Funniest Headline So Far This Morning

You realize all you have to do is put a bigger magazine in them and you have THE SAME WEAPON IT JUST LOOKS DIFFERENT.
THEN WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Go ahead and do it (illegally) and ban the AR types since you don't need them anyway. BTW, our game wardens are pretty good. Stick to your illegal hunting in Tennessee.

If they are the same gun, why ban one and not the other?

Typical leftwing "logic."
Glass half empty, glass half full. It's just how you look at it and it doesn't change the underlying amount of water in the glass.

So you have two half full glasses of water. According to you, one is bad and the other is good.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
Don't even try making sense, Bripat. It's not your strong suit.
You and I are looking at the same facts from a different perspective. It does not change the facts. Just the viewpoint.

You're looking at it from the perspective of the logically impaired. If only you knew how funny the brain damaged shit you post is.
 
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

An AR-15 with a 30 round magazine is a hunting rilfe, and they are quite commonly used for hunting:


Real sporting folks in Texas, huh? Hunting from a helicopter? Why not just use chemical weapons? LOL


Do you have any idea how much damage wild hogs cause? Evidently not, huge problem for land owners and farmers and they welcome hunters help eradicate the pests

Yes, they're a scourge. A helicopter seems excessive to me for killing any of God's creatures, but it makes a certain amount of sense that it would seem perfectly alright with you.


Perfectly fine with me, same for coyotes, coy dogs, prairie digs and any other pest.


What are "coy dogs?"
 
That must be why you have to be 21 to buy a handgun. It obviously doesn't work. I live in a state where 18 year olds are working, starting families (unfortunately) and for all intents and purposes being adults. I think it sucks that people want them to wait another three years for a hunting rifle.


sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.
 
What does that do, troll, with 200 other types of guns not banned? I'll tell you, it does nothing. All they want is the slow ban of all firearms. Anyone who says otherwise is a goddamn liar or an idiot.
Count me among the idiots, then. I have a feeling there are a lot of us. If there is a problem with 200 other types of guns that you are saying SHOULD be banned along with the AR, you can help make sure they also get on the list so it's fair.
That would be very helpful of you, Mike.


please tell us how banning AR's would stop the daily blood baths in Chicago, Philly, Detroit, New Orleans, LA, and most of the rest of our large cities. almost all of those deaths are caused by illegally obtained hand guns. BTW, when a gang member trades a gun to another gang member for a bag of crack, neither of them is going to submit a background check.
That must be why you have to be 21 to buy a handgun. It obviously doesn't work. I live in a state where 18 year olds are working, starting families (unfortunately) and for all intents and purposes being adults. I think it sucks that people want them to wait another three years for a hunting rifle.


sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.


I happen to agree with you on 30 round magazines. But if you ban the sale of them, criminals and crazy people will make them in their garage shops.

the problem today is not guns, mags, or ammo. the problem is a sick culture. Until we cure that sickness, it will only get worse.
 
sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.
Again, lying troll, how does taking guns from the law abiding make us safer?
 
sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.

That didn't work out for the employees of Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
 
An AR-15 with a 30 round magazine is a hunting rilfe, and they are quite commonly used for hunting:


Real sporting folks in Texas, huh? Hunting from a helicopter? Why not just use chemical weapons? LOL


Do you have any idea how much damage wild hogs cause? Evidently not, huge problem for land owners and farmers and they welcome hunters help eradicate the pests

Yes, they're a scourge. A helicopter seems excessive to me for killing any of God's creatures, but it makes a certain amount of sense that it would seem perfectly alright with you.


Perfectly fine with me, same for coyotes, coy dogs, prairie digs and any other pest.


What are "coy dogs?"


Cross breed between a domestic dog and coyote, no fear and vicious fuckers. They hunt them by driving them with 4 x 4's and hunters wait for them to come in view
 
sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.


don't be ignorant, the crazy person or the terrorist will just use a bomb or a truck instead of a gun. The implement is not the problem, its the person.
 
THEN WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Go ahead and do it (illegally) and ban the AR types since you don't need them anyway. BTW, our game wardens are pretty good. Stick to your illegal hunting in Tennessee.

If they are the same gun, why ban one and not the other?

Typical leftwing "logic."
Glass half empty, glass half full. It's just how you look at it and it doesn't change the underlying amount of water in the glass.

So you have two half full glasses of water. According to you, one is bad and the other is good.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
Don't even try making sense, Bripat. It's not your strong suit.
You and I are looking at the same facts from a different perspective. It does not change the facts. Just the viewpoint.

You're looking at it from the perspective of the logically impaired. If only you knew how funny the brain damaged shit you post is.
As usual, that post doesn't move forward your argument at all.
 
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.


don't be ignorant, the crazy person or the terrorist will just use a bomb or a truck instead of a gun. The implement is not the problem, its the person.
Some might figure it out. Most will just go play another video game.
 
sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.

No

all he has to do is go to WallyWorld, and buy a pressure cooker.

boston marathon bomb - Yahoo Search Results

Or Avis, and rent a truck

truck bomb manchester england - Yahoo Search Results
 
The 2nd Amendment has already been infringed upon with an age law for buying guns, as well as the fact that the government doesn't let you own all kinds of serious bombs and weapons, armed tanks, armed planes. AA missiles...

Crazy don't sell here. Try next door.
Ok, so you knew that already, but choose to cherry pick you’re outrage. Carry on.

Please make sense so that I can respond.
You get all outraged at what you perceive as an attack on the 2nd. But you don’t get outraged at the infringements already in place. Making you an outrage cherry picker.

Too funny.

The only thing that causes outrage is the willful stupidity expressed by people such as yourself.
Does that apply to everyone or are you simply cherry picking once again?
 
Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.


don't be ignorant, the crazy person or the terrorist will just use a bomb or a truck instead of a gun. The implement is not the problem, its the person.
Some might figure it out. Most will just go play another video game.


tell that to the truck victims in paris and London, the bomb victims in Boston and all over the mid east.
 
Count me among the idiots, then. I have a feeling there are a lot of us. If there is a problem with 200 other types of guns that you are saying SHOULD be banned along with the AR, you can help make sure they also get on the list so it's fair.
That would be very helpful of you, Mike.


please tell us how banning AR's would stop the daily blood baths in Chicago, Philly, Detroit, New Orleans, LA, and most of the rest of our large cities. almost all of those deaths are caused by illegally obtained hand guns. BTW, when a gang member trades a gun to another gang member for a bag of crack, neither of them is going to submit a background check.
That must be why you have to be 21 to buy a handgun. It obviously doesn't work. I live in a state where 18 year olds are working, starting families (unfortunately) and for all intents and purposes being adults. I think it sucks that people want them to wait another three years for a hunting rifle.


sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.


I happen to agree with you on 30 round magazines. But if you ban the sale of them, criminals and crazy people will make them in their garage shops.

the problem today is not guns, mags, or ammo. the problem is a sick culture. Until we cure that sickness, it will only get worse.
I agree with you that our culture glorifies this sickness and it HAS to be addressed. But guns, mags and ammo are also part of the problem, especially until the culture has once again been taught some respect for human life.
 
sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.
You realize all you have to do is put a bigger magazine in them and you have THE SAME WEAPON IT JUST LOOKS DIFFERENT.
THEN WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Go ahead and do it (illegally) and ban the AR types since you don't need them anyway. BTW, our game wardens are pretty good. Stick to your illegal hunting in Tennessee.
YOUR REASONING. Its a big ball of fallacy and you dont give a shit.
And what about hunting?
Illegal hunting? Wut?
Fallacy? PROVE IT.
IT HAS BEEN YOU JUST CHOOSE TO IGNORE IT
 
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.

Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.

No

all he has to do is go to WallyWorld, and buy a pressure cooker.

boston marathon bomb - Yahoo Search Results

Or Avis, and rent a truck

truck bomb manchester england - Yahoo Search Results
Will, if it's that easy, why don't most of our mass murders go that way?
 
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.
You realize all you have to do is put a bigger magazine in them and you have THE SAME WEAPON IT JUST LOOKS DIFFERENT.
THEN WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Go ahead and do it (illegally) and ban the AR types since you don't need them anyway. BTW, our game wardens are pretty good. Stick to your illegal hunting in Tennessee.
YOUR REASONING. Its a big ball of fallacy and you dont give a shit.
And what about hunting?
Illegal hunting? Wut?
Fallacy? PROVE IT.
IT HAS BEEN YOU JUST CHOOSE TO IGNORE IT!
That's not an answer. You are accusing me of a fallacy, yet you haven't told me where/what.
 
please tell us how banning AR's would stop the daily blood baths in Chicago, Philly, Detroit, New Orleans, LA, and most of the rest of our large cities. almost all of those deaths are caused by illegally obtained hand guns. BTW, when a gang member trades a gun to another gang member for a bag of crack, neither of them is going to submit a background check.
That must be why you have to be 21 to buy a handgun. It obviously doesn't work. I live in a state where 18 year olds are working, starting families (unfortunately) and for all intents and purposes being adults. I think it sucks that people want them to wait another three years for a hunting rifle.


sounds like you are finally agreeing that rifles are not the problem, but rather a culture that promotes hating anyone who disagrees with you, dependence on the government, lack of personal responsibility, etc.

what most of the left is promoting is exactly what the third Reich promoted in the 1930s. That's why we should be teaching our kids history, not "social justice".
Military style assault weapons are a problem. A 5+1 magazine in a hunting rifle is different from an AR-type rifle with a 30 bullet magazine. That's not necessary for any intents and purposes in our civilian life.
Our boys can start hunting at 12 (with an adult) and on kids' day, you can take a three year old with you if you want. Lots of kids get their first deer in junior high. Making them wait 'til 21 is stupid.


I happen to agree with you on 30 round magazines. But if you ban the sale of them, criminals and crazy people will make them in their garage shops.

the problem today is not guns, mags, or ammo. the problem is a sick culture. Until we cure that sickness, it will only get worse.
I agree with you that our culture glorifies this sickness and it HAS to be addressed. But guns, mags and ammo are also part of the problem, especially until the culture has once again been taught some respect for human life.


guns, hammers, knives, and bombs have been with us since 1776. We need to fix our culture, not pretend that banning dangerous objects will cure the problem and make us all safe.
 
Drop the hunting reference. It has nothing to do with the issue.
Hunting has nothing to do with gun ownership? I'm confused.
Now the troll smokes and deflects. Classic liar. So I am still waiting troll, how does taking guns away from the law abiding make us safer?
When a homicidal maniac decides to go out with a bang, he will have to work harder to kill less people if he does not have AR type weapons for sale at the nearest sporting goods store. It's risk reduction.
And you know better than to call me a troll. Let's go easy on who you call a "liar," liar.

No

all he has to do is go to WallyWorld, and buy a pressure cooker.

boston marathon bomb - Yahoo Search Results

Or Avis, and rent a truck

truck bomb manchester england - Yahoo Search Results
Will, if it's that easy, why don't most of our mass murders go that way?

take away the guns, (which also prevents self defense), and they likely will
 
You realize all you have to do is put a bigger magazine in them and you have THE SAME WEAPON IT JUST LOOKS DIFFERENT.
THEN WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? Go ahead and do it (illegally) and ban the AR types since you don't need them anyway. BTW, our game wardens are pretty good. Stick to your illegal hunting in Tennessee.
YOUR REASONING. Its a big ball of fallacy and you dont give a shit.
And what about hunting?
Illegal hunting? Wut?
Fallacy? PROVE IT.
IT HAS BEEN YOU JUST CHOOSE TO IGNORE IT!
That's not an answer. You are accusing me of a fallacy, yet you haven't told me where/what.
For the 11th time, it is all over this thread.
I wont repeat myself again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top