House Republicans Refuse To Investigate Trump’s Russia Ties

[Marion Morrison]

This is really going to sting Lakhota - but it is for your own good. It is imperative that you are told the truth. Eventually, you will come to accept reality.

Your entire false narrative is imploding right before your eyes. Every unethical angle you've taken in an attempt to falsely accuse President Trump with propaganda has failed to hold up under scrutiny (that's kind of the problem with lying - it fails to hold up).

The dossier was financed by a Clinton backer and written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele. He was hired by Democratic-tied Fusion GPS in Washington.

Mr. Steele’s 35 pages of memos were first circulated in late June. In mid-July Fusion passed around another memo that made the most sensational charges. “Further Indications of Extensive Conspiracy Between Trump’s Campaign and the Kremlin” was the headline.

John Brennan, Obama loyalist and CIA director, drove FBI to investigate Trump associates

Will Brennan and co-conspirators be indicted?

 

[TheDude]

“A committee that has oversight of many of the issues involving Russia just voted three different times to look the other way,” one Democrat said.

WASHINGTON ― House Republicans really don’t want to investigate possible ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, his administration and Russian officials.

In a House Judiciary meeting where members voted on the committee’s plans for the year, Democrats offered an amendment that would have made oversight of any ongoing investigation into Trump’s alleged connections to the Russian government a priority.

Every single Republican voted against the measure. Democrats deployed the amendment as a symbolic vote, knowing full well Republicans wouldn’t support it.

Much More: House Republicans Refuse To Investigate Trump's Russia Ties. Senate Rolls Right Past Them.

Just another disappointment from House Republicans. I hope none of them call themselves American patriots. Who wouldn't want to investigate collusion with a hostile foreign government like Russia?

Perhaps they realize they'd be chasing a treasure under the rainbow for the Demonicrats?

 

[P@triot]

So to recap the facts Lakhota:

• Nancy Pelosi is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Maxine Waters is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Dianne Feinstein is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Famed left-wing attorney Allen Dershowitz is on record stating that even if the left-wing lies about President Trump were true - there would still be no grounds for impeachment as colluding with Russia is not illegal. No such statute exists on the legal books.

• The entire accusation was started by a Clinton donor/backer

• That false accusation was placed into a dossier and facilitated by John Brennan - an Obama loyalist - who pushed it on to the F.B.I. and encouraged them to investigate something which was completely fake and would have been legal anyway had it actually occurred.

• And finally - because the left is delirious with news that Jared Kuschner facilitated some back channels with Russia in December (roughly a month or so before President Trump was set to be sworn in to office), they failed to realize that indisputably proves that the Trump campaign could not have "colluded" with Russia to "steal" the election because no back channels existed. If those relationships had, there would have been no reason for Jared Kuschner to work on developing them in December.

Damn! That is a comprehensive factual beat down Lakhota. At this point, you just come off as a partisan hack and a liar if you attempt to continue on with your absurd narrative. Of course, you still will because a partisan hack and a liar is who you are at your core. It's just a matter of how transparent you're willing to be about that reality.

 

[P@triot]

This is really going to sting Lakhota - but it is for your own good. It is imperative that you are told the truth. Eventually, you will come to accept reality.

Your entire false narrative is imploding right before your eyes. Every unethical angle you've taken in an attempt to falsely accuse President Trump with propaganda has failed to hold up under scrutiny (that's kind of the problem with lying - it fails to hold up).

The dossier was financed by a Clinton backer and written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele. He was hired by Democratic-tied Fusion GPS in Washington.

Mr. Steele’s 35 pages of memos were first circulated in late June. In mid-July Fusion passed around another memo that made the most sensational charges. “Further Indications of Extensive Conspiracy Between Trump’s Campaign and the Kremlin” was the headline.

John Brennan, Obama loyalist and CIA director, drove FBI to investigate Trump associates

Will Brennan and co-conspirators be indicted?

Of course not. For one - there is no law against lying outside of libel and slander. And those require proof of economic impact (of which there will be none for Trump). Second, people like CIA Directors are above the law. Sad...but true.

 

[Marion Morrison]

This is really going to sting Lakhota - but it is for your own good. It is imperative that you are told the truth. Eventually, you will come to accept reality.

Your entire false narrative is imploding right before your eyes. Every unethical angle you've taken in an attempt to falsely accuse President Trump with propaganda has failed to hold up under scrutiny (that's kind of the problem with lying - it fails to hold up).

The dossier was financed by a Clinton backer and written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele. He was hired by Democratic-tied Fusion GPS in Washington.

Mr. Steele’s 35 pages of memos were first circulated in late June. In mid-July Fusion passed around another memo that made the most sensational charges. “Further Indications of Extensive Conspiracy Between Trump’s Campaign and the Kremlin” was the headline.

John Brennan, Obama loyalist and CIA director, drove FBI to investigate Trump associates

Will Brennan and co-conspirators be indicted?

Of course not. For one - there is no law against lying outside of libel and slander. And those require proof of economic impact (of which there will be none for Trump). Second, people like CIA Directors are above the law. Sad...but true.

That's wrong, nobody should be above the law.

 

[Rustic]

“A committee that has oversight of many of the issues involving Russia just voted three different times to look the other way,” one Democrat said.

WASHINGTON ― House Republicans really don’t want to investigate possible ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, his administration and Russian officials.

In a House Judiciary meeting where members voted on the committee’s plans for the year, Democrats offered an amendment that would have made oversight of any ongoing investigation into Trump’s alleged connections to the Russian government a priority.

Every single Republican voted against the measure. Democrats deployed the amendment as a symbolic vote, knowing full well Republicans wouldn’t support it.

Much More: House Republicans Refuse To Investigate Trump's Russia Ties. Senate Rolls Right Past Them.

Just another disappointment from House Republicans. I hope none of them call themselves American patriots. Who wouldn't want to investigate collusion with a hostile foreign government like Russia?

Washington Redskin...

 

[P@triot]

That's wrong, nobody should be above the law.

I couldn't agree with you more. But history has proven that many in the U.S. government are. Bill Clinton was allowed to commit perjury. Hitlery Clinton was allowed to sell favors from the State Department and launder money through the Clinton Foundation. Barack Obama was allowed to egregiously violate the U.S. Constitution. The list goes forever.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's wrong, nobody should be above the law.

I couldn't agree with you more. But history has proven that many in the U.S. government are. Bill Clinton was allowed to commit perjury. Hitlery Clinton was allowed to sell favors from the State Department and launder money through the Clinton Foundation. Barack Obama was allowed to egregiously violate the U.S. Constitution. The list goes forever.

I disagree, I don't think that list goes back more than 30 years.

 

[Lakhota]

So to recap the facts Lakhota:

• Nancy Pelosi is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Maxine Waters is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Dianne Feinstein is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Famed left-wing attorney Allen Dershowitz is on record stating that even if the left-wing lies about President Trump were true - there would still be no grounds for impeachment as colluding with Russia is not illegal. No such statute exists on the legal books.

• The entire accusation was started by a Clinton donor/backer

• That false accusation was placed into a dossier and facilitated by John Brennan - an Obama loyalist - who pushed it on to the F.B.I. and encouraged them to investigate something which was completely fake and would have been legal anyway had it actually occurred.

• And finally - because the left is delirious with news that Jared Kuschner facilitated some back channels with Russia in December (roughly a month or so before President Trump was set to be sworn in to office), they failed to realize that indisputably proves that the Trump campaign could not have "colluded" with Russia to "steal" the election because no back channels existed. If those relationships had, there would have been no reason for Jared Kuschner to work on developing them in December.

Damn! That is a comprehensive factual beat down Lakhota. At this point, you just come off as a partisan hack and a liar if you attempt to continue on with your absurd narrative. Of course, you still will because a partisan hack and a liar is who you are at your core. It's just a matter of how transparent you're willing to be about that reality.

Dooshawitch? There is not enough evidence to impeach because the investigations have barely begun. Give them time...

 

[Marion Morrison]

So to recap the facts Lakhota:

• Nancy Pelosi is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Maxine Waters is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Dianne Feinstein is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Famed left-wing attorney Allen Dershowitz is on record stating that even if the left-wing lies about President Trump were true - there would still be no grounds for impeachment as colluding with Russia is not illegal. No such statute exists on the legal books.

• The entire accusation was started by a Clinton donor/backer

• That false accusation was placed into a dossier and facilitated by John Brennan - an Obama loyalist - who pushed it on to the F.B.I. and encouraged them to investigate something which was completely fake and would have been legal anyway had it actually occurred.

• And finally - because the left is delirious with news that Jared Kuschner facilitated some back channels with Russia in December (roughly a month or so before President Trump was set to be sworn in to office), they failed to realize that indisputably proves that the Trump campaign could not have "colluded" with Russia to "steal" the election because no back channels existed. If those relationships had, there would have been no reason for Jared Kuschner to work on developing them in December.

Damn! That is a comprehensive factual beat down Lakhota. At this point, you just come off as a partisan hack and a liar if you attempt to continue on with your absurd narrative. Of course, you still will because a partisan hack and a liar is who you are at your core. It's just a matter of how transparent you're willing to be about that reality.

Dooshawitch? There is not enough evidence to impeach because the investigations have barely begun. Give them time...

Sure! They'll make fools out of themselves for at least 3 more years.

Possibly 7.

 

[OKTexas]

“A committee that has oversight of many of the issues involving Russia just voted three different times to look the other way,” one Democrat said.

WASHINGTON ― House Republicans really don’t want to investigate possible ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, his administration and Russian officials.

In a House Judiciary meeting where members voted on the committee’s plans for the year, Democrats offered an amendment that would have made oversight of any ongoing investigation into Trump’s alleged connections to the Russian government a priority.

Every single Republican voted against the measure. Democrats deployed the amendment as a symbolic vote, knowing full well Republicans wouldn’t support it.

Much More: House Republicans Refuse To Investigate Trump's Russia Ties. Senate Rolls Right Past Them.

Just another disappointment from House Republicans. I hope none of them call themselves American patriots. Who wouldn't want to investigate collusion with a hostile foreign government like Russia?

So you wan't republicans micromanaging Muller? REALLY?

.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

This is really going to sting Lakhota - but it is for your own good. It is imperative that you are told the truth. Eventually, you will come to accept reality.

Your entire false narrative is imploding right before your eyes. Every unethical angle you've taken in an attempt to falsely accuse President Trump with propaganda has failed to hold up under scrutiny (that's kind of the problem with lying - it fails to hold up).

The dossier was financed by a Clinton backer and written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele. He was hired by Democratic-tied Fusion GPS in Washington.

Mr. Steele’s 35 pages of memos were first circulated in late June. In mid-July Fusion passed around another memo that made the most sensational charges. “Further Indications of Extensive Conspiracy Between Trump’s Campaign and the Kremlin” was the headline.

John Brennan, Obama loyalist and CIA director, drove FBI to investigate Trump associates

The only goal on this subject is that "they" are slowly covering up the Clinton Criminal Acts that occured on Obamma s watch and no real action was taken...The whole thing smells like a bad smoke screen. I suppose if you can get enough WEED into them it makes sense.

 

[iceberg]

So to recap the facts Lakhota:

• Nancy Pelosi is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Maxine Waters is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Dianne Feinstein is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Famed left-wing attorney Allen Dershowitz is on record stating that even if the left-wing lies about President Trump were true - there would still be no grounds for impeachment as colluding with Russia is not illegal. No such statute exists on the legal books.

• The entire accusation was started by a Clinton donor/backer

• That false accusation was placed into a dossier and facilitated by John Brennan - an Obama loyalist - who pushed it on to the F.B.I. and encouraged them to investigate something which was completely fake and would have been legal anyway had it actually occurred.

• And finally - because the left is delirious with news that Jared Kuschner facilitated some back channels with Russia in December (roughly a month or so before President Trump was set to be sworn in to office), they failed to realize that indisputably proves that the Trump campaign could not have "colluded" with Russia to "steal" the election because no back channels existed. If those relationships had, there would have been no reason for Jared Kuschner to work on developing them in December.

Damn! That is a comprehensive factual beat down Lakhota. At this point, you just come off as a partisan hack and a liar if you attempt to continue on with your absurd narrative. Of course, you still will because a partisan hack and a liar is who you are at your core. It's just a matter of how transparent you're willing to be about that reality.

Dooshawitch? There is not enough evidence to impeach because the investigations have barely begun. Give them time...

then why are all the liberals crying for his head now?

funny as hell they continue to go GUILTY and when pressed for evidence they go DUH - investigation ongoing!!!

then turn around and scream GUILTY again.

quite funny. and annoying.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

The only goal on this subject is that "they" are slowly covering up the Clinton Criminal Acts that occurred on Obamma s watch and no real action was taken...The whole thing smells like a bad smoke screen. I suppose if you can get enough WEED into them it makes sense.

 

[Cellblock2429]

“A committee that has oversight of many of the issues involving Russia just voted three different times to look the other way,” one Democrat said.

WASHINGTON ― House Republicans really don’t want to investigate possible ties between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, his administration and Russian officials.

In a House Judiciary meeting where members voted on the committee’s plans for the year, Democrats offered an amendment that would have made oversight of any ongoing investigation into Trump’s alleged connections to the Russian government a priority.

Every single Republican voted against the measure. Democrats deployed the amendment as a symbolic vote, knowing full well Republicans wouldn’t support it.

Much More: House Republicans Refuse To Investigate Trump's Russia Ties. Senate Rolls Right Past Them.

Just another disappointment from House Republicans. I hope none of them call themselves American patriots. Who wouldn't want to investigate collusion with a hostile foreign government like Russia?

 

[jc456]

So to recap the facts Lakhota:

• Nancy Pelosi is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Maxine Waters is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Dianne Feinstein is on record stating there is no evidence of anything to impeach President Trump on.

• Famed left-wing attorney Allen Dershowitz is on record stating that even if the left-wing lies about President Trump were true - there would still be no grounds for impeachment as colluding with Russia is not illegal. No such statute exists on the legal books.

• The entire accusation was started by a Clinton donor/backer

• That false accusation was placed into a dossier and facilitated by John Brennan - an Obama loyalist - who pushed it on to the F.B.I. and encouraged them to investigate something which was completely fake and would have been legal anyway had it actually occurred.

• And finally - because the left is delirious with news that Jared Kuschner facilitated some back channels with Russia in December (roughly a month or so before President Trump was set to be sworn in to office), they failed to realize that indisputably proves that the Trump campaign could not have "colluded" with Russia to "steal" the election because no back channels existed. If those relationships had, there would have been no reason for Jared Kuschner to work on developing them in December.

Damn! That is a comprehensive factual beat down Lakhota. At this point, you just come off as a partisan hack and a liar if you attempt to continue on with your absurd narrative. Of course, you still will because a partisan hack and a liar is who you are at your core. It's just a matter of how transparent you're willing to be about that reality.

Dooshawitch? There is not enough evidence to impeach because the investigations have barely begun. Give them time...

then why are all the liberals crying for his head now?

funny as hell they continue to go GUILTY and when pressed for evidence they go DUH - investigation ongoing!!!

then turn around and scream GUILTY again.

quite funny. and annoying.

annoying.

 

[P@triot]

There is not enough evidence to impeach because the investigations have barely begun. Give them time...

Well that doesn't make any sense. Why would you need "time" and an "investigation" if no evidence exists? Police officers don't drive around desperately looking for a dead body while telling the public "give us time, give us time". Someone reports a dead body, and then they investigate to find out who was responsible.

Basically you're saying "give us time to dig up (or manufacture) something to pin on President Trump"

 

[P@triot]

Oh poor little Lakhota....now you can add Chris Matthews to the list of left-wing lunatics who are openly admitting that there is no evidence of any wrong doing (along with Alan Dershowitz, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and more).



Chris Matthews: Trump-Russia collusion theory 'came apart' with Comey testimony

 

[Lakhota]

Oh poor little Lakhota....now you can add Chris Matthews to the list of left-wing lunatics who are openly admitting that there is no evidence of any wrong doing (along with Alan Dershowitz, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and more).



Chris Matthews: Trump-Russia collusion theory 'came apart' with Comey testimony

Funny. I suggest you watch Lawrence O'Donnell and his expert guests on MSNBC tonight at 10:00 pm ET.

 

[P@triot]

Oh poor little Lakhota....now you can add Chris Matthews to the list of left-wing lunatics who are openly admitting that there is no evidence of any wrong doing (along with Alan Dershowitz, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and more).



Chris Matthews: Trump-Russia collusion theory 'came apart' with Comey testimony

Funny. I suggest you watch Lawrence O'Donnell and his expert guests on MSNBC tonight at 10:00 pm ET.

Funny. I suggest you accept the fact that even MSNBC blowhards have admitted that this was all fake news from the beginning.