Federal Judge Stops trump's Plan To Use 3.6 Billion Military Dollars On Wall

[g5000]

from the emergency that wasn't back to reality -

Judge Blocks Trump Plan to Divert $3.6 Billion in Military Funds to Border Wall

ain't gonna be no damn FENCE ...

There's more than a billion to keep building till it gets to a real court. Don't worry, be happy.

AKA REPAIR OLD FENCE.

That's one hell of a repair job!

Worth every penny.

Oh wait...

]

 

[jknowgood]

I think Trump is doing a great job. Wages are up, unemployment is down. He got the new trade deal signed, all with the democrats trying to impeach him. All the republicans got to run on in the election, what did the democrats do for you and your family for the last two years. I can tell you, they worked on a failed plan to impeach a duly elected president.

FYI, it has been
11 months of Dems having power in the house, as of this month, with no power in the Senate....

What have they accomplished? A failed coop? I do appreciate it though. Y'all are gonna give Trump the power next year to be able to make roe vs wade a bad memory. Thanks to Pelosi and Schiff, I will send them a thank you note!

If you overturn RvW all that does is send it back to the States. States that want to make late term abortions legal can again.

Not if they declare a fetus, a living human.

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Supreme court ruled on using military funds for wall in June or July.
They sided with trump.
If they let it play out while lower litigation considered it, how do you think they will rule?

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain.

 

[g5000]

Dimocrats are ecstatic and celebrate that illegals will continue to have an easier time to sneak into our country.

If they had the slightest bit of intellectual honesty, they would demand that all existing fencing be removed. But, of course, they don't.

That is not what democrats stand for...

You are one of these stupid binary people, all wall or no wall...

Democrats said fence is very useful in sensible areas like urban areas and such...

Trump was the one who stated that the boarder would be 100% re-enforced concrete paid for by Mexico... And you and your lot cheered him on like idiots...

With each passing day of the campaign, Trump's wall got higher, thicker, sexier. And the check from Mexico got bigger.

 

[Siete]

from the emergency that wasn't back to reality -

Judge Blocks Trump Plan to Divert $3.6 Billion in Military Funds to Border Wall

ain't gonna be no damn FENCE ...

There's more than a billion to keep building till it gets to a real court. Don't worry, be happy.

AKA REPAIR OLD FENCE.

That's one hell of a repair job!

Worth every penny.

Oh wait...

]

handing trumpdrones their ass isnt good enough

by all means break it off too.

 

[jknowgood]

If Trump did nothing his whole presidency. Keeping Hillary from being president is all I wanted.

Which is fine. Just quit trying to defend his failures and lies.

What failures? He has also been one of the first presidents to keep almost all of his campaign promises.

I'm sure there are some fiction writing sites that would suit you better. TO be fair, Trump does take both sides of an argument many times. Hard to lose that way.

Thanks for proving my point.

of course the reason you hate Hillary is totally imaginary and proved to be nothing but garbage propaganda every time. Super dupe. Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty? The whole world thinks you are nuts....

Even Comey said she was guilty, said but she didn't intend too. Translation, she is a dumbass.

 

[g5000]

Eminent domain. I well remember when real conservatives spit nails at federal claims to eminent domain.

Trump is leading these fucking hippies ever farther leftward.

 

[Siete]

Supreme court ruled on using military funds for wall in June or July.
They sided with trump.
If they let it play out while lower litigation considered it, how do you think they will rule?

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain.

it means I just educated you about ED.

YA MORON -

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

under - through, AND OVER

MISERABLE FAIL ^^^^^^^^^^^

another couple of hundred BILLION DOLLARS should do it.

NOT.

My family lived for two years on the southern border not far from the Rio Grande. I only heard one story of an unwelcomed border crossing, and it was largely discounted because the guy who crossed had friends, was a drunk, and changed his hideouts regularly. Back then, the only border patrols I was aware of checked cars at the border and collected small crossing fees. The school had a lot of hispanic kids there, but they were very respectful, kind kids, and I liked them a lot and thought they were just like us, except they knew the Spanish language.

I lived 100 miles from the border in Junction Tx. on the S. Llano river.
It was way out in the boonies in a county with only 6k people.
It was a regular occurance to see illegals walking the river on their way to San Antonio and beyond.
They'd occasionally stop and ask for food. I told em to go to the second house about a mile down river and he'd help them out.
Of course they didnt know that was where the local sheriff lived.
He stopped me in town one day and asked me If I was the one sending illegals to his house.
I said yeah with a smile on my face and he cracked up laughing.

 

[g5000]

Smugglers are sawing through new sections of Trump’s border wall

A saw?

A fucking...SAW!?!

Man!

We didn't see that one coming!

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Supreme court ruled on using military funds for wall in June or July.
They sided with trump.
If they let it play out while lower litigation considered it, how do you think they will rule?

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain

it means I just educated you about ED.

YA MORON -

Is that your honest take away from this? LOL. You cite an article you found on Google about an issue that has nothing to do with eminent domain for government use, I nail you down on how it's not only a different issue altogether, but the delay in the appeals process over the issue in that case was later upheld by the US Supreme Court (making it controlling precedent), and you still think you scored a point? You really are some kind of stupid my friend.

 

[g5000]

 

[g5000]

Well, five million illegal Mexicans voted in the 2016 election without a single one of them geniuses getting caught. I guess we shoulda known they had access to advanced alien technologies like...a saw.

Back to the drawing board!


Advanced ALIEN technology! Get it? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Thank you...thank you...I'll be here all week.

 

[Siete]

Supreme court ruled on using military funds for wall in June or July.
They sided with trump.
If they let it play out while lower litigation considered it, how do you think they will rule?

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain

it means I just educated you about ED.

YA MORON -

Is that your honest take away from this? LOL. You cite an article you found on Google about an issue that has nothing to do with eminent domain for government use, I nail you down on how it's not only a different issue altogether, but the delay in the appeals process over the issue in that case was later upheld by the US Supreme Court (making it controlling precedent), and you still think you scored a point? You really are some kind of stupid my friend.

I quote ED history with TRUMP as a main player, and it has nothing to do with ED ?

told you about lofty goals too -

 

[22lcidw]

Dimocrats are ecstatic and celebrate that illegals will continue to have an easier time to sneak into our country.

If they had the slightest bit of intellectual honesty, they would demand that all existing fencing be removed. But, of course, they don't.

That is not what democrats stand for...

You are one of these stupid binary people, all wall or no wall...

Democrats said fence is very useful in sensible areas like urban areas and such...

Trump was the one who stated that the boarder would be 100% re-enforced concrete paid for by Mexico... And you and your lot cheered him on like idiots...

With each passing day of the campaign, Trump's wall got higher, thicker, sexier. And the check from Mexico got bigger.

Nothing is ever going to beat the Obamacare promises. Nothing. Your socialist voters didn't even purchase the insurance And they will not pay for your agendas either.

 

[Meathead]

from the emergency that wasn't back to reality -

Judge Blocks Trump Plan to Divert $3.6 Billion in Military Funds to Border Wall

ain't gonna be no damn FENCE ...

There's more than a billion to keep building till it gets to a real court. Don't worry, be happy.

AKA REPAIR OLD FENCE.

That's one hell of a repair job!

Worth every penny.

Oh wait...

]

handing trumpdrones their ass isnt good enough

by all means break it off too.

You guys seen especially triggered today. Is it the impeachment hearings?

 

[Jitss617]

When you say the fence is rejected, do you have a voting map?

 

[Siete]

Dimocrats are ecstatic and celebrate that illegals will continue to have an easier time to sneak into our country.

If they had the slightest bit of intellectual honesty, they would demand that all existing fencing be removed. But, of course, they don't.

That is not what democrats stand for...

You are one of these stupid binary people, all wall or no wall...

Democrats said fence is very useful in sensible areas like urban areas and such...

Trump was the one who stated that the boarder would be 100% re-enforced concrete paid for by Mexico... And you and your lot cheered him on like idiots...

With each passing day of the campaign, Trump's wall got higher, thicker, sexier. And the check from Mexico got bigger.

Nothing is ever going to beat the Obamacare promises. Nothing. Your socialist voters didn't even purchase the insurance And they will not pay for your agendas either.

the Obamcare Trump promised to defund, and eliminate ?

THAT OBAMACARE?

 

[g5000]

Dimocrats are ecstatic and celebrate that illegals will continue to have an easier time to sneak into our country.

If they had the slightest bit of intellectual honesty, they would demand that all existing fencing be removed. But, of course, they don't.

That is not what democrats stand for...

You are one of these stupid binary people, all wall or no wall...

Democrats said fence is very useful in sensible areas like urban areas and such...

Trump was the one who stated that the boarder would be 100% re-enforced concrete paid for by Mexico... And you and your lot cheered him on like idiots...

With each passing day of the campaign, Trump's wall got higher, thicker, sexier. And the check from Mexico got bigger.

Nothing is ever going to beat the Obamacare promises. Nothing. Your socialist voters didn't even purchase the insurance And they will not pay for your agendas either.

Ten years of Republicans promising to repeal and replace Obamacare, then Trump saying he was going to unveil his terrific, beautiful Obamacare replacement immediately after his health secretary was confirmed, which happened 33 months ago now.

Trump promised you would "have such great health care AT A TINY FRACTION OF THE COST!"

That's a much bigger promise than Obama's $2500 savings.

And now health care costs are at all time historical highs.

So, yeah. You were hoaxed. MASSIVELY. And you idiots STILL have not caught on.


And finally, that Obama was "worse than Trump" is no fucking excuse for not holding Trump accountable.

No fucking excuse at all.

That's the argument of a submissive, weak-minded cuck.

 

[g5000]

There's more than a billion to keep building till it gets to a real court. Don't worry, be happy.

AKA REPAIR OLD FENCE.

That's one hell of a repair job!

Worth every penny.

Oh wait...

]

handing trumpdrones their ass isnt good enough

by all means break it off too.

You guys seen especially triggered today. Is it the impeachment hearings?

Irony.

You get bitch slapped and that's all you got?

By the way. I'm not the slightest bit worked up about Trump's impeachment. His legacy is set in stone now. The third president ever impeached. A hundred years from now, the only thing Americans will know about Donald J. Trump is that he was elected by Putin and tried to rig the 2020 election.

So...nice try. What else you got?