Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course. There's no such thing as freedom of speech in the workplace. Offices, construction sites, football fields, whatever.I addressed that. But it's not what were talking about here. The Constitution applies only in that they won't get arrested. But they are not protected in terms of employment which is the question.
Eat my shorts, traitor punk.
They do it to lend sympathy to the thug-thief Martin, and to villainize a guy who was trying to secure his homeplace (Zimmerman). It's the upside-down way they think and act.I agree . Why does the families, give images to the news when their kids were 12 years old . Chris Brown looked nothing like this image .
View attachment 155844
And Trayvon Martin looked nothing like this .
View attachment 155845
These two images are totally misleading on their age of death .
Both were thugs ...
They do it to lend sympathy to the thug-thief Martin, and to villainize a guy who was trying to secure his homeplace (Zimmerman). It's the upside-down way they think and act.I agree . Why does the families, give images to the news when their kids were 12 years old . Chris Brown looked nothing like this image .
View attachment 155844
And Trayvon Martin looked nothing like this .
View attachment 155845
These two images are totally misleading on their age of death .
Both were thugs ...
Zimmerman was just trying to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Were you one of the crackers who sent him reward money?They do it to lend sympathy to the thug-thief Martin, and to villainize a guy who was trying to secure his homeplace (Zimmerman). It's the upside-down way they think and act.I agree . Why does the families, give images to the news when their kids were 12 years old . Chris Brown looked nothing like this image .
View attachment 155844
And Trayvon Martin looked nothing like this .
View attachment 155845
These two images are totally misleading on their age of death .
Both were thugs ...
Zimmerman was just trying to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Were you one of the crackers who sent him reward money?They do it to lend sympathy to the thug-thief Martin, and to villainize a guy who was trying to secure his homeplace (Zimmerman). It's the upside-down way they think and act.I agree . Why does the families, give images to the news when their kids were 12 years old . Chris Brown looked nothing like this image .
View attachment 155844
And Trayvon Martin looked nothing like this .
View attachment 155845
These two images are totally misleading on their age of death .
Both were thugs ...
Zimmerman was just trying to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Were you one of the crackers who sent him reward money?They do it to lend sympathy to the thug-thief Martin, and to villainize a guy who was trying to secure his homeplace (Zimmerman). It's the upside-down way they think and act.I agree . Why does the families, give images to the news when their kids were 12 years old . Chris Brown looked nothing like this image .
View attachment 155844
And Trayvon Martin looked nothing like this .
View attachment 155845
These two images are totally misleading on their age of death .
Both were thugs ...
What is sad is your disrespect for the country, its flag, its national anthem, and military members who died, so you can mouth off, as you're doing here now.WTF? Our tax system is a convoluted joke. Our healthcare system fluctuates between the best in the world and the leading cause of bankrupcy. Our elected officials routinely lie to us. Our privacy has become laughable. Our borders are porous as hell. Obesity, and the related health problems, are at epidemic levels. Our education system is a joke.
But a dozen athletes kneeling during the National Anthem is the biggest issue ever? That you think that is sad.
And that you don't have sense enough to realize this. Or you're so suckered by the Obama/Sharpton race hustlers, that you can't think straight.
Of course they are. You're either a baldfaced liar, or incredibly dumb.They are not smearing anything. To claim they are is a lie. They may not be patriotic Americans, but they are not smearing the flag, the veterans or the country.
HA HA HA. Let's hear a shred of evidence to support that outlandish claim, little Ms Race Card.. Let's hear it.the one causing the problem is the white supremacist in the White House
Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle)
They are not smearing anything. To claim they are is a lie. They may not be patriotic Americans, but they are not smearing the flag, the veterans or the country.
They are smearing it, whether they intended to or not. Unintentional consequence strikes again.
MY beliefs ? So it's not your belief that we should all pay respect to the thousands of those who have sacrificed their lives in wars (what the national anthem represents), to defend us all ? Are you that nuts ? They gave up their lives, and you can't even so much as stand for one minute. ? Wow!!What? Their religion does not allow them to pay homage to or pledge allegiance to anyone or anything besides God. But you would force them to stand, because of YOUR beliefs? Figures.
You claim to have been in the Navy. Damn shame.THank you. He claims to have been in the Army. Damn shame
The "shame" is all yours - and those who defend these spoiled brat miscreants.
The right to protest is guaranteed in the US Constitution. The protesters are not hurting anyone. They are not causing problems for anyone. They are protesting the actions against a minority. This "They are stomping on the flag!" and "They are pissing on the graves of every soldier who ever served" is just bullshit.
How many freaking times does this have to explained??? The right to protest while on the job is not guaranteed in the US Constitution. You won't get arrested, but you might get fired.
You might. It will depend on whether or not your contract says it explicitly or whether you were failing to perform your job while you were protesting. Neither of those apply here.
That's exactly the point. Depends on the player contracts and the NFL rules. In other words, the Constitution doesn't apply here.
Since it is a constitutionally protected act, it does apply. It is not the only thing that applies. But it applies.
I addressed that. But it's not what were talking about here. The Constitution applies only in that they won't get arrested. But they are not protected in terms of employment which is the question.
My Father and my husband both served in the Military so that these people CAN KNEEL in protest (if they want to) when the Anthem is being played.
END OF STORY comrade!
To call it annoying shows a complete ignorance of it. No one who understands it and its significance, would ever say that.NFL fans are cool with players who beat women and use their money to dodge rape charges as long as they stand for that annoying song.
1. There is no right to protest while on the employers time in the Constitution.The right to protest is guaranteed in the US Constitution. The protesters are not hurting anyone. They are not causing problems for anyone. They are protesting the actions against a minority. This "They are stomping on the flag!" and "They are pissing on the graves of every soldier who ever served" is just bullshit.
