This guy spends hours upon hours here, every week for the past several years... arguing the same exact things over and over again. He never fails to find the "God" threads and interject his stupidity gleaned from Neil deGrasse Tyson, whom he apparently idolizes as some kind of prophet.
When he is not copy-n-pasting propaganda found at his favorite atheist blogs, he is bouncing around like a bunny rabbit on the question of God... He doesn't exist... he may exist... he exists, but is a certain way... he doesn't know for sure if he exists... back to, he doesn't think he exists. He has previously admitted he believes in "Karma" ...a purely spiritual idea. He repeatedly talks about "eternal" and "infinite" as if these are measurable scientific empirical quantities and not spiritual philosophies that transcend the physical.
Lately, one of his more annoying memes is to regurgitate these wild speculative "theories" that have absolutely no scientific evidence to support them... (they are basically just predictions made by quantum physics) But he posts these things as if they are proven facts of Science... I guess because Tyson told him so?
Here is your first post about PROOF your God exists from way back in April 2013. In all this time have you come any closer to proving god exists to anyone? My god if you can imagine how many times you have repeated the shit you've been saying. I'm amazed you have the nerve to make fun of me. Here is your first post of PROOF that god exists. It doesn't get old. Still funny shit.
We often hear the God-haters chortle... you don't have definitive proof that god exists, therefore, it must be a fallacy. I have often been puzzled by this argument, because it seems to indicate a complete lack of basic comprehension and logic. Many people certainly DO have definitive proof that god exists, that's why they believe in god. You may not be willing to accept their proof, because it is spiritual and not physical, but that's your problem.
You see, we can't expect a spiritual entity to exist in the physical sense, then it would be a physical entity. By it's very nature, God doesn't have to physically exist to exist as a spirit or energy. So the demands for physical proof of a spiritual entity are devoid of logic to begin with. Does a thought exist? You can't see it, there is no physical proof of it's existence, but does it not still exist? How about an inspiration? How about a dream? How about love?
As you can see, the "existence" of something can be physical or nonphysical, or even spiritual. So in order to evaluate the existence of something spiritual, we have to use spiritual evidence, since physical evidence doesn't logically apply. We don't demand spiritual evidence to prove the physical.... if you demonstrate how rain is caused with physical science, and someone says...well God tells me that rain is His tears... what would you say to that? It's backward, mouth-breathing and knuckle-dragging? Right? Well, that is someone applying spiritual evidence to the physical, and rejecting physical evidence. Yes, it's kind of stupid, isn't it? Just as stupid as demanding physical evidence to support a spiritual entity, and rejecting spiritual evidence.
Now to the "definitive proof" part. Since we have now determined that Spiritual evidence is what is needed to prove God's existence, we take you back 70,000 years or so, to the ancient people of Lake Mungo, one of the oldest human civilizations ever discovered. There, they found evidence of ritual burial using red ochre in ceremony. This is important because it signifies presence of spirituality. We can trace this human connection with spirituality all through mankind's history to present day religions. Mankind has always been spiritually connected to something greater than self. Since our very origins.
Perhaps this is where we can interject some relative physical science, from none other than the father of evolution, Mr. Charles Darwin. In his book, Origin of the Species, Darwin points out that behavioral traits which are inherent in a species, exist for some fundamental reason pertaining to the advancement of the species, otherwise they are discarded over time through natural selection. No species of animal we have ever studied, just does something inherently, with no fundamental reason. Salmon swim upstream for a reason. Dogs wag their tails for a reason. We may not understand the reason, but Darwin tells us, there has to be one.
So there you have it, in just a few short paragraphs. Definitive proof that God exists!
