Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i won't mind once i get my "bonus". i love "hard working women of morals."funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Nobody takes you seriously ever! Especially the "free chicks".
cite your links, fake news right winger. Tax cut economics is simple Income Redistribution. Who gets rich and who gets to pay off the Peoples' Debt?History doesn't agree with you............the equation is jobs gained and revenue...........and your side is WRONG like always..........did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.Things always look better on paper than when its applied.Which is why the terms would have to be unconditional. UI is a leftist idea, so I say let's meet them halfway and then see how much they support it.
Our programs now take from the working and give to the non-working. UI would be taking from the working and giving to all. As a person who is the giver, I wouldn't mind being a giver and taker for a while. I get so sick of giving and watching the takers walking the streets or driving along the highways while I'm working.
If you really weigh the benefits, it makes so much more sense to replace our social programs with UI. It would inspire more people to work, it would eliminate fraud which costs us billions every year with our social programs, it would disable Democrats from telling people how the Republicans are going to take away this or take away that, it would allow people of different classes to live in peace, it could solve our never-ending problem of medical care and college tuition. It would solve most of the problems we have in this country today.
Especially, when it comes to government application.
This is true, but what we're doing now certainly isn't working. We are putting our children and grandchildren in debt, creating a government dependent society, encouraging lower income people to breed at a much higher rate than the working, and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and turning Americans against each other socially and politically.
I would be willing to try it out. At least I could advance myself instead of advancing the users who never advance at all. As a society that rewards people for being irresponsible, IU would do the opposite which would reward people for being responsible. I can't see how it could be much worse than it is now.
Try it out. Is there any government entitlement program which has ended, cut off people receiving cash from the government?
Tax cut economics that adds to the debt is simple Income Redistribution.
Your side taxes people to death and then wonders why they are living in tents and companies are leaving.................
Because you are idiots.
funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
‘Housing for All’: Democrats push for big government response to soaring rents
Dear Senate Democrats, good effort, but tax credits won’t solve this crisis. Working people need Housing-For-All: 10 million homes in 10 years.
the right wing can't budget?funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Government stealing less from Citizens, is a good thing. Tax Revenue isn't the problem. Spending is. Till folks except that, the nation is doomed. Spending more money we don't have, isn't the answer.
Yes, I understand economics. It won't go up as much as the benefit. Inflation is less than five percent in the restaurant industry with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, means more people can pay more rent and help cover upgrade costs.I didn't say you should...or have insulted you in any manner for what you choose to do or whether you make a profit or not, etc. This is just two different sides of the subject we are discussing. Or...I thought it was.Let's just say what you think has any truth to it and I don't make a profit. Do you think I do all this work around here for free? Do you think I spend all that time screwing around with categorizing expenditures, spend two days before taxes preparing, assuming the responsibilities of major repairs or replacements like roofs, furnaces, driveways is something I do for a hobby?
I didn't do this as a social obligation. I don't have those resources. Like everybody else, when I take huge responsibilities and have major bills to pay, I need a sufficient income to take care of it. If I was going to do something for charity, it certainly wouldn't be this. It takes up any and all of my free time. I would have put my hard earned money in the market or commodities.
There is, but you seem to be ignoring the other side of the argument and only focusing on yours.
My side is this: most of us landlords don't make much money on rental income. Much of what you pay is what you would otherwise pay if you owned a house: taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, updates, mortgage.........
In some cases (like mine) when I had to take a loan out for major repairs, those loans have to be repaid.
This year I was lucky, I actually made a little profit. My tax preparer has a lot of landlords, and she told me I was the only one last year that showed a profit. All her other landlord clients were in the red as they are most every other year.
Big companies probably make out, but rental property is just part of their portfolio. They are very diverse in their investments. When one investment isn't working out, then they dump that investment and put their money elsewhere.
So if the government made regulation that stopped their profit, they would be selling out probably to somebody that would charge even more for rent.
You do know the apartment staff payroll will also go up don't you?
So will the rents ...once again you don't do anything productive
.
The point you all always seem to miss, is that higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.
No more corporate welfare!‘Housing for All’: Democrats push for big government response to soaring rents
Dear Senate Democrats, good effort, but tax credits won’t solve this crisis. Working people need Housing-For-All: 10 million homes in 10 years.
Personal responsibility, not government dependency.
Life is real good for Communist/Democrat hucksters. Ask Bernie Sanders.
No more corporate welfare!‘Housing for All’: Democrats push for big government response to soaring rents
Dear Senate Democrats, good effort, but tax credits won’t solve this crisis. Working people need Housing-For-All: 10 million homes in 10 years.
Personal responsibility, not government dependency.
link? That is not what I have been reading.Yes, I understand economics. It won't go up as much as the benefit. Inflation is less than five percent in the restaurant industry with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, means more people can pay more rent and help cover upgrade costs.I didn't say you should...or have insulted you in any manner for what you choose to do or whether you make a profit or not, etc. This is just two different sides of the subject we are discussing. Or...I thought it was.
There is, but you seem to be ignoring the other side of the argument and only focusing on yours.
My side is this: most of us landlords don't make much money on rental income. Much of what you pay is what you would otherwise pay if you owned a house: taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, updates, mortgage.........
In some cases (like mine) when I had to take a loan out for major repairs, those loans have to be repaid.
This year I was lucky, I actually made a little profit. My tax preparer has a lot of landlords, and she told me I was the only one last year that showed a profit. All her other landlord clients were in the red as they are most every other year.
Big companies probably make out, but rental property is just part of their portfolio. They are very diverse in their investments. When one investment isn't working out, then they dump that investment and put their money elsewhere.
So if the government made regulation that stopped their profit, they would be selling out probably to somebody that would charge even more for rent.
You do know the apartment staff payroll will also go up don't you?
So will the rents ...once again you don't do anything productive
.
The point you all always seem to miss, is that higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.
No the point you miss is right now 50% of Americans make $15 dollars or less, you don't understand a lick of economics...
It's trickle up poor.. Everything will cost more.
.
So does unemployment insurance.No more corporate welfare!‘Housing for All’: Democrats push for big government response to soaring rents
Dear Senate Democrats, good effort, but tax credits won’t solve this crisis. Working people need Housing-For-All: 10 million homes in 10 years.
Personal responsibility, not government dependency.
Corporate welfare ( tax breaks) produces jobs and trickles down to more 2nd and 3rd tier company's moving to an area for more jobs ..
.
the right wing can't budget?funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Government stealing less from Citizens, is a good thing. Tax Revenue isn't the problem. Spending is. Till folks except that, the nation is doomed. Spending more money we don't have, isn't the answer.
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Ratescite your links, fake news right winger. Tax cut economics is simple Income Redistribution. Who gets rich and who gets to pay off the Peoples' Debt?History doesn't agree with you............the equation is jobs gained and revenue...........and your side is WRONG like always..........did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.Things always look better on paper than when its applied.
Especially, when it comes to government application.
This is true, but what we're doing now certainly isn't working. We are putting our children and grandchildren in debt, creating a government dependent society, encouraging lower income people to breed at a much higher rate than the working, and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and turning Americans against each other socially and politically.
I would be willing to try it out. At least I could advance myself instead of advancing the users who never advance at all. As a society that rewards people for being irresponsible, IU would do the opposite which would reward people for being responsible. I can't see how it could be much worse than it is now.
Try it out. Is there any government entitlement program which has ended, cut off people receiving cash from the government?
Tax cut economics that adds to the debt is simple Income Redistribution.
Your side taxes people to death and then wonders why they are living in tents and companies are leaving.................
Because you are idiots.
Both Parties are addicted to spending other peoples' money. Like i said, Tax Revenue isn't the problem. The Government sets new records annually for Tax Revenue. So it's stealing plenty of Citizens' money.
Yeah, right. Your guy is not helping reduce the debt.the right wing can't budget?funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Government stealing less from Citizens, is a good thing. Tax Revenue isn't the problem. Spending is. Till folks except that, the nation is doomed. Spending more money we don't have, isn't the answer.
Both Parties are addicted to spending other peoples' money. Like i said, Tax Revenue isn't the problem. The Government sets new records annually for Tax Revenue. So it's stealing plenty of Citizens' money.
Spending is the problem. Obama and Bush really screwed so many future generations. They should be ashamed of themselves for leaving them a shocking $22 Trillion Debt.
Now, Ray.....focus like a laser: where is that 'income' coming from???
It is stolen from producers and given to those who will vote for the Leftists.
The single greatest bar to accruing wealth is taxation.....and the reason for that taxation is to buy the votes of those with their hand out.
There has never been starvation in this country.....so, what is your argument for coercion, confiscation, and vote-buying?
Americans have always taken care of their own.
I agree 100%, but with the system we have today, we are taxed to fund these programs so Democrats can buy votes. The only control we have over our money is who we elect to spend it.
Take Commie Care for example. Is anybody stupid enough to believe that DumBama and the other Democrats gave a shit about whether we had heath insurance of not? It's silly. All they really wanted to do is create more government dependents and buy votes. So if you worked at Walmart sweeping floors, you could get a great policy for next to nothing, but floor sweepers generally vote Democrat. If you are a middle income earner, Commie Care is unaffordable, but it's likely you vote Republican.
With Universal Income, that would all end. People who work will contribute tax dollars and get something in return, and people who don't will starve or find themselves in a precarious situation. Either that or they will find a way to live dirt cheap which would preserve our remaining good neighborhoods. It would mean less poverty babies, less people to support, and the working could actually start having larger families.
I hate to make people sound like breeding dogs or something, but it isn't that much different. After all, how successful of a breeder could you be if you mostly bred dogs with genetic flaws vs prize animals that everybody would want to buy?
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Ratescite your links, fake news right winger. Tax cut economics is simple Income Redistribution. Who gets rich and who gets to pay off the Peoples' Debt?History doesn't agree with you............the equation is jobs gained and revenue...........and your side is WRONG like always..........did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.This is true, but what we're doing now certainly isn't working. We are putting our children and grandchildren in debt, creating a government dependent society, encouraging lower income people to breed at a much higher rate than the working, and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and turning Americans against each other socially and politically.
I would be willing to try it out. At least I could advance myself instead of advancing the users who never advance at all. As a society that rewards people for being irresponsible, IU would do the opposite which would reward people for being responsible. I can't see how it could be much worse than it is now.
Try it out. Is there any government entitlement program which has ended, cut off people receiving cash from the government?
Tax cut economics that adds to the debt is simple Income Redistribution.
Your side taxes people to death and then wonders why they are living in tents and companies are leaving.................
Because you are idiots.
Looks like tax cut economics doesn't work.
Yeah, right. Your guy is not helping reduce the debt.the right wing can't budget?funny, right wingers. tax cut economics is money we don't have.Yeah, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt. Let's spend more money we don't have.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Government stealing less from Citizens, is a good thing. Tax Revenue isn't the problem. Spending is. Till folks except that, the nation is doomed. Spending more money we don't have, isn't the answer.
Both Parties are addicted to spending other peoples' money. Like i said, Tax Revenue isn't the problem. The Government sets new records annually for Tax Revenue. So it's stealing plenty of Citizens' money.
Spending is the problem. Obama and Bush really screwed so many future generations. They should be ashamed of themselves for leaving them a shocking $22 Trillion Debt.
