Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One cannot help but note that, when FOX was targeted by the Obama regime, CNN did not come to its defense.
You just watch.
We are.
Score: dimocrap scum: 0 Republicans: 99
And it's late in the 4th Quarter
You're done. Finished. You got -- Nothing
One cannot help but note that, when FOX was targeted by the Obama regime, CNN did not come to its defense.
When did Obama single out a reporter and justified not answering his questions because he was supposedly from fake news channel?
False equivalence is false.
Actual score is
Obama: 55
Turmp: 37
Do you remember this quote from Obama in 2009?One cannot help but note that, when FOX was targeted by the Obama regime, CNN did not come to its defense.
When did Obama single out a reporter and justified not answering his questions because he was supposedly from fake news channel?
False equivalence is false.
Yes if the report is from a reputable source even though it may be unverified. Other administrations have used unverified reports of "yellow cake" sales and WMD research to do more than file a news report....So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
Do you remember this quote from Obama in 2009?One cannot help but note that, when FOX was targeted by the Obama regime, CNN did not come to its defense.
When did Obama single out a reporter and justified not answering his questions because he was supposedly from fake news channel?
False equivalence is false.
“What I think is fair to say about Fox — and certainly it's the way we view it — is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party. They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is.”
I don't recall CNN saying anything about that, do you?
I don't recall CNN saying diddly squat when a president directly attacked a fellow news organization, do you?Do you remember this quote from Obama in 2009?One cannot help but note that, when FOX was targeted by the Obama regime, CNN did not come to its defense.
When did Obama single out a reporter and justified not answering his questions because he was supposedly from fake news channel?
False equivalence is false.
“What I think is fair to say about Fox — and certainly it's the way we view it — is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party. They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is.”
I don't recall CNN saying anything about that, do you?
What Obama said is correct - FOX is most definitely not a news network like CNN because big part of their programming is opinion talk shows.
However, Obama has never singled out FOX reporters or denied them press conference questions because they were from FOX.
This statement by Smith just befuddles me.
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
You do realize that the Clinton news network is fake news? The original fake newsThis statement by Smith just befuddles me.
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
CNN said the Intel agencies briefed Donald that Russia knew he likes Pee pee. The intel agencies did brief Donald that Russia knew he likes a piss mouth. Donald thinks its wrong to tell us what the Intel Agencies told him.
He's not mad a Russia tho
More than anything else a Smith added an air of legitimacy to CNN, a boost they sorely neededFox News’ Shepard Smith Defends CNN Against Donald Trump’s ‘Belittling’
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith, speaking for the network, took issue with President-elect Donald Trump’s attack on CNN reporter Jim Acosta during Wednesday’s press conference.
“CNN’s exclusive reporting on the Russian matter was separate and different from the document dump executed by an online news property,” Smith said on the air on Wednesday. “Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
Trump refused to answer Acosta’s question and called CNN “fake news.” Later, Acosta said that Trump’s press secretary, Sean Spicer, threatened to have him removed from the press conference if he continued to ask Trump a question.
Trump’s anger was over allegations that Russian agents had gathered compromising information about him — claims that have not been verified. On Tuesday, CNN reported that intelligence officials had included a two-page summary of the claims in an intelligence briefing given to Trump and President Barack Obama. Soon after CNN’s story was published, BuzzFeed posted what it said was the 35-page, unverified dossier on which the two-page summary was based.
While Trump lashed out at CNN and BuzzFeed, CNN defended its reporting, issuing a statement in which it said that “CNN’s decision to publish carefully sourced reporting about the operations of our government is vastly different than Buzzfeed’s decision to publish unsubstantiated memos. The Trump team knows this. They are using Buzzfeed’s decision to deflect from CNN’s reporting, which has been matched by the other major news organizations.”
Meanwhile, some journalism watchdogs are calling out other members of the media for not coming to Acosta’s defense during the press conference.
Pete Vernon wrote in Columbia Journalism Review that journalism “is a competitive business, but it’s not a zero-sum game. We all campaign for scoops, access, and sources, but we are, effectively, on the same side. If Trump ignores or blacklists outlets he deems hostile, and others in the industry don’t defend them, the public loses out on the perspective those reporters bring, and we as an industry lose out in our efforts to hold power accountable.”
You do realize that the Clinton news network is fake news? The original fake newsThis statement by Smith just befuddles me.
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
CNN said the Intel agencies briefed Donald that Russia knew he likes Pee pee. The intel agencies did brief Donald that Russia knew he likes a piss mouth. Donald thinks its wrong to tell us what the Intel Agencies told him.
He's not mad a Russia tho
He made CNN look like the fools they are.
Trump is not immune from media inspection.
He will deserve all that he gets from the media and more.
Even the biggest coach roach can't hide from the light of the media.
Damn....weren't you banned....that was an enjoyable peaceful time....time to put this cuck back on ignore.
All I know is, this story has been around for about a year and cannot be verified.This statement by Smith just befuddles me.
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
CNN said the Intel agencies briefed Donald that Russia knew he likes Pee pee. The intel agencies did brief Donald that Russia knew he likes a piss mouth. Donald thinks its wrong to tell us what the Intel Agencies told him.
He's not mad a Russia tho
Fox News’ Shepard Smith Defends CNN Against Donald Trump’s ‘Belittling’
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith, speaking for the network, took issue with President-elect Donald Trump’s attack on CNN reporter Jim Acosta during Wednesday’s press conference.
“CNN’s exclusive reporting on the Russian matter was separate and different from the document dump executed by an online news property,” Smith said on the air on Wednesday. “Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
Trump refused to answer Acosta’s question and called CNN “fake news.” Later, Acosta said that Trump’s press secretary, Sean Spicer, threatened to have him removed from the press conference if he continued to ask Trump a question.
Trump’s anger was over allegations that Russian agents had gathered compromising information about him — claims that have not been verified. On Tuesday, CNN reported that intelligence officials had included a two-page summary of the claims in an intelligence briefing given to Trump and President Barack Obama. Soon after CNN’s story was published, BuzzFeed posted what it said was the 35-page, unverified dossier on which the two-page summary was based.
While Trump lashed out at CNN and BuzzFeed, CNN defended its reporting, issuing a statement in which it said that “CNN’s decision to publish carefully sourced reporting about the operations of our government is vastly different than Buzzfeed’s decision to publish unsubstantiated memos. The Trump team knows this. They are using Buzzfeed’s decision to deflect from CNN’s reporting, which has been matched by the other major news organizations.”
Meanwhile, some journalism watchdogs are calling out other members of the media for not coming to Acosta’s defense during the press conference.
Pete Vernon wrote in Columbia Journalism Review that journalism “is a competitive business, but it’s not a zero-sum game. We all campaign for scoops, access, and sources, but we are, effectively, on the same side. If Trump ignores or blacklists outlets he deems hostile, and others in the industry don’t defend them, the public loses out on the perspective those reporters bring, and we as an industry lose out in our efforts to hold power accountable.”
All I know is, this story has been around for about a year and cannot be verified.This statement by Smith just befuddles me.
“Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN’s report, it is our observation that its correspondents followed journalistic standards, and that neither they nor any other journalist should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the United States.”
So it's OK for a news organization to spread stories that have not been confirmed?
CNN should not be belittled but they can defame the President of the US?
Trump should sue.
CNN said the Intel agencies briefed Donald that Russia knew he likes Pee pee. The intel agencies did brief Donald that Russia knew he likes a piss mouth. Donald thinks its wrong to tell us what the Intel Agencies told him.
He's not mad a Russia tho
In addition, there are untruths in it, such as Michael Cohen visiting Russia, he's never been there.
