Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that Dershowitz was making this argument in impeachment for Trump’s defense indicates he was Trump’s lawyer.I thought you said it was in the link??How else would he wind up arguing Trump’s defense during impeachment?I read your link and it doesnt confirm he was hired by trump,,It is. And the link provided backs it up.its your claim not mine
now youre saying why else would he be there,,
which is it??
how would you know if you didnt watch or read it??No, it isn’t. Not to your claim.its all relevant,,,
could be,, but you said it was in the link,, now youre saying its obvious,, which is it??The fact that Dershowitz was making this argument in impeachment for Trump’s defense indicates he was Trump’s lawyer.I thought you said it was in the link??How else would he wind up arguing Trump’s defense during impeachment?I read your link and it doesnt confirm he was hired by trump,,It is. And the link provided backs it up.its your claim not mine
now youre saying why else would he be there,,
which is it??
The fact you’re asking this question is astonishingly stupid.
Because I was present in the thread and therefore have insight into the content of the thread.how would you know if you didnt watch or read it??
The link provided all the information one needed to know in order to determine that Dershowitz was Trump's lawyer.could be,, but you said it was in the link,, now youre saying its obvious,, which is it??
relevant is a matter of perspective,,,Because I was present in the thread and therefore have insight into the content of the thread.how would you know if you didnt watch or read it??
I also watched some of Glenn Beck's video and 30 minutes in there was ZERO mention of what you're referring to.
So I know that your claim is incorrect that it's "all relevant" to the question at hand.
Still raises the question why after all this time haven't you simply provided adequate citation of your source.
I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
youre the one always playing word games,, I just gave you a taste of your own medicine,,,The link provided all the information one needed to know in order to determine that Dershowitz was Trump's lawyer.could be,, but you said it was in the link,, now youre saying its obvious,, which is it??
Although it does require at least a modicum of intelligence to understand that.
43I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
![]()
Trump Legal Team Adds Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial (Published 2020)
Ken Starr and a third lawyer named to the team, Robert Ray, were independent counsels who investigated President Bill Clinton.www.nytimes.com
President Trump enlisted the former independent counsel Ken Starr and the celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz to join his defense team on Friday, turning to two veterans of politically charged legal cases to secure his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial that gets underway in earnest next week.
No, it's not. The question is a source for your claim and factually it can be said that the overwhelming majority of bullshit you've provided is not relevant.relevant is a matter of perspective,,,
Fine. Your question was very easily answered based on what was presented.youre the one always playing word games,, I just gave you a taste of your own medicine,,,
how did you like it??
you sure sound pissy,,,Fine. Your question was very easily answered based on what was presented.youre the one always playing word games,, I just gave you a taste of your own medicine,,,
how did you like it??
Your question revealed your ignorance which I corrected.
Notice how I didn't get all pissy about it and answered your question rather than ignore them as you are apt to do.
yes it is,,No, it's not. The question is a source for your claim and factually it can be said that the overwhelming majority of bullshit you've provided is not relevant.relevant is a matter of perspective,,,
The fact that I refuse to accept your claim as factual without substantiation isn't my problem.
I didn't ask you for your IQ.43I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
![]()
Trump Legal Team Adds Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial (Published 2020)
Ken Starr and a third lawyer named to the team, Robert Ray, were independent counsels who investigated President Bill Clinton.www.nytimes.com
President Trump enlisted the former independent counsel Ken Starr and the celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz to join his defense team on Friday, turning to two veterans of politically charged legal cases to secure his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial that gets underway in earnest next week.
242I didn't ask you for your IQ.43I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
![]()
Trump Legal Team Adds Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial (Published 2020)
Ken Starr and a third lawyer named to the team, Robert Ray, were independent counsels who investigated President Bill Clinton.www.nytimes.com
President Trump enlisted the former independent counsel Ken Starr and the celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz to join his defense team on Friday, turning to two veterans of politically charged legal cases to secure his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial that gets underway in earnest next week.![]()
maybe next time you should just google it yourself,,,No, it's not. The question is a source for your claim and factually it can be said that the overwhelming majority of bullshit you've provided is not relevant.relevant is a matter of perspective,,,
The fact that I refuse to accept your claim as factual without substantiation isn't my problem.
Now you're sharing the weight of your brain in grams? Nobody asked for that either.242I didn't ask you for your IQ.43I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
![]()
Trump Legal Team Adds Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial (Published 2020)
Ken Starr and a third lawyer named to the team, Robert Ray, were independent counsels who investigated President Bill Clinton.www.nytimes.com
President Trump enlisted the former independent counsel Ken Starr and the celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz to join his defense team on Friday, turning to two veterans of politically charged legal cases to secure his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial that gets underway in earnest next week.![]()
148Now you're sharing the weight of your brain in grams? Nobody asked for that either.242I didn't ask you for your IQ.43I can actually believe you're stupid enough to think Dershowitz just broke into the Senate chamber like a stop the steal trumpfanatic and started speaking in Trump's defense without being hired to do so. But hired he was despite your ignorance.do you have a link showing he was trump official lawyer??Well, given he was speaking specifically as Trump’s lawyer representing him, actually he does.Derschwitz does not speak for trump either
![]()
Trump Legal Team Adds Starr and Dershowitz for Senate Trial (Published 2020)
Ken Starr and a third lawyer named to the team, Robert Ray, were independent counsels who investigated President Bill Clinton.www.nytimes.com
President Trump enlisted the former independent counsel Ken Starr and the celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz to join his defense team on Friday, turning to two veterans of politically charged legal cases to secure his acquittal in the Senate impeachment trial that gets underway in earnest next week.![]()