First they complained about the makeup of the commission.........

[jc456]

Under that theory a committee investigating Climate Change can have no one on it too...

Your premise is a bit stupid and any Judge would tell you so...

Jordan was an active player in the attack... It is utterly unacceptable for him to be on the panel...

This Committee is just to do an investigation, they have no power of prosecution...

Trump choose to not appear at the committee which shows prioritises hiding stuff over clearing his name...

Anyway the evidence is pretty clear that a number of laws were broken and members of the Trump circle were definitely involved...

you got it finally. How the system is supposed to work. thanks.

 

[berg80]

If you're going to call something a lie you need to be able to prove it's a lie. Your word alone isn't worth anything, especially considering your constant posting about how much you hate trump and republicans, always propping up democrats and never even bothering to show you have anything but contempt for one and unadulterated love for the other. You never even show you consider other points of view.

So in this one article with quotes and links to other news sources you'll find where pelosi blocked republican picks.

She is quoted as saying the committee is there to create a narrative and the narrative is to recast midterm elections as way to show to show why democrats deserve to stay in power.

Among other statements by her in the article made by the same person that with held covid relief funds from all Americans when trump was president to increase her own political gain, and then tried twice and failed twice to impeach him.

Pelosi’s Court: How the Jan. 6 committee undermined its own legitimacy

Pelosi demands politics unburdened by process.

thehill.com

See post #80.

McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised

So what? It's not a trial.

Do you believe you can have an impartial investigation if one of the investigators took actions material to the investigation?

 

[CowboyTed]

Opinion of the prog lefties, nothing more.

Republicans had the right to seat who they wanted to. Dems wanted a dog and pony show.

Obviously not when the speaker can veto them...

She didn't veto all of them just the ones who would be subjects in the investigation...

So Republicans haven't the right to put people in that will totally compromise the investigation... This was a Trump tactic that absolutely backfired... The thing this is a investigation and they are clearly just following and presenting evidence...

GOP expected the Democrats to behave like them and over reach... The Committee have been highly disciplined (probably have to thank that film producer) in there approach...

 

[berg80]

impeachment for three years of his presidency interfering in the job he was voted in to do. Talk about taking away one's vote. The demofks are fking experts at it.

Had the information we know now been known at the time of the second impeachment he would have been found guilty.

 

[Seymour Flops]

See post #80.

Do you believe you can have an impartial investigation if one of the investigators took actions material to the investigation?

Like Adam Schiff?

Like any other of the kangaroos who were at the Capital that day?

Like Pelosi who refused National Guard presense that day?

 

[jc456]

See post #80.

Do you believe you can have an impartial investigation if one of the investigators took actions material to the investigation?

 

[jc456]

Obviously not when the speaker can veto them...

She didn't veto all of them just the ones who would be subjects in the investigation...

So Republicans haven't the right to put people in that will totally compromise the investigation... This was a Trump tactic that absolutely backfired... The thing this is a investigation and they are clearly just following and presenting evidence...

GOP expected the Democrats to behave like them and over reach... The Committee have been highly disciplined (probably have to thank that film producer) in there approach...

again, they were all victims, they aren't impartial at all. So that's your path forward in governance? ready to fight for it?

 

[martybegan]

Obviously not when the speaker can veto them...

She didn't veto all of them just the ones who would be subjects in the investigation...

So Republicans haven't the right to put people in that will totally compromise the investigation... This was a Trump tactic that absolutely backfired... The thing this is a investigation and they are clearly just following and presenting evidence...

GOP expected the Democrats to behave like them and over reach... The Committee have been highly disciplined (probably have to thank that film producer) in there approach...

The speaker may have the right but they usually never exercise it. Here they decided they wanted quisling RINO's.

The committee has been a shitshow, you just don't see it because you are too busy jerking off to it.

 

[berg80]

Like Adam Schiff?

Like any other of the kangaroos who were at the Capital that day?

Like Pelosi who refused National Guard presense that day?

Your attempt to derail the thread with bullshit, unproven accusations is summarily rejected.

 

[martybegan]

Your attempt to derail the thread with bullshit, unproven accusations is summarily rejected.

Adam Schiff is a lumpy hack of a "man". His place there shows this is a hatchet job.

 

[berg80]

The speaker may have the right but they usually never exercise it. Here they decided they wanted quisling RINO's.

McCarthy forced Pelosi's hand by first rejecting the compromise that was reached on a 9/11 style bipartisan commission, then putting up two Repubs who were material witnesses to what happened on 1/6. He did so intentionally. How many times are you going to deny the facts?

 

[berg80]

Adam Schiff is a lumpy hack of a "man". His place there shows this is a hatchet job.

Your attempt to derail the thread with bullshit, unproven accusations is summarily rejected.

 

[BackAgain]

McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised

There were 212 other Republican Congress members available to serve. McCarthy forbid them to serve on the panel.

Once the Mumbler of the House denied the GOP it’s choice of members, she established that it was rigged. Why would anyone give that fraud committee an air of legitimacy at that point?

And since Pelousy herself should have been a witness, she shouldn’t have had any say in who else should be or should not be on the committee.

 

[martybegan]

McCarthy forced Pelosi's hand by first rejecting the compromise that was reached on a 9/11 style bipartisan commission, then putting up two Repubs who were material witnesses to what happened on 1/6. He did so intentionally. How many times are you going to deny the facts?

Stop calling it "bipartisan", it's a shit show.

Oh, now they are only "material witnesses"?

This isn't a trial, they aren't a jury. Keep making excuses, oxygen thief.

 

[martybegan]

Your attempt to derail the thread with bullshit, unproven accusations is summarily rejected.

Your attempt to call this sham anything other than a sham is thrust upon you as bullshit.

Now go suck some Kamala cock.

 

[whitehall]

Do lefties seriously want to compare Jan 6 to 9-11? Everybody knows that the Jan 6 commission is rigged but even if it's rigged they still can't come up with anything but inuendoes and lies. It's ironic that democrats complained for the better part of 50 years over the treatment of their comrades in the communist party and here they are in power and targeting the former administration like some damned 3rd world country.

 

[berg80]

Your attempt to call this sham anything other than a sham is thrust upon you as bullshit.

Prove to me it's a sham.

 

[berg80]

Everybody knows that the Jan 6 commission is rigged

Prove it.

 

[berg80]

Stop calling it "bipartisan", it's a shit show.

Oh, now they are only "material witnesses"?

This isn't a trial, they aren't a jury. Keep making excuses, oxygen thief.

All you're doing now is recycling debunked arguments. You haven't proven anything you've said. Read this.......

Chairman Thompson Announces Bipartisan Agreement with Ranking Member Katko to Create Commission to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the Capitol | House Committee on Homeland Security

The Official Website of the House Committee on Homeland Security

homeland.house.gov

 

[martybegan]

Prove to me it's a sham.

Prove to me Trump is guilty of whatever.