Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The inventors of fascism claim it's an economic system, and it's always compared and contrasted with socialism and capitalism. If it's not an economic system, then the term is utterly meaningless.Correct about authoritarian. Fascism is a subset of authoritarian ideologies but not the same nor equal to."Authoritarian" does not equate to "fascist." Authoritarian regimes have been around since civilization began. Fascism is supposedly an economic system. Nothing in the 14 points is related to economics. It's pure bullshit.
Disagreed that fascism is an economic system. Democracy isn't an economic system either, capitalism is an economic system.
The inventors of fascism claim it's an economic system, and it's always compared and contrasted with socialism and capitalism. If it's not an economic system, then the term is utterly meaningless.Correct about authoritarian. Fascism is a subset of authoritarian ideologies but not the same nor equal to."Authoritarian" does not equate to "fascist." Authoritarian regimes have been around since civilization began. Fascism is supposedly an economic system. Nothing in the 14 points is related to economics. It's pure bullshit.
Disagreed that fascism is an economic system. Democracy isn't an economic system either, capitalism is an economic system.
Your "14 points" are nothing but biases and emotions.Only an idiot would think that an opinion piece is made credible by the fact several people have reprinted it.Once AGAIN ---- what the URL says when it's quoting a widely-circulated study is wholly irrelevant. It's not their original material. I don't know Jeff Rense from Mike Pence, nor do I need to. They're quoting an outside source. Put the same text in a book or in a different URL ------- AND IT'S STILL THE SAME TEXT.
I could care less what you think is relevant.
If I cited a verbatim copy of the Constitution from a site like Breitbart, would you condemn the source too? Of course you would! Don't sit there and mince words with me.
Fine. I'm going to start doing that. I'll see how far I get before liberals start attacking the source.
Absolute fucking bullshit. Now you're compounding a Poison the Well fallacy with a Speculation, and an unfounded one at that. Why the fuck would I condemn a source that was copying something verbatim?? Only an idiot would do that.
On one of the points, the individual who lacks any credentials mentioned the opposition to terrorism which was OBVIOUSLY tailored to appeal to leftist sensibilities and has absolutely no basis in fact.
Dogshit once again offers opinions based on nothing but his/her biases and emotions, emotions of false pathos and other pretense his/her kind use as cover for their callous conservatism and ignorance. Citing a supposed fact without evidence or links is one more example of someone with a poor education and a person who matriculated at the echo chamber.
Yes, actually. Perhaps 1000 years from now your kind may come to understand that.Your "14 points" are nothing but biases and emotions.Only an idiot would think that an opinion piece is made credible by the fact several people have reprinted it.I could care less what you think is relevant.
If I cited a verbatim copy of the Constitution from a site like Breitbart, would you condemn the source too? Of course you would! Don't sit there and mince words with me.
Fine. I'm going to start doing that. I'll see how far I get before liberals start attacking the source.
Absolute fucking bullshit. Now you're compounding a Poison the Well fallacy with a Speculation, and an unfounded one at that. Why the fuck would I condemn a source that was copying something verbatim?? Only an idiot would do that.
On one of the points, the individual who lacks any credentials mentioned the opposition to terrorism which was OBVIOUSLY tailored to appeal to leftist sensibilities and has absolutely no basis in fact.
Dogshit once again offers opinions based on nothing but his/her biases and emotions, emotions of false pathos and other pretense his/her kind use as cover for their callous conservatism and ignorance. Citing a supposed fact without evidence or links is one more example of someone with a poor education and a person who matriculated at the echo chamber.
Of course, and everything you post is logical and pragmatic.
---SARCASM ALERT---
Leftists will do anything to hide the fact that fascism is of the left....I love the 4-quad propaganda the best.....Wrong. Fascism is a form of socialism. It maintains the pretense of capitalism by allowing factory owners to retain a title that confers no rights on the possessor, but the government makes all the business decisions for the enterprise. The government determines what he produces, how much he produces, the prices he charges, the wages he pays, the profit he makes and every other decision that a business owner would normally make. It's socialism, pure and simple.Wrong. Partisan Lefties call anyone to the right of themselves "fascists" even as they advocate a totalitarian socialist agenda run by the Liberal Elite.Yeah, because claiming Republicans are fascist isn't "partisan."
How does someone as brainless as you make his lungs work?
Try dropping the partisanship and using your brain for more than a place to park your ballcap. Republicans aren't fascists, but neither is fascism the same as socialism. It's more right than left winged as shown above and most definitely authoritarian.
Link? What "inventors of fascism"?The inventors of fascism claim it's an economic system, and it's always compared and contrasted with socialism and capitalism. If it's not an economic system, then the term is utterly meaningless.
Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
Honestly, I don't think anyone cares if they belong to the democrat kkk.....Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
Mussolini, of course. Also FDR and Woodrow Wilson.Link? What "inventors of fascism"?The inventors of fascism claim it's an economic system, and it's always compared and contrasted with socialism and capitalism. If it's not an economic system, then the term is utterly meaningless.
Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
That graph is a piece of propaganda intended to deceive. Below is how the political plain is properly divided:
Everyone knows democrats started the kkk now....your attempts to hide your embarrassment are futile...Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
Nope, wrong.
Calvin Jones, Frank McCord, Capt. John Lester, Capt. John Kennedy, Richard Reed and James Crowe founded the Klan December 25 1865, in the law office of Jones' father where he was house-sitting. As a social group.
No evidence exists that any of them were politically connected or active at all. Period.
That Klan expired after a decade. Forty years after that it was restarted on Stone Mountain by one William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons. No evidence exists of any political activity or affiliation for him either. Period.
As for the second part of the question, I continue to wait --- several years now --- for someone to explain what planet it is on which literally everyone belongs to a fucking political party anyway.
He was very similar to the National Socialists in his speeches in that he spoke in plain, direct language.Please review the following two links on fascism and what we have observed since the election of Donald Trump to the office of POTUS.
Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
Donald Trump and the 14 signs of Fascism • /r/politics
Consider the promises made by Mr. Trump during the time before he received the nomination of the Republican Party, his rhetoric before his election after being nominated, and his rhetoric since being elected to POTUS?
That graph is a piece of propaganda intended to deceive. Below is how the political plain is properly divided:
Liberalism isn't on the "left", Fingerboi.
If you limit yourself to two dimensions (which doesn't at all surprise me) it's better placed at the top where you have "Libertarian" sitting.
Everyone knows democrats started the kkk now....your attempts to hide your embarrassment are futile...Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
Nope, wrong.
Calvin Jones, Frank McCord, Capt. John Lester, Capt. John Kennedy, Richard Reed and James Crowe founded the Klan December 25 1865, in the law office of Jones' father where he was house-sitting. As a social group.
No evidence exists that any of them were politically connected or active at all. Period.
That Klan expired after a decade. Forty years after that it was restarted on Stone Mountain by one William J. "Colonel Joe" Simmons. No evidence exists of any political activity or affiliation for him either. Period.
As for the second part of the question, I continue to wait --- several years now --- for someone to explain what planet it is on which literally everyone belongs to a fucking political party anyway.
Now we're onto how you are the party of fascism....
What a winner of a party you picked....
That graph is a piece of propaganda intended to deceive. Below is how the political plain is properly divided:
Liberalism isn't on the "left", Fingerboi.
If you limit yourself to two dimensions (which doesn't at all surprise me) it's better placed at the top where you have "Libertarian" sitting.
First rule of partisanship: Leave your brain at the door.First rule of thumb when dealing with fascism: resist the propaganda......A more accurate representation of political ideologies and Fascism:The Political CompassWe know where you stand....sadly...It's really quite,simple....which is why you LWNJs try to complicate it in order to hide from the facts....
Like I said, it's your Holy Grail. You can't man up and own that extremist rightwing ideologies are just as icky as extremist leftwing ideologies. In fact...they resemble each other far more than their moderate counterparts.
View attachment 104552
Why is Hitler slightly right? The Nazis were socialists, so they weren't fascists either.
Let's start with the second part first. Some respondents confuse Nazism, a political party platform, with fascism, which is a particular structure of government. Fascism legally sanctions the persecution of a particular group within the country — political, ethnic, religious — whatever. So within Nazism there are elements of fascism, as well as militarism, capitalism, socialism etc. To tar all socialists with the national socialist brush is as absurd as citing Bill Gates and Augusto Pinochet in the same breath as examples of free market capitalism.
Economically, Hitler was well to the right of Stalin. Post-war investigations led to a number of revelations about the cosy relationship between German corporations and the Reich. No such scandals subsequently surfaced in Russia, because Stalin had totally squashed the private sector. By contrast, once in power, the Nazis achieved rearmament through deficit spending. One of our respondents has correctly pointed out that they actively discouraged demand increases because they wanted infrastructure investment. Under the Reich, corporations were largely left to govern themselves, with the incentive that if they kept prices under control, they would be rewarded with government contracts. Hardly a socialist economic agenda!
But Nazi corporate ties extended well beyond Germany. It is an extraordinarily little known fact that in 1933 a cabal of Wall Street financiers and industrialists plotted an armed coup against President Roosevelt and the US Constitutional form of government. The coup planners — all of them deeply hostile to socialism — were enthusiastic supporters of German national socialism and Italian fascism. Details of the little publicised Congressional report on the failed coup may be read in 1000 Americans:The Real Rulers of the USA by George Seldes.
Fascism, according to the American Heritage Dictionary (1983) is A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism. Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile's entry in the Encyclopedia Italiana read: Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. No less an authority on fascism than Mussolini was so pleased with that definition that he later claimed credit for it.
Nevertheless, within certain US circles,the misconception remains that fascism is essentially left wing, and that the Nazis were socialists simply because of the "socialism" in their name. We wonder if respondents who insist on uncritically accepting the Nazis' cynical self-definition would be quite as eager to believe that the German Democratic Republic was democratic.
The Political Compass
A good breakdown of differences between Left and Right Wing:
Left Wing vs Right Wing - Difference and Comparison | Diffen
Second rule of partisanship: Education is evil.
Correct about the KKK being started by Democrats. What party do most KKK, Sovereign Citizen, Christian Identity and other White Supremacists belong to today? Democrats or Republicans?....They deny their fascism almost as much as they deny starting the kkk....
