Gotta Love racism from the left!

[Seawytch]

"******" is racist

"white cracker" is racist

period

I have to disagree. While they may be racial epithets, they are not necessarily "racist". Racism is when you believe your race is superior to another.

Your argeement is not required to demonstrate which are racist epithets.

Both can be, but what I've personally encountered is that those that regularly use the "N" word do believe they are superior to blacks. I do not get the same "feeling" from those that use "cracker".

 

[ClosedCaption]

I have to disagree. While they may be racial epithets, they are not necessarily "racist". Racism is when you believe your race is superior to another.

Your argeement is not required to demonstrate which are racist epithets.

Both can be, but what I've personally encountered is that those that regularly use the "N" word do believe they are superior to blacks. I do not get the same "feeling" from those that use "cracker".

Whoa now, you cant go using definitions and what words actually mean. That's Unamerican!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

"******" is racist

"white cracker" is racist

period

I have to disagree. While they may be racial epithets, they are not necessarily "racist". Racism is when you believe your race is superior to another.

So if I can find a black guy who I feel is superior to myself,I'm free to call him ******?
Glad we have that cleared up.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I have to disagree. While they may be racial epithets, they are not necessarily "racist". Racism is when you believe your race is superior to another.

Your argeement is not required to demonstrate which are racist epithets.

Both can be, but what I've personally encountered is that those that regularly use the "N" word do believe they are superior to blacks. I do not get the same "feeling" from those that use "cracker".

Seawytch, your opinion is not evidence. Words have meanings, particular meanings. Yes, blacks use "cracker" as a racial epithet.

 

[Yurt]

But you can't smear an entire movement with a comparison of the bombers of almost sixty years.

That is as silly when the righty reactionaries eyes start rolling in their heads and they compare the NAACP with the NBPP.

i'm a republican who runs around the board bashing imaginary righty reactionaries

 

[JakeStarkey]

But you can't smear an entire movement with a comparison of the bombers of almost sixty years.

That is as silly when the righty reactionaries eyes start rolling in their heads and they compare the NAACP with the NBPP.

i'm a republican who runs around the board bashing imaginary righty reactionaries

But you said you left the GOP a year ago.

 

[FireFly]

[YouTube]FiNo5Nbn-TI[/YouTube]

 

[American_Jihad]

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots
Why the Racism-Industrial-Complex refuses to let the lie die.
February 19, 2016
Jack Kerwick

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

...

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.

There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots

 

[ClosedCaption]

^^petty shit. The peanut gallery can always think of things someone else should be doing. This guy should write a book with all his whines in one place.

You see, he wants an honest discussion on slavery by going there were white slaves before knowing that we are talking about Slavery in America and not the history of slavery itself. But pretending is fun and being outraged is an industry

 

[Wry Catcher]

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots
Why the Racism-Industrial-Complex refuses to let the lie die.
February 19, 2016
Jack Kerwick

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

...

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.



There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots

Historical facts have no bearing on racism in America today. Slavery was evil then, as is racism today.

The Right Wing and avowed Racists are attracted to the Republican Party where their form of bigotry is accepted and drives policy.

On the left there are those who fear the black man but judge individuals by their character not their color, and believe equal opportunity based on race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation is the antithesis of evil, and every citizen has the same unalienable rights as do those of us born male and of European Ancestry.

 

[Unkotare]

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots
Why the Racism-Industrial-Complex refuses to let the lie die.
February 19, 2016
Jack Kerwick

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

...

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.

There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots

Are you feeling guilty about something?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.

There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Why would a movie about American Slavery take time to discuss the first slaves ever? Or black slave masters? Or that blacks were in America before slavery? Or modern slavery?

That would be an entirely new movie...titled "The History of Slavery" and not a movie with a lead character and story line

 

[Unkotare]

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots
Why the Racism-Industrial-Complex refuses to let the lie die.
February 19, 2016
Jack Kerwick

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

...

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.



There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots

On the left there are those who fear the black man but judge individuals by their character not their color, and believe equal opportunity based on race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation is the antithesis of evil, and every citizen has the same unalienable rights as do those of us born male and of European Ancestry.

Bullshit they do. The history of the democrat party and other avowed leftists shows otherwise.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots[/QUOTE]


On the left there are those who fear the black man but judge individuals by their character not their color, and believe equal opportunity based on race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation is the antithesis of evil, and every citizen has the same unalienable rights as do those of us born male and of European Ancestry.[/QUOTE]



Bullshit they do. The history of the democrat party and other avowed leftists shows otherwise.[/QUOTE]


Bullshit they do. The history of the democrat party and other avowed leftists shows otherwise.[/QUOTE]
Bullshit, the Democratic Party lost it's Southern racists in 1948 when the Dixiecrats began to seek a new home./QUOTE]

February 19, 2016
Jack Kerwick

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

...

Yet if Burton and Buccieri and those who are constantly telling us that “we” need an honest dialogue on race really wanted this, then more people would know that:

For centuries, Africans (Muslims) enslaved Europeans (Christians).

The first slaves in America were white.

The first legal slave master in America, Anthony Johnson, was black.

Johnson owned black and white servants.



There were blacks in America before slavery.

Prior to the War Between the States there were some 4,000 black slave masters in the South.

Slavery, to say nothing of a whole lot worse than slavery, persists to the present day in black Africa.

Slavery was a global institution until white Christians, especially white English Christians, spearheaded a moral revolt against it. The British Empire, while at its apex, deployed its military and economic might to bear upon Africa, the Middle East, and Asia to abolish this perennial practice—while along being met with considerable resistance by Africans, Arabs, and Asians who profited from it.

We shouldn’t expect for the History Channel to include any of these facts in its next piece of fiction.

Remaking Alex Haley’s Fake Roots[/QUOTE]


On the left there are those who fear the black man but judge individuals by their character not their color, and believe equal opportunity based on race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation is the antithesis of evil, and every citizen has the same unalienable rights as do those of us born male and of European Ancestry.[/QUOTE]



Bullshit they do. The history of the democrat party and other avowed leftists shows otherwise.[/QUOTE]

A LIE by omission is still a lie! The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today. Racism and bigotry are character flaws in the human species, but the behavior and polices of the D's today in no way reflect the racism and bigotry within the R Party today, and those who claim to I's vote for the R Party (most are too dishonest to admit they are R's, Bigots, Sexists and Racists unless they can do so anonomously or with others of their kind).

 

[Unkotare]

... The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today. ....

Of course it does, because the fundamental attitude and principles remain unchanged.

 

[Wry Catcher]

... The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today. ....

Of course it does, because the fundamental attitude and principles remain unchanged.

A LIE by omission is still a lie! The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today. Racism and bigotry are character flaws in the human species, but the behavior and polices of the D's today in no way reflect the racism and bigotry within the R Party today, and those who claim to I's vote for the R Party (most are too dishonest to admit they are R's, Bigots, Sexists and Racists unless they can do so anonymously or with others of their kind).

 

[Unkotare]

... The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today.....

It has every bearing because the party remains unchanged in its attitude and motivations.

 

[JakeStarkey]

... The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today.....

It has every bearing because the party remains unchanged in its attitude and motivations.

Your statement reveals your stupidity. You can learn but refuse to. You are on your own.

 

[ClosedCaption]

A LIE by omission is still a lie! The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today. Racism and bigotry are character flaws in the human species, but the behavior and polices of the D's today in no way reflect the racism and bigotry within the R Party today, and those who claim to I's vote for the R Party (most are too dishonest to admit they are R's, Bigots, Sexists and Racists unless they can do so anonomously or with others of their kind).

Roots is not a lie by omission since it wasnt a movie about the history of Slavery

 

[Wry Catcher]

... The History of the D Party has no bearing on the Party today.....

It has every bearing because the party remains unchanged in its attitude and motivations.

Your statement reveals your stupidity. You can learn but refuse to. You are on your own.

LOL All those black Members of Congress are not tokens; the D's nominated and elected twice a man with roots from Africa and are not the one's who claim policies to create equal opportunity for a good education, a good job and the right to vote are signs of Racism as do the conservative fringe.