eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
Why is it you want to blame Jantell, Trayvon or anyone else except the GUY WHO ACTUALLY SHOT THE KID!!!
On the other hand, why is it you want to blame the guy who defended himself and not the guy that attacked and attempted to murder someone?
Not that I'm expecting a rational answer...
Defended himself in a fight his actions caused?
"His actions" were completely legal. Are you suggesting we should outlaw neighborhood watches? Are you suggesting it should be illegal to follow someone...someone that is trespassing...at night...in the rain...while concealing his identity?
He profiled Martin
You have zero evidence to support this assumption. But even if he did, that's hardly illegal.
He stalked Martin
He followed a trespasser. Hardly stalking.
He chased Martin
You have zero evidence to support this assumption.
He cornered Martin
Again, no evidence. We do know that Martin waited around after seeing Zimmerman following him (that 4 minute time period). If anyone 'cornered' someone, it was Martin.
And when Martin defended himself against a guy who might well have been a rapist and was making a good showing for himself
All evidence suggests Martin struck first. That's NOT defending oneself, that's attacking another. Even the girlfriend understands this.
If Martin really thought Zimmerman was a rapist (ridiculous, but let's go with it), why wouldn't he have simply gone home? Instead, he doubled back and waited for Zimmerman.
he got shot.
Are you suggesting that someone who has been attacked by another who proclaimed "I"m going to kill you" and then proceeds to attempt to do just that, should NOT be able to defend himself with deadly force? Really?
As I said, I never expected a rational response, but it's been fun pointing out just how blindly bias you are to facts, logic or reason.