Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've seen that same opinion expressed by pot-smoking teenage anarchists living off their parents in a basement room....The US of A is a gargantuan FASCIST bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.
.
1) A lot of prominent people accepted the science of eugenics in the early part of the 20th. It's not like he believed Obama was a Kenyan Muslim sleeper agent sent here to destroy the United States or that Bush caused 9/11.That is because people don't know that he was a nut and believed in eugenics......if more people knew that Teddy wouldn't have the status that he has.....
what do you mean by "free"? we had a Third World economy before FDR, we cruised right past the second world due to litigation and war, and now we have a First World economy, where the right alleges that the poor are, too free to do what they want.It is now, but prior to FDR it was a passably free country.The United States of America is the evidence that limiting government meddling to the maximum extent possible is what works best.The United States of America. Perhaps you can give the name of a country which is better.....in your opinion."Seems to work best?" Obviously you don't have any actual evidence that it works best.
Bad bad example
The US of A is a gargantuan FASCIST bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.
.
That's not quite correct, although I'm sure most people will agree WWII, despite almost bankrupting the nation, gave it an industrial boost that pushed us to the top of the world economies..... we had a Third World economy before FDR, we cruised right past the second world due to litigation and war, and now we have a First World economy, where the right alleges that the poor are, too free to do what they want.
what do you mean by "free"? we had a Third World economy before FDR, we cruised right past the second world due to litigation and war, and now we have a First World economy, where the right alleges that the poor are, too free to do what they want.It is now, but prior to FDR it was a passably free country.The United States of America is the evidence that limiting government meddling to the maximum extent possible is what works best.The United States of America. Perhaps you can give the name of a country which is better.....in your opinion."Seems to work best?" Obviously you don't have any actual evidence that it works best.
Bad bad example
The US of A is a gargantuan FASCIST bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.
.
That's not quite correct, although I'm sure most people will agree WWII, despite almost bankrupting the nation, gave it an industrial boost that pushed us to the top of the world economies..... we had a Third World economy before FDR, we cruised right past the second world due to litigation and war, and now we have a First World economy, where the right alleges that the poor are, too free to do what they want.
1) "Second World" refers to communist nations since their economies were planned. First, Second, and Third World - Nations Online Project
2) The world was in a global depression in the 1930s. Despite this, the US was still an economic powerhouse. A major difference was one of attitude; the US was isolationist to a large extent and global trade was limited. The US economy was large because the country is large and prosperous whereas the USSR was large and not prosperous. China was a basketcase of competing warlords.
1) A lot of prominent people accepted the science of eugenics in the early part of the 20th. It's not like he believed Obama was a Kenyan Muslim sleeper agent sent here to destroy the United States or that Bush caused 9/11.That is because people don't know that he was a nut and believed in eugenics......if more people knew that Teddy wouldn't have the status that he has.....
2) Eugenics is simply improving the human race through selective breeding. Eugenics got a bad name because of it's association with the fucking Nazis. Not only did they selectively breed their "best", but they actively sought to eliminate all "undesirable" human beings from their population such as Jews, Homosexuals, mentally defective, Gypsies, etc. by imprisoning and executing them. 11 million people died in the Nazi Holocaust, 6 million of them Jews.
3) From 1907 to 1963, the US practiced eugenics through forced sterilization of "undesirables" such as the mentally retarded, the insane and other "defective persons". Social Origins of Eugenics
4) Today it's considered not PC to mention it even though we're entering an age of selecting desirable genes from eggs and sperm to form a desired zygote. In essence, we're on the verge of practicing Eugenics pre-conception.
Of course he did. Like I said, it was so common at the time, many states practices eugenics through forced sterilization.1) A lot of prominent people accepted the science of eugenics in the early part of the 20th. It's not like he believed Obama was a Kenyan Muslim sleeper agent sent here to destroy the United States or that Bush caused 9/11.That is because people don't know that he was a nut and believed in eugenics......if more people knew that Teddy wouldn't have the status that he has.....
2) Eugenics is simply improving the human race through selective breeding. Eugenics got a bad name because of it's association with the fucking Nazis. Not only did they selectively breed their "best", but they actively sought to eliminate all "undesirable" human beings from their population such as Jews, Homosexuals, mentally defective, Gypsies, etc. by imprisoning and executing them. 11 million people died in the Nazi Holocaust, 6 million of them Jews.
3) From 1907 to 1963, the US practiced eugenics through forced sterilization of "undesirables" such as the mentally retarded, the insane and other "defective persons". Social Origins of Eugenics
4) Today it's considered not PC to mention it even though we're entering an age of selecting desirable genes from eggs and sperm to form a desired zygote. In essence, we're on the verge of practicing Eugenics pre-conception.
Yeah...he made some really unpleasant statements supporting eugenics....and if people knew about them he would not be seen kindly.....
You should try reading it again, but let the partisan scales fall from your eyes.1. More leftist propaganda. WW II did not grow our industrial capacity that much. The claim that it did is a leftwing myth. Most of the factories used in WW II already existed before the war. They were just lying idle because of the depression.
2. So the U.S. was an economic powerhouse before the war, but the war is the reason we were an economic powerhouse? You can't even keep your propaganda straight.
As if Hillary would have done anything different, other than the cronies would all have a "D" after their names or large "charity" donation checks.The election proved demagoguery, hate and fear are sufficient to woe the votes of the biddable. Have you noticed how many common people have been nominated or appointed by the P-e? Has Trump drained the swamp, or has he reloaded it with the usual suspects; from, Wall Street, the 1%, the Military and former elected officials.
Still, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration functions. He's not even sworn in yet and you're declaring his Presidency a failure. LOL
A mandate for what?As if Hillary would have done anything different, other than the cronies would all have a "D" after their names or large "charity" donation checks.The election proved demagoguery, hate and fear are sufficient to woe the votes of the biddable. Have you noticed how many common people have been nominated or appointed by the P-e? Has Trump drained the swamp, or has he reloaded it with the usual suspects; from, Wall Street, the 1%, the Military and former elected officials.
Still, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration functions. He's not even sworn in yet and you're declaring his Presidency a failure. LOL
Hillary hasn't and won't nominate or appoint anyone, she lost the Presidency even though she received a clear mandate of a 3 million + or - votes more than Trump. That's a fact!
I haven't declared Trump's Presidency a failure. I have said and I will repeat that Trump is unfit to be POTUS, I've made that assessment by watching and listening to him closely, and by the facts that he has zero experience with governance, seems to have no sense of diplomacy, attacks persons not their argument, and has proved to me to be a classic demagogue, charlatan and narcissist.
Will his presidency be a failure? That is the question yet to be answered. Two points to consider:
- People in general either grow into a job, or they don't. We can hope and some might pray that Trump can learn he cannot succeed on tweets, lies, false pathos or promises. He must rely on others and listen to their counsel, he must try to understand other cultures and why some will tell him, NO! And he must hold his tongue (metaphorically, put the letter under his pillow and read it over the following day)
- And the question to be answered for anyone who first takes the oath of office of the President of the United States: Will he make history, or will history make him?
The United States of America is the evidence that limiting government meddling to the maximum extent possible is what works best.The United States of America. Perhaps you can give the name of a country which is better.....in your opinion."Seems to work best?" Obviously you don't have any actual evidence that it works best.
I'd suggest courses on the Economic History of the United States and The Diplomatic History of the US, but since they are mostly taught by professors, and your side of the aisle believes them to be liberal brain washers you would not be inclined to do so. There are books on both subjects, annotated with bibliographies and cites to primary sources. But I doubt you would waster your time.
I would suggest that you're a brainwashed moron. I've read hundred of books about American history, especially it's economic history.
You, on the other hand, don't know your ass for a hole in the ground. Everything you think you know is a lie.
A mandate for what?As if Hillary would have done anything different, other than the cronies would all have a "D" after their names or large "charity" donation checks.The election proved demagoguery, hate and fear are sufficient to woe the votes of the biddable. Have you noticed how many common people have been nominated or appointed by the P-e? Has Trump drained the swamp, or has he reloaded it with the usual suspects; from, Wall Street, the 1%, the Military and former elected officials.
Still, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration functions. He's not even sworn in yet and you're declaring his Presidency a failure. LOL
Hillary hasn't and won't nominate or appoint anyone, she lost the Presidency even though she received a clear mandate of a 3 million + or - votes more than Trump. That's a fact!
I haven't declared Trump's Presidency a failure. I have said and I will repeat that Trump is unfit to be POTUS, I've made that assessment by watching and listening to him closely, and by the facts that he has zero experience with governance, seems to have no sense of diplomacy, attacks persons not their argument, and has proved to me to be a classic demagogue, charlatan and narcissist.
Will his presidency be a failure? That is the question yet to be answered. Two points to consider:
- People in general either grow into a job, or they don't. We can hope and some might pray that Trump can learn he cannot succeed on tweets, lies, false pathos or promises. He must rely on others and listen to their counsel, he must try to understand other cultures and why some will tell him, NO! And he must hold his tongue (metaphorically, put the letter under his pillow and read it over the following day)
- And the question to be answered for anyone who first takes the oath of office of the President of the United States: Will he make history, or will history make him?
Not in so many words, but, as you opened with, clearly you and your fellow far Left friends, are so highly antagonistic toward Trump, you aren't even allowing him his first 100 days to see what happens....I haven't declared Trump's Presidency a failure. I have said and I will repeat that Trump is unfit to be POTUS, I've made that assessment by watching and listening to him closely, and by the facts that he has zero experience with governance, seems to have no sense of diplomacy, attacks persons not their argument, and has proved to me to be a classic demagogue, charlatan and narcissist....
what do you mean by "free"? we had a Third World economy before FDR, we cruised right past the second world due to litigation and war, and now we have a First World economy, where the right alleges that the poor are, too free to do what they want.It is now, but prior to FDR it was a passably free country.The United States of America is the evidence that limiting government meddling to the maximum extent possible is what works best.The United States of America. Perhaps you can give the name of a country which is better.....in your opinion.
Bad bad example
The US of A is a gargantuan FASCIST bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.
.
No we didn't. We had the biggest economy on earth. You're peddling a leftwing myth. Who do you imaging purchased 20 million Model T's before FDR ascended to the throne?
Disagreed here. Regardless of numbers, a lot of pissed off West Coast liberals should not be allowed to dictate to the other 47-48 states who becomes President. That's why the Founders set up the system we have. If you want to change the system, you just had 8 years to do so. Why wait until after Hillary lost to bitch about it?A mandate for what?As if Hillary would have done anything different, other than the cronies would all have a "D" after their names or large "charity" donation checks.The election proved demagoguery, hate and fear are sufficient to woe the votes of the biddable. Have you noticed how many common people have been nominated or appointed by the P-e? Has Trump drained the swamp, or has he reloaded it with the usual suspects; from, Wall Street, the 1%, the Military and former elected officials.
Still, it remains to be seen how the Trump administration functions. He's not even sworn in yet and you're declaring his Presidency a failure. LOL
Hillary hasn't and won't nominate or appoint anyone, she lost the Presidency even though she received a clear mandate of a 3 million + or - votes more than Trump. That's a fact!
I haven't declared Trump's Presidency a failure. I have said and I will repeat that Trump is unfit to be POTUS, I've made that assessment by watching and listening to him closely, and by the facts that he has zero experience with governance, seems to have no sense of diplomacy, attacks persons not their argument, and has proved to me to be a classic demagogue, charlatan and narcissist.
Will his presidency be a failure? That is the question yet to be answered. Two points to consider:
- People in general either grow into a job, or they don't. We can hope and some might pray that Trump can learn he cannot succeed on tweets, lies, false pathos or promises. He must rely on others and listen to their counsel, he must try to understand other cultures and why some will tell him, NO! And he must hold his tongue (metaphorically, put the letter under his pillow and read it over the following day)
- And the question to be answered for anyone who first takes the oath of office of the President of the United States: Will he make history, or will history make him?
Yes Virginia, there are dumb questions.
We have 200+ years of history of career politicians fucking over citizens, why would anyone trust the career politician?
Having single term limits would get the cancer out of the politician that is the career... factWe have 200+ years of history of career politicians fucking over citizens, why would anyone trust the career politician?
Would you go to a barber to remove a burst appendix? What's wrong with Congress and state/local legislative bodies is not "career politicians", it is the cash that is necessary for each of them to remain in elective office.
You should try reading it again, but let the partisan scales fall from your eyes.1. More leftist propaganda. WW II did not grow our industrial capacity that much. The claim that it did is a leftwing myth. Most of the factories used in WW II already existed before the war. They were just lying idle because of the depression.
2. So the U.S. was an economic powerhouse before the war, but the war is the reason we were an economic powerhouse? You can't even keep your propaganda straight.
