Feds charge knockout attacker with hate crime

How do we go from multiple reports of black people recorded on video committing
a serious act of violence against unsuspecting victims mostly white as no big deal.
Just random acts of violence.

Then we have a dumb ass white guy do it and they go after him with all the power the
government can bring to bear.
 
How do we go from multiple reports of black people recorded on video committing
a serious act of violence against unsuspecting victims mostly white as no big deal.
Just random acts of violence.

Then we have a dumb ass white guy do it and they go after him with all the power the
government can bring to bear.

Well, for starters, he actually admitted to attacking the guy solely because he was black. :eusa_whistle:
 
How do we go from multiple reports of black people recorded on video committing
a serious act of violence against unsuspecting victims mostly white as no big deal.
Just random acts of violence.

Then we have a dumb ass white guy do it and they go after him with all the power the
government can bring to bear.

Well, for starters, he actually admitted to attacking the guy solely because he was black. :eusa_whistle:

He said he wanted to show how he.wouldn't get coverage. How did that work out for ya.
 
Any evidence that they were?

Only that none of them were black and all of them were white. Is that enough?

Gotta be more specific for libtards" All the perps were black, all the victims, white. Now, you explain how that is not a hate crime based on race?

most of the victims are white but not all

wanna see some poetic justice though

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWDoPQ7AFw]Knockout Game Turns On Attacker - YouTube[/ame]
 
Re: hate crimes

Why is it worse if someone knocks you out because he doesn't like your race than if he knocks you out to steal your money?

Is government mandated thought control really where we want this country to go? Punishments for non PC thoughts? Really people, this is very dangerous.
 
Is he going to claim "stand your ground"? It worked before.

TM was a racist thug. Zimmerman was defending himself from an attack by the racist thug---the thug lost. The jury acquitted. Its over.

The fact that zimmerman may be a shithead has nothing to do with it.
 
The asshole that did this attack needs to be thrown in jail....like the many blacks that have done it the past few months.

As for Holder and his goons, we see how liberals especially black ones don't treat white people the same under the law as blacks....
 
Re: hate crimes

Why is it worse if someone knocks you out because he doesn't like your race than if he knocks you out to steal your money?

Is government mandated thought control really where we want this country to go? Punishments for non PC thoughts? Really people, this is very dangerous.

Think whatever you want. It's your conduct that matters. All acts of violence are a problem for society, and society is right to prosecute such deeds. Though violent acts that are fueled specifically by hatred of a specific race, gender, religion, etc are especially problematic to maintaining a peaceful society.
 
And all the black thugs targeting whites are not targeting them on the basis of race?

Any evidence that they were?

Just that they targeted only white people and call it polar bear hunting.

The knockout game is what the PCBSers call it. Blacks call it polar bear hunting.

The thing is that all of these individuals are committing isolated acts of violence. You cannot charge Jimmy with a hate crime for attacking a white man, just because some other unidentified black guy 1000 miles away also attacked a white man in a similar way and said that he was doing it for racial reasons.
 
Re: hate crimes

Why is it worse if someone knocks you out because he doesn't like your race than if he knocks you out to steal your money?

Is government mandated thought control really where we want this country to go? Punishments for non PC thoughts? Really people, this is very dangerous.

Think whatever you want. It's your conduct that matters. All acts of violence are a problem for society, and society is right to prosecute such deeds. Though violent acts that are fueled specifically by hatred of a specific race, gender, religion, etc are especially problematic to maintaining a peaceful society.

True, but you dodged the question, why is the crime worse if it is the result of negative thoughts about a race, gender, religion, etc?

Why do we want to punish thoughts rather than acts?

Answer: because PC requires that everyone have the same thoughts and beliefs--and that those thoughts and beliefs are to be dictated by the government. Do you really think that is best for a free society?
 
Any evidence that they were?

Just that they targeted only white people and call it polar bear hunting.

The knockout game is what the PCBSers call it. Blacks call it polar bear hunting.

The thing is that all of these individuals are committing isolated acts of violence. You cannot charge Jimmy with a hate crime for attacking a white man, just because some other unidentified black guy 1000 miles away also attacked a white man in a similar way and said that he was doing it for racial reasons.

but you can if the attacker is white, right :cuckoo:
 
True, but you dodged the question, why is the crime worse if it is the result of negative thoughts about a race, gender, religion, etc?

Why do we want to punish thoughts rather than acts?

Answer: because PC requires that everyone have the same thoughts and beliefs--and that those thoughts and beliefs are to be dictated by the government. Do you really think that is best for a free society?

:eusa_eh:

Pretty sure I addressed the question head on.
 
but you can if the attacker is white, right :cuckoo:

Apparently you missed this:

The FBI said that in a video from Nov. 24, the day of the assault, Mr. Barrett said he wanted “to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?”

In other videos, the FBI said, Mr. Barrett uses racial epithets and says blacks “haven’t fully experienced the blessing of evolution.”
 
but you can if the attacker is white, right :cuckoo:

Apparently you missed this:

The FBI said that in a video from Nov. 24, the day of the assault, Mr. Barrett said he wanted “to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?”

In other videos, the FBI said, Mr. Barrett uses racial epithets and says blacks “haven’t fully experienced the blessing of evolution.”

OK, the guy should be prosecuted for assualt and battery. Just as he should be if he hit the person to rob him.

why does it matter what he was thinking when he did it?
 
True, but you dodged the question, why is the crime worse if it is the result of negative thoughts about a race, gender, religion, etc?

Why do we want to punish thoughts rather than acts?

Answer: because PC requires that everyone have the same thoughts and beliefs--and that those thoughts and beliefs are to be dictated by the government. Do you really think that is best for a free society?

:eusa_eh:

Pretty sure I addressed the question head on.

no you did not. you said that crimes based on hate were problematic, yes, they are. But you don't want hate crime punishment for someone who attacks a rich white guy because he is rich, or a rich black guy because he is rich and the attacker hates rich people.

you only want hate crimes for certain types of hate. Your goal is to mandate how people think. That is a violation of FREEDOM.
 

Forum List

Back
Top