House Intel Committee briefed on more Russian efforts to help the Orange Fraud

[berg80]

View attachment 307966

You should also pay attention to the campaign to oust that shaky broad in ME.

We are.. Hillary over spent trump by millions and still lost no one likes democrats sorry

I doubt you have a clue. Pay attention.

Looks like Maine to me

How many cows voted for Trump?

You mean illegals? None

Can you prove it?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Trumpette's bob and weave and insult and deflect but never address the factual matter...............Russian interference for his benefit

Every advanced nation on this planet interferes in the elections of other nations. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.
Not only that but every one of them always has a preferred candidate based on their own needs or outlook.

So what exactly is there to discuss? Be specific.

 

[Jitss617]

Gotta read it

Did you?

Of course.. now go Away you have your evidence

What does it say?

Read it..

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

 

[Jitss617]

View attachment 307966

We are.. Hillary over spent trump by millions and still lost no one likes democrats sorry

I doubt you have a clue. Pay attention.

Looks like Maine to me

How many cows voted for Trump?

You mean illegals? None

Can you prove it?

Are you claiming there are no illegal aliens in America? Lol

 

[Yarddog]

Russia Backs Trump’s Re-election, and He Fears Democrats Will Exploit Its Support
A classified briefing to lawmakers angered the president, who complained that Democrats would “weaponize” the disclosure.
Russia Backs Trump’s Re-election, and He Fears Democrats Will Exploit Its Support

WASHINGTON — Intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected, five people familiar with the matter said, a disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.

The day after the Feb. 13 briefing to lawmakers, Mr. Trump berated Joseph Maguire, the outgoing acting director of national intelligence, for allowing it to take place, people familiar with the exchange said. Mr. Trump cited the presence in the briefing of Representative Adam B. Schiff, the California Democrat who led the impeachment proceedings against him, as a particular irritant.

During the briefing to the House Intelligence Committee, Mr. Trump’s allies challenged the conclusions, arguing that he has been tough on Russia and strengthened European security. Some intelligence officials viewed the briefing as a tactical error, saying that had the official who delivered the conclusion spoken less pointedly or left it out, they would have avoided angering the Republicans.

That intelligence official, Shelby Pierson, is an aide to Mr. Maguire who has a reputation of delivering intelligence in somewhat blunt terms. The president announced on Wednesday that he was replacing Mr. Maguire with Richard Grenell, the ambassador to Germany and long an aggressively vocal Trump supporter.
..........................................................................................................
This infuriated the Orange one because he hates to be reminded how the Russians helped him get elected.
.........................................................................................................

Trump Soured On Maguire After Staff Told Congress Russia Is Interfering On His Behalf
Trump Soured On Maguire After Staff Told Congress Russia Is Interfering On His Behalf

Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire was still considered a frontrunner to take the post in a permanent capacity until last week — when President Donald Trump found out that Maguire’s staff had briefed House lawmakers that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election on Trump’s behalf.



According to reporting from the New York Times and Washington Post, Trump was furious in particular that Maguire aide Shelby Pierson conveyed the information to Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Trump reportedly fretted that the Democrats would use it against him.

Members of both parties on the committee were in attendance at the briefing a week ago, and Trump’s allies argued with the conclusions Pierson presented, insisting that Trump has gotten tougher on Russia.

The President dressed down Maguire after the briefing, which reportedly led to his shift in favor to name U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, the acting DNI. Grenell is an avid Trump supporter who has downplayed the threat Russia poses to U.S. elections.
...................................................................................................
So, let's see. The Don is purging everyone who testified honestly about his attempt to extort Ukraine. Now he's removing all the people warning the country about Russia's efforts to help him in 2020.

The uselessness of Democrats is staggering. It’s amazing our country is doing so well in spite of them.

If Russia prefers Trump as president, it is for this reason. They know that it will cause Democrats to continue to bring the political process here in the U. S. To a stand still, or they will attempt. They undoubtedly love seeing us fight and bicker over nothing, and they are very well aware that a Trump Presidency will continue to trigger Democrats to no end, But even so, Trump is still the best pick Over any of the socialists running for president

 

[CWayne]

The DNC refused to allow the FBI to take its server - not even a copy of the server - to inspect it and confirm it was ever hacked by the Russians. Crowdstrike was / is still THE ONLY ones who actually looked at the DNC server.

You’re factually incorrect. The FBI and DoJ has access to a forensic copy of the server made by Crowdstrike.

Let me ask you a question. Why do you think the only way to determine the source of the hack requires the physical inspection of the server hardware?

I'm sure you've heard of a chain of custody? We have that standard because a forensic copy is not trustworthy.

 

[colfax_m]

Did you?

Of course.. now go Away you have your evidence

What does it say?

Read it..

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

 

[colfax_m]

The DNC refused to allow the FBI to take its server - not even a copy of the server - to inspect it and confirm it was ever hacked by the Russians. Crowdstrike was / is still THE ONLY ones who actually looked at the DNC server.

You’re factually incorrect. The FBI and DoJ has access to a forensic copy of the server made by Crowdstrike.

Let me ask you a question. Why do you think the only way to determine the source of the hack requires the physical inspection of the server hardware?

I'm sure you've heard of a chain of custody? We have that standard because a forensic copy is not trustworthy.

What’s untrustworthy about it?

 

[berg80]

View attachment 307966

I doubt you have a clue. Pay attention.

Looks like Maine to me

How many cows voted for Trump?

You mean illegals? None

Can you prove it?

Are you claiming there are no illegal aliens in America? Lol

Of course not. It's your side that makes factually indefensible assertions.

How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed
How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed — ProPublica

 

[CWayne]

The DNC refused to allow the FBI to take its server - not even a copy of the server - to inspect it and confirm it was ever hacked by the Russians. Crowdstrike was / is still THE ONLY ones who actually looked at the DNC server.

You’re factually incorrect. The FBI and DoJ has access to a forensic copy of the server made by Crowdstrike.

Let me ask you a question. Why do you think the only way to determine the source of the hack requires the physical inspection of the server hardware?

I'm sure you've heard of a chain of custody? We have that standard because a forensic copy is not trustworthy.

What’s untrustworthy about it?

Are you serious?

The physical server can provide absolute proof of tampering or not. The physical media can be examined for physical tampering. The physical media can be scanned for electronic tampering.

This cannot be trusted by individuals of unknown bias or agendas.

A company hired by who knows who, examined and copied by who knows who and under what directions is utterly untrustworthy.

Simply put, only the unbiased experts at the FBI forensics would be acceptable, and then only under sworn affidavit.

 

[CWayne]

View attachment 307966 Looks like Maine to me

How many cows voted for Trump?

You mean illegals? None

Can you prove it?

Are you claiming there are no illegal aliens in America? Lol

Of course not. It's your side that makes factually indefensible assertions.

How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed
How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed — ProPublica

Try using a credible source someday.

 

[Jitss617]

Of course.. now go Away you have your evidence

What does it say?

Read it..

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

Can you read?

 

[colfax_m]

The DNC refused to allow the FBI to take its server - not even a copy of the server - to inspect it and confirm it was ever hacked by the Russians. Crowdstrike was / is still THE ONLY ones who actually looked at the DNC server.

You’re factually incorrect. The FBI and DoJ has access to a forensic copy of the server made by Crowdstrike.

Let me ask you a question. Why do you think the only way to determine the source of the hack requires the physical inspection of the server hardware?

I'm sure you've heard of a chain of custody? We have that standard because a forensic copy is not trustworthy.

What’s untrustworthy about it?

Are you serious?

The physical server can provide absolute proof of tampering or not. The physical media can be examined for physical tampering. The physical media can be scanned for electronic tampering.

This cannot be trusted by individuals of unknown bias or agendas.

A company hired by who knows who, examined and copied by who knows who and under what directions is utterly untrustworthy.

Simply put, only the unbiased experts at the FBI forensics would be acceptable, and then only under sworn affidavit.

Why are you worried about physical tampering? This was a hack, not a break in. No one suspects the hackers physically tampered with the devices and there is no reason anyone would have.

Why would the drives need to be examined for physical tampering?

 

[Jitss617]

View attachment 307966 Looks like Maine to me

How many cows voted for Trump?

You mean illegals? None

Can you prove it?

Are you claiming there are no illegal aliens in America? Lol

Of course not. It's your side that makes factually indefensible assertions.

How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed
How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed — ProPublica

Elizabeth Warren has illegals working for her campaign! Helloo mcfly

 

[OldLady]

Trumpette's bob and weave and insult and deflect but never address the factual matter...............Russian interference for his benefit

Every advanced nation on this planet interferes in the elections of other nations. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.
Not only that but every one of them always has a preferred candidate based on their own needs or outlook.

So what exactly is there to discuss? Be specific.

I don't recall seeing political ads from France, England or anywhere else touting one candidate or the other. I don't recall any other nation hiring trolls who mask their identity and get on Facebook and other social media to influence folks' opinions on the candidates.
Give me links if you know different.

 

[colfax_m]

What does it say?

Read it..

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

Can you read?

Indeed I can. What does it say?

Why can’t you answer the question?

 

[Jitss617]

Read it..

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

Can you read?

Indeed I can. What does it say?

Why can’t you answer the question?

So read it and you can get back to me.. You probably won’t because it disproves you

 

[colfax_m]

You didn’t read it, did you.

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

Can you read?

Indeed I can. What does it say?

Why can’t you answer the question?

So read it and you can get back to me.. You probably won’t because it disproves you

How does it disprove me?

 

[Jitss617]

Of course I did did you?

What does it say?

Can you read?

Indeed I can. What does it say?

Why can’t you answer the question?

So read it and you can get back to me.. You probably won’t because it disproves you

How does it disprove me?

Can you read?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Trumpette's bob and weave and insult and deflect but never address the factual matter...............Russian interference for his benefit

Every advanced nation on this planet interferes in the elections of other nations. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.
Not only that but every one of them always has a preferred candidate based on their own needs or outlook.

So what exactly is there to discuss? Be specific.

I don't recall seeing political ads from France, England or anywhere else touting one candidate or the other. I don't recall any other nation hiring trolls who mask their identity and get on Facebook and other social media to influence folks' opinions on the candidates.
Give me links if you know different.

That's because it doesn't fit the narrative.
If you don't believe it happens then you're dumb as a box of rocks.

We even have foreign trolls on here. You think they don't exist on Facebook too? Pull your head out of your ass.