Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court

[Wehrwolfen]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

 

[Mr. Shaman]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

Yeah.....that's a lie.

​

 

[Wehrwolfen]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

Yeah.....that's a lie.

​

(1) DOJ's Attempt to Rescue Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act: Bailout Bait and Switch

(2) Texas? voter ID law blocked by Justice Department | Dallasnews.com - News for Dallas, Texas - The Dallas Morning News

(3) Rule of Law » Eric Holder Cons the Courts to Save Voting Rights Act (PJ Media Exclusive)

 

[Mr. Shaman]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

Yeah.....that's a lie.

​

(1) DOJ's Attempt to Rescue Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act: Bailout Bait and Switch

(2) Texas? voter ID law blocked by Justice Department | Dallasnews.com - News for Dallas, Texas - The Dallas Morning News

(3) Rule of Law » Eric Holder Cons the Courts to Save Voting Rights Act (PJ Media Exclusive)

Bogus!!!

​

 

[tjvh]

When the liberal nut Mr. Shaman goes ape shit, rest assured the OP is true.

 

[g5000]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

Your blogger is committing a lie of omission.

The three judges of the district court which stopped South Carolina's Voter ID law only did so for the 2012 election since not enough time was provided for every voter to meet the requirements of that law.

The exact same court has since allowed the Voter ID law to go into full effect.

To vote in the South Carolina primary yesterday in which adulterer Mark Sanford is attempting to make his comeback (is he really the best the GOP can do?) you were required to have Voter ID.

I would also like to see evidence the Texas Voter ID law is the same as Indiana's since Texas' law has been called one of the strictest Voter ID laws in the country.

 

[OKTexas]

by Doug Book, staff writer
March 20th, 2013

In yet another testament to the corrupt if inventive workings of the liberal mind, Attorney General Eric Holder recently decided to defraud the United States Supreme Court in the hope of preventing sections of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) being ruled unconstitutional.

Section 5 of the VRA requires 9 Southern states and a number of jurisdictions in 7 others—all charged with a history of voting rights abuses–to obtain “preclearance” from the DOJ or the District Court of DC before making any changes to state election policies or procedures. Passed into law in 1965, Section 5 was enacted as an “emergency provision” designed to “promote full access to the voting process” and expire in 5 years. (1)

But now, nearly 5 decades later, Section 5 has become the darling of Civil Rights groups, the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and liberal bureaucrats throughout the federal government as it has been …

It was the Justice Department’s dishonest use of Section 5 which prevented the implementation of Voter ID laws in Texas and South Carolina prior to the 2012 election. In fact, Holder and the Civil Rights Division blocked both laws from taking effect even though the changes proposed by the 2 states were patterned after the Indiana Voter ID law ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in 2009. (2)


Read more:
Eric Holder instructs Justice Department to defraud Supreme Court « Coach is Right

Your blogger is committing a lie of omission.

The three judges of the district court which stopped South Carolina's Voter ID law only did so for the 2012 election since not enough time was provided for every voter to meet the requirements of that law.

The exact same court has since allowed the Voter ID law to go into full effect.

To vote in the South Carolina primary yesterday in which adulterer Mark Sanford is attempting to make his comeback (is he really the best the GOP can do?) you were required to have Voter ID.

I would also like to see evidence the Texas Voter ID law is the same as Indiana's since Texas' law has been called one of the strictest Voter ID laws in the country.

Holder waited more than two years before he challenged the TX law, waiting till less than 6 months prior to the election to disallow the law. That mean our citizens had more than two years to get in compliance, hardly an undue burden. Holder actions were political and I would be willing to bet that the voter rolls in TX will shrink by a couple of hundred thousand once the ID law takes effect and the fraudulent voters are weeded out.