🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
only the right wing has nothing but whiner appeals to emotion instead of rational arguments. You don't have to Do anything. Congress appropriates your tax monies and spends it, for the good of the republic.
Where's you "rational argument" for that, douche bag?
Our Constitution.
That's not an argument. First you have to prove the provisions in the Constitution are just.
Providing for the general welfare is in our federal Constitution.
where do you get the idea that providing for the general welfare meant giving people free money if they were too lazy to work?
actually, considering the constitution does talk about taxes being levied equally on people, taxing one person to give the money to another could be considered unconstitutional since one is being taxed and the other is not.
 
Our Constitution.
That's not an argument. First you have to prove the provisions in the Constitution are just.
Providing for the general welfare is in our federal Constitution.
You still haven't proved it is just to take money from me.
Congress has the Power to Tax and take money from you. Any other right wing, fantasy diversions?
Yeah, and Hitler killed 6 million Jews. Your point?
I think his point is that Hitler should have gone after the mexicans instead
 
well, somewhere between hopping out of their moms lady parts and saying howdy to the nice doctor, and the day they started getting those no bid contracts, they did have to get themselves into a position of at least limited wealth before any government favors were extended
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Hard to believe thinks it's OK for the government to give money to crony capitalists. Er . . . Come to think of it, . . . . . it's exactly what libs support.
 
No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...
Forget the $1 rule for politicians. How about every other year instead of the CEO getting the bonus the workers get it. Or split the profits 50% to executives 50% to workers. another $20 million they give employees the bonus?

/---- It's none of your business what companies pay their CEOs. It's not taxpayer money, Fidel.
Then don't complain workers aren't doing as well now as they used to. You sent all those high paying jobs overseas and non union companies only give profit sharing and raises to executives.

You will never make America great again for blue collar. Not like my dad who worked for Ford. He had it real good. Those days are over for blue collar. At least the low skilled ones. Those are the people trumps going to disappoint
Robots now make fords.
Here's the other thing happening people don't realize is happening. Companies are subcontracting jobs to 3rd party companies.

In the past 35% workers were unions. In the future 35% will be temps.

This coming from a person that doesn't belong to a union and won't form one at his place of employment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Actually, most of our budget supports their interests
How does Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security support their interests?
Damn....that is a good question

Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and WELFARE enables them to hire workers at wages lower than they can live on. They get to hire a workforce at low wages and have the taxpayers make up the difference. Your worker gets sick? The taxpayer will take care of them for you

Wrong, moron. Wages are set by the market. What they can live on is irrelevant.

The rich do not benefit from Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

We'll just chalk you off as another leftwing economic ignoramus.
Yea right

Wages are set by a market where the taxpayers take care of your employees

Welfare and Medicaid benefit employers of low wage workers
I don't know what that's supposed to mean. Your theory of wages is abracadabra.
No ...it is reality

Taxpayers subsidize employer low wages
Why are we supporting YOUR employees?
 
well, somewhere between hopping out of their moms lady parts and saying howdy to the nice doctor, and the day they started getting those no bid contracts, they did have to get themselves into a position of at least limited wealth before any government favors were extended
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Uncle Sam is We the People

We the People take care of the less fortunate
 
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Uncle Sam is We the People

We the People take care of the less fortunate
we the people should all be contributing to society. Those that dont have no value to us and should not be here.
 
Our Constitution.
That's not an argument. First you have to prove the provisions in the Constitution are just.
Providing for the general welfare is in our federal Constitution.
You still haven't proved it is just to take money from me.
Congress has the Power to Tax and take money from you. Any other right wing, fantasy diversions?
Yeah, and Hitler killed 6 million Jews. Your point?
that you don't have one, only diversions.

an army group in reserve, would have been superior.
 
Last edited:
well, somewhere between hopping out of their moms lady parts and saying howdy to the nice doctor, and the day they started getting those no bid contracts, they did have to get themselves into a position of at least limited wealth before any government favors were extended
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
 
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Uncle Sam is We the People

We the People take care of the less fortunate
we the people should all be contributing to society. Those that dont have no value to us and should not be here.
did you know, that socialism requires social morals for free to achieve a Commune of Heaven on Earth?
 
only the right wing has nothing but whiner appeals to emotion instead of rational arguments. You don't have to Do anything. Congress appropriates your tax monies and spends it, for the good of the republic.
Where's you "rational argument" for that, douche bag?
Our Constitution.
That's not an argument. First you have to prove the provisions in the Constitution are just.
Providing for the general welfare is in our federal Constitution.
where do you get the idea that providing for the general welfare meant giving people free money if they were too lazy to work?
actually, considering the constitution does talk about taxes being levied equally on people, taxing one person to give the money to another could be considered unconstitutional since one is being taxed and the other is not.
Corporate welfare.
 
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
 
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.
 
I fail to see how loaning your children money entitles government to anything from them or me.
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.
In what way, give me a specific example.
 
what a coincidence. it is about capital, opportunities under Any form of Capitalism. what is wrong with getting it from Uncle Sam, if daddy is not, forthcoming.
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.
In what way, give me a specific example.
Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.
 
That's not an argument. First you have to prove the provisions in the Constitution are just.
Providing for the general welfare is in our federal Constitution.
You still haven't proved it is just to take money from me.
Congress has the Power to Tax and take money from you. Any other right wing, fantasy diversions?
Yeah, and Hitler killed 6 million Jews. Your point?
that you don't have one, only diversions.

an army group in reserve, would have been superior.
Your point seems to be that whatever government does is just. Hitler had the same point of view.
 
whats wrong with getting it from uncle same? uncle sam has no money, that money is taken from the taxpayer, the taxpayer should not be on the hook to cover the bills of a select group of lazy people.
Certainly even you can see that Uncle Sam has no money of its own.
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.

Policy analysis conducted by the Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, argued that United States fiscal policy allocated approximately US$92 billion in the 2006 federal budget toward programs that the authors considered to be corporate welfare.[29][30] Subsequent analysis by the institute estimated that number to be US$100 billion in the 2012 federal budget.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.
In what way, give me a specific example.
Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.
He asked for an example, dumbass.
 
Not sure what your point is. Corporate welfare, does what you claim of the poor.
How about you humor me and tell me about this corporate welfare, what (in your own words) is it.
Subsidies for Capitalists of wealth.
In what way, give me a specific example.
Any artificial Persons that receive funds from the government, to advance public policy decisions.

The right wing Only complains when real Persons get checks.
He asked for an example, dumbass.

Hes giving me exactly what I expected.
Proof that he is spewing a talking point without any clue what so ever what he is saying.
basically, proof that he is the typical uninformed liberal.
 
He's carrying the load for you, douche bag. That's why he's complaining.
Bullshit boot licker. If anyone's getting hosed it's us middle class.
The government hoses everyone except the poor. You're trying to justify it.
You really think the poor are going to pay the national debt? Prisons are full of the poor. You have serious brain damage.
He doesn't think the rich are fucking us just the poor. Meanwhile the mega corporations are loving NAFTA and they've never been richer.

2 months ago Republicans admitted ge and all the companies like them pay no taxes. I can't stand republicans
The rich aren't fucking us. You have failed to post any evidence that they are.

Also, corporations do no equate to "the rich."
This is why you're a partisan hack. I used to run around saying the rich are fucking us then I realized we're getting fucked by both sides.

Yea stupid, the poor alone are fucking us. How stupid are you? The poor are in charge?
 
It is, with no bid contracts.
well, somewhere between hopping out of their moms lady parts and saying howdy to the nice doctor, and the day they started getting those no bid contracts, they did have to get themselves into a position of at least limited wealth before any government favors were extended
a loan from daddy?
so? is there something wrong with a loan from a parent to a child? Ive gave my daughter 50k for a down payment on her house, did I do something wrong? should I have sent that money to some poor liberal family instead? Not sure exactly what your problem is here. (although I do understand that it is yet another attempt at discrediting Donald Trump)
You don't have to apologize for your privilege just acknowledge it
you had the same privileges that I did. You dont need to hate other because the applied themselves more than you did. You only have to recognize that and make sure you put the blame on yourself where it belongs.
You may not have but some are more and some less.

Bush, Romney and trump were given millions to start out. That's privilege.

My nephews are privileged. My brother "earned" it but he also admits he got lucky and hit the work lotto. He came from nothing. He knows reality those three guys don't. They are like my nephews. Silver spoons. I'm glad for them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top