Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not an argument that refutes the explanation from the article. Your argument is one of hate.She was never prosecuted because shes a Clinton and part of the deep state, I don't give a damn what politico says.
You post is literally 100% bullshit.For starters, Trump had clearly marked classified documents. Clinton didn’t.
The statutes require that they knowingly mishandle the information. It’s hard to claim Trump didn’t know it was classified.
Second, Clinton cooperated with the investigation. Trump didn’t. That’s why there was a raid on his compound. When subpoenaed, Clinton complied.
Why did the FBI ask him to add a lock, Simp?If that were true, there wouldn't have been classified top secret documents in his closet after they said there were no more documents at the residence.
The behave as if they believe their word is law.That's not what the FBI said.
So who was the president when those boxes were packed?the President Do you know what that means? That's right screwball, it means Trump is not.
How does the President violate the espionage act?Violation of the Espionage Act is not a civil case. Get a clue.
Yeah. None of that is actually true.When subpoenaed Clinton destroyed 33,000 emails and 11 cell phones and bleachbit her server!
In the case of President Clinton, a federal judge decided that the President determines which records are personal and which belong to the government, not some petty functionary at the National Archive.He wasn’t. The PRA is perfectly clear. Presidential records are to be under control of the Archives. It’s especially true for classified information.
They didn’t.FBI said so, right up to the invasion.
That didn’t happen.In the case of President Clinton, a federal judge decided that the President determines which records are personal and which belong to the government, not some petty functionary at the National Archive.
Says who?Yeah. None of that is actually true.
The cell phones were destroyed long before a subpoena.
She paid someone to do it, moron.Clinton did not destroy emails or bleach bit a server. She couldn’t work a computer at all.
Yes they were. Furthermore, she was the SOS. She's supposed to know when documents are classified, whether they are marked or not.No, the documents weren’t marked top secret, your article doesn’t say anything otherwise.
We do, and we don't lie about it like you do.It would help you guys if you knew what actually happened.
It sure as hell did.That didn’t happen.
Get educated, Dumbass.Yeah. None of that is actually true.
The cell phones were destroyed long before a subpoena. Clinton did not destroy emails or bleach bit a server. She couldn’t work a computer at all.
No, the documents weren’t marked top secret, your article doesn’t say anything otherwise.
It would help you guys if you knew what actually happened.
Canadian, don’t worryNice attempt at distracting from the facts, FuckBoi. Trump had hundreds of classified and sensitive documents he stole from the White House. He's going to go to jail for violating the law TRUMP himself signed, in order to prosecute Hillary Clinton.
After a search of his office by the guy he appointed to be his own personal Director of the FBI.
You still haven't found a job???? Geez, Nostra, even the mentally handicapped guys can get jobs in this market. What's wrong with YOU????
Yeah. None of that is actually true.
The cell phones were destroyed long before a subpoena. Clinton did not destroy emails or bleach bit a server. She couldn’t work a computer at all.
No, the documents weren’t marked top secret, your article doesn’t say anything otherwise.
It would help you guys if you knew what actually happened.
www.factcheck.org
Clinton’s office disclosed on March 10, 2015, that she gave the State Department 30,490 work-related emails on Dec. 5, 2014, and “chose not to keep” 31,830 emails she deemed “personal.”
It turned out that Keilar’s assumption was accurate. The 31,830 personal emails that Keilar asked about were deleted “sometime between March 25-31, 2015,” according to the FBI. That was about three weeks after Clinton received a House subpoena on March 4, 2015.
It must hurt to get pounded like that for being such a dumbass.See post 175 James Comey said it himself, dumbass.
The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org
The FBI's summary of its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contradicted some of her past statements about her use of a private email system for government business.
This would be known as destroying evidence.
The emails were subpoenaed on March 4th, and were deleted between March 25th and 31st. That is destroying evidence. Why was she not prosecuted? Where was the liberal outrage about HER mishandling of "classified documents" that we KNOW she kept on an unsecured server?
See post 175 James Comey said it himself, dumbass
This would be known as destroying evidence.
The emails were subpoenaed on March 4th, and were deleted between March 25th and 31st. That is destroying evidence. Why was she not prosecuted? Where was the liberal outrage about HER mishandling of "classified documents" that we KNOW she kept on an unsecured server?
Get educated, Dumbass.
