the population?

dc-full.png

This chart would be effective if progressives actually cared about protecting school children.

They don't.

What is wrong with you people?

Do you believe that only rw children were murdered? Do you really believe that libs are untouched by this horrible tragedy?

WHY do you now use this horror for your political agenda?

I wish you wouldn't. I wish the right could join the country in trying for an answer but just as with the lies about President Obama, an answer to this national tragedy is not what you want. Instead, as so many of you have said, you actually want more guns, more deaths, more dead children.

And, if you get what you want, you'll blame the left for those dead children.
 
Home schooling gets more appealing by the day.

I'm sure a few parents have had that same thought cross their minds. The killer was home schooled himself some it has been reported. Just saying. There are no promises in life that violence or death won't befall us or those we love and that is why I believe in what I do in my own personal life.
 

This chart would be effective if progressives actually cared about protecting school children.

They don't.

What is wrong with you people?

Do you believe that only rw children were murdered? Do you really believe that libs are untouched by this horrible tragedy?

WHY do you now use this horror for your political agenda?

I wish you wouldn't. I wish the right could join the country in trying for an answer but just as with the lies about President Obama, an answer to this national tragedy is not what you want. Instead, as so many of you have said, you actually want more guns, more deaths, more dead children.

And, if you get what you want, you'll blame the left for those dead children.
Then, what's the answer?
 

This chart would be effective if progressives actually cared about protecting school children.

They don't.

What is wrong with you people?

Do you believe that only rw children were murdered? Do you really believe that libs are untouched by this horrible tragedy?

WHY do you now use this horror for your political agenda?

I wish you wouldn't. I wish the right could join the country in trying for an answer but just as with the lies about President Obama, an answer to this national tragedy is not what you want. Instead, as so many of you have said, you actually want more guns, more deaths, more dead children.

And, if you get what you want, you'll blame the left for those dead children.
The gun grabbers start this fight long ago they are the ones who always make it political. Now a gun grabber wants to stop making it political?
OH right here's the deal end all gun control .
 
Take away all the legal guns we the people might possess. Now tell me this. Can you promise me 100 percent that no mass killings will ever happen again? If you can't make me that promise I rest my case.

Who said that "all the legal guns" should be taken away?
 

This chart would be effective if progressives actually cared about protecting school children.

They don't.

What is wrong with you people?

Do you believe that only rw children were murdered? Do you really believe that libs are untouched by this horrible tragedy?

WHY do you now use this horror for your political agenda?

I wish you wouldn't. I wish the right could join the country in trying for an answer but just as with the lies about President Obama, an answer to this national tragedy is not what you want. Instead, as so many of you have said, you actually want more guns, more deaths, more dead children.

And, if you get what you want, you'll blame the left for those dead children.



You have now joined the ranks of the officially insane.........
 
I belong to a wll regulated militia.. There is one member at the moment.

Capt Squeeze Berry
Well regulated.

our by laws state that we are well regulated.

Our defintion is that the ammo is stored safely, gun safety is practiced and all firearms are obtained legally.
So you own semi or fully automatic weapons? Weapons fitted with high capacity magazines? May I ask why? What use are they?
 
This chart would be effective if progressives actually cared about protecting school children.

They don't.

What is wrong with you people?

Do you believe that only rw children were murdered? Do you really believe that libs are untouched by this horrible tragedy?

WHY do you now use this horror for your political agenda?

I wish you wouldn't. I wish the right could join the country in trying for an answer but just as with the lies about President Obama, an answer to this national tragedy is not what you want. Instead, as so many of you have said, you actually want more guns, more deaths, more dead children.

And, if you get what you want, you'll blame the left for those dead children.
The gun grabbers start this fight long ago they are the ones who always make it political. Now a gun grabber wants to stop making it political?
OH right here's the deal end all gun control .

If by "gun grabber" you mean someone who wants to ban guns, you're wrong and you know it. Making up lies doesn't help.

If you did not mean me, please show me where someone else said they want to "grab guns".

My point still stands. You're using this to further a really disgusting agenda and then you blame the left when you get the inevitable outcome.
 
We have a problem. We need to solve the problem. The reluctance to seek solutions to the problem is difficult for me to understand. Your fears are getting in the way of rational thought.
 
Fortress Kindergarten. Armed guards in schools, on campuses, in theaters, all over. That's the answer? An assailant firing hundreds of rounds a minute seems to be the problem. And that seems to be the way to eliminate this modern and tragic phenomena of mass shootings. Such tragedies were impossible before weapons designed to kill as many human beings as possible were foisted upon the American public by gun manufacturers and their lackey lobbyists. There certainly were shootings, but not on a mass scale. The answer to the fire isn't pour on more gasoline. The answer is to stop access to weapons better held by a well regulated militia.

Connecticut has done it the gun grabbers way for years . Now Connecticut has proven gun control does not work. Now it's time to do it my way. Arm the citizens of the state.
Within my lifetime the access to semi and fully automatic weaponry, the "Saturday Night Special" cheap handgun, and high capacity magazines has eased to the point their availability is common. Also in that time, the phenomena of mass shootings has blossomed into an almost acceptable fact of modern life. Before access to weapons designed for soldiers and law enforcement, there were practically no mass gun shootings. After, we have what we are enduring today.

Can you justify the absolute need for high capacity weapons? The need for semi or fully automatic firing actions? These weapons are responsible fro the modern phenomenon of mass murder by gunfire. Is there really a reason more necessary than the lives of the victims to have such weapons in the hands of ordinary citizens and not well regulated militias?

Such weapons have no place in society. If rational heads prevail, the adolescents who think these weapons are cool would be schooled in the tragic consequence of the reality of such weapons, not the virtual video game prurient pleasure of their use. Such weapons belong in well regulated militia, not on the streets. Once confiscated, I suggest they be melted down and rendered into manhole covers to cap the putrid sewer of death they have wrought.

Bull shit Connecticut has the toughest gun control laws the shooting has proven you are a lying cock sucker and gun control does not work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top