nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,965
- 1,870
- Banned
- #1
By now, all thinking Americans well know that Barr is not an AG, nut simply a stooge for Trump lying to protect the orange buffoon and spitting on the oath he took to the Constitution.....
As smart as Barr thinks he is, he has nonetheless placed himself into a corner where there is NO EXIT (as Sartre used to say.)
First, anyone with a brain SHOULD acknowledge that Mueller......as a straight shooter and ethical special counsel.....CLEARLY stated from the onset of his report on Trump's obstruction of justice that he (Mueller) COULD NOT INDICT a sitting president based on the existing DOJ policy......PERIOD..............Here is what Mueller stated in the second part of his report (READ it carefully to understand Mueller's rationale)
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
After stating the above, Mueller NONETHELESS laid out at least TEN events that would have ANYONE other than a sitting president, be CLEARLY INDICTED and would be facing a trial.
Now.......Barr has neglected to emphasize that Mueller did NOT indict based on DOJ policy.......BUT, the idiot, Barr, is now stating that Mueller SHOULD HAVE BROKEN PROTOCOL of this policy and indict the president based on these TEN events where Trump DID obstruct justice.
What will then happen when Mueller testifies before a House committee???
Simple........the question will be asked of Mueller as what his judgment would have been about indicting a president IF the DOJ policy did not restrict him from doing so........and, of course, Mueller...as an honest prosecutor MUST state that indeed......were it not for the DOJ policy TRUMP WOULD BE INDICTED.......and since Barr is placing Mueller in that situation where Mueller must answer under oath........there is NO doubt that Mueller will respond with surety that Trump SHOULD BE INDICTED if the DOJ policy is voided.
As smart as Barr thinks he is, he has nonetheless placed himself into a corner where there is NO EXIT (as Sartre used to say.)
First, anyone with a brain SHOULD acknowledge that Mueller......as a straight shooter and ethical special counsel.....CLEARLY stated from the onset of his report on Trump's obstruction of justice that he (Mueller) COULD NOT INDICT a sitting president based on the existing DOJ policy......PERIOD..............Here is what Mueller stated in the second part of his report (READ it carefully to understand Mueller's rationale)
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment , we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
After stating the above, Mueller NONETHELESS laid out at least TEN events that would have ANYONE other than a sitting president, be CLEARLY INDICTED and would be facing a trial.
Now.......Barr has neglected to emphasize that Mueller did NOT indict based on DOJ policy.......BUT, the idiot, Barr, is now stating that Mueller SHOULD HAVE BROKEN PROTOCOL of this policy and indict the president based on these TEN events where Trump DID obstruct justice.
What will then happen when Mueller testifies before a House committee???
Simple........the question will be asked of Mueller as what his judgment would have been about indicting a president IF the DOJ policy did not restrict him from doing so........and, of course, Mueller...as an honest prosecutor MUST state that indeed......were it not for the DOJ policy TRUMP WOULD BE INDICTED.......and since Barr is placing Mueller in that situation where Mueller must answer under oath........there is NO doubt that Mueller will respond with surety that Trump SHOULD BE INDICTED if the DOJ policy is voided.
