How come democrats are anti-education?

[Third Party]

They don't educate they indoctrinate. A parent is a fool to send their child to a public school

That's odd! I learned all of that information from my public education and I taught for 21 years.

My public school senior history book stopped in 1944. I had to get the History channel to find out who won World War II. The point is, most of my learning was done on my own anyway.

That's because you obviously were kicked out of school in 1945!

The history books I used were only 5-6 years out of date, mainly because the state would not buy new ones.

Not much older than you, book was used in 1968. And what is with the kicked out of school crack? Back then we did not back down from an insult- do you want to get insulted?

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's odd! I learned all of that information from my public education and I taught for 21 years.

My public school senior history book stopped in 1944. I had to get the History channel to find out who won World War II. The point is, most of my learning was done on my own anyway.

That's because you obviously were kicked out of school in 1945!

The history books I used were only 5-6 years out of date, mainly because the state would not buy new ones.

Not much older than you, book was used in 1968. And what is with the kicked out of school crack? Back then we did not back down from an insult- do you want to get insulted?

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

 

[Third Party]

My public school senior history book stopped in 1944. I had to get the History channel to find out who won World War II. The point is, most of my learning was done on my own anyway.

That's because you obviously were kicked out of school in 1945!

The history books I used were only 5-6 years out of date, mainly because the state would not buy new ones.

Not much older than you, book was used in 1968. And what is with the kicked out of school crack? Back then we did not back down from an insult- do you want to get insulted?

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

Obviously I no longer have the book, nor does the school-it had 2 additions since I was there-or don't you believe that. I told that story for 50 years and no one ever questioned it till now. For your sake only,the reason they kept an outdated book was they only had the course cover the start of World War II-the curriculum did not require or have time for anything further-so the book was adequate as long as they were in good shape, which they were. Now, if you don't want to believe it, that is your God given right-but don't disparage me because of your lack of faith. By the way, any other readers have a similar story about outdated books or equipment?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's because you obviously were kicked out of school in 1945!

The history books I used were only 5-6 years out of date, mainly because the state would not buy new ones.

Not much older than you, book was used in 1968. And what is with the kicked out of school crack? Back then we did not back down from an insult- do you want to get insulted?

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

Obviously I no longer have the book, nor does the school-it had 2 additions since I was there-or don't you believe that. I told that story for 50 years and no one ever questioned it till now. For your sake only,the reason they kept an outdated book was they only had the course cover the start of World War II-the curriculum did not require or have time for anything further-so the book was adequate as long as they were in good shape, which they were. Now, if you don't want to believe it, that is your God given right-but don't disparage me because of your lack of faith. By the way, any other readers have a similar story about outdated books or equipment?

It had "two additions" since? Are you certain of that?

Most books come with new "editions"!

Don't talk about education until you actually receive one!

The other education bashers will simply make up lies to back up your fake story. When it comes to education, no lie is too great!

 

[Jitss617]

I am specifically talking about U.S. history.

Reading these threads over the past 16 years in these forums, liberals keep on saying over and over the same ignorant propaganda.

Its like have they ever even bothered to read a history book?

Examples:

1. High taxes and Unions in the 1950~1980

Why do they ignore WWII , the world was in ruins, the only standing country to produce was The U.S.A.

Why do they ignore the lack of regulations? Lack of government agency's like the EPA that was started by Nixion? Why they ignore the lack of Quality control..any one with a few bucks could start a company in a garage and build an empire?

Why do they ignore the fact no one paid those high taxes?

Why do they ignore the fact the world caught up?

Why do they ignore the fact no one wants to work for private Unions?

2. Why do democrats ignore their own history? What is the big deal?


How many democrats know that following the Civil War, 23 blacks -- 13 of them ex-slaves -- were elected to Congress, all as Republicans?

The first black Democrat was not elected to Congress until 1935, from the state of Illinois. The first black congressional Democrat from a Southern state was not elected until 1973.




How many democrats know, in 1854, passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

This overturned the Missouri Compromise and allowed for the importation of slaves into the territories. Disgusted with the passage of this Act, free-soilers and anti-slavery members of the Whig and Democratic parties founded the Republican Party -- not just to stop the spread of slavery, but to eventually abolish it.

How many democrats know that blacks founded the Texas Republican Party?

On July 4, 1867, in Houston, Texas, 150 blacks and 20 whites formed the party. No, not the Black Texas Republican Party, they founded the Texas Republican Party. Blacks across Southern states also founded the Republican parties in their states.

How many democrats know Fugitive slave laws?

In 1850, Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. If merely accused of being a slave, even if the person enjoyed freedom all of his or her life (as approximately 11 percent of blacks did just before the Civil War), the person lost the right to representation by an attorney, the right to trial by jury, and the right to habeas corpus.

How many democrats know Emancipation?

Republican President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War. In 1865, the 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats know Civil rights laws?

In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed giving the newly emancipated blacks full civil rights and federal guarantee of those rights, superseding any state laws. Every single voting Republican (128 of 134 -- with 6 not voting -- in the House, and 30 of 32 -- with 2 not voting -- in the Senate) voted for the 14th Amendment. Not a single Democrat (zero of 36 in the House, zero of 6 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats knowRight to vote?

When Southern states balked at implementing the 14th Amendment, Congress came back and passed the 15th Amendment in 1870, guaranteeing blacks the right to vote. Every single Republican voted for it, with every Democrat voting against it.

Ku Klux Klan? In 1872 congressional investigations, Democrats admitted beginning the Klan as an effort to stop the spread of the Republican Party and to re-establish Democratic control in Southern states. As PBS' "American Experience" notes, "In outright defiance of the Republican-led federal government, Southern Democrats formed organizations that violently intimidated blacks and Republicans who tried to win political power. The most prominent of these, the Ku Klux Klan, was formed in Pulaski, Tenn., in 1865." Blacks, who were all Republican at that time, became the primary targets of violence.



Jim Crow laws? Between 1870 and 1875, the Republican Congress passed many pro-black civil rights laws. But in 1876, Democrats took control of the House, and no further race-based civil rights laws passed until 1957. In 1892, Democrats gained control of the House, the Senate and the White House, and repealed all the Republican-passed civil rights laws. That enabled the Southern Democrats to pass the Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, literacy tests, and so on, in their individual states.

Civil rights in the '60s? Only 64 percent of Democrats in Congress voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act (153 for, 91 against in the House; and 46 for, 21 against in the Senate). But 80 percent of Republicans (136 for, 35 against in the House; and 27 for, 6 against in the Senate) voted for the 1964 Act.


Again I say..

Why are democrats so anti education?

Why?

Great post!

 

[Third Party]

Not much older than you, book was used in 1968. And what is with the kicked out of school crack? Back then we did not back down from an insult- do you want to get insulted?

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

Obviously I no longer have the book, nor does the school-it had 2 additions since I was there-or don't you believe that. I told that story for 50 years and no one ever questioned it till now. For your sake only,the reason they kept an outdated book was they only had the course cover the start of World War II-the curriculum did not require or have time for anything further-so the book was adequate as long as they were in good shape, which they were. Now, if you don't want to believe it, that is your God given right-but don't disparage me because of your lack of faith. By the way, any other readers have a similar story about outdated books or equipment?

It had "two additions" since? Are you certain of that?

Most books come with new "editions"!

Don't talk about education until you actually receive one!

The other education bashers will simply make up lies to back up your fake story. When it comes to education, no lie is too great!

The SCHOOL had two additions-if you are going to comment, at least READ the post! And your attitude is closed to any new information so good luck-and for the record, I never bashed the educational system, in fact I taught in it for a while. I find your lack of faith in other posters disturbing.

 

[beautress]

I am specifically talking about U.S. history.

Reading these threads over the past 16 years in these forums, liberals keep on saying over and over the same ignorant propaganda.

Its like have they ever even bothered to read a history book?

Examples:

1. High taxes and Unions in the 1950~1980

Why do they ignore WWII , the world was in ruins, the only standing country to produce was The U.S.A.

Why do they ignore the lack of regulations? Lack of government agency's like the EPA that was started by Nixion? Why they ignore the lack of Quality control..any one with a few bucks could start a company in a garage and build an empire?

Why do they ignore the fact no one paid those high taxes?

Why do they ignore the fact the world caught up?

Why do they ignore the fact no one wants to work for private Unions?

2. Why do democrats ignore their own history? What is the big deal?


How many democrats know that following the Civil War, 23 blacks -- 13 of them ex-slaves -- were elected to Congress, all as Republicans?

The first black Democrat was not elected to Congress until 1935, from the state of Illinois. The first black congressional Democrat from a Southern state was not elected until 1973.




How many democrats know, in 1854, passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

This overturned the Missouri Compromise and allowed for the importation of slaves into the territories. Disgusted with the passage of this Act, free-soilers and anti-slavery members of the Whig and Democratic parties founded the Republican Party -- not just to stop the spread of slavery, but to eventually abolish it.

How many democrats know that blacks founded the Texas Republican Party?

On July 4, 1867, in Houston, Texas, 150 blacks and 20 whites formed the party. No, not the Black Texas Republican Party, they founded the Texas Republican Party. Blacks across Southern states also founded the Republican parties in their states.

How many democrats know Fugitive slave laws?

In 1850, Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. If merely accused of being a slave, even if the person enjoyed freedom all of his or her life (as approximately 11 percent of blacks did just before the Civil War), the person lost the right to representation by an attorney, the right to trial by jury, and the right to habeas corpus.

How many democrats know Emancipation?

Republican President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War. In 1865, the 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats know Civil rights laws?

In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed giving the newly emancipated blacks full civil rights and federal guarantee of those rights, superseding any state laws. Every single voting Republican (128 of 134 -- with 6 not voting -- in the House, and 30 of 32 -- with 2 not voting -- in the Senate) voted for the 14th Amendment. Not a single Democrat (zero of 36 in the House, zero of 6 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats knowRight to vote?

When Southern states balked at implementing the 14th Amendment, Congress came back and passed the 15th Amendment in 1870, guaranteeing blacks the right to vote. Every single Republican voted for it, with every Democrat voting against it.

Ku Klux Klan? In 1872 congressional investigations, Democrats admitted beginning the Klan as an effort to stop the spread of the Republican Party and to re-establish Democratic control in Southern states. As PBS' "American Experience" notes, "In outright defiance of the Republican-led federal government, Southern Democrats formed organizations that violently intimidated blacks and Republicans who tried to win political power. The most prominent of these, the Ku Klux Klan, was formed in Pulaski, Tenn., in 1865." Blacks, who were all Republican at that time, became the primary targets of violence.



Jim Crow laws? Between 1870 and 1875, the Republican Congress passed many pro-black civil rights laws. But in 1876, Democrats took control of the House, and no further race-based civil rights laws passed until 1957. In 1892, Democrats gained control of the House, the Senate and the White House, and repealed all the Republican-passed civil rights laws. That enabled the Southern Democrats to pass the Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, literacy tests, and so on, in their individual states.

Civil rights in the '60s? Only 64 percent of Democrats in Congress voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act (153 for, 91 against in the House; and 46 for, 21 against in the Senate). But 80 percent of Republicans (136 for, 35 against in the House; and 27 for, 6 against in the Senate) voted for the 1964 Act.


Again I say..

Why are democrats so anti education?

Why?

I don't know, bear. the Party of Democrats is what they are right now, and right now, they're bent on squelching the male sex.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why? Are you going to continue to post lies about schools?

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

Obviously I no longer have the book, nor does the school-it had 2 additions since I was there-or don't you believe that. I told that story for 50 years and no one ever questioned it till now. For your sake only,the reason they kept an outdated book was they only had the course cover the start of World War II-the curriculum did not require or have time for anything further-so the book was adequate as long as they were in good shape, which they were. Now, if you don't want to believe it, that is your God given right-but don't disparage me because of your lack of faith. By the way, any other readers have a similar story about outdated books or equipment?

It had "two additions" since? Are you certain of that?

Most books come with new "editions"!

Don't talk about education until you actually receive one!

The other education bashers will simply make up lies to back up your fake story. When it comes to education, no lie is too great!

The SCHOOL had two additions-if you are going to comment, at least READ the post! And your attitude is closed to any new information so good luck-and for the record, I never bashed the educational system, in fact I taught in it for a while. I find your lack of faith in other posters disturbing.

The correct word is "editions", you dumbass! Why should I waste time conversing with a moron? Apparently that is all I am doing.

 

[SandSquid]

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember it. You can't make up history, though, and you can't make it up, either.

Who won the south in the 1976 presidential election????????????????


your racism doesn't fly










.

Isn't that crazy??? Just one candidate, an old Georgian Democrat to win the south in 4 or 5 decades and it took the Nixon fallout of his impeachment and corruption in the Republican party and 5 recessions in just over 2 decades to get it. That was it... when Republicans couldn't win it for nearly a century beforehand. Gone are Lincoln's promises of larger gov't paid by more taxes. His belief of larger public works, state funded college education, open borders (only President in US history to relax back border security), etc.

And he ran on no more corruption, increase employment, help small businesses, tax breaks for the middle class, help the vietnam vets, the farmers, an "America first" military policy....

 

[Lysistrata]

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

These are not reliable sources.They also do not mention the woman-hatred, xenophobia, homophobia, and anti-religious bigotry, for which the republican party is now famous.

 

[Third Party]

State the lie you think you see-and explain why you think you know more than the others on this website-they have not questioned a simple statement- why do you feel compelled-ADMIRAL?

The story about a history book that stopped in 1944 is an obvious lie. Are you that stupid to believe such bullshit?

Obviously I no longer have the book, nor does the school-it had 2 additions since I was there-or don't you believe that. I told that story for 50 years and no one ever questioned it till now. For your sake only,the reason they kept an outdated book was they only had the course cover the start of World War II-the curriculum did not require or have time for anything further-so the book was adequate as long as they were in good shape, which they were. Now, if you don't want to believe it, that is your God given right-but don't disparage me because of your lack of faith. By the way, any other readers have a similar story about outdated books or equipment?

It had "two additions" since? Are you certain of that?

Most books come with new "editions"!

Don't talk about education until you actually receive one!

The other education bashers will simply make up lies to back up your fake story. When it comes to education, no lie is too great!

The SCHOOL had two additions-if you are going to comment, at least READ the post! And your attitude is closed to any new information so good luck-and for the record, I never bashed the educational system, in fact I taught in it for a while. I find your lack of faith in other posters disturbing.

The correct word is "editions", you dumbass! Why should I waste time conversing with a moron? Apparently that is all I am doing.

Get a dictionary- addition is when you add rooms to a school-Jesus you are thick. Editions IS for books. If it is so important to you that you have the last word, then I'll give it to you-just post "sorry".

 

[koshergrl]

koshergrl,

IMPEACH Donald Trump 666 the current Antichrist

The Bible prophesies the return of the Christ and the 666 Antichrist. Donald Trump = "six hundred sixty-six (666)" using the Evil=48 Code of A=49, B50...Z74. He's the current Antichrist whose actions are the opposite of the Christ, e.g. he's a compulsive/pathological liar who worships Gold, not God. He's extremely greedy and boastful. He helps the rich while hurting the poor. He wants to torture. Etc.

Donald Trump 666 is an evil genius, but he's not smarter than the returned Christ. Trump is guilty of treason, collusion, obstructing justice, personally profiting from being president, and cheating at golf!

Hahahahahahahaha

 

[koshergrl]

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

These are not reliable sources.They also do not mention the woman-hatred, xenophobia, homophobia, and anti-religious bigotry, for which the republican party is now famous.

That's just you, lys. Not the object of your fascination and hatred.

 

[koshergrl]

Democrats aren't especially anti-education but they are certainly anti-information. Since FDR the U.S. education system has become a left wing propaganda tool of the democrat party or worse. Kids graduate from high school with nothing more than a vague idea of global warming and how to put a condom on a freaking cucumber but not much else. According to David Horowitz, every high profile conservative speaker has been the victim of assault on a college campus. Shades of George Orwell, but there is now a system on college campus where words and ideas not sanctioned by the liberal professors can get a kid kicked out. There are freaking single words, either written or spoken on college campus that can get a student expelled. The mainstream media has even become the propaganda arm of the democrat party and they have ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, Al Jazeera and the freaking comedy channel for news analysis. The left refuses to argue about political issues but they prefer to shut down Fox and Talk Radio when they disagree with the message. Unfortunately the democrat party is and has been within a hair of scrapping the Freedom of Speech clause in the 1st Amendment in favor of something they laughingly call the "fairness doctrine". God help us if the radical fringe of the democrat party ever gets their slimy hands on the Bill of Rights.

They're anti-education in the sense that they do everything they can to prevent people from communicating and teaching history, reality, and truth.

 

[Moonglow]

I am specifically talking about U.S. history.

Reading these threads over the past 16 years in these forums, liberals keep on saying over and over the same ignorant propaganda.

Its like have they ever even bothered to read a history book?

Examples:

1. High taxes and Unions in the 1950~1980

Why do they ignore WWII , the world was in ruins, the only standing country to produce was The U.S.A.

Why do they ignore the lack of regulations? Lack of government agency's like the EPA that was started by Nixion? Why they ignore the lack of Quality control..any one with a few bucks could start a company in a garage and build an empire?

Why do they ignore the fact no one paid those high taxes?

Why do they ignore the fact the world caught up?

Why do they ignore the fact no one wants to work for private Unions?

2. Why do democrats ignore their own history? What is the big deal?


How many democrats know that following the Civil War, 23 blacks -- 13 of them ex-slaves -- were elected to Congress, all as Republicans?

The first black Democrat was not elected to Congress until 1935, from the state of Illinois. The first black congressional Democrat from a Southern state was not elected until 1973.




How many democrats know, in 1854, passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

This overturned the Missouri Compromise and allowed for the importation of slaves into the territories. Disgusted with the passage of this Act, free-soilers and anti-slavery members of the Whig and Democratic parties founded the Republican Party -- not just to stop the spread of slavery, but to eventually abolish it.

How many democrats know that blacks founded the Texas Republican Party?

On July 4, 1867, in Houston, Texas, 150 blacks and 20 whites formed the party. No, not the Black Texas Republican Party, they founded the Texas Republican Party. Blacks across Southern states also founded the Republican parties in their states.

How many democrats know Fugitive slave laws?

In 1850, Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. If merely accused of being a slave, even if the person enjoyed freedom all of his or her life (as approximately 11 percent of blacks did just before the Civil War), the person lost the right to representation by an attorney, the right to trial by jury, and the right to habeas corpus.

How many democrats know Emancipation?

Republican President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War. In 1865, the 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats know Civil rights laws?

In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed giving the newly emancipated blacks full civil rights and federal guarantee of those rights, superseding any state laws. Every single voting Republican (128 of 134 -- with 6 not voting -- in the House, and 30 of 32 -- with 2 not voting -- in the Senate) voted for the 14th Amendment. Not a single Democrat (zero of 36 in the House, zero of 6 in the Senate) voted for it.

How many democrats knowRight to vote?

When Southern states balked at implementing the 14th Amendment, Congress came back and passed the 15th Amendment in 1870, guaranteeing blacks the right to vote. Every single Republican voted for it, with every Democrat voting against it.

Ku Klux Klan? In 1872 congressional investigations, Democrats admitted beginning the Klan as an effort to stop the spread of the Republican Party and to re-establish Democratic control in Southern states. As PBS' "American Experience" notes, "In outright defiance of the Republican-led federal government, Southern Democrats formed organizations that violently intimidated blacks and Republicans who tried to win political power. The most prominent of these, the Ku Klux Klan, was formed in Pulaski, Tenn., in 1865." Blacks, who were all Republican at that time, became the primary targets of violence.



Jim Crow laws? Between 1870 and 1875, the Republican Congress passed many pro-black civil rights laws. But in 1876, Democrats took control of the House, and no further race-based civil rights laws passed until 1957. In 1892, Democrats gained control of the House, the Senate and the White House, and repealed all the Republican-passed civil rights laws. That enabled the Southern Democrats to pass the Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, literacy tests, and so on, in their individual states.

Civil rights in the '60s? Only 64 percent of Democrats in Congress voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act (153 for, 91 against in the House; and 46 for, 21 against in the Senate). But 80 percent of Republicans (136 for, 35 against in the House; and 27 for, 6 against in the Senate) voted for the 1964 Act.


Again I say..

Why are democrats so anti education?

Why?

You have presented zero proof for your assumptions just allegations and speculation. And poor historical recitations without footnotes or bibliography..

 

[Unkotare]

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

.... It might also be interesting to note that the two parties switched sides from at least the 1970's on. Remember Nixon's "southern strategy"?

It might be interesting if that wasn’t a bullshit democrat fantasy.

You may be too young to remember Nixon and Reagan.........

Or maybe not.

The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch' | Dan O'Donnell | News/Talk 1130 WISN


[Press Release] PragerU Debunks the “Southern Strategy” Myth, Which Labels Republicans as Racists


The Myth of Republican Racism | National Review

These are not reliable sources....

Oh, what a shock. The leftist rejects anything that deviates from his little bubble of lies and propaganda. Truly shocking.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I've always found the most humorous lack of education the "lost cause" myth. Where it seems that those fighting the hardest to keep statues of those founding fathers and leaders of the Confederacy so we "don't forget our history" have the most warped, and least factual beliefs on it.

Say what?

The only reason why you want them removed is a page right out of 1984, you want the democrats evil past out of public view



.

 

[regent]

So why are historians usually accused of being liberals? Why do Black people vote Democratic? Why did historians name FDR as America's greatest president?
Why did the liberal founders insist on public education?




















w

 

[Third Party]

So why are historians usually accused of being liberals? Why do Black people vote Democratic? Why did historians name FDR as America's greatest president?
Why did the liberal founders insist on public education?

There are many conservative historians-you just have to know where to look. Democrats won the marketing battle in the sixties and cornered the black vote. Republicans were so neutral, it seemed like they did not care. FDR was named because he enacted so many pieces of legislation and he served longer than any other president. And I thought Lincoln was named greatest?


















w

 

[koshergrl]

So why are historians usually accused of being liberals? Why do Black people vote Democratic? Why did historians name FDR as America's greatest president?
Why did the liberal founders insist on public education?




















w

What on earth are you talking about?

You people are so retarded. Seriously.

The historians who twist and lie about history are liberals, the ones who are truthful and accurate, aren't.

Black people vote democratic because they have been told that if they want to get free stuff, they need democrats to provide it for them. It's called staying on the plantation.

The *historians* who named FDR the *greatest president* are communist shills, and nothing more.

And the worst thing to ever happen to education in this country is *public education*.

Yes, you are a retard.