frazzledgear
Senior Member
- Mar 17, 2008
- 1,479
- 544
- 48
Actually our conservatives have a lot in common with the Mullahs in Iran.
Bush and Ahmedinajad are very similar characters.
Bullshit -just another leftist lie. Liberals have FAR more in common with them. Which explains why US conservatives are FAR more likely to consider Iran one of the most dangerous nations on earth -and why liberals are FAR more sympathetic to Iran and more likely to instead insist the US is to blame for the "misunderstanding" between the two nations. US conservatives don't consider it a "misunderstanding" when Iran has a system of total government control over nearly every aspect of their citizens' lives and state approved sermons urge citizens to envision a world without the existence of either Israel or the US, insisting they are both the cause of all the world's ills. Get real on this one -are liberals or conservatives more likely to agree with that bullshit? US liberals naturally understand Iran's state control and government coercion because they also firmly believe in the use of state control and state coercion -even if the way in which the mullahs exercise total government control isn't the identical way liberals intend to do in this country. The USE of government control and coercion is far more important to liberals than how such government coercion is used. All cultures are equal and none superior to another according to US liberals -so OF COURSE US liberals sympathize with the Iranian mullahs exercising total and oppressive governmental control over their people. Even when that state control means both political dissidents and rape victims alike are executed for "crimes of immorality" against the state.
You stupid people insisted that Bush was some kind of conservative religious whacko when in fact his religion -United Methodist - is one of the most tolerant, liberal MAINSTREAM Christian religions in this country. Are you really so stupid you ended up believing the lies and propaganda of your own side? Because the bullshit the left put out for years insisting Bush claimed to have received instructions from God and was some kind of conservative religious whacko -was just that. Total bullshit. Bush was neither a political conservative nor a religious whacko.
Bush only went to war over Islamofascism after thousands were slaughtered on OUR soil. Until then Bush was quite content to continue with Clinton's failed policy of pretending Islamofascism didn't even exist -in spite of at least six major attacks on US interests under Clinton. But once Bush decided to take actions to prevent it from happening again -conservatives understood and approved the need for that -while liberals promptly staged protests AGAINST it and shrilly demanded that all advantages should be given to those who have sworn to destroy us as a nation! How many liberals have insisted that Bush somehow WASTED the sympathy of the world? As if wallowing in useless victimhood was far more important than actually preventing another attack on our soil. A mind bogglingly DANGEROUS mentality -that history has repeatedly proven to be a lethal mentality. It is another topic entirely as to why liberals are reluctant to use force to protect this country's own citizens and instead are far more likely to respond by blaming the US for the existence of its enemies. Even though EVERY nation IN HISTORY has enemies and always will. Rather than understand the need to defend and protect the citizens of this country who have a far greater right to simply exist than our enemies have a right to kill us on our own soil - liberals are far more likely to write articles entitled "Why They Hate Us" instead. Conservatives don't give a shit why they hate us -because we always have the greater right to exist without the threat of attack on our own soil by our enemies. If our enemies believe otherwise -then taking them out is the only answer since THEY have ruled out peaceful coexistence. Not us. Gee, did we agonize over why Hitler and Nazi Germany hated us? LOL
Can't figure out why conservatives so clearly understand why Iran is an enemy of this country even while some may PERSONALLY share some of the same social positions - and why liberals usually find themselves on the same side as some of the world's most brutal and oppressive regimes instead -including Iran? I'll give you a major clue. That difference has NOTHING to do with the religious beliefs of anyone and NOTHING to do with where individuals on either side may PERSONALLY stand on social issues.
The difference between the two is only about who each side thinks should decide these issues -and that belief determines where those on each side fall. On the side of the oppressors of a nation -or on the side of the people. That's it.
Conservatives believe it is the people themselves, through their elected representatives who can be held accountable - who should decide those issues. Liberals believe their agenda is OH-SO "noble" and OH-SO "wonderful" that it justifies the use of government coercion and ramming it down the throats of the majority against their will. And the Iranian mullahs believe the EXACT same thing. Naturally liberals are FAR more sympathetic with the Iranian mullahs than US conservatives. They both believe in the use of government COERCION and control of the majority against their will -all in the name of their oh-so "noble and righteous" political agenda. Liberals believe their own agenda justifies the use of government coercion against the will of the majority and figure everyone else believes the same thing. Wrong -conservatives do not believe ANY agenda justifies the use of government coercion and force against the will of the majority but believe that people have the right of self-determination to decide what rules and laws THEY will live by. You either get that idea and understand it is the very foundation of political and economic freedom - or you don't get it. And liberals really don't -with MANY liberals who just flat-out disagree with it. Which can only mean such liberals believe that some people are so elite and special -that they have a greater "right" to rule over others than people have a right to their freedom and self-determination.
I'd rather swim with the fishes than be a liberal. Truly. For reasons most liberals haven't the intelligence and critical thinking skills to even understand.
Last edited: