Elizabeth Warren? Seriously?

She was a lonely, nutty housewife, going nowhere when she decided to tell the Big Lie and check the "American Indian" box.


You, Frank, were the only poster to even attempt an answer (yesterday), which as I pointed out the same day, utterly fails as it does nothing but pose questions without answering any.

So if we count this post that's 0-for-7.
 
Swiiiiing and a miss. That's 0-for-5 now. And it speaks volumes about your source for whatever cockamamie bullshit that link goes to.

So you didn't scroll down...


Didn't need to. I asked YOU. And you failed.

So did the hack writer, claiming in his sublink "she lied" -- also without backing it up. Which he doesn't do because he can't, which is because it's a myth for the gullible.

Nice planet, where you can just write your own realities based on nothing.
I won't be visiting. I like solid ground.

I really can't help it that you are such a dumb bitch, that you wouldn't KNOW to scroll down!!! But hell when you have fought over

1. The KKK wasn't formed by Democrats
2. Declared Boko Harem wasn't about religion when they forced the girls to convert
3. Had no idea the Hillary LIED about being named after Sir E. Hillary
4. Fought that Fracking only produced natural gas!
5.Said I commited fraud when I stated 19 people had Thanked me for a post
6. And who did you bet $1 million dollars and welched on the deal?

Seems you're 0 for 6 but I do have 2-3 more if you need them! Fucking OCD girl!
 
I can just see Elizabeth Warren's campaign slogan for 2016:


Warren for President Because Obama wasn't Commie Enough!


Just think how many Moon Bats would have that bumper sticker on their cars.
 
The USA, you dumb fuck

Name a country without roads and bridges, you dumb fuck
They were built before you ever entered the workforce you twit. You're welcome.
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?
NO. BUt even so, they also contribute the most.
How many hours has Bill Gates cut from boring unpleasant tasks?
How much more productive are people who use Steve Jobs' products?
How much money have people saved because Sam Walton took retail to a new level?
I admired Steve Jobs but Bill Gates and Sam Walton built their fortunes on plunder mainly.

I'll grant that there are a few people out there who deserve to be extremely rich but they're rare. Others might deserve it but don't live extravagantly. One of my heroes, Walt Disney lived pretty simply. I couldn't help but compare his office (of which there's a mock up in Disneyland) to Richard Fuld's, the Wall Street fuckwad who spent a million dollars renovating his office after receiving a bailout for his company. I never heard Disney, Jobs, Gates or Walton complain about taxes publicly. I suspect they had enough material wealth that they didn't have to worry about it.
Steve Jobs was an asshole. ANd it isnt up to you to decide who deserves what.
 
I can just see Elizabeth Warren's campaign slogan for 2016:


Warren for President Because Obama wasn't Commie Enough!


Just think how many Moon Bats would have that bumper sticker on their cars.
Warren for President: From Each According To His Ability To Each According To His Needs.
 
It's only people who never built or ran anything that can tell an entrepreneur, "You didn't build that!"
Wow, you built roads, schools, police and fire departments and a military force? Impressive. What's the name of your country?

The USA, you dumb fuck

Name a country without roads and bridges, you dumb fuck
They were built before you ever entered the workforce you twit. You're welcome.
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
 
Wow, you built roads, schools, police and fire departments and a military force? Impressive. What's the name of your country?

The USA, you dumb fuck

Name a country without roads and bridges, you dumb fuck
They were built before you ever entered the workforce you twit. You're welcome.
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.
 
The USA, you dumb fuck

Name a country without roads and bridges, you dumb fuck
They were built before you ever entered the workforce you twit. You're welcome.
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

I know all that, but I wanted some lame-assed liberal to respond with some pathetic attempt to justify government looting the earnings of the productive members of society so I could tear him apart.
 
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

No wonder the dumbshits believe it. Libtards aren't exactly know for their intelligence. After all most of them voted for Obama so you know that they aren't all that bright so it is not surprising they would believe in that socialistic horseshit that has failed every place else.

Socialistic greed is a terrible thing.
 
They were built before you ever entered the workforce you twit. You're welcome.
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

I know all that, but I wanted some lame-assed liberal to respond with some pathetic attempt to justify government looting the earnings of the productive members of society so I could tear him apart.
Looting?

Our richest taxpayers have the lowest effective tax rate in history
That is why they fear Elizabeth Warren. She stirs up the masses
 
Last edited:
Did you say Estella Warren?

aug-31-estella-warren__iphone_640.jpg


I'd vote for her!
 
Swiiiiing and a miss. That's 0-for-5 now. And it speaks volumes about your source for whatever cockamamie bullshit that link goes to.

So you didn't scroll down...


Didn't need to. I asked YOU. And you failed.

So did the hack writer, claiming in his sublink "she lied" -- also without backing it up. Which he doesn't do because he can't, which is because it's a myth for the gullible.

Nice planet, where you can just write your own realities based on nothing.
I won't be visiting. I like solid ground.

I really can't help it that you are such a dumb bitch, that you wouldn't KNOW to scroll down!!! But hell when you have fought over

1. The KKK wasn't formed by Democrats
2. Declared Boko Harem wasn't about religion when they forced the girls to convert
3. Had no idea the Hillary LIED about being named after Sir E. Hillary
4. Fought that Fracking only produced natural gas!
5.Said I commited fraud when I stated 19 people had Thanked me for a post
6. And who did you bet $1 million dollars and welched on the deal?

Seems you're 0 for 6 but I do have 2-3 more if you need them! Fucking OCD girl!

Not an answer, is it?
Wassamatta? Caught in a myth and can't get out? :itsok:
 
Last edited:
And only rich people use them, right? That's why Warren wants to make them pay more taxes.

"You didn't build that" applies to everyone, not just rich people. EVERYONE uses roads and bridges, so EVERYONE should be paying more for them, not just rich people.
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

I know all that, but I wanted some lame-assed liberal to respond with some pathetic attempt to justify government looting the earnings of the productive members of society so I could tear him apart.
Looting?

Our richest taxpayers have the lowest effective tax rate in history
That is why they fear Elizabeth Warren. She stirs up the masses
What's the tax rate for the bottom 40% of earners?
Oh, yeah.
 
Swiiiiing and a miss. That's 0-for-5 now. And it speaks volumes about your source for whatever cockamamie bullshit that link goes to.

So you didn't scroll down...


Didn't need to. I asked YOU. And you failed.

So did the hack writer, claiming in his sublink "she lied" -- also without backing it up. Which he doesn't do because he can't, which is because it's a myth for the gullible.

Nice planet, where you can just write your own realities based on nothing.
I won't be visiting. I like solid ground.

I really can't help it that you are such a dumb bitch, that you wouldn't KNOW to scroll down!!! But hell when you have fought over

1. The KKK wasn't formed by Democrats
2. Declared Boko Harem wasn't about religion when they forced the girls to convert
3. Had no idea the Hillary LIED about being named after Sir E. Hillary
4. Fought that Fracking only produced natural gas!
5.Said I commited fraud when I stated 19 people had Thanked me for a post
6. And who did you bet $1 million dollars and welched on the deal?

Seems you're 0 for 6 but I do have 2-3 more if you need them! Fucking OCD girl!

Not an answer, is it?
Wassamatta? Caught in a myth and can't get out? :smiliehug:

I gave you the answer twice, and now you're back again, and STILL don't understand....Besides, I enjoyed showing what a fucking :ahole-1: you are, especially when you TRY to make others look bad, when you are worse! Perhaps I won't do that next time, I'll simply
iconsex-goldenshowers.gif
 
Wouldn't you agree that rich people benefit most from the society that everyone has created?

Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

I know all that, but I wanted some lame-assed liberal to respond with some pathetic attempt to justify government looting the earnings of the productive members of society so I could tear him apart.
Looting?

Our richest taxpayers have the lowest effective tax rate in history
That is why they fear Elizabeth Warren. She stirs up the masses
What's the tax rate for the bottom 40% of earners?
Oh, yeah.
What should it be on the portion of the population that has 4 tenths of a percent of our nations wealth?
 
Society and government are two separate things. Why is government entitled to anything because of benefits that society provides?
OK, we've parsed this one before but I'll repeat it.
According to the Lib Doctrine: no one got wealthy on their own. Society made them wealthy. Therefore their money isnt really theirs. It belongs to society. They just happened to be i the right place at the right time. Like winning the lottery.
So government really has a duty to take as much of that wealth as voters want and redistribute it to the people, whose money it is anyway.
Seriously, they actually believe this.

I know all that, but I wanted some lame-assed liberal to respond with some pathetic attempt to justify government looting the earnings of the productive members of society so I could tear him apart.
Looting?

Our richest taxpayers have the lowest effective tax rate in history
That is why they fear Elizabeth Warren. She stirs up the masses
What's the tax rate for the bottom 40% of earners?
Oh, yeah.
What should it be on the portion of the population that has 4 tenths of a percent of our nations wealth?
But only consume a small fraction of all imported cheese.
 

Forum List

Back
Top