Glenn Beck is not fooling around anymore, he is attempting to incite violence

[ba1614]

I started the thread, and if you actually read what I wrote, you would see that I have indeed watched beck's program from time to time.

He states frequently that violence is not the answer and that the progressives are trying to cause Americans to use violence as a trigger for Government action .He warns against falling into that trap.
He says it several times a day on the radio.

The scary thing is that he may just be right about that.

I don't think there's any doubt that it's going to happen, eventually.

 

[Intense]

He states frequently that violence is not the answer and that the progressives are trying to cause Americans to use violence as a trigger for Government action .He warns against falling into that trap.
He says it several times a day on the radio.

The scary thing is that he may just be right about that.

I don't think there's any doubt that it's going to happen, eventually.

Most things are inevitable, given time and circumstance. Should it happen, document what you can, protect what you can, and remain passive as best as you can.

The opposition want's bad things to happen because it believes it will gain advantage.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

The scary thing is that he may just be right about that.

I don't think there's any doubt that it's going to happen, eventually.

Most things are inevitable, given time and circumstance. Should it happen, document what you can, protect what you can, and remain passive as best as you can.

The opposition want's bad things to happen because it believes it will gain advantage.

Totalitarian control.

 

[Vast LWC]

Who ever started this thread has never listened to Beck,

I started the thread, and if you actually read what I wrote, you would see that I have indeed watched beck's program from time to time.

He states frequently that violence is not the answer and that the progressives are trying to cause Americans to use violence as a trigger for Government action .He warns against falling into that trap.
He says it several times a day on the radio.

And just about every time he does, he also includes comments that encourage people to "be ready to defend themselves", predicting that "leftists", "socialists" and "statists" are more than ready to start the armed conflict to come.

He states that he abhors violence, but his "cautionary tales" are driving people in his audience closer and closer to feeling that some sort of "first strike" is necessary.

Let me give you a simplified example:

What if I told you that your nextdoor neighbor, whom you really never got along with, was going to kill your wife and family?

Then what if I presented you with some trumped-up "evidence" that he was in fact going to do so?

Then what if I told you to go buy a gun, but to "be sure not to commit any violence"?

Do you think this behavior would make a violent encounter more or less likely to happen?

That is just about EXACTLY what Glenn Beck is doing. He is talking out both sides of his mouth.

On one side he is indirectly inciting people to commit violent acts, and providing "proof" that if they don't there will be dire consequences....

...And then on the other side he is making many short denials of his calls for violence, telling people to be peaceful in the face of all the threats he has just finished pointing out.

 

[Vast LWC]

as he did several times throughout the show in question
and he also said left wing extremmists would tell you that he was

He also has pointed out, many times, including in the clip that Pilgrim kindly provided a while back, that "left-wing extremists" as supposedly "plotting violence on a mass scale".

As to why that matters, see my last post.

 

[Vast LWC]

The scary thing is that he may just be right about that.

I don't think there's any doubt that it's going to happen, eventually.

Most things are inevitable, given time and circumstance. Should it happen, document what you can, protect what you can, and remain passive as best as you can.

The opposition want's bad things to happen because it believes it will gain advantage.

Look how your own posts prove my point!!!

He's got you all thinking that "Progressives" are planning some violent coup d'tat!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Glen Beck incited Maurice Schwenkler

 

[Intense]

I don't think there's any doubt that it's going to happen, eventually.

Most things are inevitable, given time and circumstance. Should it happen, document what you can, protect what you can, and remain passive as best as you can.

The opposition want's bad things to happen because it believes it will gain advantage.

Look how your own posts prove my point!!!

He's got you all thinking that "Progressives" are planning some violent coup d'tat!

First the Left must disarm us. ... You forgot that part... skipped over it.... neglected to mention it..... sort of an oversight......I'm sure you just spaced it.....Remember only bad guys, gangs, criminals, and the Privileged "More Equal Class" get to stay armed.

Progressives are going to round us all up and suck out our brains. LWC has inside knowledge. It's in the grits the drug, the poison.......

I did it. I fought off the poison and survived. Don't eat Jello, It's in that too. ATL abducted me and made me eat it. They made me listen to Celine Dion CD's until I puked, and that's what saved me. It allowed my system to clear and I escaped. I can't stay long because they implanted a tracking device which activates every time I sneeze.


That just goes to prove my point.

 

[Vast LWC]

Most things are inevitable, given time and circumstance. Should it happen, document what you can, protect what you can, and remain passive as best as you can.

The opposition want's bad things to happen because it believes it will gain advantage.

Look how your own posts prove my point!!!

He's got you all thinking that "Progressives" are planning some violent coup d'tat!

First the Left must disarm us. ... You forgot that part... skipped over it.... neglected to mention it..... sort of an oversight......I'm sure you just spaced it.....Remember only bad guys, gangs, criminals, and the Privileged "More Equal Class" get to stay armed.

Progressives are going to round us all up and suck out our brains. LWC has inside knowledge. It's in the grits the drug, the poison.......

I did it. I fought off the poison and survived. Don't eat Jello, It's in that too. ATL abducted me and made me eat it. They made me listen to Celine Dion CD's until I puked, and that's what saved me. It allowed my system to clear and I escaped. I can't stay long because they implanted a tracking device which activates every time I sneeze.


That just goes to prove my point.

ROFL. That was beautiful.

 

[Intense]

LWC, in all seriousness, which ever side of an issue you are on, Play Safely, and watch your back, and watch others. There are always unexpected things happening. When violent things start happening, collateral damage is a given. Contingency, Always.

 

[Intense]

70 Pages and not one Credible Link. Break out the Tequila.

Not saying Glenn doesn't touch on Psycho or Drama Queen, just that You all picked the wrong skirmish, got on the wrong train, plane, off on the wrong floor, the doc. removed the wrong leg.

 

[Meister]

The left seemed to think that all of Glenn Beck sponsors have left. They thought he would have been gaffed. Is he still on the air? Does he still have sponsors?
Don't bother answering...it was a couple of rhetorical questions.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Part 1 Obamas new shirts, Dont know what color they will be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhslBXCx70U]YouTube - Obama Civilian Security :Obamas New Shirts 1[/ame]
Part 2 Obamas new shirts, Dont know what color they will be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abaj1EUBtOI]YouTube - Obama Civilian Security :Obamas New Shirts 2[/ame]
Part 3 Obamas new shirts, Dont know what color they will be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9qWkyuAjGE]YouTube - Obama Civilian Security :Obamas New Shirts 3[/ame]
Part 4 Obamas new shirts, Dont know what color they will be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNQ1jDjrxzc]YouTube - Obama Civilian Security :Obamas New Shirts 4[/ame]
Part 5 Obamas new shirts, Dont know what color they will be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhxs7WYlXtE]YouTube - Obama Civilian Security :Obamas New Shirts 5[/ame]

Another day another chance for becks detractors to make their case.

 

[oldcutlas]

Beck is a half retarded psychopath.

FULLY RETARDED not half!!!!!

 

[ba1614]

Beck is a half retarded psychopath.

FULLY RETARDED not half!!!!!

and still no honest attempts by anyone to answer the "half/fully retarded psychopath's" very reasonable questions.

 

[KittenKoder]

Beck is a half retarded psychopath.

FULLY RETARDED not half!!!!!

and still no honest attempts by anyone to answer the "half/fully retarded psychopath's" very reasonable questions.

There's a simple reason, if they did then their whole plan to gain more government control would be too easy to see ... it's like facing ones own reflection, it shatters your world when you realize you are backing people who are really against your own ideals.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I started the thread, and if you actually read what I wrote, you would see that I have indeed watched beck's program from time to time.

He states frequently that violence is not the answer and that the progressives are trying to cause Americans to use violence as a trigger for Government action .He warns against falling into that trap.
He says it several times a day on the radio.

And just about every time he does, he also includes comments that encourage people to "be ready to defend themselves", predicting that "leftists", "socialists" and "statists" are more than ready to start the armed conflict to come.

He states that he abhors violence, but his "cautionary tales" are driving people in his audience closer and closer to feeling that some sort of "first strike" is necessary.

Let me give you a simplified example:

What if I told you that your nextdoor neighbor, whom you really never got along with, was going to kill your wife and family?

Then what if I presented you with some trumped-up "evidence" that he was in fact going to do so?

Then what if I told you to go buy a gun, but to "be sure not to commit any violence"?

Do you think this behavior would make a violent encounter more or less likely to happen?

That is just about EXACTLY what Glenn Beck is doing. He is talking out both sides of his mouth.

On one side he is indirectly inciting people to commit violent acts, and providing "proof" that if they don't there will be dire consequences....

...And then on the other side he is making many short denials of his calls for violence, telling people to be peaceful in the face of all the threats he has just finished pointing out.

You have got to be one of the dumbest idiots on here. In the "what if" scenario, he asked would buying a gun to protect yourself and/or your family make a violent encounter more or less likely? The answer depends on the neighbor, if he attempts to harm your family then of course he will face a violent encounter, if he doesn't then no violent encounter would take place. In other words, arming yourself for protection or defense does not mean you will be more violent, but it does mean that those that wish you harm will be met with violence.

Indirectly inciting violence? What a fucking joke!! Either he's inciting violence or he's not, what he's inciting is the right to defend liberty against statism, socialism and the like.

 

[Oddball]

70 Pages and not one Credible Link. Break out the Tequila.

Not saying Glenn doesn't touch on Psycho or Drama Queen, just that You all picked the wrong skirmish, got on the wrong train, plane, off on the wrong floor, the doc. removed the wrong leg.

Now there's something we don't see every day!

 

[Vast LWC]

LWC, in all seriousness, which ever side of an issue you are on, Play Safely, and watch your back, and watch others. There are always unexpected things happening. When violent things start happening, collateral damage is a given. Contingency, Always.

This is a truism. I'm always prepared for the worst.

I'm just not going to go scaring people via national television.

 

[Vast LWC]

He states frequently that violence is not the answer and that the progressives are trying to cause Americans to use violence as a trigger for Government action .He warns against falling into that trap.
He says it several times a day on the radio.

And just about every time he does, he also includes comments that encourage people to "be ready to defend themselves", predicting that "leftists", "socialists" and "statists" are more than ready to start the armed conflict to come.

He states that he abhors violence, but his "cautionary tales" are driving people in his audience closer and closer to feeling that some sort of "first strike" is necessary.

Let me give you a simplified example:

What if I told you that your nextdoor neighbor, whom you really never got along with, was going to kill your wife and family?

Then what if I presented you with some trumped-up "evidence" that he was in fact going to do so?

Then what if I told you to go buy a gun, but to "be sure not to commit any violence"?

Do you think this behavior would make a violent encounter more or less likely to happen?

That is just about EXACTLY what Glenn Beck is doing. He is talking out both sides of his mouth.

On one side he is indirectly inciting people to commit violent acts, and providing "proof" that if they don't there will be dire consequences....

...And then on the other side he is making many short denials of his calls for violence, telling people to be peaceful in the face of all the threats he has just finished pointing out.

You have got to be one of the dumbest idiots on here. In the "what if" scenario, he asked would buying a gun to protect yourself and/or your family make a violent encounter more or less likely? The answer depends on the neighbor, if he attempts to harm your family then of course he will face a violent encounter, if he doesn't then no violent encounter would take place. In other words, arming yourself for protection or defense does not mean you will be more violent, but it does mean that those that wish you harm will be met with violence.

Indirectly inciting violence? What a fucking joke!! Either he's inciting violence or he's not, what he's inciting is the right to defend liberty against statism, socialism and the like.

Sigh, you just don't get it, do you?

It wasn't the gun part that was the issue. It was the planting of the idea in your head that your neighbor was dangerous and could kill your family at any moment.

Let's say your neighbor gets locked out of his house in the middle of the night, and comes over to knock on your door. You see him passing by your window at 3:00 in the morning.

You don't see any problem with this scenario? No likelihood that you might shoot your neighbor because this idea that he was dangerous to your family was planted in your head?

Seriously, you don't see what I'm getting at here? Or are you just playing dumb?