Theowl32
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2013
- 22,833
- 17,179
- 2,415
Yesterday we learned that only 36% of Americans support this corrupt Administration. You can count the idiot Sallow as one of the Obama Zombies who doesn't give a damn about the truth.. Circle the wagons and throw out shit from years, almost a decade ago. 8 US Attorneys were dismissed which happens under EVERY SINGLE NEW ADMINISTRATION and serve at the President's pleasure.. Liberals tried to turn it in to a scandal, just like Bush lied thousands died which we all know now was a big fucking lie by liberals as well.. It's a pattern we see .. Is it any wonder these liars elect the biggest liar that's ever served as President???
The operative word being "new". Presidents do that at the beginning of every term. Not in the middle of a term. And it was because the attorney's had too much integrity to go after opponents simply because they are opponents that they were replaced with Bible School Graduates.
I'm sick of you talking without a clue. You are ignorant. That scandal wasn't all that long ago. What are you? About 15 or 16?
What is it with these Republicans? When you point out real scandals that happened under Bush and the Republicans, they go "BOOOOOOOSH" as if that absolves the scandal.
Iraq was a scandal.
American soldiers dying from electrocution in substandard dwellings was a scandal.
Old and rusty equipment was a scandal.
Moldy hospitals
9 billion in cash thrown away
three quarters of the Christian population being killed or chased from their homeland
women being forced into Burkas
the looting of museums and government buildings
Blackwater
Halliburton
ALL SCANDALS.
And why weren't any investigated? Because Republicans controlled both houses and the presidency. This is why the GOP is a scummy party. And look at these USMB Republicans. "BOOOOOSH". They are worse than al Qaeda. They caused more damage.
FactCheck.org an organization which ascertains the validity of political campaign advertisements researched this accusation. According to FactCheck, "The Bush administration is doing a fair amount to fight corporate corruption, convicting or indicting executives of Enron, Arthur Andersen, Tyco International, Worldcom, Adelphia Communications Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, HealthSouth Corporation and others, including Martha Stewart. The Department of Justice says it has brought charges against 20 executives of Enron alone, and its Corporate Fraud Task Force says it has won convictions of more than 250 persons to date. Bush also signed the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation in 2002, imposing stringent new accounting rules in the wake of the Arthur Andersen scandal."
When Factcheck.org checked the facts about allegations by Democrats that there was a scandal because of the "no-bid" contracts awarded to Halliburton they stated, "It is false to imply that Bush personally awarded a contract to Halliburton. The ‘no-bid contract’ in question is actually an extension of an earlier contract to support U.S. troops overseas that Halliburton won under open bidding. In fact, the notion that Halliburton benefited from any cronyism has been poo-poohed by a Harvard University professor, Steven Kelman, who was administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Clinton administration. ‘One would be hard-pressed to discover anyone with a working knowledge of how federal contracts are awarded...who doesn't regard these allegations as being somewhere between highly improbable and utterly absurd,’ Kelman wrote in the Washington Post last November."
Neither the Center for Public Integrity nor Factcheck.org determined anything sinister about Halliburton’s no-bid" contracts for the Iraq war. Two nonpartisan, nonaligned, public interest organizations have investigated the Halliburton allegations and found them to be specious allegations made for purely political purposes.
An L.A. Times op-ed of April 22 said, "Halliburton Received No-Bid Contracts During Clinton Administration For Work In Bosnia And Kosovo." An October 2003 article in the (Raleigh, NC) News & Observer quoted Bill Clinton's Undersecretary Of Commerce William Reinsch as saying "'Halliburton has a distinguished track record,' he said. 'They do business in some 120 countries. This is a group of people who know what they're doing in a difficult business. It's a particularly difficult business when people are shooting at you.'"
If Democrats want to investigate a scandal involving Iraq they should devote their efforts to the UN "Oil-for-Food" program instead of Halliburton. However, they will not because Saddam Hussein is not a candidate in this presidential election.
http://www.factcheck.org/
Whenever one of these puppets bring up the Halliburton cliche (they never have anything other than their cliches, better known as the puppet strings put out by the democrat puppet masters) just show them how wrong they are.
Not just factcheck, but I also cited the LA Times. Showing how it was actually Clinton that awarded Halliburton no-bid contracts.
They hate facts, and I have dispatched this dick before. Rdean of course forgets or ignores the facts as presented and goes right back to the cliches.
They are pathetic. and the fact they always think they are oh so smart is what makes them funny.
Last edited: