Hogg's 5 wishes to end gun violence are just as pointless as all the other new anti gun laws

Why would anyone object to CDC studying gun violence?

What could be wrong with trying to understand why we have 30,000 gun deaths a year?
 
Maybe get your friends to stop bullying people David.


That's got to be the stupidest thing any of you RWNJs have ever said.

"bullying"??????????????//

Here's some "bullying".
an overripe melon smashed by a sledgehammer, and was bleeding extensively.
found only shreds
Nothing was left to repair
cavitation - a swath of tissue damage that extends several inches from its path.


Yeah. How dare Hogg and other demand their RIGHT to be safe from actual BULLYING.
Bullying pushes these unstable kids to lash out. The only stupidity here is yours alone
 
Why would anyone object to CDC studying gun violence?

What could be wrong with trying to understand why we have 30,000 gun deaths a year?

Wasting money is what DC does best

How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?
 
Why would anyone object to CDC studying gun violence?

What could be wrong with trying to understand why we have 30,000 gun deaths a year?

Wasting money is what DC does best

How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.
 
Why would anyone object to CDC studying gun violence?

What could be wrong with trying to understand why we have 30,000 gun deaths a year?

Wasting money is what DC does best

How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.

Evidently not
We have no idea how to stop 30,000 deaths a year

Other nations seem to know

Why would you oppose studying our gun fatalities?
 
Wasting money is what DC does best

How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.

Evidently not
We have no idea how to stop 30,000 deaths a year

Other nations seem to know

See, here's your problem. Because there is a known number, you assume we don't know how to stop them. We know for a fact that gang members and Drug dealers account for most homicides. Those could be easily stopped by rounding up gang members and putting them away until they are old and gray. Of the rest, most are suicides. Taking guns away would not have much of an affect on the number as a gun is not prerequisite to a suicide.

I earlier listed 3 suicide attempts when the person did not have access to a gun and used an highway overpass, or drove their cars down the freeway the wrong way. Had they had access to a gun, 3, in total would be dead. Because they did not have guns, 11 died. Now, if I have my math right, that is 8 more dead because of a lack of a gun, not because they have a gun.

In the case of School mass shootings, we know that the use of SSRI antidepressants was what tuned, normally good kids into monsters.

One more time:



Done, and not a single taxpayer dollar spent. Think of me next April 15th
 
How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.

Evidently not
We have no idea how to stop 30,000 deaths a year

Other nations seem to know

See, here's your problem. Because there is a known number, you assume we don't know how to stop them. We know for a fact that gang members and Drug dealers account for most homicides. Those could be easily stopped by rounding up gang members and putting them away until they are old and gray. Of the rest, most are suicides. Taking guns away would not have much of an affect on the number as a gun is not prerequisite to a suicide.

I earlier listed 3 suicide attempts when the person did not have access to a gun and used an highway overpass, or drove their cars down the freeway the wrong way. Had they had access to a gun, 3, in total would be dead. Because they did not have guns, 11 died. Now, if I have my math right, that is 8 more dead because of a lack of a gun, not because they have a gun.

In the case of School mass shootings, we know that the use of SSRI antidepressants was what tuned, normally good kids into monsters.

One more time:



Done, and not a single taxpayer dollar spent. Think of me next April 15th

Good start

Now let’s do an in depth analysis of gang violence and how to stop it. How do we keep guns away from gangs? Where do they get their weapons? Incarceration is not working

Suicide is a major contributor. How do we keep guns away from those who are suicidal?

CDC has a lot of work to do.....why would anyone want to block them from working?
 
Now, let’s move in to Universal Background Checks
Americans overwhelmingly support them

Why would anyone want criminals and crazies to have access to guns?
 
Hogg could have 500 wishes. At the end of the day, he's nothing more than another liberal banner for taking bows. He burst on the scene and gun grabbers got giddy. After a week though Congress couldn't possibly be any less interested:bigbed: :bye1::bye1::bye1:
 
Wasting money is what DC does best

How is studying gun deaths wasteful?

Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.

Evidently not
We have no idea how to stop 30,000 deaths a year

Other nations seem to know

Why would you oppose studying our gun fatalities?


Most are suicides....so intervention....then you have repeat gun offenders, let out of jail by democrats....to stop them? You keep them locked up.......and that is how you lower the gun murder rate.
 
Because we already know the answers.
Evidently, we don’t
We still have 30,000 deaths a year

What is wrong with investigating how we can reduce these deaths?

And we know why we have 30,000 deaths per year, and we also know how to eliminate many of them. Some you will never stop though, so one more study is simply pissing in the wind.

Evidently not
We have no idea how to stop 30,000 deaths a year

Other nations seem to know

See, here's your problem. Because there is a known number, you assume we don't know how to stop them. We know for a fact that gang members and Drug dealers account for most homicides. Those could be easily stopped by rounding up gang members and putting them away until they are old and gray. Of the rest, most are suicides. Taking guns away would not have much of an affect on the number as a gun is not prerequisite to a suicide.

I earlier listed 3 suicide attempts when the person did not have access to a gun and used an highway overpass, or drove their cars down the freeway the wrong way. Had they had access to a gun, 3, in total would be dead. Because they did not have guns, 11 died. Now, if I have my math right, that is 8 more dead because of a lack of a gun, not because they have a gun.

In the case of School mass shootings, we know that the use of SSRI antidepressants was what tuned, normally good kids into monsters.

One more time:



Done, and not a single taxpayer dollar spent. Think of me next April 15th

Good start

Now let’s do an in depth analysis of gang violence and how to stop it. How do we keep guns away from gangs? Where do they get their weapons? Incarceration is not working

Suicide is a major contributor. How do we keep guns away from those who are suicidal?

CDC has a lot of work to do.....why would anyone want to block them from working?



We aren't incarcerating people when they are let out of jail on repeat gun offenses in less than 3 years......

No one wants to stop gun research...we just don't want to pay for political research targeted against gun owners...
 
Now, let’s move in to Universal Background Checks
Americans overwhelmingly support them

Why would anyone want criminals and crazies to have access to guns?


Universal background checks are only supported because they sound good, which is why anti gun era want to use them to get gun registration. Criminals use straw buyers, people who can pass any background check.....which means the only reason for universal background checks is to next demand gun registration.......or criminals steal their guns.
 
Most are suicides....so intervention....then you have repeat gun offenders, let out of jail by democrats....to stop them? You keep them locked up.......and that is how you lower the gun murder rate.

^^^^^^This. Criminals get little, or no jail time as the DA's plead down the charges to get a fast conviction. Many of these thugs are repeat offenders.
 

Forum List

Back
Top