Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that's even close to the truth nobody had a job under Bush:
If that's even close to the truth nobody had a job under Bush:
I did and what does that have to do with now? Bush hasn't been president for seven years.
Their spin is :hate and fear" so they HAVE to ignore factsAwww. They tried to do math again
The only reason you can say there has been job growth is because that's what they told you.7 straight years of job growth? Unemployment rate that has fallen from 10.1 % to 4.9%? A strong dollar? A strong stock market? Record profits for the auto industry that was at the point of going out of business in 2009?
Obama the socialist. LOL
Ninety-eight million is almost 50% of the working-age population. Math: Not FAUXNews' strong suit.
7 straight years of job growth? Unemployment rate that has fallen from 10.1 % to 4.9%? A strong dollar? A strong stock market? Record profits for the auto industry that was at the point of going out of business in 2009?
Obama the socialist. LOL
your reading comprehension is poorNinety-eight million is almost 50% of the working-age population. Math: Not FAUXNews' strong suit.
America has almost 300 million people. 98/300 is about 1/3. What were you saying about math...wait...let me speak slower. What....were...you...saying...about...math?
your reading comprehension is poorNinety-eight million is almost 50% of the working-age population. Math: Not FAUXNews' strong suit.
America has almost 300 million people. 98/300 is about 1/3. What were you saying about math...wait...let me speak slower. What....were...you...saying...about...math?
It could be fuckin true with the way the numbers have been manipulated over the years. Once you count person not working different that person's not seeking work for more than two weeks (seriously) then we may actually have 98 million out of work. I don't know why we don't count unemployement the way we use to which is a person who has been out of work for a year. That seems to make more sense and more accurate. Of course, politicians will have to answer to that which is why making the numbers look good may benefit them.
Wrong. It is the number of Americans over the age of 16 not working.It could be fuckin true with the way the numbers have been manipulated over the years. Once you count person not working different that person's not seeking work for more than two weeks (seriously) then we may actually have 98 million out of work. I don't know why we don't count unemployement the way we use to which is a person who has been out of work for a year. That seems to make more sense and more accurate. Of course, politicians will have to answer to that which is why making the numbers look good may benefit them.
The only way America can have 98 million out of work is if you count babies and seniors.
The untold story.
Wrong. It is the number of Americans over the age of 16 not working.It could be fuckin true with the way the numbers have been manipulated over the years. Once you count person not working different that person's not seeking work for more than two weeks (seriously) then we may actually have 98 million out of work. I don't know why we don't count unemployement the way we use to which is a person who has been out of work for a year. That seems to make more sense and more accurate. Of course, politicians will have to answer to that which is why making the numbers look good may benefit them.
The only way America can have 98 million out of work is if you count babies and seniors.
If big ears were an R, this would be a huge story.