RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
So let me get this straight, AssLips, MrClean, et.al.
I can be proud of my son who fought in Afghan/Iraq even though it wasn't a popular war.
I can pay homage to my dad because he served in Korea and Vietnam even though they were very unpopular in their time.
I can keep grandpa's flag in tribute to his service in WWII, regardless of how many Japanese we incinerated.
But as soon as I fly the flag that my great-great-uncle fought and died for I am automatically an inbred backwoods country-fuck redneck?
![]()
That doesnt make you an inbred backwoods country-fuck redneck at all. It makes you seem ignorant or at worst racist if you don't get that your relative fought to keep people enslaved and against the country you currently claim to be a citizen of. Whats honorable about someone fighting to support their belief that people should be enslaved and losing?
*yawn*
This tired-ass narrow viewpoint again?
The South wanted to secede from the Union in much the same way that we, not too long before, had just done from the restraints of King George.
Lincoln flat out tells us that his ONLY concern was preserving the Union - REGARDLESS - of how many slaves were freed or held captive in the process.
It was funny to hear the panty-waists cry that "Bush's War" was "All about the Oil".
Got news for ya, Lippy.....Lincoln was the exact kind of Republican.
Only difference being is that "Lincoln's War" was "All about the Cotton, Citrus, Tobacco, and Atlantic and Gulf Ports".
His ONLY concern was to rule over as much real estate as he could.
THAT is what the majority of Southerners fought against, as that majority didn't own slaves or gave two shits about the issue of slavery.
Want a fun little scavenger hunt?
Check out the percentage of white-vs-black slave-owners in the Louisiana area
![]()
The South had no right to leave the Union and failed to do so by force of arms. get over your loss. A State still does not have the right to leave the Union Unilaterally. It requires the Permission of Congress.