CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,056
- 70,223
- 2,330
No, it's brand new. It's here, it's now, and you have Rush and folks like full-auto and the others on this board for making it brand new.
You talk about what the left tried to do, and what you're not understanding is that they didn't do this. When Fluke spoke, it wasn't about her. It wasn't personal. She was just another person blending into the background of a sea of people supporting an agenda that Democrats and liberals have been supporting for a very long time.
Fluke would have been just as forgettable as any person walking down a busy street. Even if Rush felt the need to respond to her statements, he could have focused his comments on addressing the issues and her arguments on their merits, and nobody would have noticed Fluke. Just another person saying more or less the same things that lots of people have said lots of times before. But Rush insisted on a completely different approach, and that had a completely different result.
Now, the first and foremost issue is Sandra Fluke, college student, human being, intelligent, articulate, respectful toward others, cool and composed. She's been publicly humiliated, being called vile names, for no other reason than the fact that she has different political positions than Rush. He's a conservative, she's a liberal, therefore he feels the need to call her vile names. Now, people who didn't know who Fluke was, would have never heard her name, people who don't normally bother with politics, are hearing her name and seeing her. And what is the first thing they see? The fact that she was senselessly attacked on a personal level, and that she's standing strong, composed, level headed, courageous. And most people in the country are thinking "Wow, she's pretty impressive."
For some people, it will end there, they'll lose interest again. Other people will dig deeper and learn more about what she has to say. Young people who are perhaps getting ready to vote for the first time in a Presidential election, but who still don't really know what side of the aisle the think they belong on, are now weighing their options between the filthy fat dude who eats too many pills and says vulgar things, and the well dressed, cool and professional woman with whom they might disagree about certain things but is still alot more worthy of imitation that that guy.
This could have remained about the issue of the health care law, the insurance mandate, and the provision that does not allow religious organizations to exempt themselves from the law. But Rush turned it into something else entirely. And what are we talking about now? Sandra Fluke. And regardless of whether you agree or disagree with her politics on the health care law, she deserves no bit of the vile disrespect that has been thrown at her.
I am opposed to the health care law. I have been all along. I remain opposed, I support the law being repealed. But Sandra Fluke does not deserve to be demonized for nothing more than expressing her position in a respectful, professional, and articulate manner. She does not deserve to be called vile names just because her and I hold differences of opinion on this issue. I condemn Rush, not just for his comments. But for moving the discussion away from the real issues and being an ABSOLUTE FAILURE toward the cause of repealing the health care law. He could have argued the issue. But instead he argued the person. And in doing so, he gave Fluke a big opportunity, which she is capitalizing on quite well I might add, to walk through that door and look the part of an inspiration for alot of young women in our country.
You should wear a big "Fluke Me!" Button
Amazing how you just made InTheMiddle's case for him. Just like that.
Fluke is just an disposable tool in the Liberal assault on America.
She'll go down in the pantheon of soon-forgotten Liberal heroes like the guy who outed Mark Foley
Also, if she's so concerned about the cost of birth control maybe she should work on her gag reflex.