George Zimmerman banned from Tinder dating app

Look at those little bastards. Bad seeds all. Best to shoot them all now.
Black people think it is cool to be a criminal----FACT

More right wing, racist bullshit.
Lol
You’re one of those fools that look at everything through a race… It’s best if you stay in seclusion in your safe space snowflake


You kind of have to look at everything through race. Had Zimmerman shot a honky dressed in a rebel flag hoodie and a Copenhagen hat it never would have made the news.

I agree because Zimmerman's ass would have went straight to jail and he would be doing 30 to Life.


Maybe. It’s still Florida. The system there let a woman go free after she killed her kid with a trash bag and tossed her body in a ditch. If I ever want to do murder, Florida is where I would do it.
 
Lol
You do realize Obama was only half black?
Why do you call him black then?

He calls himself black, now run and tell that.
Lol
Zimmerman is Hispanic, but politically correct morons like yourself want to call him a white guy…

His daddy is a white man, but dumbasses like you try to tell us differently. How many fucking Hispanic Zimmerman's have you met?
Lol
Undeniably Hispanic...

george-zimmerman-the-acquitted-shooter-in-the-death-of-trayvon-martin-picture-id450573897
zimmerman-parents-16x9.png


Undeniably WHITE.
Lol
Are your eyes lying to ya?
 
Here is the thing. If I’m at a concert and a dudes fat head is in my way, I talk shit, get popped in the mouth then shoot him for popping me am I justified?
No.

But, that dude had no right to pop you in the mouth. Violence in response to insults is UNACCEPTABLE. You could have told that dude that his momma is a nasty whore that did a horrible job sucking you dick, and he still has no right to pop you in the mouth.

If he continues to pound on you with no avenue of your escape, it becomes justified for you to use deadly force to get him to stop.

..
 
Libs desperate Trump Witch Hunt narrative is fading so drag up Zimmerman again.
 
Which you’ve been proven insane for asserting since you failed miserably to prove it.
you havent proven otherwise and the jury sides with me not you
You remain an idiot as the jury did not render any decisions on who started the confrontation. They only decided on Zimmerman’s use of lethal self-defense, which they decided was justified; with which I agree. Which also means .... you’re too stupid to comprehend the jury sided with me as well. :cuckoo:
how did they side with you???
LOL

I just fucking explained it and you still don’t understand??

Sorry, you’ll have to deal with your own ignorance; that’s not my problem. :eusa_naughty:
you claim Z was guilty but they said hes not guilty,,,
You must be insane. Quote me saying Zimmerman was guilty of murder...
 
Not in Flori-duh. They said the same thing about Casey Anthony. I mean, any state who will let a woman off for killing her children is a state that should not be used in the same sentence as “moral”. He was a dumbass. Still seems to be a dumb ass.


Following a suspected criminal so that you can tell the police where to find him, while obviously risky, is not legally nor morally wrong.


I won't even call it stupid. YOu balanced the risk to himself, ie getting attacked, with the potential gain to his community, ie getting a criminal off the streets.


Hey, anyone ever hear if those robberies continued or stopped after Martin died?
He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.


1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.
 
I note for the forum, you have still not presented any proof that Martin attacked him.


To support the claim that Zimmerman is responsible for Martin's death, it is on you, as it was in the court, to support the claim that Zimmerman attacked Martin.
We’re talking about who initiated the physical confrontation. Please try harder to keep up.



and that was TM
Which you’ve been proven insane for asserting since you failed miserably to prove it.


Said the man that can't prove the Zimmerman initiated the physcial confrontation.
Why should I prove that when I never made any such claim? :dunno:
 
Following a suspected criminal so that you can tell the police where to find him, while obviously risky, is not legally nor morally wrong.


I won't even call it stupid. YOu balanced the risk to himself, ie getting attacked, with the potential gain to his community, ie getting a criminal off the streets.


Hey, anyone ever hear if those robberies continued or stopped after Martin died?
He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.


1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.



Had Zimmerman been here in Texas, he could have been shot. Hell, had Teavon killed him first he would have been justified in doing so.
 
He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.


1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.



Had Zimmerman been here in Texas, he could have been shot. Hell, had Teavon killed him first he would have been justified in doing so.

Had trayvonista killed George you would never have heard about it....there would have been a small item in the back pages of the local paper and that would have been that...similar things happen all the time....as in young black men who compose only about 3 per cent of our total population comitt over half of all violent crime in America.

Blacks commit higher rates of murder, rape, and other violent crime. These are crimes that you're caught for afterword and don't have to do with a single interaction with police. FBI crime statistics show many types of crime broken down by race. Despite being a minority, blacks commit the majority of murders, and black-on-white crime is higher than white-on-black, for example.

One resource is: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/...

This table shows that blacks are responsible for more than 50% of all murders in 2015, and a greater absolute number than white-committed murders. Blacks make up around 10-12% of the population, so the rate at which they commit this crime is far higher than whites

Blacks commit higher rates of murder, rape, and other violent crime. These are c... | Hacker News
 
Last edited:
1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.



Had Zimmerman been here in Texas, he could have been shot. Hell, had Teavon killed him first he would have been justified in doing so.

Had trayvonista killed George you would never have heard about it....there would have been a small item in the back pages of the local paper and that would have been that...similar things happen all the time....as in young black men who compose only about 3 per cent of our total population comitt over half of all violent crime in America.



Yup, mostly agains other young black men.
 
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.



Had Zimmerman been here in Texas, he could have been shot. Hell, had Teavon killed him first he would have been justified in doing so.

Had trayvonista killed George you would never have heard about it....there would have been a small item in the back pages of the local paper and that would have been that...similar things happen all the time....as in young black men who compose only about 3 per cent of our total population comitt over half of all violent crime in America.



Yup, mostly agains other young black men.

yes.................The Color of Crime - American Renaissance
 
I thought he wasn't following him.


Just to be clear, you are dropping the line of argument that being followed, is what killed Martin?

A coward with a gun is who killed Trayvon.

Just like that, you put forth an argument, I challenge it, and you drop it like a hot potato, with zero attempt to defend it.

Really?



No, you said that "being chased" is what killed him. And now you are saying something else.



I see what you are doing. You are jumping back and forth, saying stupid shit like, "being chased is what killed him"


because you can actually demonstrate that Zimmerman DID follow Martin.


But when called on how being chased doesn't kill someone, you switch gears, and make a claim you CAN'T support, ie that Zimmerman started teh fight, and when called on that bullshit,


you go back to proving the Zimmerman followed Martin.



You libs, you spend so much time and energy hiding from the Truth and spewing bullshit.

This coming from a man who will defend a grown coward with a gun killing an unarmed teenager who was doing NOTHING wrong.


you keep forgetting that teen was trying to kill him,,,WHY???
There's no evidence Trayvon was trying to kill Zimmerman.
 
This coming from a man who will defend a grown coward with a gun killing an unarmed teenager who was doing NOTHING wrong.


you keep forgetting that teen was trying to kill him,,,WHY???


Because Zimmerman was a creepy fatso following him threw a dark space whispering into a cell phone. Going by the law that let Zimmerman wall, Trayvon was well within this rights to strangle the mighty wimp Zimmerman.
no he wasnt,,,


Wanna bet? It’s all in the 911 call. This is also why no one will touch Zimmerman.


where in the 911 call did it give TM a right to strangle Z
Martin never strangled Zimmerman. You're arguing with your hallucinations again.
 
He was trained by police to not follow like he did.

And because he did, a teenager who had every right to be there, ended up dead. Martin made his own mistakes which contributed to his own death, but Zimmerman was the adult in that situation and Zimmerman was the one with formal training who abandoned everything he was taught.


1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.


only in your world,,,
Nope, in the world where words have meaning...

neg·li·gent
adjective



    • failing to take proper care in doing something.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Yeah, that was awful. LOL!
Of course it was, it led to a death.
 
Just to be clear, you are dropping the line of argument that being followed, is what killed Martin?

A coward with a gun is who killed Trayvon.

Just like that, you put forth an argument, I challenge it, and you drop it like a hot potato, with zero attempt to defend it.

Really?



No, you said that "being chased" is what killed him. And now you are saying something else.



I see what you are doing. You are jumping back and forth, saying stupid shit like, "being chased is what killed him"


because you can actually demonstrate that Zimmerman DID follow Martin.


But when called on how being chased doesn't kill someone, you switch gears, and make a claim you CAN'T support, ie that Zimmerman started teh fight, and when called on that bullshit,


you go back to proving the Zimmerman followed Martin.



You libs, you spend so much time and energy hiding from the Truth and spewing bullshit.

This coming from a man who will defend a grown coward with a gun killing an unarmed teenager who was doing NOTHING wrong.


you keep forgetting that teen was trying to kill him,,,WHY???
There's no evidence Trayvon was trying to kill Zimmerman.
Lol
Well, Trayvon Martin is taking a dirt nap for a reason
 
1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.


only in your world,,,
Nope, in the world where words have meaning...

neg·li·gent
adjective



    • failing to take proper care in doing something.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Yeah, that was awful. LOL!
Of course it was, it led to a death.
Lol
Zimmerman had every right to follow Trayvon Martin… A know punk ass gangbanger want a bee
 
1. Every failure of training, is not a crime nor even morally wrong.

2. The reason that neighborhood watch are trained to not follow suspected criminals, is that bad actors can react badly, even violently to being followed. That being said, while avoiding a situation were a violent response is possible is the goal of that, the person committing the violence is still the one responsible for the violence.
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.



1. Thank you for admitting that his following Martin was not a criminal act.

2. It was not negligent, it was reckless. It did not directly contribute to Martin's death. It did set up a potential situation that had further potential to turn dangerous. But further actions were needed before that happened, actions that were much more directly responsible for Martin's death that Zimmerman walking down the street.
Zimmerman didn't merely "walk down the street." First he followed Trayvon in his truck from one end of the complex to the other; and then when he ran out of road, he continued his pursuit on foot. Had Trayvon been a woman, Zimmerman could have gotten a face full of pepper spray, and rightfully so.



Had Zimmerman been here in Texas, he could have been shot. Hell, had Teavon killed him first he would have been justified in doing so.

Had trayvonista killed George you would never have heard about it....there would have been a small item in the back pages of the local paper and that would have been that...similar things happen all the time....as in young black men who compose only about 3 per cent of our total population comitt over half of all violent crime in America.

Blacks commit higher rates of murder, rape, and other violent crime. These are crimes that you're caught for afterword and don't have to do with a single interaction with police. FBI crime statistics show many types of crime broken down by race. Despite being a minority, blacks commit the majority of murders, and black-on-white crime is higher than white-on-black, for example.

One resource is: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/...

This table shows that blacks are responsible for more than 50% of all murders in 2015, and a greater absolute number than white-committed murders. Blacks make up around 10-12% of the population, so the rate at which they commit this crime is far higher than whites

Blacks commit higher rates of murder, rape, and other violent crime. These are c... | Hacker News
These feelings killings facts are just soooo waaaayyycist
 
he had every reason to follow,,,

Absolutely true...the only problem Trayvon had run out of his sight...thus since you cannot follow someone you cannot see....all Z could do was to attempt to follow and look about.


Or, do as the authorities said and not tried to be Paul Blart the mall cop. Again, Zimmerman was acting outside of the charter of the neighborhood watch that night. What would have been awesomely is if the rejection letters from the prince William PD were made public. But it was clear that Zimmerman wanted to be a sillier cop hero, found out fast that he didn't have what it took and shot him self out of the situation. Zimmerman May not be a coward, but he is definitely a weakling, a sheep playing at being a wolf.


Or, do as the authorities said and not tried to be Paul Blart the mall cop.

Meh. Not against the law.

Again, Zimmerman was acting outside of the charter

OMG! Outside of the charter.

he is definitely a weakling

But not dead, like the thug.


Yeah, he was looking for a kid. Follow the pattern of Zimmerman’s life. Always in trouble for picking on people weaker then him. Guess he forgot that young men are still men? That’s why Zimmerman sticks to beating women and pulling guns on his girl friends.

Yeah, he was looking for a kid.

Yup. All 6'2" of the thug.

Follow the pattern of Zimmerman’s life. Always in trouble for picking on people weaker then him.

Is that why he was suspended from school? Oh, wait, that was the other guy.
LOL

And by "thug" you mean a teen armed with iced tea and candy.
 
you keep forgetting that teen was trying to kill him,,,WHY???


Because Zimmerman was a creepy fatso following him threw a dark space whispering into a cell phone. Going by the law that let Zimmerman wall, Trayvon was well within this rights to strangle the mighty wimp Zimmerman.
no he wasnt,,,


Wanna bet? It’s all in the 911 call. This is also why no one will touch Zimmerman.


where in the 911 call did it give TM a right to strangle Z
Martin never strangled Zimmerman. You're arguing with your hallucinations again.


Even if he did, what was he thinking? Had one of my boys been accosted by some fat dude either one of them would have kicked his ass and called the cops. Zimmerman
I didn’t say his failure to comply with the police was criminal. It was negligent, however, and contributed to a death.


only in your world,,,
Nope, in the world where words have meaning...

neg·li·gent
adjective



    • failing to take proper care in doing something.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Zimmerman failed to comply with police instructions by following Trayvon like he did.

Yeah, that was awful. LOL!
Of course it was, it led to a death.
Lol
Zimmerman had every right to follow Trayvon Martin… A know punk ass gangbanger want a bee



No, not really. But I bet you were okay with Casey Anthony strangling her kid with a trash bag and getting away with it because you think she is hawt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top